Volume 9, Issue 5 e70014
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Open Access

Factors associated with loss and recovery of smell and taste after COVID-19 infection

Diego E. Razura BS

Diego E. Razura BS

Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee, USA

Caruso Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ido Badash MD

Ido Badash MD

Caruso Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Bozena Wrobel MD

Bozena Wrobel MD

Caruso Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Kevin Hur MD

Corresponding Author

Kevin Hur MD

Caruso Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA

Correspondence

Kevin Hur, MD, USC Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, 1537 Norfolk Street, Suite 5800, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 September 2024
Citations: 1

This study was presented at the Triological Combined Sections Meeting in West Palm Beach, FL, January 25–27, 2024.

Abstract

Objective

To identify predictors associated with loss and recovery of smell and taste after COVID-19 infection.

Methods

The Integrated Public Use Microdata Series (IPUMS) 2021 National Health Interview Series (NHIS) database was used to analyze factors associated with loss and recovery of smell and taste in respondents who had a previous COVID-19 infection. Significant variables from univariate analysis were included in a stepwise backward regression model to identify independent predictors.

Results

Of the 3844 individuals who answered yes to having contracted COVID-19, 51.1% and 48.9% reported losing smell and taste, respectively. 95.7% recovered smell and 97% recovered taste. Predictors associated with higher odds of reporting a loss of smell included younger age (odds ratio [OR] 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98–0.99), female sex (OR 1.38; CI 1.17–1.63), use of e-cigarettes (OR 1.59; CI 1.25–2.02), and Mexican ethnicity (OR 1.61; CI 1.22–2.11). Predictors of taste loss were younger age (OR 0.98; CI 0.98–0.99), female sex (OR 1.31; CI 1.08–1.58), and higher BMI (OR 1.02; CI 1.00–1.04). Female sex was associated with decreased odds of reporting a recovery of smell (OR 0.74; CI 0.59–0.92) and taste (OR 0.54; CI 0.42–0.69). Black/African American race (OR 1.44; CI 1.03–2.03) and non-Mexican Hispanic ethnicities (OR 1.55; CI 1.02–2.34) were associated with an increased likelihood of reporting the recovery of smell.

Conclusion

Various factors may be associated with the loss and recovery of smell and taste after COVID-19 infections. Clinicians may use this information to better counsel patients with these symptoms.

Level of evidence

4.

1 INTRODUCTION

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19), caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, is known to negatively impact the respiratory, olfactory, and gustatory organ systems.1, 2 Based on recently published systematic reviews and meta-analyses, the prevalence of olfactory dysfunction and gustatory dysfunction is estimated to be between 41−52.7% and 38.2–43.9% among patients who test positive for COVID-19, respectively.3-6 When combined, the prevalence of loss of smell and taste has an estimated prevalence of 35.1%.3

Individuals who experience loss of taste or smell due to COVID-19 face significant quality of life (QOL) declines, personal safety risks, and job performance challenges. Olfactory dysfunction particularly can lead to less hygiene awareness, loss of appetite, and inability to detect hazards, such as gas, fire, or smoke.7, 8 Those with gustatory dysfunction have reported decreased enjoyment in eating, loss of appetite, and difficulty identifying spoiled foods.7, 8 Additionally, many individuals have reported depression and reduced enjoyment of life associated with loss of smell and taste, and certain occupational groups have experienced limitations in job performance, leading to job insecurity, financial instability, and eventual search for alternative employment.7-10

Recovery times from olfactory and gustatory dysfunction can vary among individuals. While most recover some sense of taste and smell within 3 months, an observational cohort study by McWilliams et al. found that after 2 years, 54.3% of individuals only partially recovered these senses, while 7.5% reported no recovery at all.11 In a large single-institution study, Johnson et al. analyzed a wide array of potential predictors associated with smell and taste loss.12 However, to the best of our knowledge, there appear to be no existing studies investigating comorbidities and social factors that influence recovery of smell and taste following loss due to COVID-19. In our study, we analyzed the 2021 National Health Interview Survey to identify predictors associated with loss and recovery of smell and taste after COVID-19 infection.

2 METHODS

2.1 Study design

This study was determined to be exempt from review by the University of Southern California's Institutional Review Board as the queried database contained no identifiable patient information. The Integrated Public Use Microdata Series (IPUMS) 2021 National Health Interview Series (NHIS) database was used as the data source for this study. The NHIS included data from 37,743 adults (≥18 years old) who completed the NHIS census questionnaire in 2021. The queried data is publicly available with all patients de-identified. The 2021 annual NHIS data file was utilized as this was the first iteration of the survey to include questions specific to COVID-19, and the NHIS database has been previously used by other research groups.13, 14 The acquired NHIS data series included variables consisting of geography, core demographics, ethnicity/nativity, education, profession, material hardships, general health, women's health, influenza, medical conditions, smoking, non-cigarette tobacco usage, anxiety, depression, and COVID-19.

Respondents who indicated having been diagnosed with COVID-19 after a positive test were further asked about suffering loss of taste or smell or experiencing phantom smells or tastes. Those who reported losing smell and/or taste were then asked about whether they experienced recovery of smell or taste, and whether this recovery was full, partial, or negligible. Respondents who did not report a previous history of coronavirus/COVID-19 according to a diagnostic test were excluded from this study. A complete list of survey variables that were assessed in this study can be found in Appendix S1.

2.2 Statistical analysis

Univariate and multivariate analyses were utilized to investigate the association between potential predictor variables and loss and recovery of smell and taste in respondents who had a previous COVID-19 infection. Separate analyses were performed for loss of smell, loss of taste, recovery of smell, and recovery of taste. Univariate analysis consisted of Pearson's chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, while the Shapiro-Francia test and Mann–Whitney U test were utilized for continuous variables. For multivariate analysis, variables that were found to be statistically significant (p < .05) on univariate analysis were included in a stepwise backward regression to evaluate their association with loss and recovery of smell and taste. Logistic regression was performed for loss of smell and taste, while ordinal regression was performed for recovery of smell and taste to assess associations with full recovery, partial recovery, or non-recovery of smell or taste. A Bonferroni correction was calculated and adjusted for the number of variables included in the backward stepwise regression to reduce the likelihood of false positives within our analysis. The entry variable significance level was set at 0.05 for every dependent variable, but the stay variable significance level was set to the variable set by the Bonferroni correction based on the total number of tests. All data analysis was performed in Stata/SE (v. 18.0, StataCorp. LLC, College Station, TX).

3 RESULTS

There were 3844 respondents who reported testing positive for coronavirus/COVID-19. Of those who tested positive, 1963 (51.1%) and 1881 (48.9%) answered “Yes” to losing smell or taste, respectively, while 1692 (44.0%) individuals reported losing both smell and taste.

Of individuals who reported loss of smell, 1374 (70.0%) responded that they fully recovered their sense of smell, 505 (25.7%) reported partial recovery, while 83 (4.2%) reported no recovery at all. Among respondents who reported a loss of taste, 1403 (74.6%) responded that they fully recovered, 422 (22.4%) indicated partial recovery, while 54 (2.9%) reported no recovery (Table 1).

TABLE 1. Factors associated with loss of smell and taste.
Loss of smell due to COVID-19 Reported “Yes” (N = 1963) Reported “No” (N = 1220) Total (N = 3183) p
Age <.001
N 1961 1218 3179
Mean (SD) 45 (16.4) 51.2 (18.1) 47.3 (17.3)
Median (IQR) 43 (31, 57) 52 (36, 66) 46 (33, 60)
Range 18, 85 18, 85 18, 85
Sex <.001
Male 814 (41.5%) 583 (47.8%) 1397 (43.9%)
Female 1149 (58.5%) 637 (52.2%) 1786 (56.1%)
Current marital status .003
Married—Spouse present 907 (46.2%) 544 (44.6%) 1451 (45.6%)
Married—Spouse not in household 55 (2.8%) 39 (3.2%) 94 (3.0%)
Widowed 110 (5.6%) 113 (9.3%) 223 (7.0%)
Divorced 247 (12.6%) 151 (12.4%) 398 (12.5%)
Separated 40 (2.0%) 18 (1.5%) 58 (1.8%)
Never Married 544 (27.7%) 313 (25.7%) 857 (26.9%)
Hispanic ethnicity <.001
Not Hispanic/Spanish origin 1472 (75.0%) 1002 (82.1%) 2474 (77.7%)
Mexican 292 (14.9%) 117 (9.6%) 409 (12.8%)
Other Hispanic 196 (10.0%) 96 (7.9%) 292 (9.2%)
Body mass index .031
N 1784 1113 2897
Mean (SD) 28.8 (5.7) 28.2 (5.4) 28.6 (5.6)
Median (IQR) 27.9 (24.7, 32.1) 27.5 (24.2, 31.4) 27.8 (24.4, 31.9)
Range 17.2, 51 17.2, 48.9 17.2, 51
Had ANY flu vaccine, past 12 months .015
No 1078 (54.9%) 619 (50.7%) 1697 (53.3%)
Yes 854 (43.5%) 587 (48.1%) 1441 (45.3%)
Ever told had arthritis/rheumatoid arthritis/gout/lupus/fibromyalgia <.001
No 1554 (79.2%) 885 (72.5%) 2439 (76.6%)
Yes 406 (20.7%) 335 (27.5%) 741 (23.3%)
Ever told had cancer <.001
No 1818 (92.6%) 1060 (86.9%) 2878 (90.4%)
Yes 145 (7.4%) 159 (13.0%) 304 (9.6%)
Ever told had high cholesterol .013
No 1437 (73.2%) 844 (69.2%) 2281 (71.7%)
Yes 521 (26.5%) 374 (30.7%) 895 (28.1%)
Ever told you had dementia .014
No 1955 (99.6%) 1206 (98.9%) 3161 (99.3%)
Yes 8 (0.4%) 14 (1.1%) 22 (0.7%)
Ever told had diabetes .022
No or not mentioned 1769 (90.1%) 1069 (87.6%) 2838 (89.2%)
Yes or mentioned 192 (9.8%) 151 (12.4%) 343 (10.8%)
Ever told had hypertension .004
No 1329 (67.7%) 766 (62.8%) 2095 (65.8%)
Yes 632 (32.2%) 453 (37.1%) 1085 (34.1%)
Ever been told you had COPD .017
No 1873 (95.4%) 1142 (93.6%) 3015 (94.7%)
Yes 86 (4.4%) 77 (6.3%) 163 (5.1%)
Ever used e-cigarette <.001
No 1489 (75.1%) 1022 (83.8%) 2511 (78.9%)
Yes 421 (21.4%) 162 (13.3%) 583 (18.3%)
Ever told you had any anxiety disorder .001
No 1568 (79.9%) 1033 (84.7%) 2601 (81.7%)
Yes 393 (20.0%) 187 (15.3%) 580 (18.2%)
Severity of coronavirus/COVID-19 symptoms at their worst <.001
No symptoms 43 (2.2%) 219 (18.0%) 262 (8.2%)
Mild symptoms 700 (35.7%) 469 (38.4%) 1169 (36.7%)
Moderate symptoms 791 (40.3%) 373 (30.6%) 1164 (36.6%)
Severe symptoms 429 (21.9%) 159 (13.0%) 588 (18.5%)
Loss of taste due to COVID-19 Reported “Yes” (N = 1881) Reported “No” (N = 1316) Total (N = 3197) p
Age <.001
N 1879 1314 3193
Mean (SD) 45.3 (16.4) 50.3 (18.2) 47.4 (17.3)
Median (IQR) 43 (32, 57) 51 (35, 64) 46 (33, 61)
Range 18, 85 18, 85 18, 85
Sex <.001
Male 774 (41.1%) 631 (47.9%) 1405 (43.9%)
Female 1107 (58.9%) 685 (52.1%) 1792 (56.1%)
Current marital status .007
Married—spouse present 879 (46.7%) 576 (43.8%) 1455 (45.5%)
Married—spouse not in household 52 (2.8%) 42 (3.2%) 94 (2.9%)
Widowed 107 (5.7%) 118 (9.0%) 225 (7.0%)
Divorced 239 (12.7%) 161 (12.2%) 400 (12.5%)
Separated 40 (2.1%) 19 (1.4%) 59 (1.8%)
Never married 503 (26.7%) 358 (27.2%) 861 (26.9%)
Hispanic ethnicity .012
Not Hispanic/Spanish origin 1432 (76.1%) 1057 (80.3%) 2489 (77.9%)
Mexican 263 (14.0%) 145 (11.0%) 408 (12.8%)
Other Hispanic 183 (9.7%) 109 (8.3%) 292 (9.1%)
Body mass index .031
N 1707 1203 2910
Mean (SD) 28.9 (5.8) 28.1 (5.3) 28.6 (5.6)
Median (IQR) 28.1 (24.7, 32.4) 27.5 (24.2, 31.2) 27.8 (24.4, 31.9)
Range 17.2, 51 17.2, 48.9 17.2, 51
Ever told had arthritis/rheumatoid arthritis/gout/lupus/fibromyalgia .006
No 1472 (78.3%) 976 (74.2%) 2448 (76.6%)
Yes 406 (21.6%) 340 (25.8%) 746 (23.3%)
Ever told had cancer <.001
No 1731 (92.0%) 1157 (87.9%) 2888 (90.3%)
Yes 150 (8.0%) 158 (12.0%) 308 (9.6%)
Ever told had coronary heart disease .038
No 1796 (95.5%) 1236 (93.9%) 3032 (94.8%)
Yes 81 (4.3%) 78 (5.9%) 159 (5.0%)
Ever had depression .040
No 1494 (79.4%) 1082 (82.2%) 2576 (80.6%)
Yes 387 (20.6%) 232 (17.6%) 619 (19.4%)
Ever used e-cigarette <.001
No 1431 (76.1%) 1092 (83.0%) 2523 (78.9%)
Yes 399 (21.2%) 186 (14.1%) 585 (18.3%)
Ever told you had any anxiety disorder .002
No 1503 (79.9%) 1109 (84.3%) 2612 (81.7%)
Yes 376 (20.0%) 207 (15.7%) 583 (18.2%)
Severity of coronavirus/COVID-19 symptoms at their worst <.001
No symptoms 41 (2.2%) 220 (16.7%) 261 (8.2%)
Mild symptoms 648 (34.4%) 524 (39.8%) 1172 (36.7%)
Moderate symptoms 768 (40.8%) 404 (30.7%) 1172 (36.7%)
Severe symptoms 424 (22.5%) 167 (12.7%) 591 (18.5%)
Difficulty smelling <.001
No difficulty 620 (33.0%) 1081 (82.1%) 1701 (53.2%)
A little difficulty 342 (18.2%) 90 (6.8%) 432 (13.5%)
Moderate difficulty 262 (13.9%) 36 (2.7%) 298 (9.3%)
A lot of difficulty 348 (18.5%) 39 (3.0%) 387 (12.1%)
Cannot smell at all 265 (14.1%) 36 (2.7%) 301 (9.4%)
Smell unpleasant odor <.001
No 1498 (79.6%) 1224 (93.0%) 2722 (85.1%)
Yes 333 (17.7%) 53 (4.0%) 386 (12.1%)

The mean age of respondents who reported a loss of smell or taste due to COVID-19 was 45 years in both groups. Females comprised 58.5% and 58.9% of respondents who lost their smell and taste, respectively. Younger age and female sex were both found to be significantly associated with loss of smell (p < .001) and loss of taste on univariate analysis (p < .001) (Table 1). Of respondents who reported a recovery of smell and taste, the mean age for “Fully recovered,” “Partially recovered,” and “Not recovered at all” was 44.1, 47.1, and 45.6, respectively (Table 2). The complete list of significant factors from the univariate analysis for COVID-19-related loss and recovery of smell and taste can be found in Tables 1 and 2. Factors found to be non-significant on univariate analysis are reported in Appendix S1.

TABLE 2. Factors associated with recovery of smell and taste.
Recovered loss of smell due to COVID-19 Reported “Fully recovered” (N = 1374) Reported “Partially recovered” (N = 505) Reported “Not recovered at all” (N = 83) Total (N = 1962) p
Urban–rural county classification .035
Large central metro 457 (33.3%) 133 (26.3%) 21 (25.3%) 611 (31.1%)
Large fringe metro 310 (22.6%) 116 (23.0%) 17 (20.5%) 443 (22.6%)
Medium and small metro 390 (28.4%) 153 (30.3%) 26 (31.3%) 569 (29.0%)
Nonmetropolitan 217 (15.8%) 103 (20.4%) 19 (22.9%) 339 (17.3%)
Age .001
N 1374 503 83 1960
Mean (SD) 44.1 (16.5) 47.1 (15.9) 45.6 (16.8) 45.0 (16.4)
Median (IQR) 42 (31, 56) 47 (34, 59) 42 (32, 59) 43 (31, 57)
Range 18, 85 18, 85 19, 84 18, 85
Sex .001
Male 607 (44.2%) 174 (34.5%) 33 (39.8%) 814 (41.5%)
Female 767 (55.8%) 331 (65.5%) 50 (60.2%) 1148 (58.5%)
Self-reported race .003
White only 981 (71.4%) 399 (79.0%) 64 (77.1%) 1444 (73.6%)
Black/African American 163 (11.9%) 43 (8.5%) 7 (8.4%) 213 (10.9%)
American Indian/Alaskan Native only 12 (0.9%) 5 (1.0%) 1 (1.2%) 18 (0.9%)
Asian Only 53 (3.9%) 10 (2.0%) 1 (1.2%) 64 (3.3%)
Other Race and Multiple Race (2019-forward: Excluding American Indian/Alaska Native) 16 (1.2%) 9 (1.8%) 1 (1.2%) 26 (1.3%)
American Indian/Alaska Native and Any Other Race 9 (0.7%) 8 (1.6%) 4 (4.8%) 21 (1.1%)
Hispanic ethnicity .005
Not Hispanic/Spanish origin 998 (72.6%) 406 (80.4%) 68 (81.9%) 1472 (75.0%)
Mexican 225 (16.4%) 56 (11.1%) 10 (12.0%) 291 (14.8%)
Other Hispanic 149 (10.8%) 42 (8.3%) 5 (6.0%) 196 (10.0%)
Health status .006
Excellent 351 (25.5%) 94 (18.6%) 20 (24.1%) 465 (23.7%)
Very Good 450 (32.8%) 190 (37.6%) 30 (36.1%) 670 (34.1%)
Good 404 (29.4%) 140 (27.7%) 19 (22.9%) 563 (28.7%)
Fair 135 (9.8%) 63 (12.5%) 8 (9.6%) 206 (10.5%)
Poor 33 (2.4%) 18 (3.6%) 6 (7.2%) 57 (2.9%)
Ever told had arthritis/rheumatoid arthritis/gout/lupus/fibromyalgia .003
No 1115 (81.1%) 379 (75.0%) 59 (71.1%) 1553 (79.2%)
Yes 257 (18.7%) 125 (24.8%) 24 (28.9%) 406 (20.7%)
Ever told had high cholesterol .019
No 1029 (74.9%) 345 (68.3%) 62 (74.7%) 1436 (73.2%)
Yes 342 (24.9%) 158 (31.3%) 21 (25.3%) 521 (26.6%)
Ever had depression <.001
No 1131 (82.3%) 378 (74.9%) 58 (69.9%) 1567 (79.9%)
Yes 243 (17.7%) 126 (25.0%) 25 (30.1%) 394 (20.1%)
Ever had any chronic liver condition .001
No 1363 (99.2%) 496 (98.2%) 79 (95.2%) 1938 (98.8%)
Yes 10 (0.7%) 8 (1.6%) 4 (4.8%) 22 (1.1%)
Ever smoked 100 cigarettes in life .008
No 913 (66.4%) 299 (59.2%) 51 (61.4%) 1263 (64.4%)
Yes 424 (30.9%) 194 (38.4%) 29 (34.9%) 647 (33.0%)
Ever told you had any anxiety disorder <.001
No 1137 (82.8%) 372 (73.7%) 58 (69.9%) 1567 (79.9%)
Yes 235 (17.1%) 133 (26.3%) 25 (30.1%) 393 (20.0%)
Severity of coronavirus/COVID-19 symptoms at their worst <.001
No symptoms 36 (2.6%) 6 (1.2%) 1 (1.2%) 43 (2.2%)
Mild symptoms 538 (39.2%) 143 (28.3%) 19 (22.9%) 700 (35.7%)
Moderate symptoms 516 (37.6%) 233 (46.1%) 42 (50.6%) 791 (40.3%)
Severe symptoms 284 (20.7%) 123 (24.4%) 21 (25.3%) 428 (21.8%)
Recovered loss of taste due to COVID-19 Reported “Fully recovered” (N = 1403) Reported “Partially recovered” (N = 422) Reported “Not recovered at all” (N = 54) Total (N = 1879) p
Age <.001
N 1402 421 54 1877
Mean (SD) 44.0 (16.2) 49.4 (16.2) 47.2 (16.7) 45.3 (16.4)
Median (IQR) 41.5 (31, 56) 49 (37, 61) 49 (31, 61) 43 (32, 57)
Range 18, 85 18, 85 19, 74 18, 84
Sex <.001
Male 623 (44.4%) 133 (31.5%) 17 (31.5%) 773 (41.1%)
Female 780 (55.6%) 289 (68.5%) 37 (68.5%) 1106 (58.9%)
Current marital status .007
Married—spouse present 641 (45.7%) 209 (49.5%) 28 (51.9%) 878 (46.7%)
Married—spouse not in household 39 (2.8%) 10 (2.4%) 3 (5.6%) 52 (2.8%)
Widowed 67 (4.8%) 35 (8.3%) 5 (9.3%) 5 (0.3%)
Divorced 170 (12.1%) 63 (14.9%) 5 (9.3%) 238 (12.7%)
Separated 33 (2.4%) 7 (1.7%) 0 (0.0%) 40 (2.1%)
Never married 404 (28.8%) 87 (20.6%) 12 (22.2%) 503 (26.8%)
Self-reported race .015
White only 1019 (72.6%) 338 (80.1%) 41 (75.9%) 1398 (74.4%)
Black/African American 173 (12.3%) 36 (8.5%) 4 (7.4%) 213 (11.3%)
American Indian/Alaskan Native only 11 (0.8%) 5 (1.2%) 2 (3.7%) 18 (1.0%)
Asian only 50 (3.6%) 7 (1.7%) 1 (1.9%) 58 (3.1%)
Other race and multiple race (2019-forward: excluding American Indian/Alaska Native) 15 (1.1%) 6 (1.4%) 1 (1.9%) 22 (1.2%)
American Indian/Alaska Native and any other race 11 (0.8%) 7 (1.7%) 2 (3.7%) 20 (1.1%)
Health status <.001
Excellent 359 (25.6%) 68 (16.1%) 15 (27.8%) 442 (23.5%)
Very Good 469 (33.4%) 141 (33.4%) 16 (29.6%) 626 (33.3%)
Good 400 (28.5%) 135 (32.0%) 11 (20.4%) 546 (29.1%)
Fair 142 (10.1%) 61 (14.5%) 8 (14.8%) 211 (11.2%)
Poor 32 (2.3%) 17 (4.0%) 4 (7.4%) 53 (2.8%)
Ever told had arthritis/rheumatoid arthritis/gout/lupus/fibromyalgia <.001
No 1132 (80.7%) 301 (71.3%) 37 (68.5%) 1470 (78.2%)
Yes 269 (19.2%) 120 (28.4%) 17 (31.5%) 406 (21.6%)
Ever told had cancer .017
No 1306 (93.1%) 377 (89.3%) 47 (87.0%) 1730 (92.1%)
Yes 97 (6.9%) 45 (10.7%) 7 (13.0%) 149 (7.9%)
Ever told had coronary heart disease .028
No 1349 (96.2%) 393 (93.1%) 52 (96.3%) 1794 (95.5%)
Yes 51 (3.6%) 28 (6.6%) 2 (3.7%) 81 (4.3%)
Ever told had high cholesterol .024
No 1019 (72.6%) 285 (67.5%) 45 (83.3%) 1349 (71.8%)
Yes 381 (27.2%) 135 (32.0%) 9 (16.7%) 525 (27.9%)
Ever had depression .007
No 1138 (81.1%) 314 (74.4%) 40 (74.1%) 1492 (79.4%)
Yes 265 (18.9%) 108 (25.6%) 14 (25.9%) 387 (20.6%)
Ever told had hypertension .002
No 966 (68.9%) 256 (60.7%) 30 (55.6%) 1252 (66.6%)
Yes 436 (31.1%) 165 (39.1%) 24 (44.4%) 625 (33.3%)
Ever been told you had COPD .018
No 1346 (95.9%) 392 (92.9%) 49 (90.7%) 1787 (95.1%)
Yes 55 (3.9%) 28 (6.6%) 5 (9.3%) 88 (4.7%)
Number cigarettes per day (daily smokers) .021
N 76 29 1 106
Mean (SD) 12.5 (7.5) 12.7 (7.7) 10 (N/A) 12.5 (7.5)
Median (IQR) 10 (5.5, 20) 10 (8, 20) 10 (10, 10) 10 (6, 20)
Range 1, 40 4, 40 10 1, 40
Number cigarettes per day (some day smokers) .033
N 39 13 2 54
Mean (SD) 2.9 (2.5) 7 (6.6) 1.5 (0.7) 3.9 (4.2)
Median (IQR) 2 (1, 4) 4 (2, 10) 1.5 (1, 2) 2 (1, 5)
Range 1, 10 2, 20 1, 2 1, 20
Ever told you had any anxiety disorder .005
No 1145 (81.6%) 315 (74.6%) 41 (75.9%) 1501 (79.9%)
Yes 256 (18.2%) 107 (25.4%) 13 (24.1%) 376 (20.0%)
Severity of coronavirus/COVID-19 symptoms at their worst <.001
No symptoms 31 (2.2%) 8 (1.9%) 2 (3.7%) 41 (2.2%)
Mild symptoms 524 (37.3%) 112 (26.5%) 12 (22.2%) 648 (34.5%)
Moderate symptoms 558 (39.8%) 184 (43.6%) 25 (46.3%) 767 (40.8%)
Severe symptoms 290 (20.7%) 118 (28.0%) 15 (27.8%) 423 (22.5%)
Difficulty smelling <.001
No difficulty 555 (39.6%) 57 (13.5%) 8 (14.8%) 620 (33.0%)
A little difficulty 248 (17.7%) 92 (21.8%) 2 (3.7%) 342 (18.2%)
Moderate difficulty 165 (11.8%) 95 (22.5%) 2 (3.7%) 262 (13.9%)
A lot of difficulty 216 (15.4%) 117 (27.7%) 13 (24.1%) 346 (18.4%)
Cannot smell at all 182 (13.0%) 55 (13.0%) 28 (51.9%) 265 (14.1%)
Smell unpleasant odor <.001
No 1162 (82.8%) 296 (70.1%) 38 (70.4%) 1496 (79.6%)
Yes 200 (14.3%) 119 (28.2%) 14 (25.9%) 333 (17.7%)

For loss of smell due to COVID-19, older age (odds ratio [OR] 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98–0.99) and history of cancer (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.56–1.00) were identified as protective factors (Table 3). Female sex (OR 1.38; 95% CI 1.17–1.64), Mexican ethnicity (OR 1.61; 95% CI 1.22–2.11), married with a spouse present (OR 1.21; 95% CI 1.02–1.43), history of e-cigarette use (OR 1.57; 95% CI 1.23–1.99), and severe COVID symptoms at worst (OR 15.29; 95% CI 10.08–23.21) were associated with higher odds of reporting a loss of smell (Table 3).

TABLE 3. Association of various factors with smell and taste loss and recovery on backwards stepwise regression.
Loss of smell due to COVID-19 (N = 2759) OR (95% CI) p
Age 0.98 (0.98–0.99) <.001
Sex
Male Ref
Female 1.38 (1.17–1.64) <.001
Current marital status
Never married Ref
Married—spouse present 1.21 (1.02–1.43) .028
Hispanic ethnicity
Not Hispanic/Spanish origin Ref
Mexican 1.56 (1.19–2.04) .001
Ever told had cancer
No Ref
Yes 0.75 (0.56–1.00) .050
Ever used e-cigarette
No Ref
Yes 1.57 (1.23–1.99) <.001
Severity of coronavirus/COVID-19 symptoms at their worst
No symptoms Ref
Mild symptoms 7.53 (5.12–11.08) <.001
Moderate symptoms 10.87 (7.37–16.02) <.001
Severe symptoms 15.29 (10.08–23.21) <.001
Loss of taste due to COVID-19 (N = 2771) OR (95% CI) p
Age 0.98 (0.98–0.99) <.001
Sex
Male Ref
Female 1.34 (1.12–1.61) .002
Body mass index 1.02 (1.01–1.04) .008
Ever told had arthritis/RA/gout/lupus/fibromyalgia
No Ref
Yes 0.76 (0.59–0.97) .030
Severity of coronavirus/COVID-19 symptoms at their worst
No symptoms Ref
Mild symptoms 5.46 (4.28–7.47) <.001
Moderate symptoms 6.06 (3.87–9.49) <.001
Severe symptoms 9.36 (5.80–15.11) <.001
Difficulty smelling
No difficulty Ref
A little difficulty 5.66 (4.28–7.47) <.001
Moderate difficulty 10.94 (7.37–16.24) <.001
A lot of difficulty 11.47 (7.90–16.63) <.001
Cannot smell at all 11.24 (7.48–16.89) <.001
Smell unpleasant odor
No Ref
Yes 2.32 (1.62–3.33) <.001
Recovered loss of smell due to COVID-19 (N = 1770) OR (95% CI) p
Age 0.99 (0.99–1.00) .014
Sex
Male Ref
Female 0.74 (0.60–0.92) .006
Self-reported race
White only Ref
Black/African American only 1.43 (1.02–2.01) .041
Other racea (including American/Alaskan Native) 0.51 (0.31–0.86) .010
Hispanic ethnicity
Not Hispanic/Spanish origin Ref
Other Hispanic 1.53 (1.01–2.33) .043
Ever had any chronic liver condition
No Ref
Yes 0.31 (0.12–0.79) .014
Ever told you had any anxiety disorder
No Ref
Yes 0.67 (0.52–0.85) .001
Severity of coronavirus/COVID-19 symptoms at their worst
No symptoms Ref
Moderate symptoms 0.59 (0.46–0.74) <.001
Severe symptoms 0.64 (0.48–0.85) .002
Recovered loss of taste due to COVID-19 (N = 1658) OR (95% CI) p
Age 0.98 (0.97–0.99) <.001
Sex
Male Ref
Female 0.55 (0.43–0.70) <.001
Self-reported race
White only Ref
Other race (including American/Alaskan Native) 0.47 (0.26–0.85) .012
Severity of coronavirus/COVID-19 symptoms at their worst
No symptoms Ref
Mild symptoms 1.40 (1.09–1.81) .009
Difficulty smelling
No difficulty Ref
A little difficulty 0.38 (0.26–0.55) <.001
Moderate difficulty 0.26 (0.18–0.38) <.001
A lot of difficulty 0.25 (0.17–0.34) <.001
Cannot smell at all 0.22 (0.15–0.33) <.001
Smell unpleasant odor
No Ref
Yes 0.57 (0.44–0.70) <.001
  • Note: Bold values indicate significance (p < 0.050).
  • Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
  • a Other Race excluded White, Black/African American, Asian race.

For loss of taste due to COVID-19, older age (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.98–0.99) and a history of arthritis/RA/gout/lupus/fibromyalgia (OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.59–0.97) were identified as protective factors (Table 3). Female sex (OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.12–1.61), higher body mass index (BMI) (OR 1.02; 95% CI 1.01–1.04), severe COVID-19 symptoms at worst (OR 9.36; 95% CI 5.80–15.11), inability to smell (OR 11.24; 95% CI 7.48–16.89), and smell of unpleasant odor (OR 2.32; 95% CI 1.62–3.33) were associated with higher odds of reporting a loss of taste (Table 3).

For recovery of smell, younger age (OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.99–1.00) Black/African American race (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.02–2.01), and non-Mexican Hispanic ethnicity (OR 1.53; 95% CI 1.01–2.33) were found to be associated with recovery. Female sex (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.60–0.92), other self-reported race (excluding White, Black/African American, and Asian race) (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.31–0.86), history of chronic liver condition (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.12–0.79), history of anxiety disorder (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.52–0.85), and severe COVID-19 symptom severity at worst (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.48–0.85) were associated with a decreased likelihood of reporting a recovery of smell (Table 3).

For recovery of taste, older age (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.97–0.99), female sex (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.43–0.70), other self-reported race (excluding White, Black/African American, and Asian race) (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.26–0.85), inability to smell (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.15–0.33), and smell of unpleasant odor (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.44–0.70) were associated with a decreased likelihood of reporting a recovery of smell (Table 3).

4 DISCUSSION

This is the first study to analyze a large national survey in order to determine factors associated with loss and recovery of smell and taste after COVID-19 infection in the United States. We identified various factors which may influence the loss and recovery of smell and taste after COVID-19 infection. Clinicians may use this information to counsel patients on healing expectations after experiencing sensory losses after COVID-19 infection.

Like previously published papers, our findings suggest female sex is associated with an increased likelihood of losing smell and taste due to COVID-19 and decreased odds of reporting recovery of smell and taste.5, 15-18 Although males may have higher exposure rates to certain infections, females may potentially have a heightened immune response compared with males due to differences in sex-chromosome-linked genes that regular immune function.19, 20 A more robust immune response can lead to increased disease symptom severity and injury to the olfactory nerves.

We found that older patients have a decreased likelihood of losing smell and taste, but also lower likelihood of recovering smell and taste once these senses are lost.12, 17, 18 Younger patients have better immunological function compared with older adults, which could be responsible for the improved recovery rates demonstrated in our analysis.21-23 Despite the high prevalence of olfaction decay in the elderly population, no hypothesis has been established regarding the increased propensity for COVID-19 to alter olfaction at younger ages.24 It is possible that younger populations are at an increased risk for exposure.

Additionally, our study identified that individuals of Mexican ethnicity may have an increased likelihood of olfactory dysfunction secondary to COVID-19. This might be attributed to the fact that Hispanic groups in the United States have a lower likelihood of seeking or receiving healthcare compared to the general population which might be due to lower health insurance coverage and language barriers.25-27

History of e-cigarette use was also found to be associated with increased likelihood of losing smell due to COVID-19. This might be due to evidence suggesting that e-cigarette flavors and aerosol compounds reduce main olfactory epithelium (MOE) sensitivity through adaptation and cytotoxic damage to the barrier.28, 29 Disruption of MOE from e-cigarette use could exacerbate the loss of smell when in conjunction with a COVID-19 infection. Of note, a large number of survey respondents (18.3%) who reported testing positive for COVID-19 also reported current or previous use of an e-cigarette, highlighting the increased popularity of these devices in the United States.

A history of anxiety disorder may contribute to reduced rates of recovery after olfactory loss. Anxiety disorders have been previously recognized to exacerbate the immune system's response to COVID-19.30 In addition, Speth et al. have hypothesized that emotional well-being disturbances might be secondary to central nervous system involvement of COVID-19.31 Further studies are needed to determine if anxiety stems directly from the coronavirus infection, QOL distress from loss of smell, or if the prior history of anxiety is responsible for worsened recovery rate.

Increasing BMI was found to be correlated with loss of taste in our study. There have been reports of pre-existing lower sensitivity for taste and decreased smell perception in obese patients compared to controls that could potentially confound virus-associated loss of either of these senses.32-35 Nonetheless, it has been hypothesized that COVID-19 induced dysregulations in ghrelin and leptin, and inflammation involving IL-6 and TNF-α, are responsible for the dysregulated immune response which may result in decreased loss of taste perception.36-38

By contrast, higher income and history of inflammatory musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders may be associated with decreased odds of losing taste. As might be expected, higher income could allow for more flexibility to get tested and treated sooner due to job stability and the likelihood of having medical insurance, resulting in reduced disease severity and sensory dysfunction. The association between MSK disorders and reduced rates of smell loss may be due to the prevalence of anti-inflammatory medications, such as corticosteroids, used to treat inflammatory MSK disorders. As an indirect effect, the user may experience benefits from the neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory actions, thus potentially reducing the likelihood of report loss of taste.39

This cross-sectional national database study is subject to several limitations. The absence of patient-level data means that there are many clinical data points we could not capture, including differences in medical history and medication use, which could explain variations in sensory dysfunction between individuals. Due to the cross-sectional nature of this study, we are also unable to establish causality to determine direct relationships between COVID-19 and the loss or recovery of smell and taste. Additionally, as with any survey, there is potential for selection bias that occurs if the sample population is not an accurate representation of the broader population. As a result, data might be skewed or unrepresentative. Another limitation is our inability to provide temporal data that would allow us to identify the recovery rate between COVID-19 diagnosis, initial presentation of gustatory and olfactory dysfunction, and the onset of recovery. Although we are unable to provide information on the recovery timeline and its variability with individual predictors, other research groups have found general individual recovery rate timelines for smell and taste dysfunction.15, 40 Lastly, the self-reported data from the national database survey is inherently limited to recall bias and social desirability bias. The data may have potential inaccuracies, which can lead to underreporting or overreporting of certain survey responses.

5 CONCLUSION

This is the first study to analyze a large national survey in order to identify patient characteristics associated with loss and recovery of smell and taste after COVID-19 infection. Factors including sex, age, ethnicity, BMI, income, as well as history of anxiety and e-cigarette use may influence sensory dysfunction after infection with SARS-CoV-2, and clinicians may use this information to counsel patients on healing expectations after experiencing sensory losses. This improved guidance can be crucial for patient care, as the impact of losing smell and taste can significantly affect QOL and patient well-being.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.