Volume 28, Issue 3 pp. 1022-1040
REVIEW ARTICLE

Nonpharmacological interventions for respiratory health in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

L. McMahon

Corresponding Author

L. McMahon

UCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Population Science, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

Correspondence

L. McMahon, UCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Population Science, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
C. Blake

C. Blake

UCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Population Science, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

Search for more papers by this author
O. Lennon

O. Lennon

UCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Population Science, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 October 2020
Citations: 8

Abstract

Background and purpose

Respiratory dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease (PD) is often an underdiagnosed and untreated impairment associated with the disease. Clinically, a reactive approach to respiratory morbidity is taken, rather than preventative approaches that address underlying impairment/s. This systematic review identifies the current evidence to support nonpharmacological interventions to improve respiratory impairments in individuals with PD.

Methods

The relevant literature was searched using a customised and systematic strategy. Randomised and nonrandomised control trials of nonpharmacological interventions targeting respiratory outcome measures in PD were included. Outcomes of interest were respiratory morbidity and mortality, respiratory muscle strength, spirometry measures, lung volumes, peak cough flow, and perception of dyspnoea.

Results

Nonpharmacological interventions included: functional training, generalised strength training, respiratory muscle strength training, aerobic exercise, qigong, yoga, breath stacking, incentive spirometry and singing. Methodological quality of included studies varied. Meta-analyses of nonpharmacological interventions demonstrated significant effects for inspiratory muscle strength (mean difference [MD] 19.68; confidence interval [CI] 8.49, 30.87; z = 3.45; p = 0.0006; I2 = 2%), expiratory muscle strength (MD 18.97; CI 7.79, 30.14; z = 3.33; p = 0.0009; I2 = 23%) and peak expiratory flow (MD 72.21; CI 31.19, 113.24; z = 3.45; p = 0.0006; I2 = 0%). Best-evidence synthesis identified level 1 evidence supporting nonpharmacological interventions for improving peak cough flow and perceived dyspnoea. No studies were identified reporting outcomes of respiratory rate, inspiration:expiration ratio or respiratory morbidity or mortality in PD.

Conclusions

Nonpharmacological interventions improved respiratory muscle strength and peak expiratory flow in PD. Additional trials targeting respiratory dysfunction and longitudinal studies examining the relationship between respiratory dysfunction and morbidity and mortality rates in PD are required.

Disclosure of conflicts of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.