This study aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of multimodal language rehabilitation on second language acquisition and recovery in bilingual aphasic patients.

Methods

The data of 78 bilingual aphasic patients who underwent language rehabilitation at the language rehabilitation team consisting of students and experts in this field from Beijing Jiaotong University and other universities and institutes from January 2021 to December 2022 were retrospectively analysed. Patients were divided into the conventional group (receiving conventional language rehabilitation, n = 38) and the multimodal group (receiving multimodal language rehabilitation, n = 40). The overall efficacy rate, second language vocabulary acquisition, language function scores, oral motor function scores, articulation clarity and quality of life scores in both groups were compared.

Results

The multimodal group demonstrated significantly higher overall efficacy rates compared to the conventional group (97.50% vs. 81.58%, p < 0.05). Notably, multimodal rehabilitation led to marked improvements in second language vocabulary acquisition (10.25 ± 2.14 vs. 8.14 ± 1.56, p = 0.001) and language function scores (124.75 ± 18.04 vs. 108.90 ± 17.62, p = 0.001). Enhanced articulation clarity (24.65 ± 4.75 vs. 20.58 ± 5.22, p = 0.001) and a social function, mental health and emotional role function in the quality of life further underscored its therapeutic advantage.

Conclusion

Multimodal language rehabilitation significantly facilitates second language recovery in bilingual aphasia, with sustained improvements in linguistic competence and psychosocial well-being. These findings advocate for prioritizing multimodal approaches in clinical practice to address the complex linguistic needs of bilingual patients.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on the subject

Bilingual aphasia poses unique challenges in rehabilitation due to the complex interaction between two languages in a shared cognitive system. While there is a growing body of research on monolingual aphasia, the long-term efficacy of multimodal language rehabilitation in bilingual aphasic patients remains understudied.

What this paper adds to existing knowledge

Our study demonstrates that multimodal language rehabilitation significantly improves second language acquisition and recovery in bilingual aphasic patients, enhancing language function, oral motor function, articulation clarity and quality of life. These findings support the integration of multimodal approaches in clinical practice for bilingual individuals with aphasia.

What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?

The results of our study suggest that multimodal language rehabilitation can be a highly effective intervention for bilingual aphasic patients, potentially leading to improved outcomes and better quality of life. Clinicians should consider incorporating multimodal rehabilitation strategies into their treatment plans for bilingual patients to optimize recovery.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Open Research

Data Availability Statement

The data involved in the present study can be provided under reasonable request.

References

Abutalebi, J., A. Miozzo, and S. F. Cappa. 2000. “Do Subcortical Structures Control `Language Selection' in Polyglots? Evidence From Pathological Language Mixing.” Neurocase 6, no. 1: 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/neucas/6.1.56.
10.1093/neucas/6.1.56
Google Scholar
Arheix-Parras, S., C. Barrios, G. Python, et al. 2021. “A Systematic Review of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Aphasia Rehabilitation: Leads for Future Studies.” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 127: 212–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.04.008.
10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.04.008
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Basilakos, A., W. D. Hula, L. P. Johnson, S. Kiran, G. M. Walker, and J. Fridriksson. 2022. “Defining the Neurobiological Mechanisms of Action in Aphasia Therapies: Applying the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System Framework to Research and Practice in Aphasia.” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 103, no. 3: 581–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.10.017.
10.1016/j.apmr.2021.10.017
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Biou E., H. Cassoudesalle, M. Cogné, et al. 2019. “Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Post-Stroke Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review.” Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 62, no. 2: 104–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.01.003.
10.1016/j.rehab.2019.01.003
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Boyle, M., J. K. Gordon, S. M. Harnish, et al. 2022. “Evaluating Cognitive-Linguistic Approaches to Interventions for Aphasia Within the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System.” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 103, no. 3: 590–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.07.816.
10.1016/j.apmr.2021.07.816
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Burke, J., R. Palmer, and M. Harrison. 2021. “What Are the Factors That May Influence the Implementation of Self-Managed Computer Therapy for People With Long Term Aphasia Following Stroke? A Qualitative Study of Speech and Language Therapists' Experiences in the Big CACTUS Trial.” Disability and Rehabilitation 44, no. 14: 3577–3589. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1871519.
10.1080/09638288.2020.1871519
PubMed Google Scholar
Cheng, B. B. Y., B. Ryan, D. A. Copland, and S. J. Wallace. 2022. “Prognostication in Post-Stroke Aphasia: Speech Pathologists' Clinical Insights on Formulating and Delivering Information About Recovery.” Disability and Rehabilitation 44, no. 18: 5046–5059. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1922514.
10.1080/09638288.2021.1922514
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Cheng, B. B. Y., L. E. Worrall, D. A. Copland, and S. J. Wallace. 2020. “Prognostication in Post-Stroke Aphasia: How Do Speech Pathologists Formulate and Deliver Information About Recovery?” International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 55, no. 4: 520–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12534.
10.1111/1460-6984.12534
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Cherney, L. R., G. DeDe, E. L. Hoover, L. Murray, J. Obermeyer, and R. H. Pompon. 2022. “Applying the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System to Functional Communication Treatment Approaches for Aphasia.” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 103, no. 3: 599–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.10.016.
10.1016/j.apmr.2021.10.016
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Cruice, M., N. Botting, J. Marshall, et al. 2020. “UK Speech and Language Therapists' Views and Reported Practices of Discourse Analysis in Aphasia Rehabilitation.” International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 55, no. 3: 417–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12528.
10.1111/1460-6984.12528
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Fabbro F. 2000. “Pathological Switching Between Languages After Frontal Lesions in a Bilingual Patient.” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 68, no. 5: 650–652. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.68.5.650.
10.1136/jnnp.68.5.650
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
Finch E., J. Lethlean, T. Rose, et al. 2020. “Conversations Between People With Aphasia and Speech Pathology Students via Telepractice: A Phase II Feasibility Study.” International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 55, no. 1: 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12501.
10.1111/1460-6984.12501
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Fridriksson J., A. Basilakos, M. Boyle, et al. 2022. “Demystifying the Complexity of Aphasia Treatment: Application of the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification Systemx.” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 103, no. 3: 574–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.08.025.
10.1016/j.apmr.2021.08.025
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Godecke E., E. Armstrong, T. Rai, et al. 2021. “A Randomized Control Trial of Intensive Aphasia Therapy After Acute Stroke: The Very Early Rehabilitation for SpEech (VERSE) Study.” International Journal of Stroke 16, no. 5: 556–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493020961926.
10.1177/1747493020961926
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Haldin C., H. Loevenbruck, T. Hueber, et al. 2021. “Speech Rehabilitation in Post-Stroke Aphasia Using Visual Illustration of Speech Articulators: A Case Report Study.” Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 35, no. 3: 253–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2020.1780473.
10.1080/02699206.2020.1780473
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Herschmann, H., and O. Pötzl. 1920. “Bemerkungen über die Aphasie der Polyglotten.” Zentralblatt Neurologie 39: 114–128.
Google Scholar
Jacobs, M., and C. Ellis. 2022. “Understanding the Economics of Aphasia: Recent Findings From Speech and Language Research.” Seminars in Speech and Language 43, no. 3: 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1749132.
10.1055/s-0042-1749132
PubMed Google Scholar
Johnson, F., S. Beeke, and W. Best. 2021. “Searching for Active Ingredients in Rehabilitation: Applying the Taxonomy of Behaviour Change Techniques to a Conversation Therapy for Aphasia.” Disability and Rehabilitation 43, no. 18: 2550–2560. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1703147.
10.1080/09638288.2019.1703147
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Jong, N. S., and P. Phukpattaranont. 2019. “A Speech Recognition System Based on Electromyography for the Rehabilitation of Dysarthric Patients: A Thai Syllable Study.” Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering 39, no. 1: 234–245.
10.1016/j.bbe.2018.11.010
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Kearns, Á., H. Kelly, and I. Pitt. 2021. “Self-Reported Feedback in ICT-Delivered Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Literature Review.” Disability and Rehabilitation 43, no. 9: 1193–1207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1655803.
10.1080/09638288.2019.1655803
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Kearns, Á., H. Kelly, and I. J. A. Pitt. 2020. “Rating Experience of ICT-Delivered Aphasia Rehabilitation: Co-Design of a Feedback Questionnaire.” Aphasiology 34, no. 3: 319–342.
10.1080/02687038.2019.1649913
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Lambon Ralph, M. A. 2021. “Listen Up: It Is Time to Integrate Neuroscience and Technologies Into Aphasia Rehabilitation.” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 92: 346–347. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2020-325349.
10.1136/jnnp-2020-325349
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Leemans, M., M. J. A. van Alphen, R. Dirven, G. J. Verkerke, E. E. G. Hekman, and M. W. M. van den Brekel. 2021. “Improving Hands-Free Speech Rehabilitation in Patients With a Laryngectomy: Proof-of-Concept of an Intratracheal Fixation Device.” Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 165, no. 2: 317–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820982634.
10.1177/0194599820982634
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Liu M., Q. Qian, W. Wang, et al. 2022. “Improvement in Language Function in Patients With Aphasia Using Computer-Assisted Executive Function Training: A Controlled Clinical Trial.” PM & R 14, no. 8: 913–921. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.12679.
10.1002/pmrj.12679
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Mariën, P., J. Abutalebi, S. Engelborghs, and P. P. De Deyn. 2005. “Pathophysiology of Language Switching and Mixing in an Early Bilingual Child With Subcortical Aphasia.” Neurocase 11, no. 6: 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/13554790500212880.
10.1080/13554790500212880
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Mueller-Sarnowski F., N. Sollmann, A. Schröder, et al. 2022. “Neuronavigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as Novel Mapping Technique Provides Insights Into Language Function in Primary Progressive Aphasia.” Brain Imaging and Behavior 16, no. 3: 1208–1216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-021-00605-6.
10.1007/s11682-021-00605-6
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Namasivayam A. K., D. Coleman, A. O'dwyer, P. Van Lieshout. 2019. “Speech Sound Disorders in Children: An Articulatory Phonology Perspective.” Frontiers in Psychology 10: 2998. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02998.
10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02998
PubMed Google Scholar
Ruggeri, M., C. Biagioli, M. Ricci, C. Gerace, and C. Blundo. 2020. “Progressive Aphasia, Apraxia of Speech and Agraphia in Corticobasal Degeneration: A 12-Case Series Clinical and Neuropsychological Descriptive Study.” International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 55, no. 6: 867–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12559.
10.1111/1460-6984.12559
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Sang, B., S. Deng, J. Zhai, et al. 2022. “Does Acupuncture Therapy Improve Language Function of Patients With Aphasia Following Ischemic Stroke? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Neurorehabilitation 51, no. 2: 231–245. https://doi.org/10.3233/nre-220007.
10.3233/nre?220007
PubMed Google Scholar
Sterenborg, B., S. I. Kalaykova, S. Knuijt, B. A. C. Loomans, and M. Huysmans. 2020. “Speech Changes in Patients With a Full Rehabilitation for Severe Tooth Wear, a First Evaluation Study.” Clinical Oral Investigations 24, no. 9: 3061–3067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03174-7.
10.1007/s00784-019-03174-7
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Zatorre, R. J. 1989. “Intact Absolute Pitch Ability After Left Temporal Lobectomy.” Cortex; A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior 25, no. 4: 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-9452(89)80018-8.
10.1016/S0010-9452(89)80018-8
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Zhao, Q., J. Wang, Z. Li, L. Song, and X. Li. 2021. “Effect of Anodic Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With Speech Language Therapy on Nonfluent Poststroke Aphasia.” Neuromodulation 24, no. 5: 923–929. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.13337.
10.1111/ner.13337
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar

Volume60, Issue4

July/August 2025

e70076

Evaluating the Long-Term Effects of Multimodal Language Rehabilitation on Second Language Acquisition and Recovery in Bilingual Aphasic Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

ABSTRACT

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

Conflicts of Interest

Open Research

Data Availability Statement

References

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

Evaluating the Long-Term Effects of Multimodal Language Rehabilitation on Second Language Acquisition and Recovery in Bilingual Aphasic Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

ABSTRACT

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

Conflicts of Interest

Open Research

Data Availability Statement

References

References

Related

Information