Volume 74, Issue 7 pp. 1352-1363
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Variability of allergens in commercial fish extracts for skin prick testing

Thimo Ruethers

Thimo Ruethers

Molecular Allergy Research Laboratory, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia

Centre for Food and Allergy Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Aya C. Taki

Aya C. Taki

Molecular Allergy Research Laboratory, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia

Centre for Food and Allergy Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Roni Nugraha

Roni Nugraha

Molecular Allergy Research Laboratory, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia

Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia

Department of Aquatic Product Technology, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, Jawa Barat, Indonesia

Search for more papers by this author
Trúc T. Cao

Trúc T. Cao

Molecular Allergy Research Laboratory, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Martina Koeberl

Martina Koeberl

Technical Development and Innovation Group, National Measurement Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Sandip D. Kamath

Sandip D. Kamath

Molecular Allergy Research Laboratory, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia

Centre for Food and Allergy Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Nicholas A. Williamson

Nicholas A. Williamson

Bio21 Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics Facility, The Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Sean O'Callaghan

Sean O'Callaghan

Bio21 Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics Facility, The Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Shuai Nie

Shuai Nie

Bio21 Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics Facility, The Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Sam S. Mehr

Sam S. Mehr

Centre for Food and Allergy Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Department of Allergy and Immunology, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Dianne E. Campbell

Dianne E. Campbell

Centre for Food and Allergy Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Department of Allergy and Immunology, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Andreas L. Lopata

Corresponding Author

Andreas L. Lopata

Molecular Allergy Research Laboratory, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia

Centre for Food and Allergy Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia

Correspondence

Andreas L. Lopata; Pharmacy and Medical Research Building, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 14 February 2019
Citations: 50

Abstract

Background

Commercial allergen extracts for allergy skin prick testing (SPT) are widely used for diagnosing fish allergy. However, there is currently no regulatory requirement for standardization of protein and allergen content, potentially impacting the diagnostic reliability of SPTs. We therefore sought to analyse commercial fish extracts for the presence and concentration of fish proteins and in vitro IgE reactivity using serum from fish-allergic patients.

Methods

Twenty-six commercial fish extracts from five different manufacturers were examined. The protein concentrations were determined, protein compositions analysed by mass spectrometry, followed by SDS-PAGE and subsequent immunoblotting with antibodies detecting 4 fish allergens (parvalbumin, tropomyosin, aldolase and collagen). IgE-reactive proteins were identified using serum from 16 children with confirmed IgE-mediated fish allergy, with focus on cod, tuna and salmon extracts.

Results

The total protein, allergen concentration and IgE reactivity of the commercial extracts varied over 10-fold between different manufacturers and fish species. The major fish allergen parvalbumin was not detected by immunoblotting in 6/26 extracts. In 7/12 extracts, five known fish allergens were detected by mass spectrometry. For cod and tuna, almost 70% of patients demonstrated the strongest IgE reactivity to collagen, tropomyosin, aldolase A or β-enolase but not parvalbumin.

Conclusions

Commercial fish extracts often contain insufficient amounts of important allergens including parvalbumin and collagen, resulting in low IgE reactivity. A comprehensive proteomic approach for the evaluation of SPT extracts for their utility in allergy diagnostics is presented. There is an urgent need for standardized allergen extracts, which will improve the diagnosis and management of fish allergy.

Graphical Abstract

Commercial skin prick test (SPT) extracts often contain insufficient amounts of important fish allergens, resulting in low IgE reactivity. Collagen, tropomyosin and aldolase A are of under-recognized importance for the diagnosis of fish allergy. Understanding the molecular allergology of SPT allergen extracts is essential for best diagnostics.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.