

research papers
X-ray absorption linear dichroism at the Ti K-edge of rutile (001) TiO2 single crystal
aLaboratory of Ultrafast Spectroscopy, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne SB-ISIC-LSU
and Lausanne Centre for Ultrafast Science (LACUS), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland,
bLaboratory for Femtochemistry – MicroXAS Beamline Project, Paul Scherrer Institute,
CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland, cLaboratory for Multiscale Materials Experiments, Paul Scherrer Institute, CH-5232
Villigen, Switzerland, and dElectrochemistry Laboratory, Paul Scherrer Institute, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]
X-ray absorption linear dichroism of rutile TiO2 at the Ti K-edge provides information about the electronic states involved in the pre-edge transitions. Here, linear dichroism with high energy resolution is analyzed in combination with ab initio finite difference method calculations and spherical tensor analysis. It provides an assignment of the three pre-edge peaks beyond the octahedral approximation and estimates the spatial extension of the corresponding final states. It is then discussed for the first time the X-ray absorption (XAS) of pentacoordinated titanium atoms due to oxygen vacancies and it is found that, similarly to anatase TiO2, rutile is expected to exhibit a transition on the low-energy side of peak A3. Its apparent absence in the experiment is related to the degree of p–d orbital mixing which is small in rutile due to its centrosymmetric A recent linear dichroism study on anatase TiO2 single crystals has shown that peak A2 has an intrinsic origin and is due to a quadrupolar transition to the 3d energy levels. In rutile, due to its centrosymmetric the corresponding peak A2 has a small explaining the weak transition. The results are confronted with recent picosecond X-ray absorption spectroscopy on rutile TiO2 nanoparticles.
1. Introduction
Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is a wide-band-gap insulator which exhibits superior properties in a wide range
of applications (Liu & Aydil, 2009; Miyoshi et al., 2018
; Gao et al., 2019
). Its natural polymorph in bulk crystals is rutile TiO2 (r-TiO2) in which TiO6 octahedra with D2h symmetry are connected to ten neighbouring octahedra via a corner or an edge (Fig.
1
). Anatase is another polymorph of TiO2 (a-TiO2) which becomes the most abundant phase in nanomaterials. It is also made of TiO6 octahedra but in a different spatial arrangement which generates an indirect band
gap, contrary to rutile. Although a-TiO2 exhibits more appealing properties in a lot of applications such as (Linsebigler et al., 1995
), the two polymorphs exhibit similar performances in photovoltaics (Park et al., 2000
).
![]() |
Figure 1 Conventional unit cell of rutile TiO2. Two equivalent Ti sites are present in the at the corners and in the centre which correspond to different orientations of the TiO6 octahedra. |
Optoelectronic device performances are in part governed by the mobility of photogenerated
charge carriers. The mobility can be reduced by coupling with the lattice modes, generating
heavier quasiparticles which can localize in a few unit cells and slow down their
recombination (Okamoto et al., 2010, 2011
). Anatase TiO2 is prone to lattice deformation which generates self-trapped excitons under band
gap excitation (Tang et al., 1995
) while free excitons and bound excitons are observed in the spectra of rutile (Amtout & Leonelli, 1992
). Recent progress in the description of the bound excitons spatial extension (Baldini
et al., 2017a
,b
) has shown that experimental techniques which are more sensitive to the local character
of photogenerated quasiparticles are required to obtain the fine details of their
geometrical and electronic structure.
XAS at the transition metal K-edge is an element-specific spectroscopy technique which can access both the electronic
structure and local geometry with subatomic spatial resolution (Rehr & Albers, 2000). It is usually decomposed into three spectral regions around the which correspond to the absorption of the X-ray photon by an electron in the 1s orbital: (i) the extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) at >50 eV above
the edge corresponds to single scattering events of the photoemitted electron by surrounding
atoms – it provides information about the bond distances and is straightforward to
interpret (Hollas, 2004
); (ii) the X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) at the up to ∼50 eV above it corresponds to multiple scattering (MS) events of the photoemitted
electrons which provide information about bond angles and distances. XANES is usually
more complicated to interpret because of the contribution of transitions to the continuum
and below to diffuse 4p orbitals, as well as to MS; (iii) the pre-edge exhibits weak features below the which are due to transitions to bound states above the These transitions can have quadrupolar and/or dipolar character depending on the
selection rules and the around the atom absorbing the X-radiation. Since the pioneering work of Brümmer and
Dräger, it is established that the dipole and quadrupolar matrix elements of the transitions
can be separated with linear dichroism (LD) experiments in which different crystal orientations are probed by the electric field
and wavevectors of the X-rays (Brümmer et al., 1971
; Dräger et al., 1988
). More recent methods such as resonant X-ray emission spectroscopy (Szlachetko et al., 2014
) or resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (Bagger et al., 2017
) provide the same information since they involve the matrix elements. Quadrupolar transitions are usually 10–100 times weaker than dipolar
ones which makes them difficult to study experimentally with standard LD techniques as used in this work. In this respect, the can be used to enhance the amplitude of the quadrupole transitions (Pettifer et al., 2008
; Tolkiehn et al., 2011
).
The 2 at the K-edge exhibits three pre-edge peaks labelled A1, A3 and B in this work.1 Previous measurements have shown a pronounced LD of the pre-edge features especially for peak
A1 (Brouder et al., 1990) which undergoes a 90°-periodic 30% amplitude variation when the sample is rotated
in the ([100], [010]) plane indicating a quadrupolar component. A pronounced LD is
also observed in the XANES (Poumellec et al., 1991
) when the sample is rotated in the ([100], [001]) plane where components along the
ordinary and extraordinary axes are exchanged (Poumellec et al., 1995
). The LD of peaks A1 and A3 has been confirmed more recently as well as the quadrupolar
nature of peak A1 by angular-resolved resonant Auger spectroscopy (Le Fèvre et al., 2005
). We have shown how the analysis of the LD can assign final states to the bound transitions
in the pre-edge of a-TiO2 (Rossi et al., 2019
). In particular, for distorted octahedral systems such as a-TiO2 and r-TiO2, the usual into t2g and eg final states is inappropriate and does not account for the experimental evolution
of the peak amplitudes with incident electric field and wavevector (Ruiz-Lopez & Munoz-Paez,
1991
). In this paper, we analyze the LD of r-TiO2 (001) single crystal which provides an assignment of the final states involved in
each pre-edge transition in the monoelectronic approximation. The novelty of the approach
resides in the combination of ab initio and analytical theoretical techniques to infer the presence of given orbitals in
the final states involved in the pre-edge transitions.
The assignment of the final states involved in the pre-edge goes hand in hand with
theoretical modelling. Muffin-tin MS calculations are insufficient to describe the
et al., 1999; Bunău & Joly, 2009
; Kravtsova et al., 2010
). The finite difference method (FDM) developed by Y. Joly (Joly et al., 1999
; Joly, 2001
) has shown that, in r-TiO2, A1 is a quadrupolar transition to t2g orbitals, A3 is essentially dipolar with a weak eg quadrupolar contribution, and B is purely dipolar (Cabaret et al., 1999
). The spatial extension of the final state can be used to address the dipolar or
quadrupolar character of the transition. We have shown that the quadrupole transitions
in a-TiO2 populate a final state localized in the TiO6 octahedron where the Ti atom absorbs the X-radiation (Rossi et al., 2019
). Final states which result from on-site or off-site p–d orbital can have various spatial extensions sensitive to the first coordinating shell of
TiO6 octahedra or even further away. In this work, we investigate the spatial extension
of the final states in detail using ab initio FDM calculations.
The pre-edge of a-TiO2 and r-TiO2 differs by the presence of a pronounced A2 peak on the low-energy side of peak A3
in a-TiO2 which is absent in r-TiO2. Empirical studies have shown that the amplitude of A2 is related to the amount of
oxygen vacancies in a-TiO2 while no difference is observed in the r-TiO2 case (Luca et al., 1998; Hanley et al., 2002
; Luca, 2009
). Recent theoretical modelings have shown that the local structural disorder also
plays an important role in the amplitude of A2 in a-TiO2 (Zhang et al., 2008
; Triana et al., 2016
). Our recent LD study has shown that peak A2 is present in a-TiO2 single crystals and is due to an intrinsic quadrupolar transition which exhibits
LD (Rossi et al., 2019
). It is the result of the weak p–d and p-density of states (DOS). Ab initio calculations including the explicit treatment of the core-hole interaction in the
Bethe–Salpeter equation are in agreement with this assignment (Vorwerk et al., 2017
) and suggest that peak A2 may be seen in r-TiO2 on the low-energy side of peak A3 under azimuthal rotation (Shirley, 2004
). The final states of peaks A1 and A2 in a-TiO2 have orthogonal p-DOS contributions which indicate a difference in the binding energy with the core-hole.
The energy splitting between these bound states has a similar origin to the bound
excitonic states found in a-TiO2 in the optical range (Baldini et al., 2017a
; Chiodo et al., 2010
). It is thus surprising a priori that the A2 peak is not observed in the r-TiO2 polymorph either due to an intrinsic quadrupolar transition in the bulk or because
of penta-coordinated Ti atoms due to oxygen vacancies. This is clarified in this work
as we show that the degree of p–d is key to the amplitude of peak A2 in both cases.
In regard to the discrepancy of orbital assignment and spatial extension of the final
state in previous studies as well as the absence of discussion about the absence of
peak A2 in r-TiO2, a combined experimental and theoretical LD study is valuable to provide an accurate description of the orbital content in the
pre-edge. In this work, we combine the measured at different incidence angles at the surface of (001) r-TiO2 with FDM calculations and spherical harmonic analysis (Brouder et al., 2008) to provide an unambiguous assignment beyond the usual octahedral approximation which is inappropriate for r-TiO2 (Ruiz-Lopez & Munoz-Paez, 1991
). Previous assignments of the pre-edge peaks are provided in Table 1
together with the ones established in this work.
|
2. Experimental
The LD measurements were performed at the MicroXAS beamline of the SLS in Villigen, Switzerland, using a double Si(311) crystal monochromator to optimize the energy resolution. Energy calibration is performed from the first derivative of the
of a thin Ti foil. We used a moderately unfocused rectangular-shaped X-ray beam of 20 µm (horizontal) × 200 µm (vertical). The is obtained in total with a Ketek Axas detector system with Vitus H30 SFF and ultralow capacitance Cube-Asic preamplifier (Ketek GmbH).The sample consists of a (001)-oriented crystalline r-TiO2 thin film [thickness 46 nm; see §S1 of the supporting information (SI) for details on the sample growth and characterizations] mounted on a set of
translation and rotation stages allowing a fixed centre of rotation at the sample
surface. By convention, a set of Euler angles (θ, ϕ, ψ) orients the electric field and wavevector
with respect to the sample crystallographic axes (Fig. 2
). θ measures the angle between
and the [001] crystal direction (
axis of the sample frame) orthogonal to the surface. ϕ measures the angle between
and the sample rotation axis
. In principle, a third angle ψ is necessary to fix the position of the wavevector in the orthogonal plane to the
electric field but here ψ = 0°. The θ angles reported in the experimental datasets are with a maximum systematic offset
of ±0.2° which comes from the precision setting up the θ = 0° reference from the sample half-clipping of the X-ray beam at grazing incidence.
The precision of the rotation stage of ±0.01° is negligible with respect to this angular
offset.
![]() |
Figure 2 Linear dichroism experimental geometry and angular conventions with (a) side view and (b) top view. The sample surface is in grey while the incident X-ray beam is in pink. A set of Euler angles (θ, ϕ, ψ) is used to orient the electric field ![]() ![]() |
LD is usually studied with the sample rotated in the plane orthogonal to the incident
X-ray beam (ϕ-rotation) (Brouder et al., 1990). Here, the sample is rotated around
(θ-rotation) where the changes in the are the most pronounced. Under this rotation, the X-ray footprint onto the sample
surface changes with θ. However, we clearly show that this procedure does not introduce spectral distortions
because the effective of the X-rays through the material [between ∼85 nm and ∼540 nm across the absorption
K-edge of r-TiO2 for the largest footprint at θ = 1° used here (Henke et al., 1993
)] is kept constant as the sample is thinner than the attenuation length at the Ti
K-edge. Instead, the total amount of material probed by the X-rays changes due to the
larger X-ray footprint when θ increases and a renormalization over the number of detected photons is required. This is done with the support of finite difference method near-edge
structure (FDMNES) calculations (vide infra) since a few energy points have θ-independent cross-sections as previously reported on other systems (Frétigny et al., 1986
; Stizza et al., 1986
; Oyanagi et al., 1987
, 1989
; George et al., 1989
; Loupias et al., 1990
; Pettifer et al., 1990
; Rossi et al., 2019
).2 With this renormalization procedure performed at a single energy point (4987.3 eV),
we could obtain a set of experimental points with θ-independent cross-sections at
the energies predicted by the theory confirming the reliability of the method (vide infra). Hence, crystalline thin films with suitable thicknesses with respect to the X-ray
offer more possibilities to study LD effects than single crystals and prevent the
usual self-absorption distortion of bulk materials using total detection (Carboni et al., 2005
).
2.1. FDM calculations
The ab initio calculations of the were performed with the full potential finite difference method (FDM) as implemented
in the FDMNES package (Joly et al., 1999; Joly, 2001
). A cluster of 7.0 Å was used for the calculation with the fundamental of the oxygen atom and an configuration for the titanium atom (Ti:[Ar]3d14s24p1). Previous calculations have shown that it converges faster to the same results as
the starting electronic structure 3d24s2 showing the robustness of the method (Bunău & Joly, 2009
). We checked the convergence of the calculation for increasing cluster sizes and
found minor evolution for larger cluster radii than 7.0 Å. The Hedin–Lundqvist exchange-correlation
potential is used (Hedin & Lundqvist, 2001
) although it provides similar results as the other widely used Perdew–Wang potential
(Perdew & Wang, 1992
). The agreement between the experimental and theoretical pre-edge feature energies
can be better matched by adding self-consistency to the calculation which acts especially
on the 3d states close to the decreasing the energy of peak A1 (Joly et al., 2009
). Alternatively, the change in the screening of the 3d electrons of titanium provides the same effect decreasing the energy of quadrupole
allowed transitions. This is the method we have used by considering a screening of
0.85 for the 3d electrons of Ti similar to previous studies (Aïfa et al., 1997
). An arctan convolution with maximum broadening of 1.5 eV is applied to the calculated
spectra to account for core-hole lifetime and a constant broadening of 0.095 eV is
applied to account for the experimental resolution.
2.2. Spherical tensor analysis of the dipole and quadrupole cross-sections
Analytical expressions of the dipole and quadrupole and
, respectively] are obtained from their expansion into spherical harmonic components
(Brouder, 1990
; Brouder et al., 1990
). The expressions of
and
depend on the crystal which is D2h (2/mmm) for r-TiO2. For the dipole we obtain
and, for the quadrupole cross-section,
where (θ, ϕ, ψ) are Euler angles in the Ti frame. σX(l, m) with X = D, Q is the spherical tensor with rank l and projection m. The Euler angles (θ, ϕ, ψ) in the experiment are referenced to the crystal frame which is rotated with respect
to the Euler angles in the Ti site frame. Consequently, the angles in equations (1) and (2)
differ from the angles defined in Fig. 2
by rotation around θ and ϕ. For instance, the
axis of the site frame is rotated by an angle π/2 around a bisecting axis in the
plane of the site frame with respect to the crystal frame. Consequently, the formulas
(1)
and (2)
need to be modified to match the incidence angle θ used in the experiment [details in §S7 (SI)]. The dipole is now given by
and the quadrupole
byAlthough some terms of and
may be negative, the total dipolar and quadrupolar cross-sections must be positive
putting constraints on the values of σD(l, m) and σQ(l, m). The electric field
and wavevector
coordinates in the
basis of Fig. 2
are given by
Hence the detail of the σD(l, m) and σQ(l, m) as performed elsewhere (Brouder et al., 2008). The measured experimentally is an average over equivalent Ti atoms under the symmetry
operations of the crystal The analytical formula representing this average requires the site symmetrization
and crystal symmetrization of the spherical tensors, which is provided in §S7 and
§S7.2 (SI). In the case of θ-rotation at ϕ = 0° described in this paper, the two equivalent Ti sites have the same spectra. We provide spectra calculated at the two equivalent Ti sites of r-TiO2 under θ [Fig. S8 (SI)] and ϕ rotation [Fig. S9 (SI)] showing this effect. Assuming pure 3d and 4p final states in the monoelectronic approximation, analytical expressions are provided
for
and
whose angular dependence with θ are given in Table 2
. The full expressions of the cross-sections are provided in §S7.4 (SI). In this paper,
we analyze the angular dependence of the pre-edge peak intensities with θ and assign them to specific final states corresponding to Ti-3d and/or 4p orbitals with the support of both FDM and spherical tensor analysis.
|
3. Results
The experimental evolution of the normalized θ is depicted in Fig. 3(b) with an emphasis on the pre-edge given in Fig. 3(a)
. The results are similar to previous published spectra under similar rotation between
[001] and
(Aïfa et al., 1997
). In the pre-edge, the amplitudes of peaks A3 and B are notably affected by the sample
orientation with a of the maximum for peak A3 and a blue shift for peak B with θ. Strong changes are also observed in the post-edge region showing that the LD remains
well above the edge. Calculated spectra using FDMNES are shown in Figs. 3(c) and 3(d)
with the same polarization conditions as in the experiment. The evolution of the
peak B amplitude and energy shift is nicely reproduced while a with θ appears for peak A3 with an underestimated amplitude change. The ratio between A3
and B amplitudes changes between the experiment and the theory [Figs. 3(a) and 3(c)
] similarly to previous calculations with the same computational method (Joly et al., 1999
) but also with full multiple scattering (Zhang et al., 2008
). The evolution of peak A1 is weak in accord with the experiment and with previous
results which assigned it to a purely quadrupolar transition (Uozumi et al., 1992
; Parlebas, 1993
; Parlebas et al., 1995
). An excellent reproduction of the experimental data is also obtained above the edge
where the isosbestic points are found in agreement, marked by black arrows in Fig.
3
. This shows the absence of self-absorption effects in the experimental data which
would distort the spectra (Carboni et al., 2005
).
![]() |
Figure 3 (a), (b) Experimental and (c), (d) theoretical evolution of the at the Ti K-edge of r-TiO2 for different angles of incidence θ. (a), (c) Pre-edge region. (b), (d) XANES and Isosbestic points are shown with black arrows. Thick lines in (c) are spectra calculated with dipole and quadrupole matrix elements; thin lines show the quadrupole matrix elements contribution only. |
We have fitted the pre-edge peaks with Gaussians for the experimental data and with
pseudo-Voigt functions for the theoretical data in order to extract the evolution
of the amplitude with the incidence angle θ. The fitted amplitudes of the three experimental pre-edge edge peaks appear as black
circles with error bars in Fig. 4. The vertical scale is modified to match the theoretical evolution of the according to a procedure described in §S2 (SI). Fittings to individual spectra are
given in Fig. S4 (SI). Peak A1 undergoes an almost pure quadrupolar evolution with
90°-periodicity, reaching its maximum amplitude for θ = 45° [Fig. 4(a)
]. However, we notice a slight deviation to this behaviour with the being larger when θ → 90° than when θ → 0°. This behaviour is in excellent agreement with the theory [blue circles in Fig.
4(a)
] which indicates a weak dipolar contribution underlying the overwhelming quadrupolar
one. Experimentally, both peaks A3 and B have a monotonic decrease with θ which does not match the theory for peak A3 in which an increase in amplitude appears
from θ ≃ 60° [Figs. 4(b) and 4(c)
]. This is likely due to the underestimated amplitude of peak A3 and its evolution
which competes with peak broadening changes with the incidence angle.
![]() |
Figure 4 Evolution of the experimental (black circles with error bars) and theoretical (coloured circles) amplitudes of the pre-edge peaks (a) A1, (b) A3 and (c) B in r-TiO2 going from an electric field along [001] (θ = 0°) to [100] (θ = 90°). The error bars represent 95% confidence interval in the fitted experimental amplitude. The sum of dipole and quadrupole components is fitted in the theoretical data. Details about the fitting procedure and the fitting results are given in §S2 and §S3 (SI). |
In order to assign the 3d and 4p orbitals contributing to the final state of the pre-edge transitions, we look at
the DOS in the pre-edge provided by FDMNES [Fig. S7 (SI)] as well as the expected evolution from the spherical tensor analysis
(Table 2).
In the region of peak A1, the p-DOS is negligible [Fig. S7(b) (SI)] while the DOS of all possible d-states is present except dyz [Fig. S7(c) (SI)]. This is in agreement with the dominant quadrupolar evolution observed experimentally
[Fig. 4(a)], compatible with 3d orbitals contributing to the final state. Similar results were obtained by others
under ϕ-rotation (Parlebas, 1993
; Parlebas et al., 1995
). The dz2 and dxy-DOS is ∼500 times larger than the dxz, dyz-DOS [Fig. S7(c) (SI)]. The spherical tensor analysis of the involving dz2 and dxy orbitals in the final state gives a maximum for θ = 45° [Fig. S6(b) (SI)], in agreement with the experiment [Fig. 4(a)
] and the calculated DOS [Fig. S7(c) (SI)]. The deviation from the ideal quadrupolar evolution goes in the direction
of a weak with 4px,y states which reach their maximum amplitude for θ = 90° according to the spherical tensor analysis [Fig. S6(a) (SI)].
The experimental amplitude of peak A3 decreases [Fig. 4(b)], reflecting the dominant contribution of the pz-DOS to the transition according to the spherical tensor analysis [Fig. S6(a) (SI)] in agreement with the calculated DOS [Fig. S7(b) (SI)] and conclusions from previous studies (Parlebas et al., 1995
). However, the calculated pz-DOS is only slightly larger than the px,y-DOS [Fig. S7(b) (SI)] giving less than 10% amplitude variation with respect to the maximum in the
theoretical spectra [Fig. 4(b)
]. The fitted theoretical evolution of the peak A3 amplitude shows a non-monotonic
behaviour indicating the overlapping contributions of a dipolar and quadrupolar transitions.
The calculation of the quadrupolar indicates a contribution in the region of peak A3, which reaches its maximum for
θ = 0°[90°] [Fig. 3(c)
], in agreement with the fitted behaviour which shows that peak A3 originates from
the superposition of a dipolar and quadrupolar transition. A quadrupolar evolution
with maximum at θ = 0[90]° is only compatible with the presence of dxz, dyz states according to the spherical tensor analysis [Fig. S6(b) (SI)]. It corresponds to the largest d-DOS found in the region of peak A3 [Fig. S7c) (SI)]. The quadrupolar contributions of peaks A1 and A3 found in this work are in
agreement with temperature-dependent studies in which only quadrupolar transitions undergo a change in at the metal K-edge (Durmeyer et al., 2010
; Brouder et al., 2010
).
At the peak B, the pz-DOS dominates over px,y [Fig. S7(b) (SI)] while all d-states have similar contributions except dxy [Fig. S7(c) SI)]. Experimentally, peak B shows a monotonic decrease in amplitude
with θ both experimentally and theoretically [Fig. 4(c)] which is compatible with the dominant pz-DOS identified in our calculations [Fig. S7(b) (SI)] and the spherical tensor analysis which predicts a monotonic decay when pz-DOS is dominant [Fig. S6(a) (SI)]. Peaks A3 and B are also observed by bremsstrahlung isochromat spectroscopy
(BIS) which shows that they originate from essentially empty p-DOS which is due to the strong 3d–4p for peak A3 and the 4p-DOS for peak B (Beaurepaire et al., 1993
), in agreement with our results. The absence of peak A1 in BIS is due to the absence
of core-hole effects (Hüfner, 2013
).
Hence, using a combination of ab initio FDM calculations and spherical tensor analysis with our experimental LD, the assignment
of the dominant final states contributing to the pre-edge transitions at the Ti K-edge of r-TiO2 is established. The assignments are given in Table 1.
4. Discussion
4.1. Spatial extension of the final states in the pre-edge
The spatial extension of the final states involved in the pre-edge transitions can
be approached from the calculations of shows calculated spectra for increasing cluster sizes from the smallest TiO6 octahedron up to a cluster with 5.5 Å radius involving the second nearest-neighbour
shell of Ti atoms. Peak A1 can be reproduced with a simple TiO6 octahedron in agreement with its quadrupolar nature involving 3d final states centred on the absorbing Ti atom (red curve). Peaks A3 and B are absent
for the TiO6 octahedron showing that they involve final states which are delocalized away from
the central TiO6 octahedron. The former appears when the nearest coordinating shell of TiO6 octahedra is included for a cluster size of 4 Å (green curve) while the latter involves
the next nearest neighbour shell which appears for a cluster size of 5.5 Å (purple
curve). These results shine a light on the sensitivity of pre-edge peaks to different
length scales around the atoms absorbing the radiation. It is clear that the p–d occurring in the final states of peak A3 and the pure p-DOS component in peak B contribute to their increased sensitivity to coordinating
shells. These results are similar to the results obtained on a-TiO2 for the peaks A3 and B (Rossi et al., 2019
).
![]() |
Figure 5 Influence of cluster size on the calculated XAS cross-section (sum of dipole and quadrupole components) (a) for θ = 90° and (b) for θ = 0°. |
4.2. Appearance of transitions to pentacoordinated titanium atoms in the pre-edge
A remarkable difference between the 2 and r-TiO2 is the absence of a peak A2 in the latter. Previous assignments of this peak in a-TiO2 include undercoordinated titanium atoms due to oxygen vacancies (Farges et al., 1997; Luca et al., 1998
; Luca, 2009
) and structural disorder (Zhang et al., 2008
; Triana et al., 2016
). At high defect concentrations, both phases converge to an amorphous phase where
the A2 peak becomes dominant. studies have shown that r-TiO2 retains a crystalline structure when nanoparticle materials are synthesized by sol-gel
(Manzini et al., 1995
) or calcined at different temperatures (Luca, 2009
), which may explain the absence of peak A2. Wu and co-workers have reported changes
in the pre-edge of r-TiO2 at the Ti K-edge from bulk to nanosized materials with a of peak A3 and a and decrease of the amplitude of peak B, while peak A1 is unaffected (Wu et al., 2002
). The most pronounced differences are located in the XANES. Lemercier and co-workers
have shown that, under UV irradiation, peak A3 undergoes a which is compatible with the formation of Ti3+ centres at the surface of r-TiO2 (LeMercier et al., 1995
). Recently, a combined experimental and theoretical study at the Ti L2, 3-edge of r-TiO2 nanoparticles with oxygen vacancies has shown blue-shifted peak replicas from the
t2g and eg derived final states which are due to VO 2+ vacancies (Vásquez et al., 2016
). Similar peaks are observed in a-TiO2 nanoparticles at the same edge (Thakur et al., 2011
; Krüger et al., 2017
). It is thus surprising that defect-related peaks have been observed in only a few
studies at the Ti K-edge of r-TiO2 while several studies at the O K-edge and Ti L2,3-edge report well defined resonances due to oxygen vacancies (Thomas et al., 2007
; Thakur et al., 2011
; Chen et al., 2015
; Tian et al., 2015
; Vásquez et al., 2016
). They often appear as extra peaks on the high-energy side of the bulk resonances.
These resonances become more pronounced with surface-sensitive techniques such as
electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS) (Göpel et al., 1984
; Eriksen & Egdell, 1987
; Henderson et al., 2003
), which shows the importance of polaron states in the trapping of charges at oxygen
vacancies (Eriksen & Egdell, 1987
). These results support our approach of using a relaxed lattice structure around
VO 2+ oxygen vacancies (Ovac) to find the expected pre-edge peaks due to pentacoordinated titanium atoms at the
Ti K-edge.
A qualitative simulation of the Ti K-edge of undercoordinated Ti atoms with Ovac in r-TiO2 can help in understanding the expected changes from the bulk structure. For these
simulations with the full potential FDM, we have used the relaxed local structure
from density functional theory calculations with hybrid functionals for the exchange
and the correlation terms reported in an earlier work (Janotti et al., 2010). A bulk 4 × 4 × 4 of r-TiO2 is considered first, which contains 739 atoms. A doubly ionized oxygen vacancy (VO 2+) close to the centre of the is simulated by removing an oxygen atom and displacing the nearest Ti atoms by the
bond distances reported by Janotti et al. (2010
) along the broken Ti—O bonds due to the Ovac. The are calculated separately at the Ti K-edge of the atoms having the Ovac in equatorial or in apical position. The results are depicted in Fig. 6
(blue and red thick lines). Similarly to our previous results on a-TiO2 (Rossi et al., 2019
), we find that, for the equatorial Ovac, peak A1 is absent while a peak appears on the low-energy side of peak A3 (red curve).
The of the apical Ovac shows mainly one peak centred at the position of peak A3. A similar trend has been
previously obtained by others with a smaller cluster size in the multiple scattering
approach (Jeanne-Rose et al., 1997
). This additional peak is consistent with DOS appearing at the Ti L2,3-edge upon formation of oxygen vacancies on the blue side of t2g and eg-DOS (Vásquez et al., 2016
). These results show that a defect-related resonance due to pentacoordinated Ti atoms
may be expected on the low-energy side of peak A3, where the peak A2 is present in
a-TiO2, which originates from the relaxed projected DOS of Ti atoms in the vicinity of an
Ovac. We noticed that some experimental studies at the Ti K-edge of r-TiO2 seem to show a peak A3 asymmetry on the red side, suggesting the presence of peak
A2 (Manzini et al., 1995
; Finkelstein et al., 2002
). The spectrum measured by Finkelstein and co-workers is shown in Fig. 6
(blue circles) in which the shoulder at ∼4958 eV is in good agreement with the position
of the maximum in our computed spectra with Ovac. We suspect that peak A2 can only be observed with a substantial amount of VO 2+ and a monochromator with high energy resolution. The low amount of such vacancies
in our crystalline r-TiO2 (001) thin films partially explains the absence of peak A2 since the other possible
contribution to the formation of this peak is a quadrupolar transition from the d-DOS which is discussed in Section 4.3
.
![]() |
Figure 6 Evolution of the pre-edge of r-TiO2 upon formation of VO 2+ at the Ti K-edge. The spectra are calculated for a Ti atom in the bulk structure (black curve), with VO 2+ at the apical (blue curve) or the equatorial position (red curve). The calculations are without polarization of the X-ray field (angular average). A linear combination of the apical and equatorial Ovac spectra gives a spectrum representative of the titanium atoms surrounding the Ovac (green curve). Experimental data from r-TiO2 nanoparticles are reproduced from Finkelstein et al. (2002 ![]() ![]() |
Picosecond 2 nanoparticles shows an enhancement of the spectral signature of trapped charges around
metal centres at defects (Rittmann-Frank et al., 2014). Our picosecond Ti K-edge study of r-TiO2 nanoparticles (Budarz et al., 2017
) shows the reduction of pentacoordinated Ti centres in the defect-rich shell of the
nanoparticles. The transient spectrum at 100 ps after excitation shows an increase
in amplitude on the red side of peak A3 and a decrease in peak B amplitude (black
line with circle markers in Fig. 6
). To model the of Ti3+ centres with a trapped electron without the polarization information, we have taken
a linear combination of the calculated apical and equatorial Ovac (one-third of the first and two-thirds of the second in agreement with the relative
weight of these Ti atoms around the vacancy) which is shown as a green curve in Fig.
6
. A net positive signal appears on the red side of peak A3 and a decrease at peak
A1 and B with respect to the bulk spectrum (black curve) in agreement with the transient
spectrum (Budarz et al., 2017
). The good qualitative agreement between our simulations and picosecond is evidence of the presence of peak A2 buried under the red side of peak A3 in the
of r-TiO2 with oxygen vacancies such as in nanoparticles.
We have recently shown that peak A2 is not only due to oxygen vacancies but can also
originate from an intrinsic quadrupolar transition in a-TiO2 which becomes dominant in single crystals (Rossi et al., 2019). We investigate the presence of such transition in the pre-edge of r-TiO2.
4.3. Absence of a quadrupolar A2 peak in the pre-edge of r-TiO2 single crystal
Just as for a-TiO2, in r-TiO2 the calculated quadrupolar at peak A3 has a doublet structure which becomes evident at θ ≃ 45° [thin lines in Fig. 3(c)]. At θ = 0[90]° the quadrupolar matches the position of the peak A3 maximum while at θ = 45° the peak is clearly red-shifted with a maximum around 4971 eV. However, this
peak is very broad and spans from 4970 to 4973 eV, which prevents formation of a well
defined feature at this angle. Additionally, the amplitude of the quadrupolar near peak A3 is only ∼7% of the total peak amplitude while in a-TiO2 the quadrupolar at peak A2 can be as large as ∼30% (Rossi et al., 2019
). Hence, while d-DOS is present in the region of the expected quadrupolar peak A2, the absence of
such intrinsic transition in r-TiO2 is essentially due to the weak quadrupolar contribution in this region of the spectrum.
It originates from the centrosymmetric local of rutile (D2h) which generates strict quadrupolar transitions approximately 100 times weaker than
dipolar ones (de Groot, 1994
; Yamamoto, 2008
).
Recent calculations dealing explicitly with the core-hole interaction in the Bethe–Salpeter
equation have shown that an intrinsic electronic transition on the low-energy side
of peak A3 is present in both a-TiO2 and r-TiO2 (Vorwerk et al., 2017). The degree of on-site p–d orbital is the key parameter for peak A2 to appear as well as the amount of p-DOS. In r-TiO2, on-site p–d orbital is the limiting factor due to the centrosymmetric D2h. Hence, we exclude that a quadrupolar transition results in the apparent asymmetry
on the low energy side of peak A3 reported in previous studies of nanoparticles since
this transition is expected to be too weak to be observed (LeMercier et al., 1995
; Wu et al., 2002
). It is likely due to a transition to pentacoordinated Ti atoms as discussed in Section
4.2
. Parlebas and co-workers have reported that a peak A2 is required to fit the experimental
in total electron yield of r-TiO2 (001) single crystal (Parlebas, 1993
; Parlebas et al., 1995
). However, this shoulder is also present in their BIS data which shows that it does
not originate from a blue-shifted quadrupolar transition due to the core-hole effect
as would be expected for a quadrupolar peak A2. The presence of a shoulder on the
low-energy side of peak A3 in their data is likely due to oxygen vacancies in the
single crystal in agreement with our reasoning.
5. Conclusion
In conclusion, we have experimentally investigated in detail the linear dichroism
of a rutile TiO2 (001) thin film and analyzed it with the support of FDMNES ab initio calculations and spherical tensor analysis. An unambiguous assignment of the pre-edge
transitions is provided which completes the work for the most common rutile and anatase
(Rossi et al., 2019) polymorphs of TiO2. The effect of an oxygen vacancy on the of a pentacoordinated Ti atom is investigated for the first time and compared with
similar calculations on anatase TiO2. The results show that peak A2 is only due to the presence of pentacoordinated titanium
atoms at the Ti K-edge of r-TiO2, in agreement with picosecond (Budarz et al., 2017
). The quadrupolar transition which may be expected from the d-DOS in the region of peak A2 cannot be observed because of the limited p–d in rutile contrary to anatase TiO2 (Rossi et al., 2019
).
6. Related literature
The following references, not cited in the main body of the paper, have been cited
in the supporting information: Mo & Ching (1995); DeVore (1951
); Björck & Andersson (2007
); Als-Nielsen & McMorrow (2011
).
Supporting information
Description of the sample synthesis and characterization, the detailed procedure of the pre-edge fittings, a magnification of the fittings in the pre-edge region, the evolution of the spherical tensor components with incidence angle, the calculated https://doi.org/10.1107/S160057752000051X/gb5100sup1.pdf
FDMNES calculations at equivalent sites and the procedure for the crystal symmetrization of the spherical tensors. DOI:Footnotes
1This choice of nomenclature can be found in previous works (Wu et al., 1997). The usual nomenclature in which the pre-edge peaks are labelled A1, A2 and A3 is
misleading since it does not allow a direct comparison with the pre-edge peaks of
anatase, another polymorph of TiO2. In particular, it was recently shown that the peak A2 in anatase single crystals
originates from a quadrupole allowed transition (Rossi et al., 2019
) which is not the case for the usually labelled peak A2 of rutile [see this work
and Cabaret et al. (2010
)]. The absence of a similar quadrupolar peak A2 in the pre-edge of rutile is detailed
in the current work and originates from the centrosymmetry of the TiO6 octahedra leading to a weak transition not experimentally observable. The presence
of quadrupolar peak A2 in rutile is predicted by recent state-of-the-art calculations
on the low-energy side of peak A3 (Vorwerk et al., 2017
). Hence, the choice of nomenclature in this work allows a direct comparison between
the pre-edge of anatase and rutile in which the same labels correspond to similar
final states (based on the nature of the orbitals involved and spatial extension).
2For a spectrum measured well above the the atomic background absorption converges to the same amplitude for any incident polarization and can also be used in principle to renormalize the spectra.
Acknowledgements
We thank Yves Joly and Christian Brouder for fruitful discussions and Hengzhong Zhang for providing the FDMNES input files. We also thank Beat Meyer and Mario Birri of the microXAS beamline for their technical support as well as the Bernina station staff of the SwissFEL for lending us the goniometer stage.
Funding information
This work was supported by: the Swiss NSF via the NCCR:MUST and grants 200020_169914 and 200021_175649 and the European Research Council Advanced Grants H2020 ERCEA 695197 DYNAMOX; GFM and CB were supported via the InterMUST Women Fellowship; National Center of Competence in Research – Molecular Ultrafast Science and Technology.
References
Aïfa, Y., Poumellec, B., Jeanne-Rose, V., Cortes, R., Vedrinskii, R. V. & Kraizman,
V. L. (1997). J. Phys. IV, 7, C2-217–C2-218. Google Scholar
Als-Nielsen, J. & McMorrow, D. (2011). Elements of Modern X-ray Physics. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
Amtout, A. & Leonelli, R. (1992). Phys. Rev. B, 46, 15550–15553. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Bagger, A., Haarman, T., Puig Molina, A., Moses, P. G., Ishii, H., Hiraoka, N., Wu,
Y.-H., Tsuei, K.-D., Chorkendorff, I. & De Groot, F. (2017). J. Synchrotron Rad. 24, 296–301. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Baldini, E., Chiodo, L., Dominguez, A., Palummo, M., Moser, S., Yazdi-Rizi, M., Auböck,
G., Mallett, B. P. P., Berger, H., Magrez, A., Bernhard, C., Grioni, M., Rubio, A.
& Chergui, M. (2017a). Nat. Commun. 8, 13. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Baldini, E., Dominguez, A., Chiodo, L., Sheveleva, E., Yazdi-Rizi, M., Bernhard, C.,
Rubio, A. & Chergui, M. (2017b). Phys. Rev. B, 96, 041204–5. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Beaurepaire, E., Lewonczuk, S., Ringeissen, J., Parlebas, J. C., Uozumi, T., Okada,
K. & Kotani, A. (1993). Europhys. Lett. 22, 463–467. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Björck, M. & Andersson, G. (2007). J. Appl. Cryst. 40, 1174–1178. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Brouder, C. (1990). J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 2, 701–738. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Brouder, C., Cabaret, D., Juhin, A. & Sainctavit, P. (2010). Phys. Rev. B, 81, 115125. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Brouder, C., Juhin, A., Bordage, A. & Arrio, M.-A. (2008). J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 20, 455205–16. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Brouder, C., Kappler, J. P. & Beaurepaire, E. (1990). 2nd European Conference on Progress in X-ray Synchrotron Radiation Research, 2–6 October 1989, Rome, Italy, pp. 19–22. Google Scholar
Brümmer, O., DrÄger, G. & Starke, W. (1971). J. Phys. Colloq. 32, C4-169–C4-171. Google Scholar
Budarz, J., Santomauro, F. G., Rittmann-Frank, M. H., Milne, C. J., Huthwelker, T.,
Grolimund, D., Rittmann, J., Kinschel, D., Rossi, T. & Chergui, M. (2017). Chimia, 71, 768–772. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Bunău, O. & Joly, Y. (2009). J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 21, 345501. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Cabaret, D., Bordage, A., Juhin, A., Arfaoui, M. & Gaudry, E. (2010). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 12, 5619–5633. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cabaret, D., Joly, Y., Renevier, H. & Natoli, C. R. (1999). J. Synchrotron Rad. 6, 258–260. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Carboni, R., Giovannini, S., Antonioli, G. & Boscherini, F. (2005). Phys. Scr. 2005, 986. CrossRef Google Scholar
Chen, C. L., Dong, C.-L., Chen, C.-H., Wu, J.-W., Lu, Y.-R., Lin, C.-J., Liou, S.
Y., Tseng, C.-M., Kumar, K., Wei, D.-H., Guo, J., Chou, W.-C. & Wu, M.-K. (2015).
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 22064–22071. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chiodo, L., García-Lastra, J. M., Iacomino, A., Ossicini, S., Zhao, J., Petek, H.
& Rubio, A. (2010). Phys. Rev. B, 82, 045207. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
DeVore, J. R. (1951). J. Opt. Soc. Am. 41, 416. CrossRef Google Scholar
Dräger, G., Frahm, R., Materlik, G. & Brümmer, O. (1988). Phys. Status Solidi B, 146, 287–294. Google Scholar
Durmeyer, O., Beaurepaire, E., Kappler, J. P., Brouder, C. & Baudelet, F. (2010).
J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 22, 125504. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Eriksen, S. & Egdell, R. G. (1987). Surf. Sci. 180, 263–278. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Farges, F., Brown, G. E. & Rehr, J. J. (1997). Phys. Rev. B, 56, 1809–1819. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Finkelstein, L. D., Zabolotzky, E. I., Korotin, M. A., Shamin, S. N., Butorin, S.
M., Kurmaev, E. Z. & Nordgren, J. (2002). X-ray Spectrom. 31, 414–418. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Fischer, D. W. (1972). Phys. Rev. B, 5, 4219–4226. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Frétigny, C., Bonnin, D. & CortÈs, R. (1986). J. Phys. Colloq. 47, C8-869–C8-873. Google Scholar
Gao, C., Wei, T., Zhang, Y., Song, X., Huan, Y., Liu, H., Zhao, M., Yu, J. & Chen,
X. (2019). Adv. Mater. 31, 1806596. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
George, G. N., Prince, R. C., Frey, T. G. & Cramer, S. P. (1989). Physica B, 158, 81–83. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Göpel, W., Anderson, J. A., Frankel, D., Jaehnig, M., Phillips, K., Schäfer, J. A.
& Rocker, G. (1984). Surf. Sci. 139, 333–346. Google Scholar
Groot, F. M. F. de (1994). J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 67, 529–622. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Hanley, T. L., Luca, V., Pickering, I. & Howe, R. F. (2002). J. Phys. Chem. B, 106, 1153–1160. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Hedin, L. & Lundqvist, B. I. (2001). J. Phys. C.: Solid State Phys. 4, 2064–2083. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Henderson, M. A., Epling, W. S., Peden, C. H. F. & Perkins, C. L. (2003). J. Phys. Chem. B, 107, 534–545. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Henke, B. L., Gullikson, E. M. & Davis, J. C. (1993). At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 54, 181–342. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Hollas, J. M. (2004). Modern Spectroscopy. John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
Hüfner, S. (2013). Photoelectron Spectroscopy: Principles and Applications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media. Google Scholar
Janotti, A., Varley, J. B., Rinke, P., Umezawa, N., Kresse, G. & Van de Walle, C.
G. (2010). Phys. Rev. B, 81, 085212. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Jeanne-Rose, V., Poumellec, B. & Aïfa, Y. (1997). J. Phys. IV Fr. 7, C2-221–C2-222. Google Scholar
Joly, Y. (2001). Phys. Rev. B, 63, 125120. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Joly, Y., Bunău, O., Lorenzo, J. E., Galéra, R. M., Grenier, S. & Thompson, B. (2009).
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 190, 012007. CrossRef Google Scholar
Joly, Y., Cabaret, D., Renevier, H. & Natoli, C. R. (1999). Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2398–2401. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Kravtsova, A. N., Soldatov, A. V., Nachtegaal, M., Tew, M. W. & van Bokhoven, J. A.
(2010). Physica B, 405, 724–726. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Krüger, P., Sluban, M., Umek, P., Guttmann, P. & Bittencourt, C. (2017). J. Phys. Chem. C, 121, 17038–17042. Google Scholar
Le Fèvre, P., Magnan, H., Chandesris, D., Jupille, J., Bourgeois, S., Barbier, A.,
Drube, W., Uozumi, T. & Kotani, A. (2005). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 547, 176–186. Google Scholar
Le Mercier, T., Mariot, J. M., Parent, P., Fontaine, M. F., Hague, C. F. & Quarton,
M. (1995). Appl. Surf. Sci. 86, 382–386. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Linsebigler, A. L., Lu, G. & Yates, J. T. Jr (1995). Chem. Rev. 95, 735–758. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Liu, B. & Aydil, E. S. (2009). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 3985–3990. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Loupias, G., Rabii, S., Tarbès, J., NozièRes, S. & Tatar, R. C. (1990). Phys. Rev. B, 41, 5519–5523. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Luca, V. (2009). J. Phys. Chem. C, 113, 6367–6380. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Luca, V., Djajanti, S. & Howe, R. F. (1998). J. Phys. Chem. B, 102, 10650–10657. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Manzini, I., Antonioli, G., Bersani, D., Lottici, P. P., Gnappi, G. & Montenero, A.
(1995). J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 192–193, 519–523. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Miyoshi, A., Nishioka, S. & Maeda, K. (2018). Chem. Eur. J. 24, 18204–18219. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mo, S.. & Ching, W. Y. (1995). Phys. Rev. B, 51, 13023–13032. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Okamoto, H., Miyagoe, T., Kobayashi, K., Uemura, H., Nishioka, H., Matsuzaki, H.,
Sawa, A. & Tokura, Y. (2010). Phys. Rev. B, 82, 060513. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Okamoto, H., Miyagoe, T., Kobayashi, K., Uemura, H., Nishioka, H., Matsuzaki, H.,
Sawa, A. & Tokura, Y. (2011). Phys. Rev. B, 83, 125102. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Oyanagi, H., Oka, K., Unoki, H., Nishihara, Y., Murata, K., Matsushita, T., Tokumoto,
M. & Kimura, Y. (1989). Physica B, 158, 436–439. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Oyanagi, H., Tokumoto, M., Ishiguro, T., Shirakawa, H., Nemoto, H., Matsushita, T.
& Kuroda, H. (1987). Synth. Met. 17, 491–496. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Park, N. G., van de Lagemaat, J. & Frank, A. J. (2000). J. Phys. Chem. B, 104, 8989–8994. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Parlebas, J. C. (1993). Phys. Status Solidi B, 178, 9–35. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Parlebas, J. C., Khan, M. A., Uozumi, T., Okada, K. & Kotani, A. (1995). J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 71, 117–139. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Perdew, J. P. & Wang, Y. (1992). Phys. Rev. B, 45, 13244–13249. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Pettifer, R. F., Brouder, C., Benfatto, M., Natoli, C. R., Hermes, C. & Ruiz López,
M. F. (1990). Phys. Rev. B, 42, 37–42. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Pettifer, R. F., Collins, S. P. & Laundy, D. (2008). Nature, 454, 196–199. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Poumellec, B., Cortés, R. & Berthon, J. (1995). Physica B, 208–209, 81–83. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Poumellec, B., Cortes, R., Tourillon, G. & Berthon, J. (1991). Phys. Status Solidi B, 164, 319–326. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Rehr, J. J. & Albers, R. C. (2000). Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 621–654. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Rittmann-Frank, M. H., Milne, C. J., Rittmann, J., Reinhard, M., Penfold, T. J. &
Chergui, M. (2014). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 5858–5862. CAS Google Scholar
Rossi, T. C., Grolimund, D., Nachtegaal, M., Cannelli, O., Mancini, G. F., Bacellar,
C., Kinschel, D., Rouxel, J. R., Ohannessian, N., Pergolesi, D., Lippert, T. & Chergui,
M. (2019). Phys. Rev. B, 100, 245207. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Ruiz-Lopez, M. F. & Munoz-Paez, A. (1991). J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 3, 8981–8990. CAS Google Scholar
Shirley, E. L. (2004). J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 136, 77–83. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Stizza, S., Benfatto, M., Bianconi, A., García, J., Mancini, G. & Natoli, C. R. (1986).
J. Phys. Colloq. 47, C8-691–C8-696. Google Scholar
Szlachetko, J., Michalow-Mauke, K., Nachtegaal, M. & Sá, J. (2014). J. Chem. Sci. 126, 511–515. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Tang, H., Lévy, F., Berger, H. & Schmid, P. E. (1995). Phys. Rev. B, 52, 7771–7774. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Thakur, H., Kumar, R., Thakur, P., Brookes, N. B., Sharma, K. K., Pratap Singh, A.,
Kumar, Y., Gautam, S. & Chae, K. H. (2011). J. Appl. Phys. 110, 083718. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Thomas, A. G., Flavell, W. R., Mallick, A. K., Kumarasinghe, A. R., Tsoutsou, D.,
Khan, N., Chatwin, C., Rayner, S., Smith, G. C., Stockbauer, R. L., Warren, S., Johal,
T. K., Patel, S., Holland, D., Taleb, A. & Wiame, F. (2007). Phys. Rev. B, 75, 035105. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Tian, M., Mahjouri-Samani, M., Eres, G., Sachan, R., Yoon, M., Chisholm, M. F., Wang,
K., Puretzky, A. A., Rouleau, C. M., Geohegan, D. B. & Duscher, G. (2015). ACS Nano, 9, 10482–10488. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tolkiehn, M., Laurus, T. & Collins, S. P. (2011). Phys. Rev. B, 84, 241101. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Triana, C. A., Araujo, C. M., Ahuja, R., Niklasson, G. A. & Edvinsson, T. (2016).
Phys. Rev. B, 94, 165129. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Uozumi, T., Okada, K., Kotani, A., Durmeyer, O., Kappler, J. P., Beaurepaire, E. &
Parlebas, J. C. (1992). Europhys. Lett. 18, 85–90. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Vásquez, G. C., Karazhanov, S. Z., Maestre, D., Cremades, A., Piqueras, J. & Foss,
S. E. (2016). Phys. Rev. B, 94, 235209. Google Scholar
Vorwerk, C., Cocchi, C. & Draxl, C. (2017). Phys. Rev. B, 95, 155121. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Wu, Z. Y., Ouvrard, G., Gressier, P. & Natoli, C. R. (1997). Phys. Rev. B, 55, 10382–10391. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Wu, Z. Y., Zhang, J., Ibrahim, K., Xian, D. C., Li, G., Tao, Y., Hu, T. D., Bellucci,
S., Marcelli, A., Zhang, Q. H., Gao, L. & Chen, Z. Z. (2002). Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 2973–2975. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Yamamoto, T. (2008). X-ray Spectrom. 37, 572–584. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Zhang, H., Chen, B., Banfield, J. F. & Waychunas, G. A. (2008). Phys. Rev. B, 78, 214106. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.