Accurate and efficient description of protein vibrational dynamics: Comparing molecular dynamics and Gaussian models
Corresponding Author
Cristian Micheletti
International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA) and INFM, Trieste, Italy
Abdus Salam International Center for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy
International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA/ISAS), Via Beirut 2-4, I-34014 Trieste, Italy===Search for more papers by this authorPaolo Carloni
International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA) and INFM, Trieste, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorAmos Maritan
International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA) and INFM, Trieste, Italy
Abdus Salam International Center for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy
Dip. di Fisica “Gi Galilei”, Padua, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Cristian Micheletti
International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA) and INFM, Trieste, Italy
Abdus Salam International Center for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy
International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA/ISAS), Via Beirut 2-4, I-34014 Trieste, Italy===Search for more papers by this authorPaolo Carloni
International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA) and INFM, Trieste, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorAmos Maritan
International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA) and INFM, Trieste, Italy
Abdus Salam International Center for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy
Dip. di Fisica “Gi Galilei”, Padua, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Current all-atom potential based molecular dynamics (MD) allows the identification of a protein's functional motions on a wide-range of timescales, up to few tens of nanoseconds. However, functional, large-scale motions of proteins may occur on a timescale currently not accessible by all-atom potential based MD. To avoid the massive computational effort required by this approach, several simplified schemes have been introduced. One of the most satisfactory is the Gaussian network approach based on the energy expansion in terms of the deviation of the protein backbone from its native configuration. Here, we consider an extension of this model that captures in a more realistic way the distribution of native interactions due to the introduction of effective side-chain centroids. Since their location is entirely determined by the protein backbone, the model is amenable to the same exact and computationally efficient treatment as previous simpler models. The ability of the model to describe the correlated motion of protein residues in thermodynamic equilibrium is established through a series of successful comparisons with an extensive (14 ns) MD simulation based on the AMBER potential of HIV-1 protease in complex with a peptide substrate. Thus, the model presented here emerges as a powerful tool to provide preliminary, fast yet accurate characterizations of protein near-native motion. Proteins 2004. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
REFERENCES
- 1 Karplus M. Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules. Acc Chem Res 2002; 35: 321–323.
- 2 Lipari G, Szabo A. Model free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in macromolecules: 1. Theory and range of validity. J Am Chem Soc 1982; 104: 4546–4559.
- 3 Lipari G, Szabo A. Model free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in macromolecules: 2. Analysis of experimental results. J Am Chem Soc 1982; 104: 4559–4570.
- 4
Brooks CL,
Karplus M,
Pettitt BM.
Proteins: a theoretical perspective of dynamics, structure, and thermodynamics.
New York:
Wiley;
1988.
10.1002/9780470141205 Google Scholar
- 5 Noguti T, Go N. Collective variable description of small-amplitude conformational fluctuations in a globular protein. Nature 1982; 296: 776–778.
- 6 Hess B. Convergence of sampling in protein simulations. Phys Rev E 2002; 65: 031910.
- 7 Tirion MM. Large amplitude elastic motions in proteins from a single-parameter, atomic analysis. Phys Rev Lett 1996; 77: 1905–1908.
- 8 Bahar I, Atilgan AR, Erman B. Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single parameter harmonic potential. Fold Des 1997; 2: 173–181.
- 9
Doruker P,
Atilgan A,
Bahar I.
Dynamics of proteins predicted by molecular dynamics simulations and analytical approaches: application to alpha-amylase inhibitor.
Proteins
2000;
40:
512–524.
10.1002/1097-0134(20000815)40:3<512::AID-PROT180>3.0.CO;2-M CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 10 Atilgan AR, Durell SR, Jernigan RL, Demirel MC, Keskin O, Bahar I. Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. Biophys J 2001; 80: 505–515.
- 11 Piana S, Carloni P, Parrinello M. Role of conformational fluctuations in the enzymatic reaction of hiv-1 protease. J Mol Biol 2002; 319: 567–583.
- 12 Piana S, Carloni P, Rothlisberger U. Drug resistance in hiv-1 protease: flexibility-assisted mechanism of compensatory mutations. Protein Sci 2002; 11: 2393–2402.
- 13 Condra JH, Schleif WA, Blahy OM, Gabryelski LJ, Graham DJ, Quintero JC, Rhodes A, Robbins HL, Roth E, Shivaprakash M, Titus D, Yang T, Teppler H, Squires KE, Deutsch PJ. In-vivo emergence of hiv-1 variants resistant to multiple protease inhibitors. Nature 1995; 374: 569–571.
- 14 Patrick AK, Mo H, Markowitz M, Appelt K, Wu B, Musick L, Kalish V, Kaldor S, Reich S, Ho D, Webber S. Antiviral and resistance studies of AG1343, an orally bioavailable inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus protease. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1996; 40: 292–297.
- 15 Piana S, Carloni P, Rothlisberger U. Reaction mechanism of hiv-1 protease by hybrid car-Parrinell MD/classical MD simulations, 2003. In press.
- 16 Settanni G, Cattanea A, Carloni P. Molecular dynamics simulations of the ngf-trka domain 5 comples and comparison with biological data. Biophys J 2003; 84: 2282–2292.
- 17 Horiuchi T, Go N. Projection of Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics trajectories onto the normal mode axes: human lysozyme. Proteins 1991; 10: 106–116.
- 18 Frauenfelder H, Sligar SG, and Wolynes PG. The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. Science 1991; 254: 1598–1603.
- 19 Park B, Levitt M. Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near-native folds from well-constructed decoys. Proteins 1996; 258: 367–392.
- 20 Levitt M, Sander C, Stern PS. Protein normal-mode dynamics: trypsin inhibitor, crambin, ribonuclease and lysozyme. J Mol Biol 1985; 181: 423–447.
- 21 Brooks B, Karplus M. Normal modes for specific motions of macromolecules: application to the hinge-bending mode of lysozyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1985; 82: 4995–4999.
- 22 Case DA. Normal mode analysis of protein dynamics. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1994; 4: 285–290.
- 23
Hinsen K.
Analysis of domain motions by approximate normal mode calculations.
Proteins
1998;
33:
417–429.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19981115)33:3<417::AID-PROT10>3.0.CO;2-8 CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 24 Tirion MM, ben Avraham D. Normal mode analysis of g-actin. J Mol Biol 1993; 230: 186–195.
- 25 Bahar I, Erman B, Jernigan RL, Atilgan AR, Covell DG. Collective motions in hiv-1 reverse transcriptase: Examination of flexibility and enzyme function. J Mol Biol 1999; 285: 1023–1037.
- 26
Haliloglu T,
Bahar I.
Structure based analysis of protein dynamics: comparison of theoretical results for hen lysozyme with X-ray diffraction and NMR relaxation data.
Proteins
1999;
37:
654–667.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19991201)37:4<654::AID-PROT15>3.0.CO;2-J CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 27 Goldstein H. Classical mechanics. 2nd ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1980.
- 28 McCammon JA, Gelin BR, Karplus M, Wolynes PG. The hinge-bending mode in lysozyme. Nature 1976; 262: 325–326.
- 29 Swaminathan S, Ichiye T, van Gusteren W, Karplus M. Time dependence of atomic fluctuations in proteins: analysis of local and collective motions in bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. Biochemistry 1982; 21: 5230–5241.
- 30 Howard J. Mechanics of motor proteins and the cytoskeleton. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates; 2001.
- 31
Chandrasekhar S.
Stochastic problems in physics and astronomy.
Rev Mod Phys
1943;
15:
1–89.
10.1103/RevModPhys.15.1 Google Scholar
- 32 Micheletti C, Lattanzi G, Maritan A. Elastic properties of proteins: insight on the folding process and evolutionary selection of native structures. J Mol Biol 2002; 321: 909–921.
- 33 Doruker P, Jernigan R, Bahar I. Dynamics of large proteins through hierarchical levels of coarse-grained structures. J Comput Chem 2002; 23: 119–127.
- 34 Doruker P, Jernigan R, Navizer I, Hernandez R. Important fluctuation dynamics of large protein structures are preserved upon renormalization. Int J Quantum Chem 2002; 90: 822–837.
- 35 Hobohm U, Sander C. Enlarged representative set of protein structures. Protein Sci 1994; 3: 522–524.
- 36 Halle B. Flexibility and packing in proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 1274–1279.
- 37 Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP. Numerical recipes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
- 38
Micheletti C,
Seno F,
Banavar JR,
Maritan A.
Learning effective amino acid interactions through iterative stochastic techniques.
Proteins
2001;
42:
422–431.
10.1002/1097-0134(20010215)42:3<422::AID-PROT120>3.0.CO;2-2 CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 39 Amadei A, Linssen ABM, Berendsen HJC. Essential dynamics of proteins. Proteins 1993; 17: 412–425.
- 40 Garcia A. Large-amplitude nonlinear motions in proteins. Phys Rev Lett 1992; 68: 2696–2699.
- 41 Rod TH, Radkiewicz JL, Brooks CL. Correlated motion and the effect of distal mutations in dihydrofolate reductase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 3954–3959.
- 42 Ala PJ, Huston EE, Klabe RM, Jadhav PK, Lam PYS, Chang CH. Counteracting HIV-1 protease drug resistance: structural analysis of mutant proteases complexed with XV638 and SD146, cyclic urea amides with broad specificities. Biochemistry 1998; 37: 15042–15049.
- 43 Gulnik S, Erickson JW, Xie D. Vitamins and hormones—advances in research and applications. Vitam Horm 2000; 58: 213–256.
- 44 Wlodawer A, Erickson JW. Structure-based inhibitors of HIV-1 protease. Annu Rev Biochem 1993; 62: 543–585, and references therein.
- 45 Reddy P, Ross J. Amprenavir—a protease inhibitor for the treatment of patients with HIV-1 infection. Formulary 1999; 34: 567–675.
- 46 Brown AJL, Korber BT, Condra JH. Associations between amino acids in the evolution of HIV type 1 protease sequences under indinavir therapy. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 1999; 15: 247–253.
- 47 Boucher C. Rational approaches to resistance: using saquinavir. AIDS 1996; 10: S15–S19.
- 48 Molla A, Korneyeva M, Gao Q, Vasavanonda S, Schipper PJ, Mo HM, Markowitz M, Chernyavskiy T, Niu P, Lyons N, Hsu A, Granneman GR, Ho DD, Boucher CAB, Leonard JM, Norbeck DW, Kempf DJ. Ordered accumulation of mutations in HIV protease confers resistance to ritonavir. Nat Med 1996; 2: 760–766.
- 49 Markowitz M, Mo HM, Kempf DJ, Norbeck DW, Bhat TN, Erickson JW, Ho DD. Selection and analysis of human-immunodeficiency-virus type-i variants with increased resistance to abt-538, a novel protease inhibitor. J Virol 1995; 69: 701–706.
- 50
Amadei A,
Ceruso MA,
Nola AD.
On the convergence of the conformational coordinates basis set obtained by the essential dynamics analysis of proteins' molecular dynamics simulations.
Proteins
1999;
36:
419–424.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19990901)36:4<419::AID-PROT5>3.0.CO;2-U CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 51 Jacobs D, Rader A, Kuhn L, Thorpe M. Protein flexibility predictions using graph theory. Proteins 2001; 44: 150–165.
- 52 Bahar I, Atilgan AR, Demirel MC, Erman B. Vibrational dynamics of folded proteins: significance of slow and fast motions in relation to function and stability. Phys Rev Lett 1998; 80: 2733–2736.
- 53 Kurt N, Scott W, Schiffer C, Haliloglu T. Cooperative fluctuations of unliganded and substrate-bound hiv-1 protease: a structure-based analysis on a variety of conformations from crystallography and molecular dynamics simulations. Proteins 2003; 51: 409–422.
- 54tk;4 Micheletti C, Cecconi F, Flammini A, Maritan A. Crucial stages of protein folding through a solvable model: predicting target sites for enzyme-inhibiting drugs. Protein Sci 2002; 11: 1878–1887.
- 55 Micheletti C, Banavar J, Maritan A. Conformations of proteins in equilibrium. Phys Rev Lett 2001; 87: DOI:088102-1.