Volume 33, Issue 3 pp. e28-e30
DEN Video Article
Free Access

Using Cusco’s speculum to endoscopically remove a large colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection specimen

Sho Suzuki

Sho Suzuki

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center for Digestive Disease and Division of Endoscopy, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Hiroshi Kawakami

Corresponding Author

Hiroshi Kawakami

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center for Digestive Disease and Division of Endoscopy, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan

Corresponding: Hiroshi Kawakami, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center for Digestive Disease, and Division of Endoscopy, University of Miyazaki Hospital, 5200 Kihara, Kiyotake, Miyazaki 889-1692, Japan. Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Tadashi Miike

Tadashi Miike

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center for Digestive Disease and Division of Endoscopy, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 January 2021

Abstract

Watch a video of this article.

Brief Explanation

Unlike endoscopic mucosal resection, there is no size limitation for colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), anticipating en bloc resection.1 If the retrieval net fits well and can grasp the entire collected specimen, the resected specimen can be removed through the anus with minimal resistance. However, it is sometimes difficult to retrieve a large resected specimen after ESD without damage to the specimen by the anal sphincter muscle. Conventional retrieval techniques (e.g., the use of the forefinger-compression method,2 Valsalva maneuver defecation,3 a small plastic bag,4 or sliding tube5) have been suggested, but are often ineffective. We devised a method to collect specimens by widening the inner diameter of the anus sufficiently. This novel technique uses Cusco's speculum. First, after moving the resected specimen to the rectum, only the endoscope was removed. Next, after passing through a Cusco's speculum (SS size, 110 × 90 × 35 mm) (Fig. 1a), an endoscope was reinserted into the anus. Subsequently, the Cusco's speculum was inserted into the anus with an endoscope (Fig. 1b), opened (Fig. 1c), and fixed. Finally, the anus was sufficiently expanded, and the resected specimen grasped by a retrieval net (Roth Net – foreign body – standard. The width is 1.8–3.0 cm, US endoscopy, Mentor, OH, USA) could be collected without resistance through the Cusco’s speculum (Fig. 1d, Video S1). It is a safe and convenient method, and does not require any change in the patient's posture.

Details are in the caption following the image
(a) Image showing the Cusco's speculum (SS size, 110 × 90×35 mm). (b) Image showing that the Cusco's speculum is opened and fixed. (c) Image showing the endoscope and retrieval net through the Cusco's speculum. (d) Image showing that the Cusco's speculum is inserted, opened and fixed into the anus using the Colon model.

A 50-year-old woman was referred to our department for a laterally spreading rectal tumor measuring approximately 60-mm and occupying approximately 2/3 of the circumference of the rectum (Fig. 2a). An ESD was performed with dissection of the semi-circumference of the rectum (Fig. 2b).1 After ESD, we collected a large colonic ESD specimen without damage, using Cusco’s speculum (Fig. 2c,d, Video S1).

Details are in the caption following the image
(a) Endoscopic image showing a huge rectal laterally spreading tumor. (b) Endoscopic image showing mucosal defect of right after rectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. (c) Endoscopic image showing the grasped resected specimen with the retrieval net. (d) Macroscopic image showing resected specimen (specimen size: 80 × 67 mm and lesion size: 60 mm × 51 mm, respectively).

Authors declare no conflicts of interest for this article.

Acknowledgment

Informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of her information and imaging.

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.