Volume 16, Issue 6 pp. 372-379
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Validity and reliability of the MD Anderson dysphagia inventory in English and Chinese in head and neck cancer patients

Kaisin Yee

Corresponding Author

Kaisin Yee

Speech Therapy Department, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore

Correspondence

Kaisin Yee, Speech Therapy Department, Singapore General Hospital, Rehabilitation Centre, Level 4, 10 Hospital Boulevard 168582, Singapore.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Seng Mun Wong

Seng Mun Wong

Speech Therapy Department, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore

Search for more papers by this author
Irene Teo

Irene Teo

Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore

Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore

Search for more papers by this author
Jamie Loy

Jamie Loy

Speech Therapy Department, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore

Search for more papers by this author
Elizabeth Roche

Elizabeth Roche

Speech Therapy Department, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore

Search for more papers by this author
Yee Pin Tan

Yee Pin Tan

Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore

Search for more papers by this author
Hiang Khoon Tan

Hiang Khoon Tan

Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Singapore General Hospital/National Cancer Centre, Singapore

Search for more papers by this author
Ngian Chye Tan

Ngian Chye Tan

Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Singapore General Hospital/National Cancer Centre, Singapore

Search for more papers by this author
N Gopalakrishna Iyer

N Gopalakrishna Iyer

Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Singapore General Hospital/National Cancer Centre, Singapore

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 June 2020
Citations: 16

Abstract

Aims

Patient-reported outcome measures are important in assessing the impact of dysphagia on quality of life. Our aim was to adapt and examine the cultural validity and reliability of a swallowing-related quality of life measure, the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), in English and Chinese, with head and neck cancer patients.

Methods

We adapted the MDADI to Chinese through formal forward-backward translation. Sixty-six head and neck cancer survivors completed the MDADI, Swallowing Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL) questionnaire and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in English or Chinese. Swallowing status was scored on the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS). Seventy-four percent (n = 49) of participants completed a repeat administration of the MDADI for test–retest reliability analysis.

Results

The MDADI showed high internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α , 0.82 ≤ α ≤ 0.94), and test–retest reliability in both English (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC = 0.81) and Chinese (ICC = 0.72). Criterion validity was established through moderate to strong correlations with relevant SWAL-QOL domains. Convergent validity was determined by significant correlations to the HADS and FOIS. Divergent validity was determined by nonsignificant association to the SWAL-QOL Sleep domain. The MDADI also presented as hypothesised to most known-group theoretical constructs.

Conclusions

The MDADI showed good psychometric properties in English and Chinese. This avails a reliable and psychometrically valid MDADI for Chinese speakers.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.