Volume 32, Issue 18 pp. 9452-9474
SPECIAL ISSUE ARTICLE

Characterizing some improperly posed problems in proportional-derivative control

César-Fernando Méndez-Barrios

Corresponding Author

César-Fernando Méndez-Barrios

Faculty of Engineering, Autonomous University of San Luis Potosí (UASLP), San Luis Potosí, Mexico

Correspondence César-Fernando Méndez-Barrios, UASLP, San Luis Potosí, Mexico.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Silviu-Iulian Niculescu

Silviu-Iulian Niculescu

University Paris-Saclay, CNRS, CentraleSupélec, Inria, Laboratoire des Signaux et Systèmes (L2S, UMR CNRS 8506), Gif-sur-Yvette, France

Search for more papers by this author
Alejandro Martínez-González

Alejandro Martínez-González

Faculty of Engineering, Autonomous University of San Luis Potosí (UASLP), San Luis Potosí, Mexico

University Paris-Saclay, CNRS, CentraleSupélec, Inria, Laboratoire des Signaux et Systèmes (L2S, UMR CNRS 8506), Gif-sur-Yvette, France

Search for more papers by this author
Adrián Ramírez

Adrián Ramírez

Cátedras CONACYT-Division of Control and Dynamical Systems, IPICYT, San Luis Potosí, Mexico

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 31 July 2021
Citations: 6
Abbreviations: LTI, linear time-invariant; PD-control, proportional-derivative control; SISO, single-input, single-output.

Abstract

This article focuses on the root behavior of the characteristic function of some LTI SISO systems controlled by a PD-control when a delay-difference operator is used to approximate the derivative action. We will focus on the cases when the corresponding stability problem is improperly posed for “small” delay values. In this context, we will express the solutions of the corresponding characteristic function as power series and exploit their structure in deriving the asymptotic behavior of the characteristic roots. This analysis will allow detecting and explicitly characterizing the cases when delay-difference approximations lead to improperly posed stability problems. Furthermore, in the case when the derivative approximation guarantees the properly posedness of the closed-loop system, the robustness of the scheme with respect to the delay margin of the delay-difference approximation and control gains parameters are explicitly addressed. More precisely, upper bounds on the delays as well as the robustness of the corresponding controller are computed. Some illustrative examples complete the presentation.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no potential conflict of interests.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data are openly available in a public repository that issues datasets with DOIs

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.