Volume 216, Issue 17 1900220
Original Paper

Gettering Mechanism of Copper in n-Type Silicon Wafers

Rie Ozaki

Corresponding Author

Rie Ozaki

Technology Division, Advanced Evaluation and Technology Development Department, SUMCO Corporation, 1-52 Kubara, Yamashiro-cho, Imari, Saga, 849-4256 Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Kazuhisa Torigoe

Kazuhisa Torigoe

Technology Division, Advanced Evaluation and Technology Development Department, SUMCO Corporation, 1-52 Kubara, Yamashiro-cho, Imari, Saga, 849-4256 Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Taisuke Mizuno

Taisuke Mizuno

Technology Division, Advanced Evaluation and Technology Development Department, SUMCO Corporation, 1-52 Kubara, Yamashiro-cho, Imari, Saga, 849-4256 Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Kazuhiro Yamamoto

Kazuhiro Yamamoto

Technology Division, Advanced Evaluation and Technology Development Department, SUMCO Corporation, 1-52 Kubara, Yamashiro-cho, Imari, Saga, 849-4256 Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 June 2019
Citations: 1

Abstract

The dependence of the gettering efficiency for copper impurity in n-type silicon wafers on the concentration of a dopant such as phosphorus, arsenic, or antimony is investigated by chemical analysis of the copper concentration and the observation of copper precipitates. It is found that the gettering efficiency decreases gradually with increasing dopant concentration in the range of 1014–1019 cm−3 and increases rapidly at concentrations higher than 1019 cm−3. Copper precipitates are observed in the bulk of silicon wafers doped with phosphorus in the concentration range of 1014–1019 cm−3, suggesting that the relaxation gettering of copper occurs. In contrast, no copper precipitates are observed at concentrations above 1019 cm−3. It is suggested that segregation gettering occurs as a result of the pairing reaction between copper and heavily doped phosphorus. It is concluded that the gettering mechanism of copper in n-type silicon wafers changes from relaxation gettering to segregation gettering with increasing dopant concentration.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.