Volume 26, Issue 1 pp. 38-43
Original Article

Optimization of immunocytochemistry in cytology: comparison of two protocols for fixation and preservation on cytospin and smear preparations

C. Pinheiro

Corresponding Author

C. Pinheiro

Department of Anatomic Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal

Correspondence:

C. Pinheiro, Laboratório de Citopatologia, Rua Professor Lima Basto, 1099-023 Lisboa, Portugal

Tel.: +351-217-229-831 Fax: +351-217-229-825;

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
R. Roque

R. Roque

Department of Anatomic Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal

Lisbon School of Health Technology, Lisbon, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
A. Adriano

A. Adriano

Department of Anatomic Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
P. Mendes

P. Mendes

Department of Anatomic Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
M. Praça

M. Praça

Department of Anatomic Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal

Polytechnic Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
I. Reis

I. Reis

Department of Anatomic Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
T. Pereira

T. Pereira

Department of Anatomic Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
I. Srebotnik Kirbis

I. Srebotnik Kirbis

Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Search for more papers by this author
S. André

S. André

Department of Anatomic Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 May 2014
Citations: 14

Abstract

Objective

A new protocol for fixation and slide preservation was evaluated in order to improve the quality of immunocytochemical reactions on cytology slides.

Methods

The quality of immunoreactions was evaluated retrospectively on 186 cytology slides (130 direct smears, 56 cytospins) prepared from different cytology samples. Ninety-three of the slides were air dried, stored at −20 °C and fixed in acetone for 10 minutes (Protocol 1), whereas the other 93 were immediately fixed in methanol at −20 °C for at least 30 minutes, subsequently protected with polyethylene glycol (PEG) and stored at room temperature (Protocol 2). Immunocytochemical staining, with eight primary antibodies, was performed on a Ventana BenchMark Ultra instrument using an UltraView Universal DAB Detection Kit. The following parameters were evaluated for each immunoreaction: morphology preservation, intensity of specific staining, background and counterstain. The slides were blinded and independently scored by four observers with marks from 0 to 20.

Results

The quality of immunoreactions was better on methanol-fixed slides protected with PEG than on air-dried slides stored in the freezer: urn:x-wiley:09565507:media:cyt12156:cyt12156-math-0001 = 14.44 ± 3.58 versus urn:x-wiley:09565507:media:cyt12156:cyt12156-math-0002 = 11.02 ± 3.86, respectively (< 0.001).

Conclusion

Immediate fixation of cytology slides in cold methanol with subsequent application of PEG is an easy and straightforward procedure that improves the quality of immunocytochemical reactions and allows the storage of the slides at room temperature.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.