Electrospun core–sheath fibers for integrating the biocompatibility of silk fibroin and the mechanical properties of PLCL
Guiyang Liu
National Engineering Laboratory for Modern Silk, College of Textile and Clothing Engineering, Soochow University, No. 199 Ren'ai Road, Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215123 China
Department of Textile, Nantong Textile Vocational Technology College, No. 105 Qingnian Road, Nantong, 226007 China
Search for more papers by this authorQiang Tang
National Engineering Laboratory for Modern Silk, College of Textile and Clothing Engineering, Soochow University, No. 199 Ren'ai Road, Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215123 China
Search for more papers by this authorYanni Yu
National Engineering Laboratory for Modern Silk, College of Textile and Clothing Engineering, Soochow University, No. 199 Ren'ai Road, Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215123 China
Search for more papers by this authorJing Li
National Engineering Laboratory for Modern Silk, College of Textile and Clothing Engineering, Soochow University, No. 199 Ren'ai Road, Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215123 China
Search for more papers by this authorJingwan Luo
National Engineering Laboratory for Modern Silk, College of Textile and Clothing Engineering, Soochow University, No. 199 Ren'ai Road, Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215123 China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Mingzhong Li
National Engineering Laboratory for Modern Silk, College of Textile and Clothing Engineering, Soochow University, No. 199 Ren'ai Road, Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215123 China
Correspondence to: Mingzhong Li, National Engineering Laboratory for Modern Silk, College of Textile and Clothing Engineering, Soochow University, No. 199 Ren'ai Road, Industrial Park, Suzhou 215123, China.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorGuiyang Liu
National Engineering Laboratory for Modern Silk, College of Textile and Clothing Engineering, Soochow University, No. 199 Ren'ai Road, Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215123 China
Department of Textile, Nantong Textile Vocational Technology College, No. 105 Qingnian Road, Nantong, 226007 China
Search for more papers by this authorQiang Tang
National Engineering Laboratory for Modern Silk, College of Textile and Clothing Engineering, Soochow University, No. 199 Ren'ai Road, Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215123 China
Search for more papers by this authorYanni Yu
National Engineering Laboratory for Modern Silk, College of Textile and Clothing Engineering, Soochow University, No. 199 Ren'ai Road, Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215123 China
Search for more papers by this authorJing Li
National Engineering Laboratory for Modern Silk, College of Textile and Clothing Engineering, Soochow University, No. 199 Ren'ai Road, Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215123 China
Search for more papers by this authorJingwan Luo
National Engineering Laboratory for Modern Silk, College of Textile and Clothing Engineering, Soochow University, No. 199 Ren'ai Road, Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215123 China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Mingzhong Li
National Engineering Laboratory for Modern Silk, College of Textile and Clothing Engineering, Soochow University, No. 199 Ren'ai Road, Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215123 China
Correspondence to: Mingzhong Li, National Engineering Laboratory for Modern Silk, College of Textile and Clothing Engineering, Soochow University, No. 199 Ren'ai Road, Industrial Park, Suzhou 215123, China.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
In the process of preparing core–sheath fibers via coaxial electrospinning, the relative evaporation rates of core and sheath solvents play a key role in the formation of the core–sheath structure of the fiber. Both silk fibroin (SF) and poly(lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) (PLCL) have good biocompatibility and biodegradability. SF has better cell affinity than PLCL, whereas PLCL has higher breaking strength and elongation than SF. In this work, hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP)-formic acid (volume ratio 8:2), HFIP and HFIP–dichloromethane (volume ratio 8:2) were used to dissolve PLCL as the core solutions, and HFIP was used to dissolve SF as the sheath solution. Then, core–sheath structured SF/PLCL (C-SF/PLCL) fibers were prepared by coaxial electrospinning with the core and sheath solutions. Transmission electron microscopy images indicated the existence of the core–shell structure of the fibers, and energy dispersive X-ray analysis results revealed that the fiber mat with the greatest content of core–shell structure fibers was obtained when the core solvent was HFIP–dichloromethane (volume ratio 8:2). Tensile tests showed that the C-SF/PLCL fiber mat displayed improved tensile properties, with strength and elongation that were significantly higher than those of the pure SF mat. The C-SF/PLCL fiber mat was further investigated as a scaffold for culturing EA.hy926 cells, and the results showed that the fiber mat permitted cellular adhesion, proliferation and spreading in a manner similar to that of the pure SF fiber mat. These results indicated that the coaxial electrospun SF/PLCL fiber mat could be considered a promising candidate for tissue engineering scaffolds for blood vessels. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
REFERENCES
- 1 P. W. Madden, J. N. Lai, K. A. George, T. Giovenco, D. G. Harkin, T. V. Chirila, Biomaterials 2011, 32(17), 4076–4084.
- 2 Y. Wang, E. Bella, C. S. Lee, C. Migliaresi, L. Pelcastre, Z. Schwartz, B. D. Boyan, A. Motta, Biomaterials 2010, 31(17), 4672–4681.
- 3 M. Li, S. Lu, Z. Wu, H. Yan, J. Mo, L. Wang, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001, 79(12), 2185–2191.
- 4 X. Hu, Q. Lu, L. Sun, P. Cebe, X. Wang, X. Zhang, D. L. Kaplan, Biomacromolecules 2010, 11(11), 3178–3188.
- 5 M. Li, S. Lu, Z. Wu, K. Tan, N. Minoura, S. Kuga, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2002, 30(2), 89–94.
- 6 Y. Shen, Y. Qian, H. Zhang, B. Zuo, Z. Lu, Z. Fan, P. Zhang, F. Zhang, C. Zhou, Cell Transplant 2010, 19(2), 147–157.
- 7 A. Alessandrino, B. Marelli, C. Arosio, S. Fare, M. Tanzi, G. Freddi, Eng. Life Sci. 2008, 8(3), 219–225.
- 8 Y. Zhang, W. Fan, Z. Ma, C. Wu, W. Fang, G. Liu, Y. Xiao, Acta Biomater. 2010, 6(8), 3021–3028.
- 9 S. Talukdar, M. Mandal, D. W. Hutmacher, P. J. Russell, C. Soekmadji, S. C. Kundu, Biomaterials 2011, 32(8), 2149–2159.
- 10 K. Numata, D. L. Kaplan, Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2010, 62(15), 1497–1508.
- 11 X. Zhang, C. B. Baughman, D. L. Kaplan, Biomaterials 2008, 29(14), 2217–2227.
- 12 Y. Wang, D. D. Rudym, A. Walsh, L. Abrahamsen, H. J. Kim, H. S. Kim, C. Kirker-Head, D. L. Kaplan, Biomaterials 2008, 29(24), 3415–3428.
- 13 J. Zhou, C. Cao, X. Ma, L. Hu, L. Chen, C. Wang, Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2010, 95(9), 1679–1685.
- 14 B. M. Min, G. Lee, S. H. Kim, Y. S. Nam, T. S. Lee, W. H. Park, Biomaterials 2004, 25(7), 1289–1297.
- 15 S. Srouji, T. Kizhner, E. Suss-Tobi, E. Livne, E. Zussman, J. Mate, Sci-Mater. M. 2008, 19(3), 1249–1255.
- 16 V. Leung, F. Ko, Polym. Advan. Technol. 2011, 22(3), 350–365.
- 17 H. Cao, K. Mchugh, S. Y. Chew, J. M. Anderson, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2010, 93(3), 1151–1159.
- 18 X. Zhang, V. Thomas, Y. Xu, S. L. Bellis, Y. K. Vohra, Biomaterials 2010, 31(15), 4376–4381.
- 19 H. J. Jin, J. Chen, V. Karageorgiou, G. H. Altman, D. L. Kaplan, Biomaterials 2004, 25(6), 1039–1047.
- 20 B. Marelli, A. Alessandrino, S. Farè, G. Freddi, D. Mantovani, M. C. Tanzi, Acta Biomater. 2010, 6(10), 4019–4026.
- 21 K. Wei, Y. Li, K. O. Kim, Y. Nakagawa, B. S. Kim, K. Abe, G. Q. Chen, I. S. Kim, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2011, 97(3), 272–280.
- 22 X. Zhang, M. R. Reagan, D. L. Kaplan, Adv. Drug Deliver. Rev. 2009, 61(12), 988–1006.
- 23 F. Han, S. Liu, X. Liu, Y. Pei, S. Bai, H. Zhao, Q. Lu, F. Ma, D. Kaplan, H. Zhu, Acta Biomater. 2014, 10(2), 921–930.
- 24 M. Wang, H. J. Jin, D. L. Kaplan, G. C. Rutledge, Macromolecules 2004, 37(18), 6856-6864.
- 25 B. Marelli, M. Achilli, A. Alessandrino, G. Freddi, M. C. Tanzi, S. Farè, D. Mantovani, Macromol. Biosci. 2012, 12(11), 1566–1574.
- 26
D. Aytemiz,
T. Asakura, Biotechnology of Silk, Springer, Heidelberg, 2014.
10.1007/978-94-007-7119-2_4 Google Scholar
- 27 S. Y. Park, C. S. Ki, Y. H. Park, H. M. Jung, K. M. Woo, H. J. Kim, Tissue Eng. A 2010, 16(4), 1271–1279.
- 28 J. Zhou, C. Cao, X. Ma, J. Lin, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2010, 47(4), 514–519.
- 29 H. J. Jin, S. V. Fridrikh, G. C. Rutledge, D. L. Kaplan, Biomacromolecules 2002, 3(6), 1233–1239.
- 30 C. Schindler, B. L. Williams, H. N. Patel, V. Thomas, D. R. Dean, Polymer 2013, 54(25), 6824–6833.
- 31 Y. Xia, X. Lu, H. Zhu, Compos. Sci.Technol. 2013, 77, 37–41.
- 32 A. J. Meinel, K. E. Kubow, E. Klotzsch, M. Garcia-Fuentes, M. L. Smith, V. Vogel, H. P. Merkle, L. Meinel, Biomaterials 2009, 30(17), 3058–3067.
- 33 H. Pan, Y. Zhang, Y. Hang, H. Shao, X. Hu, Y. Xu, C. Feng, Biomacromolecules 2012, 13(9), 2859–2867.
- 34 S. Wang, Y. Zhang, H. Wang, G. Yin, Z. Dong, Biomacromolecules 2009, 10(8), 2240–2244.
- 35 K. Zhang, H. Wang, C. Huang, Y. Su, X. Mo, Y. Ikada, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2010, 93(3), 984–993.
- 36 K. E. Park, S. Y. Jung, S. J. Lee, B. M. Min, W. H. Park, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2006, 38(3), 165-173.
- 37 G. Wang, X. Hu, W. Lin, C. Dong, H. Wu, In vitro Cell. Dev-An. 2011, 47(3), 234–240.
- 38 S. I. Jeong, J. H. Kwon, J. I. Lim, S. W. Cho, Y. Jung, W. J. Sung, S. H. Kim, Y. H. Kim, Y. M. Lee, B. S. Kim, Biomaterials 2005, 26(12), 1405–1411.
- 39 M. Kim, B. Hong, J. Lee, S. E. Kim, S. S. Kang, Y. H. Kim, G. Tae, Biomacromolecules 2012, 13(8), 2287-2298.
- 40 S. I. Jeong, S. H. Kim, Y. H. Kim, Y. Jung, J. H. Kwon, B. S. Kim, Y. M. Lee, J. Biomat. Sci-Polyme. 2004, 15(5), 645–660.
- 41 J. Haag, S. Baiguera, P. Jungebluth, D. Barale, C. Del Gaudio, F. Castiglione, A. Bianco, C.E. Comin, D. Ribatti, P. Macchiarini, Biomaterials 2012, 7(3), 780–789.
- 42 J. Drexler, H. Powell, Acta Biomater. 2011, 7(3), 1133–1139.
- 43 Z. Sun, E. Zussman, A. L. Yarin, J. H. Wendorff, A. Greiner, Adv. Mater. 2003, 15(22), 1929–1932.
- 44 A. Greiner, J. Wendorff, A. Yarin, E. Zussman, Appl. Microbiol Biot. 2006, 71(4), 387–393.
- 45 E. Aranda, G.I. Owen, Biol. Res. 2009, 42(3), 377–389.
- 46 C. H. Kim, M. S. Khil, H. Y. Kim, H. U. Lee, K. Y. Jahng, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B 2006, 78(2), 283–290.