Binding mode analysis of a major T3SS translocator protein PopB with its chaperone PcrH from Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Anindyajit Banerjee
Division of Structural Biology and Bioinformatics, Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Kolkata, 700 032 West Bengal, India
Anindyajit Banerjee and Supratim Dey contributed equally to this work.
Search for more papers by this authorSupratim Dey
Division of Structural Biology and Bioinformatics, Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Kolkata, 700 032 West Bengal, India
Anindyajit Banerjee and Supratim Dey contributed equally to this work.
Search for more papers by this authorAbhijit Chakraborty
Division of Structural Biology and Bioinformatics, Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Kolkata, 700 032 West Bengal, India
Search for more papers by this authorAohona Datta
Division of Structural Biology and Bioinformatics, Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Kolkata, 700 032 West Bengal, India
Search for more papers by this authorAbhishek Basu
Division of Structural Biology and Bioinformatics, Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Kolkata, 700 032 West Bengal, India
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Saikat Chakrabarti
Division of Structural Biology and Bioinformatics, Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Kolkata, 700 032 West Bengal, India
Correspondence to: Saikat Chakrabarti, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research—Indian Institute of Chemical Biology Structural Biology and Bioinformatics Division, 4, Raja S.C. Mullick Road, Kolkata 700 032, West Bengal, India. E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected] or Saumen Datta, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research—Indian Institute of Chemical Biology Structural Biology and Bioinformatics Division, 4, Raja S.C. Mullick Road, Kolkata 700 032, West Bengal, India. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Saumen Datta
Division of Structural Biology and Bioinformatics, Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Kolkata, 700 032 West Bengal, India
Correspondence to: Saikat Chakrabarti, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research—Indian Institute of Chemical Biology Structural Biology and Bioinformatics Division, 4, Raja S.C. Mullick Road, Kolkata 700 032, West Bengal, India. E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected] or Saumen Datta, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research—Indian Institute of Chemical Biology Structural Biology and Bioinformatics Division, 4, Raja S.C. Mullick Road, Kolkata 700 032, West Bengal, India. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorAnindyajit Banerjee
Division of Structural Biology and Bioinformatics, Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Kolkata, 700 032 West Bengal, India
Anindyajit Banerjee and Supratim Dey contributed equally to this work.
Search for more papers by this authorSupratim Dey
Division of Structural Biology and Bioinformatics, Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Kolkata, 700 032 West Bengal, India
Anindyajit Banerjee and Supratim Dey contributed equally to this work.
Search for more papers by this authorAbhijit Chakraborty
Division of Structural Biology and Bioinformatics, Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Kolkata, 700 032 West Bengal, India
Search for more papers by this authorAohona Datta
Division of Structural Biology and Bioinformatics, Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Kolkata, 700 032 West Bengal, India
Search for more papers by this authorAbhishek Basu
Division of Structural Biology and Bioinformatics, Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Kolkata, 700 032 West Bengal, India
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Saikat Chakrabarti
Division of Structural Biology and Bioinformatics, Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Kolkata, 700 032 West Bengal, India
Correspondence to: Saikat Chakrabarti, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research—Indian Institute of Chemical Biology Structural Biology and Bioinformatics Division, 4, Raja S.C. Mullick Road, Kolkata 700 032, West Bengal, India. E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected] or Saumen Datta, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research—Indian Institute of Chemical Biology Structural Biology and Bioinformatics Division, 4, Raja S.C. Mullick Road, Kolkata 700 032, West Bengal, India. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Saumen Datta
Division of Structural Biology and Bioinformatics, Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Kolkata, 700 032 West Bengal, India
Correspondence to: Saikat Chakrabarti, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research—Indian Institute of Chemical Biology Structural Biology and Bioinformatics Division, 4, Raja S.C. Mullick Road, Kolkata 700 032, West Bengal, India. E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected] or Saumen Datta, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research—Indian Institute of Chemical Biology Structural Biology and Bioinformatics Division, 4, Raja S.C. Mullick Road, Kolkata 700 032, West Bengal, India. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorABSTRACT
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a Gram-negative pathogen uses a specialized set of Type III secretion system (T3SS) translocator proteins to establish virulence in the host cell. An understanding of the factors that govern translocation by the translocator protein–chaperone complex is thus of immense importance. In this work, experimental and computational techniques were used to probe into the structure of the major translocator protein PopB from P. aeruginosa and to identify the important regions involved in functioning of the translocator protein. This study reveals that the binding sites of the common chaperone PcrH, needed for maintenance of the translocator PopB within the bacterial cytoplasm, which are primarily localized within the N-terminal domain. However, disordered and flexible residues located both at the N- and C-terminal domains are also observed to be involved in association with the chaperone. This intrinsic disorderliness of the terminal domains is conserved for all the major T3SS translocator proteins and is functionally important to maintain the intrinsically disordered state of the translocators. Our experimental and computational analyses suggest that a “disorder-to-order” transition of PopB protein might take place upon PcrH binding. The long helical coiled-coil part of PopB protein perhaps helps in pore formation while the flexible apical region is involved in chaperone interaction. Thus, our computational model of translocator protein PopB and its binding analyses provide crucial functional insights into the T3SS translocation mechanism. Proteins 2014; 82:3273–3285. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Supporting Information
Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article.
Filename | Description |
---|---|
prot24666-sup-0001-suppinfo.docx2.7 MB |
Supplementary Information |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- 1Cornelis GR. The type III secretion injectisome. Nat Rev Microbiol 2006; 4: 811–825.
- 2Galan JE. Common themes in the design and function of bacterial effectors. Cell Host Microbe 2009; 5: 571–579.
- 3Marlovits TC, Stebbins CE. Type III secretion systems shape up as they ship out. Curr Opin Microbiol 2010; 13: 47–52.
- 4Wu W, Huang J, Duan B, Traficante DC, Hong H, Risech M, Lory S, Priebe GP. Th17-stimulating protein vaccines confer protection against Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012; 186: 420–427.
- 5Broz P, Mueller CA, Muller SA, Philippsen A, Sorg I, Engel A, Cornelis GR. Function and molecular architecture of the Yersinia injectisome tip complex. Mol Microbiol 2007; 65: 1311–1320.
- 6Goure J, Pastor A, Faudry E, Chabert J, Dessen A, Attree I. The V antigen of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is required for assembly of the functional PopB/PopD translocation pore in host cell membranes. Infect Immun 2004; 72: 4741–4750.
- 7Lee PC, Stopford CM, Svenson AG, Rietsch A. Control of effector export by the Pseudomonas aeruginosa type III secretion proteins PcrG and PcrV. Mol Microbiol 2010; 75: 924–941.
- 8Mueller CA, Broz P, Muller SA, Ringler P, Erne-Brand F, Sorg I, Kuhn M, Engel A, Cornelis GR. The V-antigen of Yersinia forms a distinct structure at the tip of injectisome needles. Science 2005; 310: 674–676.
- 9Picking WL, Nishioka H, Hearn PD, Baxter MA, Harrington AT, Blocker A, Picking WD. IpaD of Shigella flexneri is independently required for regulation of Ipa protein secretion and efficient insertion of IpaB and IpaC into host membranes. Infect Immun 2005; 73: 1432–1440.
- 10Johnson S, Roversi P, Espina M, Olive A, Deane JE, Birket S, Field T, Picking WD, Blocker AJ, Galyov EE, Picking WL, Lea SM. Self-chaperoning of the type III secretion system needle tip proteins IpaD and BipD. J Biol Chem 2007; 282: 4035–4044.
- 11Blocker A, Gounon P, Larquet E, Niebuhr K, Cabiaux V, Parsot C, Sansonetti P. The tripartite type III secretion of Shigella flexneri inserts IpaB and IpaC into host membranes. J Cell Biol 1999; 147: 683–693.
- 12Schoehn G, Di Guilmi AM, Lemaire D, Attree I, Weissenhorn W, Dessen A. Oligomerization of type III secretion proteins PopB and PopD precedes pore formation in Pseudomonas. EMBO J 2003; 22: 4957–4967.
- 13Hakansson S, Schesser K, Persson C, Galyov EE, Rosqvist R, Homble F, Wolf-Watz H. The YopB protein of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis is essential for the translocation of Yop effector proteins across the target cell plasma membrane and displays a contact-dependent membrane disrupting activity. EMBO J 1996; 15: 5812–5823.
- 14Parsot C, Menard R, Gounon P, Sansonetti PJ. Enhanced secretion through the Shigella flexneri Mxi-Spa translocon leads to assembly of extracellular proteins into macromolecular structures. Mol Microbiol 1995; 16: 291–300.
- 15Nordfelth R, Wolf-Watz H. YopB of Yersinia enterocolitica is essential for YopE translocation. Infect Immun 2001; 69: 3516–3518.
- 16Espina M, Olive AJ, Kenjale R, Moore DS, Ausar SF, Kaminski RW, Oaks EV, Middaugh CR, Picking WD, Picking WL. IpaD localizes to the tip of the type III secretion system needle of Shigella flexneri. Infect Immun 2006; 74: 4391–4400.
- 17Buttner CR, Sorg I, Cornelis GR, Heinz DW, Niemann HH. Structure of the Yersinia enterocolitica type III secretion translocator chaperone SycD. J Mol Biol 2008; 375: 997–1012.
- 18Lunelli M, Lokareddy RK, Zychlinsky A, Kolbe M. IpaB-IpgC interaction defines binding motif for type III secretion translocator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 9661–9666.
- 19Job V, Mattei PJ, Lemaire D, Attree I, Dessen A. Structural basis of chaperone recognition of type III secretion system minor translocator proteins. J Biol Chem 2010; 285: 23224–23232.
- 20D'Andrea LD, Regan L. TPR proteins: the versatile helix. Trends Biochem Sci 2003; 28: 655–662.
- 21Discola KF, Forster A, Boulay F, Simorre JP, Attree I, Dessen A, Job V. Membrane and chaperone recognition by the major translocator protein PopB of the type III secretion system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Biol Chem 2014; 289: 3591–3601.
- 22Galle M, Jin S, Bogaert P, Haegman M, Vandenabeele P, Beyaert R. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa type III secretion system has an exotoxin S/T/Y independent pathogenic role during acute lung infection. PLoS One 2012; 7(7): 1–8.
- 23Faudry E, Job V, Dessen A, Attree I, Forge V. Type III secretion system translocator has a molten globule conformation both in its free and chaperone-bound forms. FEBS J 2007; 274: 3601–3610.
- 24Hamada D, Kato T, Ikegami T, Suzuki KN, Hayashi M, Murooka Y, Honda T, Yanagihara I. EspB from enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli is a natively partially folded protein. FEBS J 2005; 272: 756–768.
- 25Dey S, Basu A, Datta S. Characterization of molten globule PopB in absence and presence of its chaperone PcrH. Protein J 2012; 31: 401–416.
- 26Pallen MJ, Dougan G, Frankel G. Coiled-coil domains in proteins secreted by type III secretion systems. Mol Microbiol 1997; 25: 423–425.
- 27Delahay RM, Frankel G. Coiled-coil proteins associated with type III secretion systems: a versatile domain revisited. Mol Microbiol 2002; 45: 905–916.
- 28Gazi AD, Charova SN, Panopoulos NJ, Kokkinidis M. Coiled-coils in type III secretion systems: structural flexibility, disorder and biological implications. Cell Microbiol 2009; 11: 719–729.
- 29Zhang Y. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 2008; 9: 1–8.
- 30Soding J, Biegert A, Lupas AN. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33 (Web Server issue): W244–W248.
- 31Kelley LA, Sternberg MJ. Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the Phyre server. Nat Protoc 2009; 4: 363–371.
- 32Eswar N, Eramian D, Webb B, Shen MY, Sali A. Protein structure modeling with MODELLER. Methods Mol Biol 2008; 426: 145–159.
- 33Laskowski AR, MacArthur WM, Moss SD, Thornton MJ. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J Appl Cryst 1993; 26: 283–291.
- 34Eisenberg D, Luthy R, Bowie JU. VERIFY3D: assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Methods Enzymol 1997; 277: 396–404.
- 35Schneidman-Duhovny D, Inbar Y, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. PatchDock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric docking. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33 (Web Server issue): W363–W367.
- 36Mashiach E, Schneidman-Duhovny D, Andrusier N, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. FireDock: a web server for fast interaction refinement in molecular docking. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36 (Web Server issue): W229–W232.
- 37Krissinel E, Henrick K. Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J Mol Biol 2007; 372: 774–797.
- 38Linding R, Jensen LJ, Diella F, Bork P, Gibson TJ, Russell RB. Protein disorder prediction: implications for structural proteomics. Structure 2003; 11: 1453–1459.
- 39Ishida T, Kinoshita K. PrDOS: prediction of disordered protein regions from amino acid sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35 (Web Server issue): W460–W464.
- 40Prilusky J, Felder CE, Zeev-Ben-Mordehai T, Rydberg EH, Man O, Beckmann JS, Silman I, Sussman JL. FoldIndex: a simple tool to predict whether a given protein sequence is intrinsically unfolded. Bioinformatics 2005; 21: 3435–3438.
- 41Yang ZR, Thomson R, McNeil P, Esnouf RM. RONN: the bio-basis function neural network technique applied to the detection of natively disordered regions in proteins. Bioinformatics 2005; 21: 3369–3376.
- 42Linding R, Russell RB, Neduva V, Gibson TJ. GlobPlot: exploring protein sequences for globularity and disorder. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31: 3701–3708.
- 43Ishida T, Kinoshita K. Prediction of disordered regions in proteins based on the meta approach. Bioinformatics 2008; 24: 1344–1348.
- 44Ward JJ, Sodhi JS, McGuffin LJ, Buxton BF, Jones DT. Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life. J Mol Biol 2004; 337: 635–645.
- 45Romero P, Obradovic Z, Li X, Garner EC, Brown CJ, Dunker AK. Sequence complexity of disordered protein. Proteins 2001; 42: 38–48.
- 46Hess B, Kutzner C, van der Spoel D, Lindahl E. GROMACS 4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J Chem Theory Comput 2008; 4: 435–447.
- 47Darian E, Gannett PM. Application of molecular dynamics simulations to spin-labeled oligonucleotides. J Biomol Struct Dyn 2005; 22: 579–593.
- 48Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 1983; 79: 926–935.
- 49Van Gunsteren WF, Berendsen HJC. A leap-frog algorithm for stochastic dynamics. Mol Simul 2007; 1: 173–185.
- 50Essmann U, Perera L, Berkowitz ML, Darden T, Lee H, Pedersen LG. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J Chem Phys 1995; 103: 8577–8593.
- 51Van der Spoel D, Van Maaren PJ. The origin of layer structure artifacts in simulations of liquid water. J Chem Theory Comput 2006; 2: 1–11.
- 52Parrinello M, Rahman A. Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: a new molecular dynamics method. J Appl Phys 1981; 52: 7182–7190.
- 53Christ CD, Mark AE, van Gunsteren WF. Basic ingredients of free energy calculations: a review. J Comput Chem 2010; 31: 1569–1582.
- 54Pohorille A, Jarzynski C, Chipot C. Good practices in free-energy calculations. J Phys Chem B 2010; 114: 10235–10253.
- 55Villa A, Mark AE. Calculation of the free energy of solvation for neutral analogs of amino acid side chains. J Comput Chem 2002; 23: 548–553.
- 56Grant BJ, Rodrigues AP, ElSawy KM, McCammon JA, Caves LS. Bio3d: an R package for the comparative analysis of protein structures. Bioinformatics 2006; 22: 2695–2696.
- 57Hinsen K, Petrescu A, Dellerue S, Bellissent-Funel M, Kneller G. Harmonicity in slow protein dynamics. Chem Phys 2000; 261: 25–37.
- 58Blocker A, Jouihri N, Larquet E, Gounon P, Ebel F, Parsot C, Sansonetti P, Allaoui A. Structure and composition of the Shigella flexneri “needle complex,” a part of its type III secreton. Mol Microbiol 2001; 39: 652–663.
- 59Cordes FS, Komoriya K, Larquet E, Yang S, Egelman EH, Blocker A, Lea SM. Helical structure of the needle of the type III secretion system of Shigella flexneri. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 17103–17107.
- 60Burkhard P, Stetefeld J, Strelkov SV. Coiled coils: a highly versatile protein folding motif. Trends Cell Biol 2001; 11: 82–88.
- 61Knodler LA, Ibarra JA, Perez-Rueda E, Yip CK, Steele-Mortimer O. Coiled-coil domains enhance the membrane association of Salmonella type III effectors. Cell Microbiol 2011; 13: 1497–1517.
- 62Ibuki T, Shimada M, Minamino T, Namba K, Imada K. Crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of FliJ, a cytoplasmic component of the flagellar type III protein-export apparatus from Salmonella sp. Acta Crystallogr Sect F 2009; 65 (Part 1): 47–50.
- 63Lorenzini E, Singer A, Singh B, Lam R, Skarina T, Chirgadze NY, Savchenko A, Gupta RS. Structure and protein-protein interaction studies on Chlamydia trachomatis protein CT670 (YscO Homolog). J Bacteriol 2010; 192(11): 2746–2756.
- 64Gazi AD, Bastaki M, Charova SN, Gkougkoulia EA, Kapellios EA, Panopoulos NJ, Kokkinidis M. Evidence for a coiled-coil interaction mode of disordered proteins from bacterial type III secretion systems. J Biol Chem 2008; 283: 34062–34068.
- 65Deane JE, Roversi P, Cordes FS, Johnson S, Kenjale R, Daniell S, Booy F, Picking WD, Picking WL, Blocker AJ, Lea SM. Molecular model of a type III secretion system needle: implications for host-cell sensing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103: 12529–12533.
- 66Zhang L, Wang Y, Picking WL, Picking WD, De Guzman RN. Solution structure of monomeric BsaL, the type III secretion needle protein of Burkholderia pseudomallei. J Mol Biol 2006; 359: 322–330.
- 67Wang Y, Ouellette AN, Egan CW, Rathinavelan T, Im W, De Guzman RN. Differences in the electrostatic surfaces of the type III secretion needle proteins PrgI, BsaL, and MxiH. J Mol Biol 2007; 371: 1304–1314.
- 68Derewenda U, Mateja A, Devedjiev Y, Routzahn KM, Evdokimov AG, Derewenda ZS, Waugh DS. The structure of Yersinia pestis V-antigen, an essential virulence factor and mediator of immunity against plague. Structure 2004; 12: 301–306.
- 69Erskine PT, Knight MJ, Ruaux A, Mikolajek H, Wong Fat Sang N, Withers J, Gill R, Wood SP, Wood M, Fox GC, Cooper JB. High resolution structure of BipD: an invasion protein associated with the type III secretion system of Burkholderia pseudomallei. J Mol Biol 2006; 363: 125–136.
- 70Yip CK, Finlay BB, Strynadka NC. Structural characterization of a type III secretion system filament protein in complex with its chaperone. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2005; 12: 75–81.
- 71Khandelwal P, Keliikuli K, Smith CL, Saper MA, Zuiderweg ER. Solution structure and phosphopeptide binding to the N-terminal domain of Yersinia YopH: comparison with a crystal structure. Biochemistry 2002; 41: 11425–11437.
- 72Stebbins CE, Galan JE. Modulation of host signaling by a bacterial mimic: structure of the Salmonella effector SptP bound to Rac1. Mol Cell 2000; 6: 1449–1460.
- 73Barta ML, Dickenson NE, Patil M, Keightley A, Wyckoff GJ, Picking WD, Picking WL, Geisbrecht BV. The structures of coiled-coil domains from type III secretion system translocators reveal homology to pore-forming toxins. J Mol Biol 2012; 417: 395–405.
- 74Tomalka AG, Stopford CM, Lee PC, Rietsch A. A translocator-specific export signal establishes the translocator-effector secretion hierarchy that is important for type III secretion system function. Mol Microbiol 2012; 86: 1464–1481.
- 75Kim BH, Kim HG, Kim JS, Jang JI, Park YK. Analysis of functional domains present in the N-terminus of the SipB protein. Microbiology 2007; 153 (Part 9): 2998–3008.
- 76Lokareddy RK, Lunelli M, Eilers B, Wolter V, Kolbe M. Combination of two separate binding domains defines stoichiometry between type III secretion system chaperone IpgC and translocator protein IpaB. J Biol Chem 2010; 285: 39965–39975.
- 77Schreiner M, Niemann HH. Crystal structure of the Yersinia enterocolitica type III secretion chaperone SycD in complex with a peptide of the minor translocatorYopD. BMC Struct Biol 2012; 12: 1–9.
- 78Adam PR, Patil MK, Dickenson NE, Choudhari S, Barta M, Geisbrecht BV, Picking WL, Picking WD. Binding affects the tertiary and quaternary structures of the Shigella translocator protein IpaB and its chaperone IpgC. Biochemistry 2012; 51: 4062–4071.
- 79Lilic M, Vujanac M, Stebbins CE. A common structural motif in the binding of virulence factors to bacterial secretion chaperones. Mol Cell 2006; 21: 653–664.
- 80Tucker SC, Galan JE. Complex function for SicA, a Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium type III secretion-associated chaperone. J Bacteriol 2000; 182: 2262–2268.
- 81Menard R, Sansonetti P, Parsot C, Vasselon T. Extracellular association and cytoplasmic partitioning of the IpaB and IpaCinvasins of S. flexneri. Cell 1994; 79: 515–525.
- 82Terry CM, Picking WL, Birket SE, Flentie K, Hoffman BM, Barker JR, Picking WD. The C-terminus of IpaC is required for effector activities related to Shigella invasion of host cells. Microb Pathog 2008; 45: 282–289.
- 83Akeda Y, Galan JE. Chaperone release and unfolding of substrates in type III secretion. Nature 2005; 437: 911–915.
- 84Buchko GW, Niemann G, Baker ES, Belov ME, Smith RD, Heffron F, Adkins JN, McDermott JE. A multi-pronged search for a common structural motif in the secretion signal of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium type III effector proteins. Mol Biosyst 2010; 6: 2448–2458.
- 85Amer AA, Ahlund MK, Broms JE, Forsberg A, Francis MS. Impact of the N-terminal secretor domain on YopD translocator function in Yersinia pseudotuberculosis type III secretion. J Bacteriol 2011; 193: 6683–6700.
- 86Broms JE, Francis MS, Forsberg A. Diminished LcrV secretion attenuates Yersinia pseudotuberculosis virulence. J Bacteriol 2007; 189: 8417–8429.
- 87Tan YW, Yu HB, Sivaraman J, Leung KY, Mok YK. Mapping of the chaperone AcrH binding regions of translocators AopB and AopD and characterization of oligomeric and metastable AcrH-AopB-AopD complexes in the type III secretion system of Aeromonas hydrophila. Protein Sci 2009; 18: 1724–1734.
- 88.Charova SN, Gazi AD, Kotzabasaki M, Sarris PF, Fadouloglou VE, Panopoulos NJ, Michael Kokkinidis M. Protein flexibility and coiled-coil propensity: new insights into type III and other bacterial secretion systems, Biochemistry, Prof. Deniz Ekinci (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-51-0076-8, InTech, DOI: 10.5772/32582.