Incorporating biochemical information and backbone flexibility in RosettaDock for CAPRI rounds 6–12
Sidhartha Chaudhury
Program in Molecular and Computational Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
Sidhartha Chaudhury and Aroop Sircar contributed equally to this work.
Search for more papers by this authorAroop Sircar
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
Sidhartha Chaudhury and Aroop Sircar contributed equally to this work.
Search for more papers by this authorArvind Sivasubramanian
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
Search for more papers by this authorMonica Berrondo
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jeffrey J. Gray
Program in Molecular and Computational Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21218===Search for more papers by this authorSidhartha Chaudhury
Program in Molecular and Computational Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
Sidhartha Chaudhury and Aroop Sircar contributed equally to this work.
Search for more papers by this authorAroop Sircar
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
Sidhartha Chaudhury and Aroop Sircar contributed equally to this work.
Search for more papers by this authorArvind Sivasubramanian
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
Search for more papers by this authorMonica Berrondo
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jeffrey J. Gray
Program in Molecular and Computational Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21218===Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
In CAPRI rounds 6–12, RosettaDock successfully predicted 2 of 5 unbound–unbound targets to medium accuracy. Improvement over the previous method was achieved with computational mutagenesis to select decoys that match the energetics of experimentally determined hot spots. In the case of Target 21, Orc1/Sir1, this resulted in a successful docking prediction where RosettaDock alone or with simple site constraints failed. Experimental information also helped limit the interacting region of TolB/Pal, producing a successful prediction of Target 26. In addition, we docked multiple loop conformations for Target 20, and we developed a novel flexible docking algorithm to simultaneously optimize backbone conformation and rigid-body orientation to generate a wide diversity of conformations for Target 24. Continued challenges included docking of homology targets that differ substantially from their template (sequence identity <50%) and accounting for large conformational changes upon binding. Despite a larger number of unbound–unbound and homology model binding targets, Rounds 6–12 reinforced that RosettaDock is a powerful algorithm for predicting bound complex structures, especially when combined with experimental data Proteins 2007. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
REFERENCES
- 1 Gray JJ. High-resolution protein-protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006; 16: 183–193.
- 2 Janin J,Henrick K,Moult J,Eyck LT,Sternberg MJ,Vajda S,Vakser I,Wodak SJ. CAPRI: a critical assessment of predicted interactions. Proteins 2003; 52: 2–9.
- 3 Gray JJ,Moughon SE,Kortemme T,Schueler-Furman O,Misura KM,Morozov AV,Baker D. Protein–protein docking predictions for the CAPRI experiment. Proteins 2003; 52: 118–122.
- 4 Daily MD,Masica D,Sivasubramanian A,Somarouthu S,Gray JJ. CAPRI rounds 3–5 reveal promising successes and future challenges for RosettaDock. Proteins 2005; 60: 181–186.
- 5 Gray JJ,Moughon S,Wang C,Schueler-Furman O,Kuhlman B,Rohl CA,Baker D. Protein–protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. J Mol Biol 2003; 331: 281–299.
- 6 Zhang C,Liu S,Zhou Y. Docking prediction using biological information, ZDOCK sampling technique, and clustering guided by the DFIRE statistical energy function. Proteins 2005; 60: 314–318.
- 7 Ma XH,Li CH,Shen LZ,Gong XQ,Chen WZ,Wang CX. Biologically enhanced sampling geometric docking and backbone flexibility treatment with multiconformational superposition. Proteins 2005; 60: 319–323.
- 8 van Dijk AD,de Vries SJ,Dominguez C,Chen H,Zhou HX,Bonvin AM. Data-driven docking: HADDOCK's adventures in CAPRI. Proteins 2005; 60: 232–238.
- 9 Sivasubramanian A,Chao G,Pressler HM,Wittrup KD,Gray JJ. Structural model of the mAb 806-EGFR complex using computational docking followed by computational and experimental mutagenesis. Structure 2006; 14: 401–414.
- 10 Structural Genomics Consortium. http://wwwsgc.utoronto.ca/
- 11 Méndez R,Leplae R,De Maria L,Wodak SJ. Assessment of blind predictions of protein–protein interactions: current status of docking methods. Proteins 2003; 52: 51–67.
- 12 Wang C,Schueler-Furman O,Baker D. Improved side-chain modeling for protein–protein docking. Protein Sci 2005; 14: 1328–1339.
- 13 Kim DE,Chivian D,Baker D. Protein structure prediction and analysis using the Robetta server. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32: W526–W531.
- 14 Bose ME,McConnell KH,Gardner-Aukema KA,Muller U,Weinreich M,Keck JL,Fox CA. The origin recognition complex and Sir4 protein recruit Sir1p to yeast silent chromatin through independent interactions requiring a common Sir1p domain. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24: 774–786.
- 15 Berman HM,Westbrook J,Feng Z,Gilliland G,Bhat TN,Weissig H,Shindyalov IN,Bourne PE. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28: 235–242.
- 16 Zhang Z,Hayashi MK,Merkel O,Stillman B,Xu RM. Structure and function of the BAH-containing domain of Orc1p in epigenetic silencing. Embo J 2002; 21: 4600–4611.
- 17 Hou Z,Bernstein DA,Fox CA,Keck JL. Structural basis of the Sir1-origin recognition complex interaction in transcriptional silencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 8489–8494.
- 18 Kortemme T,Baker D. A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein–protein complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 14116–14121.
- 19
Kortemme T,Kim DE,Baker D.
Computational alanine scanning of protein–protein interfaces.
Sci STKE
2004; 2004:
l2.
10.1126/stke.2192004pl2 Google Scholar
- 20 Bonsor DA,Grishkovskaya I,Dodson EJ,Kleanthous C. Molecular mimicry enables competitive recruitment by a natively disordered protein. J Am Chem Soc 2007; 129: 4800–4807.
- 21 Wang C,Schueler-Furman O,Andrea I,London N,Fleishman S,Bradley P,Qian B,Baker D. RosettaDock in CAPRI rounds 6–12. Proteins, in press.
- 22 Heurgue-Hamard V,Champ S,Engstrom A,Ehrenberg M,Buckingham RH. The hemK gene in Escherichia coli encodes the N(5)-glutamine methyltransferase that modifies peptide release factors. Embo J 2002; 21: 769–778.
- 23 Rohl CA,Strauss CE,Chivian D,Baker D. Modeling structurally variable regions in homologous proteins with rosetta. Proteins 2004; 55: 656–677.
- 24 Vestergaard B,Van LB,Andersen GR,Nyborg J,Buckingham RH,Kjeldgaard M. Bacterial polypeptide release factor RF2 is structurally distinct from eukaryotic eRF1. Mol Cell 2001; 8: 1375–1382.
- 25 Schubert HL,Phillips JD,Hill CP. Structures along the catalytic pathway of PrmC/HemK, an N5-glutamine AdoMet-dependent methyltransferase. Biochemistry 2003; 42: 5592–5599.
- 26 Graille M,Heurgue-Hamard V,Champ S,Mora L,Scrima N,Ulryck N,van Tilbeurgh H,Buckingham RH. Molecular basis for bacterial class I release factor methylation by PrmC. Mol Cell 2005; 20: 917–927.
- 27 Hyvonen M,Macias MJ,Nilges M,Oschkinat H,Saraste M,Wilmanns M. Structure of the binding site for inositol phosphates in a PH domain. Embo J 1995; 14: 4676–4685.
- 28 Shiba T,Kawasaki M,Takatsu H,Nogi T,Matsugaki N,Igarashi N,Suzuki M,Kato R,Nakayama K,Wakatsuki S. Molecular mechanism of membrane recruitment of GGA by ARF in lysosomal protein transport. Nat Struct Biol 2003; 10: 386–393.
- 29 Bradley P,Baker D. Improved beta-protein structure prediction by multilevel optimization of nonlocal strand pairings and local backbone conformation. Proteins 2006; 65: 922–929.
- 30 Simons KT,Kooperberg C,Huang E,Baker D. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J Mol Biol 1997; 268: 209–225.
- 31 Canutescu AA,Dunbrack RLJr. Cyclic coordinate descent: a robotics algorithm for protein loop closure. Protein Sci 2003; 12: 963–972.
- 32 Goldberg J. Structural basis for activation of ARF GTPase: mechanisms of guanine nucleotide exchange and GTP-myristoyl switching. Cell 1998; 95: 237–248.
- 33 Dubois T,Paleotti O,Mironov AA,Fraisier V,Stradal TE,De Matteis MA,Franco M,Chavrier P. Golgi-localized GAP for Cdc42 functions downstream of ARF1 to control Arp2/3 complex and F-actin dynamics. Nat Cell Biol 2005; 7: 353–364.
- 34 Grunberg R,Leckner J,Nilges M. Complementarity of structure ensembles in protein–protein binding. Structure 2004; 12: 2125–2136.
- 35 Betts MJ,Sternberg MJ. An analysis of conformational changes on protein–protein association: implications for predictive docking. Protein Eng 1999; 12(4): 271–283.
- 36 Daily MD,Gray JJ. Local motions in a benchmark of allosteric proteins. Proteins 2007; 67: 385–399.
- 37 Ray MC,Germon P,Vianney A,Portalier R,Lazzaroni JC. Identification by genetic suppression of Escherichia coli TolB residues important for TolB-Pal interaction. J Bacteriol 2000; 182: 821–824.
- 38 Abergel C,Bouveret E,Claverie JM,Brown K,Rigal A,Lazdunski C,Benedetti H. Structure of the Escherichia coli TolB protein determined by MAD methods at 1.95 A resolution. Structure 1999; 7: 1291–1300.
- 39 Abergel C,Walburger A,Bouveret E,Claverie JM. MAD structure of a periplasmic domain in E. Coli Pal protein, to be published.
- 40 Menetrey J,Perderiset M,Cicolari J,Dubois T,El Khatib N,El Khadali F,Franco M,Chavrier P,Houdusse A. Structural basis of Arhgap21-mediated cross-talk between Arf and Rho signalling pathways, to be published.
- 41 Tong H,Hateboer G,Perrakis A,Bernards R,Sixma TK. Crystal structure of murine/human Ubc9 provides insight into the variability of the ubiquitin-conjugating system. J Biol Chem 1997; 272: 21381–21387.
- 42 Choe J,Avvakumov G,Newman E,Mackenzie F,Kozieradzki I,Bochkarev A,Sundstrom M,Arrowsmith C,Edwards A,Dhe-paganon S, (SGC) SGC. Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2–25 kDa (Huntingtin interacting protein 2, to be published.
- 43 Pichler A,Knipscheer P,Oberhofer E,van Dijk WJ,Korner R,Olsen JV,Jentsch S,Melchior F,Sixma TK. SUMO modification of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2–25K. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2005; 12: 264–269.
- 44 Lin D,Tatham MH,Yu B,Kim S,Hay RT,Chen Y. Identification of a substrate recognition site on Ubc9. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 21740–21748.
- 45 Walker J,Avvakumov G,Xue S,Newman E,Mackenzie F,Weigelt J,Sundstrom M,Arrowsmith C,Edwards A,Bochkarev A,Dhe-paganon S,SGC SGC. A novel and unexpected complex between SUMO-1-conjugationg enzyme ubc9 and the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2–25kDa, to be published.
- 46 Liang S,Liu S,Zhang C,Zhou Y. A simple reference state makes a significant improvement in near-native selections from structurally refined docking decoys. Proteins 2007; 69: 244–253.
- 47 Verdecia MA,Joazeiro CA,Wells NJ,Ferrer JL,Bowman ME,Hunter T,Noel JP. Conformational flexibility underlies ubiquitin ligation mediated by the WWP1 HECT domain E3 ligase. Mol Cell 2003; 11: 249–259.
- 48 Ogunjimi AA,Briant DJ,Pece-Barbara N,Le Roy C,Di Guglielmo GM,Kavsak P,Rasmussen RK,Seet BT,Sicheri F,Wrana JL. Regulation of Smurf2 ubiquitin ligase activity by anchoring the E2 to the HECT domain. Mol Cell 2005; 19: 297–308.
- 49 Schueler-Furman O,Wang C,Baker D. Progress in protein–protein docking: atomic resolution predictions in the CAPRI experiment using RosettaDock with an improved treatment of side-chain flexibility. Proteins 2005; 60: 187–194.
- 50 Huang L,Kinnucan E,Wang G,Beaudenon S,Howley PM,Huibregtse JM,Pavletich NP. Structure of an E6AP-UbcH7 complex: insights into ubiquitination by the E2-E3 enzyme cascade. Science 1999; 286: 1321–1326.
- 51 Walker J,Avvakumov G,Xue S,Butler-Cole C,Weigelt J,Sundstrom M,Arrowsmith C,Edwards A,Bochkarev A,Dhe-paganon S. NEDD4-like E3 Ubiquitin-protein Ligase, to be published.