Volume 55, Issue 8 pp. 908-920
Meta-Analysis

Meta-analysis: hepatitis B vaccination in inflammatory bowel disease

Anupam Kumar Singh

Corresponding Author

Anupam Kumar Singh

Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Correspondence

Anupam Kumar Singh, Department of Gastroenterology, Nehru Hospital, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Sector-12, Chandigarh, India.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Anuraag Jena

Anuraag Jena

Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Search for more papers by this author
Gaurav Mahajan

Gaurav Mahajan

Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Search for more papers by this author
Ritin Mohindra

Ritin Mohindra

Department of Internal Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Search for more papers by this author
Vikas Suri

Vikas Suri

Department of Internal Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Search for more papers by this author
Vishal Sharma

Vishal Sharma

Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 March 2022
Citations: 5

As part of AP&T’s peer review process, a technical check of this meta-analysis was performed by Dr Y Yuan. The Handling Editor for this article was Dr Cynthia Seow, and it was accepted for publication after full peer-review.

Summary

Background

The response rate of hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is variable. Increasing dose or accelerated schedule is the suggested strategy to improve seroconversion.

Aim

We performed a meta-analysis to determine the pooled response rate of HBV vaccination and to identify the predictors of seroconversion.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library databases. Studies reporting the response of HBV vaccination in IBD patients were included. Response was recorded as adequate immune response (AIR, >10 IU/L) and Effective immune response (EIR, >100 IU/L). Pooled AIR and EIR rates were calculated for different doses (10–20 μg or 40 μg) and schedules (standard: 0, 1 and 6 months or accelerated: 0, 1 and 2 months). Meta-analysis was performed to identify the predictors of response.

Results

Twenty-one studies including 2602 patients were eligible. Pooled AIR and EIR rates after HBV vaccination were 62% (95% CI, 55–68) and 42% (95% CI, 37–48), respectively. Pooled AIR and EIR rates for standard and double dose were similar. Pooled AIR and EIR rates were also comparable for different schedules of HBV vaccination. Gender, IBD subtype and disease activity did not affect the response rate. Use of immunosuppression [immunomodulators (RR: 0.73, 95% CI, 0.62–0.87) and anti-TNFs (RR: 0.72, 95% CI, 0.60–0.87)] was a predictor of poor immune response compared to no immunosuppressive therapy.

Conclusion

Patients with IBD have a poor serological response after HBV vaccination. HBV screening and vaccination should preferably be done before starting the immunosuppressive drugs.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

No data are available.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.