Review Article
Universal dental adhesives: Current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance
Sanket Nagarkar,
Nicole Theis-Mahon,
Jorge Perdigão,
Sanket Nagarkar
Park Dental Group, Minneapolis, Minnesota, and Clinical Research Assistant Professor (affiliated), Department of Restorative Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Search for more papers by this authorNicole Theis-Mahon
Bio-Medical Library, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jorge Perdigão
Division of Operative Dentistry, Department of Restorative Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Correspondence to: Jorge Perdigão; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorSanket Nagarkar,
Nicole Theis-Mahon,
Jorge Perdigão,
Sanket Nagarkar
Park Dental Group, Minneapolis, Minnesota, and Clinical Research Assistant Professor (affiliated), Department of Restorative Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Search for more papers by this authorNicole Theis-Mahon
Bio-Medical Library, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jorge Perdigão
Division of Operative Dentistry, Department of Restorative Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Correspondence to: Jorge Perdigão; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Increasing demand for simplified and user-friendly adhesive systems has led to the development of a new class of adhesives termed as Universal Adhesives (UAs). The term “Universal” reflects manufacturers' claims that these adhesives can be applied with any adhesion strategy and offer the versatility of use with a variety of direct and indirect restorative materials. The aim of this review was to synthesize the literature regarding the current status of UAs, their adhesion potential to various substrates and their performance in different restorative situations. In vitro studies, clinical trials and systematic reviews were identified utilizing controlled vocabulary and keyword searches in Medline and EMBASE databases. About 282 studies (272 in vitro studies; 11 clinical studies) were included. Available laboratory and clinical evidence does not support the claim that UAs can be used with any adhesive strategy. Although, they can chemically bond to various tooth and direct/indirect restorative substrates, the stability of this bond is material-dependent and subject to hydrolytic degradation. Hence, additional measures are still needed to ensure long-term durability. which undermines the versatility of UAs. The lack of long-term data regarding the clinical performance of UAs further complicates clinical decision-making. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 107B: 2121–2131, 2019.
REFERENCES
- 1Cardoso MV, de Almeida Neves A, Mine A, Coutinho E, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B. Current aspects on bonding effectiveness and stability in adhesive dentistry. Aust Dent J 2011; 56(Suppl 1): 31–44.
- 2Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011; 27(1): 17–28.
- 3Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia G, Tenore G, Romeo U, Migliau G. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: From the IV generation to the universal type. Ann Stomatol (Roma) 2017; 8(1): 1–17.
- 4Murdoch-Kinch CA, McLean ME. Minimally invasive dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134(1): 87–95.
- 5Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frencken JE, Mount GJ. Minimal intervention dentistry – A review. FDI Commission project 1-97. Int Dent J 2000; 50(1): 1–12.
- 6Black GV, Black AD. A Work on Operative Dentistry. Chicago: Medico-Dental Publishing Company; 1917.
- 7 FDI policy statement on Minimal Intervention Dentistry (MID) for managing dental caries. Adopted by the general assembly: September 2016, Poznan, Poland. Int Dent J 2017; 67(1): 6–7.
- 8Mount GJ, Tyas JM, Duke ES, Hume WR, Lasfargues JJ, Kaleka R. A proposal for a new classification of lesions of exposed tooth surfaces. Int Dent J 2006; 56(2): 82–91.
- 9Schwendicke F, Frencken JE, Bjørndal L, Maltz M, Manton DJ, Ricketts D, Van Landuyt K, Banerjee A, Campus G, Doméjean S, Fontana M, Leal S, Lo E, Machiulskiene V, Schulte A, Splieth C, Zandona AF, Innes NPT. Managing carious lesions: Consensus recommendations on carious tissue removal. Adv Dent Res 2016; 28(2): 58–67.
- 10Schwendicke F, Kern M, Dörfer C, Kleemann-Lüpkes J, Paris S, Blunck U. Influence of using different bonding systems and composites on the margin integrity and the mechanical properties of selectively excavated teeth in vitro. J Dent 2015; 43(3): 327–334.
- 11Perdigão J. New developments in dental adhesion. Dent Clin N Am 2007; 51(2): 333–357. viii.
- 12Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Mattar D, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P. Microtensile bond strengths of an etch & rinse and self-etch adhesive to enamel and dentin as a function of surface treatment. Oper Dent 2003; 28(5): 647–660.
- 13De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Four-year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res 2003; 82(2): 136–140.
- 14Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28(3): 215–235.
- 15Asmussen E, Uno S. Adhesion of restorative resins to dentin: Chemical and physicochemical aspects. Oper Dent 1992; 5: 68–74.
- 16Cardoso MV, Moretto SG, Carvalho RC, Russo EM. Influence of intrapulpal pressure simulation on the bond strength of adhesive systems to dentin. Braz Oral Res 2008; 22(2): 170–175.
- 17Bowen RL, Eick JD, Henderson DA, Anderson DW. Smear layer: Removal and bonding considerations. Oper Dent Suppl 1984; 3: 30–34.
- 18Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 1982; 16(3): 265–273.
- 19Kramer IRH, McLean JW. Alterations in the staining reaction of dentine resulting from a constituent of a new self-polymerising resin. Brit Dent J 1952; 93: 150–153.
- 20Schwendicke F, Gostemeyer G, Blunck U, Paris S, Hsu LY, Tu YK. Directly placed restorative materials: Review and network meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2016; 95(6): 613–622.
- 21Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J. Bonding effectiveness of a new 'multi-mode' adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent 2012; 40(6): 475–484.
- 22Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2015; 43(7): 765–776.
- 23Muñoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda NH. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent 2013; 41(5): 404–411.
- 24Antoniazzi BF, Nicoloso GF, Lenzi TL, Soares FZ, Rocha Rde O. Selective acid etching improves the bond strength of universal adhesive to sound and demineralized enamel of primary teeth. J Adhes Dent 2016; 18(4): 311–316.
- 25Kim JH, Chae SY, Lee Y, Han GJ, Cho BH. Effects of multipurpose, universal adhesives on resin bonding to zirconia ceramic. Oper Dent 2015; 40(1): 55–62.
- 26Seabra B, Arantes-Oliveira S, Portugal J. Influence of multimode universal adhesives and zirconia primer application techniques on zirconia repair. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112(2): 182–187.
- 27Van Meerbeek B, Frankenberger R. Editorial: What's next after “universal” adhesives, “bioactive” adhesives? J Adhes Dent 2017; 19(6): 459–460.
- 28Matos AB, Trevelin LT, Silva B, Francisconi-Dos-Rios LF, Siriani LK, Cardoso MV. Bonding efficiency and durability: Current possibilities. Braz Oral Res 2017; 31(suppl 1): e57.
- 29Alex G. Universal adhesives: The next evolution in adhesive dentistry? Compend Contin Educ Dent 2015; 36(1): 15–26. quiz 28, 40.
- 30Perdigão J, Swift EJ Jr. Universal adhesives. J Esthet Restor Dent 2015; 27(6): 331–334.
- 31Kaczor K, Gerula-Szymanska A, Smektala T, Safranow K, Lewusz K, Nowicka A. Effects of different etching modes on the nanoleakage of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018; 30: 287–298.
- 32Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Okihara T, De Munck J, Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, Minagi S, Osaka A, Van Meerbeek B. Adhesive interfacial interaction affected by different carbon-chain monomers. Dent Mater 2013; 29(8): 888–897.
- 33Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Torii Y, Ogawa T, Osaka A, Van Meerbeek B. Self-assembled nano-layering at the adhesive interface. J Dent Res 2012; 91(4): 376–381.
- 34Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 2004; 83(6): 454–458.
- 35Chen L, Suh BI, Brown D, Chen X. Bonding of primed zirconia ceramics: Evidence of chemical bonding and improved bond strengths. Am J Dent 2012; 25(2): 103–108.
- 36Yoshida K, Tsuo Y, Atsuta M. Bonding of dual-cured resin cement to zirconia ceramic using phosphate acid ester monomer and zirconate coupler. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006; 77(1): 28–33.
- 37Al Jeaidi ZA, Alqahtani MA, Awad MM, Rodrigues FP, Alrahlah AA. Bond strength of universal adhesives to air-abraded zirconia ceramics. J Oral Sci 2017; 59(4): 565–570.
- 38Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Okihara T, Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B. Chemical interaction of glycero-phosphate dimethacrylate (GPDM) with hydroxyapatite and dentin. Dent Mater 2018; 34(7): 1072–1081.
- 39Sezinando A, Perdigão J, Ceballos L. Long-term in vitro adhesion of polyalkenoate-based adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2017; 19(4): 305–316.
- 40Sezinando A, Serrano ML, Pérez VM, Muñoz RA, Ceballos L, Perdigão J. Chemical adhesion of polyalkenoate-based adhesives to hydroxyapatite. J Adhes Dent 2016; 18(3): 257–265.
- 41Vogl V, Hiller KA, Buchalla W, Federlin M, Schmalz G. Controlled, prospective, randomized, clinical split-mouth evaluation of partial ceramic crowns luted with a new, universal adhesive system/resin cement: Results after 18 months. Clin Oral Investig 2016; 20(9): 2481–2492.
- 42van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Three-year randomized clinical study of a one-step universal adhesive and a two-step self-etch adhesive in class II composite restorations. J Adhes Dent 2017; 19(4): 287–294.
- 43Oz FD, Kutuk ZB, Ozturk C, Soleimani R, Gurgan S. An 18-month clinical evaluation of three different universal adhesives used with a universal flowable composite resin in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. Clin Oral Investig 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2571-2 [Epub ahead of print].
- 44Ruschel VC, Shibata S, Stolf SC, Chung Y, Baratieri LN, Heymann HO, Walter R. Eighteen-month clinical study of universal adhesives in noncarious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 2018; 43(3): 241–249.
- 45Loguercio AD, Luque-Martinez IV, Fuentes S, Reis A, Muñoz MA. Effect of dentin roughness on the adhesive performance in non-carious cervical lesions: A double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Dent 2018; 69: 60–69.
- 46Loguercio AD, de Paula EA, Hass V, Luque-Martinez I, Reis A, Perdigão J. A new universal simplified adhesive: 36-month randomized double-blind clinical trial. J Dent 2015; 43(9): 1083–1092.
- 47Lawson NC, Robles A, Fu CC, Lin CP, Sawlani K, Burgess JO. Two-year clinical trial of a universal adhesive in total-etch and self-etch mode in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 2015; 43(10): 1229–1234.
- 48Lopes LS, Calazans FS, Hidalgo R, Buitrago LL, Gutierrez F, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Barceleiro MO. Six-month follow-up of cervical composite restorations placed with a new universal adhesive system: A randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent 2016; 41(5): 465–480.
- 49Perdigão J, Kose C, Mena-Serrano AP, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis AL, Loguercio AD. A new universal simplified adhesive: 18-month clinical evaluation. Oper Dent 2014; 39(2): 113–127.
- 50Mena-Serrano A, Kose C, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Perdigão J. A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013; 25(1): 55–69.
- 51de Carvalho LD, Gondo R, Lopes GC. One-year clinical evaluation of resin composite restorations of noncarious cervical lesions in smokers. J Adhes Dent 2015; 17(5): 405–411.
- 52de Albuquerque EG, Santana FW, Calazans FS, Poubel LA, Marins SS, de Paris Matos T, Hanzen TA, de Oliveira Barceleiro M, Loguercio AD. A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month randomized multi-center clinical trial. Rev Bras Odontol 2017; 74(4): 251–260.
10.18363/rbo.v74n4.p.251 Google Scholar
- 53Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength--evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater 1994; 10(4): 236–240.
- 54Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, De Munck J. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater 2010; 26(2): e100–e121.
- 55Armstrong S, Breschi L, Özcan M, Pfefferkorn F, Ferrari M, Van Meerbeek B. Academy of dental materials guidance on in vitro testing of dental composite bonding effectiveness to dentin/enamel using micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) approach. Dent Mater 2017; 33(2): 133–143.
- 56De Munck J, Mine A, Poitevin A, Van Ende A, Cardoso MV, Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B. Meta-analytical review of parameters involved in dentin bonding. J Dent Res 2012; 91(4): 351–357.
- 57Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Scheidel DD, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Effect of phosphoric acid pre-etching on fatigue limits of self-etching adhesives. Oper Dent 2015; 40(4): 379–395.
- 58Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Scheidel DD, Watanabe H, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Influence of water storage on fatigue strength of self-etch adhesives. J Dent 2015; 43(12): 1416–1427.
- 59Pongprueksa P, De Munck J, Karunratanakul K, Barreto BC, Van Ende A, Senawongse P, Van Meerbeek B. Dentin bonding testing using a mini-interfacial fracture toughness approach. J Dent Res 2016; 95(3): 327–333.
- 60Heintze SD, Thunpithayakul C, Armstrong SR, Rousson V. Correlation between microtensile bond strength data and clinical outcome of class V restorations. Dent Mater 2011; 27(2): 114–125.
- 61Ayres AP, Bonvent JJ, Mogilevych B, Soares LE, Martin AA, Ambrosano GM, Nascimento FD, Van Meerbeek B, Giannini M. Effect of non-thermal atmospheric plasma on the dentin-surface topography and composition and on the bond strength of a universal adhesive. Eur J Oral Sci 2018; 126(1): 53–65.
- 62Perdigão J, Sezinando A, Monteiro PC. Laboratory bonding ability of a multi-purpose dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 2012; 25(3): 153–158.
- 63Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez I, Muñoz MA, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Perdigão J. Influence of a hydrophobic resin coating on the immediate and 6-month dentin bonding of three universal adhesives. Dent Mater 2015; 31(10): e236–e246.
- 64Marchesi G, Frassetto A, Mazzoni A, Apolonio F, Diolosa M, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, Pashley DH, Tay F, Breschi L. Adhesive performance of a multi-mode adhesive system: 1-year in vitro study. J Dent 2014; 42(5): 603–612.
- 65Gutiérrez MF, Sutil E, Malaquias P, de Paris Matos T, de Souza LM, Reis A, Perdigão J, Loguercio AD. Effect of self-curing activators and curing protocols on adhesive properties of universal adhesives bonded to dual-cured composites. Dent Mater 2017; 33(7): 775–787.
- 66Wang R, Shi Y, Li T, Pan Y, Cui Y, Xia W. Adhesive interfacial characteristics and the related bonding performance of four self-etching adhesives with different functional monomers applied to dentin. J Dent 2017; 62: 72–80.
- 67Bömicke W, Schürz A, Krisam J, Rammelsberg P, Rues S. Durability of resin-zirconia bonds produced using methods available in dental practice. J Adhes Dent 2016; 18(1): 17–27.
- 68Yao C, Zhou L, Yang H, Wang Y, Sun H, Guo J, Huang C. Effect of silane pretreatment on the immediate bonding of universal adhesives to computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing lithium disilicate glass ceramics. Eur J Oral Sci 2017; 125(2): 173–180.
- 69Zhang ZY, Tian FC, Niu LN, Ochala K, Chen C, Fu BP, Wang XY, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Defying ageing: An expectation for dentine bonding with universal adhesives? J Dent 2016; 45: 43–52.
- 70Vermelho PM, Reis AF, Ambrosano GMB, Giannini M. Adhesion of multimode adhesives to enamel and dentin after one year of water storage. Clin Oral Investig 2017; 21(5): 1707–1715.
- 71Tian FC, Wang XY, Huang Q, Niu LN, Mitchell J, Zhang ZY, Prananik C, Zhang L, Chen JH, Breshi L, Pashley DH. Effect of nanolayering of calcium salts of phosphoric acid ester monomers on the durability of resin-dentin bonds. Acta Biomater 2016; 38: 190–200.
- 72Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent 2014; 42(7): 800–807.
- 73de Souza G, Hennig D, Aggarwal A, Tam LE. The use of MDP-based materials for bonding to zirconia. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112(4): 895–902.
- 74Nagaoka N, Yoshihara K, Feitosa VP, Tamada Y, Irie M, Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Hayakawa S. Chemical interaction mechanism of 10-MDP with zirconia. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 45563.
- 75Xie H, Li Q, Zhang F, Lu Y, Tay FR, Qian M, Chen C. Comparison of resin bonding improvements to zirconia between one-bottle universal adhesives and tribochemical silica coating, which is better? Dent Mater 2016; 32(3): 403–411.
- 76Boas V, Fernandes Júnior V, Barbosa Dantas DC, Bresciani E, Lima R, Huhtala MF. Evaluation of the bond strength and characteristics of zirconia after different surface treatments. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 120(6): 955–959.
- 77Cardenas AM, Siqueira F, Hass V, Malaquias P, Gutierrez MF, Reis A, Perdigão J, Loguercio AD. Effect of MDP-containing silane and adhesive used alone or in combination on the long-term bond strength and chemical interaction with lithium disilicate ceramics. J Adhes Dent 2017; 19(3): 203–212.
- 78Loguercio AD, Moura SK, Pellizzaro A, Dal-Bianco K, Patzlaff RT, Grande RH, Reis A. Durability of enamel bonding using two-step self-etch systems on ground and unground enamel. Oper Dent 2008; 33(1): 79–88.
- 79Diniz AC, Bandeca MC, Pinheiro LM, Dos JS, Torres CR, Borges AH, Pinto SC, Tonetto MR, De RJ, Firoozmand LM. Influence of different etching modes on bond strength to enamel using universal adhesive systems. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016; 17(10): 820–825.
- 80Beltrami R, Chiesa M, Scribante A, Allegretti J, Poggio C. Comparison of shear bond strength of universal adhesives on etched and nonetched enamel. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2016; 14(1): e78–e83.
- 81McLean DE, Meyers EJ, Guillory VL, Vandewalle KS. Enamel bond strength of new universal adhesive bonding agents. Oper Dent 2015; 40(4): 410–417.
- 82Suda S, Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Nojiri K, Nagura Y, Takamizawa T, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Comparison of enamel bond fatigue durability between universal adhesives and two-step self-etch adhesives: Effect of phosphoric acid pre-etching. Dent Mater J 2018; 37(2): 244–255.
- 83Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, Watanabe H, Johnson WW, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Influence of duration of phosphoric acid pre-etching on bond durability of universal adhesives and surface free-energy characteristics of enamel. Eur J Oral Sci 2016; 124(4): 377–386.
- 84Suzuki T, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Endo H, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Influence of etching mode on enamel bond durability of universal adhesive systems. Oper Dent 2016; 41(5): 520–530.
- 85Loguercio AD, Muñoz MA, Luque-Martinez I, Hass V, Reis A, Perdigão J. Does active application of universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode improve their performance? J Dent 2015; 43(9): 1060–1070.
- 86Cardenas AM, Siqueira F, Rocha J, Szesz AL, Anwar M, El-Askary F, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Influence of conditioning time of universal adhesives on adhesive properties and enamel-etching pattern. Oper Dent 2016; 41(5): 481–490.
- 87Fujiwara S, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Imai A, Watanabe H, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Nakatsuka T, Miyazaki M. Effect of double-layer application on bond quality of adhesive systems. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2018; 77: 501–509.
- 88Perdigão J, Muñoz MA, Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez IV, Staichak R, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Immediate adhesive properties to dentin and enamel of a universal adhesive associated with a hydrophobic resin coat. Oper Dent 2014; 39(5): 489–499.
- 89Perdigão J. Dentin bonding-variables related to the clinical situation and the substrate treatment. Dent Mater 2010; 26(2): e24–e37.
- 90Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, De Stefano Dorigo E. Dental adhesion review: Aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater 2008; 24(1): 90–101.
- 91Reis A, Carrilho M, Breschi L, Loguercio AD. Overview of clinical alternatives to minimize the degradation of the resin-dentin bonds. Oper Dent 2013; 38(4): e1–e25.
- 92Elkaffas AA, Hamama HHH, Mahmoud SH. Do universal adhesives promote bonding to dentin? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Restor Dent Endod 2018; 43: e29.
- 93Lezaja Zebic M, Dzeletovic B, Miletic V. Microtensile bond strength of universal adhesives to flat versus class I cavity dentin with pulpal pressure simulation. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018; 30(3): 240–248.
- 94Manfroi FB, Marcondes ML, Somacal DC, Borges GA, Júnior LH, Spohr AM. Bond strength of a novel one bottle multi-mode adhesive to human dentin after six months of storage. Open Dent J 2016; 10: 268–277.
- 95Muñoz MA, Luque-Martinez I, Malaquias P, Hass V, Reis A, Campanha NH, Loguercio AD. In vitro longevity of bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Oper Dent 2015; 40(3): 282–292.
- 96Muñoz MA, Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez I, Szesz AL, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda NH, Perdigão J. Influence of a hydrophobic resin coating on the bonding efficacy of three universal adhesives. J Dent 2014; 42(5): 595–602.
- 97Thanatvarakorn O, Prasansuttiporn T, Takahashi M, Thittaweerat S, Foxton RM, Ichinose S, Tagami J, Nakajima M. Effect of scrubbing technique with mild self-etching adhesives on dentin bond strengths and nanoleakage expression. J Adhes Dent 2016; 18(3): 197–204.
- 98Moritake N, Takamizawa T, Ishii R, Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Effect of active application on bond durability of universal adhesives. Oper Dent 2018 Aug 14. https://doi.org/10.2341/17-384-L [Epub ahead of print].
- 99Sabatini C, Pashley DH. Aging of adhesive interfaces treated with benzalkonium chloride and benzalkonium methacrylate. Eur J Oral Sci 2015; 123(2): 102–107.
- 100Tekçe N, Tuncer S, Demirci M, Balci S. Do matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors improve the bond durability of universal dental adhesives? Scanning 2016; 38(6): 535–544.
- 101Martini EC, Parreiras SO, Gutierrez MF, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Effect of different protocols in preconditioning with EDTA in sclerotic dentin and enamel before universal adhesives applied in self-etch mode. Oper Dent 2017; 42(3): 284–296.
- 102Fu J, Saikaew P, Kawano S, Carvalho RM, Hannig M, Sano H, Selimovic D. Effect of air-blowing duration on the bond strength of current one-step adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater 2017; 33(8): 895–903.
- 103Luque-Martinez IV, Perdigão J, Muñoz MA, Sezinando A, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Effects of solvent evaporation time on immediate adhesive properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater 2014; 30(10): 1126–1135.
- 104Isolan CP, Sarkis-Onofre R, Lima GS, Moraes RR. Bonding to sound and caries-affected dentin: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent 2018; 20(1): 7–18.
- 105Ekambaram M, Yiu CKY, Matinlinna JP. Bonding of resin adhesives to caries-affected dentin - a systematic review. Int J Adhes Adhes 2015; 61: 23–34.
- 106Nicoloso GF, Antoniazzi BF, Lenzi TL, Soares FZ. Rocha RO. Is there a best protocol to optimize bond strength of a universal adhesive to artificially induced caries-affected primary or permanent dentin? J Adhes Dent 2016; 18(5): 441–446.
- 107Nicoloso GF, Antoniazzi BF, Lenzi TL, Soares FZM, Rocha RO. The bonding performance of a universal adhesive to artificially-created caries-affected dentin. J Adhes Dent 2017; 19(4): 317–321.
- 108Follak AC, Miotti LL, Lenzi TL, Rocha RO, Soares FZ. Degradation of multimode adhesive system bond strength to artificial caries-affected dentin due to water storage. Oper Dent 2018; 43(2): e92–e101.
- 109Follak AC, Miotti LL, Lenzi TL, Rocha RO, Maxnuck Soares FZ. The impact of artificially caries-affected dentin on bond strength of multi-mode adhesives. J Conserv Dent 2018; 21(2): 136–141.
- 110Forgerini TV, Ribeiro JF, Rocha RO, Soares FZ, Lenzi TL. Role of etching mode on bonding longevity of a universal adhesive to eroded dentin. J Adhes Dent 2017; 19(1): 69–75.
- 111Siqueira FS, Cardenas AM, Ocampo JB, Hass V, Coelho MB, Gomes JC, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Bonding performance of universal adhesives to eroded dentin. J Adhes Dent 2018; 20(2): 121–132.
- 112Frattes FC, Augusto MG, Torres CRG, Pucci CR, Borges AB. Bond strength to eroded enamel and dentin using a universal adhesive system. J Adhes Dent 2017; 19(2): 121–127.
- 113Lenzi TL, Raggio DP, Soares FZ, Rocha Rde O. Bonding performance of a multimode adhesive to artificially-induced caries-affected primary dentin. J Adhes Dent 2015; 17(2): 125–131.
- 114Lenzi TL, Soares FZM, de Oliveira Rocha R. Does bonding approach influence the bond strength of universal adhesive to dentin of primary teeth? J Clin Pediatr Dent 2017; 41(3): 214–218.
- 115Lenzi TL, Soares FZ, Raggio DP, Pereira GK, Rocha RO. Dry-bonding etch-and-rinse strategy improves bond longevity of a universal adhesive to sound and artificially-induced caries-affected primary dentin. J Adhes Dent 2016; 18(6): 475–482.
- 116Oskoee SS, Bahari M, Kimyai S, Asgary S, Katebi K. Push-out bond strength of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin using multimode adhesive system. J Endod 2016; 42(12): 1794–1798.
- 117Bakaus TE, Gruber YL, Reis A, Gomes JC, Gomes GM. Bonding properties of universal adhesives to root canals prepared with different rotary instruments. J Prosthet Dent 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.02.013 [Epub ahead of print].
- 118Bitter K, Polster L, Askar H, von Stein-Lausnitz M, Sterzenbach G. Effect of final irrigation protocol and etching mode on bond strength of a multimode adhesive in the root canal. J Adhes Dent 2017; 19(3): 245–252.
- 119Shafiei F, Mohammadparast P, Jowkar Z. Adhesion performance of a universal adhesive in the root canal: Effect of etch-and-rinse vs. self-etch mode. PLoS One 2018; 13(4): e0195367.
- 120Nair P, Hickel R, Ilie N. Adverse effects of salivary contamination for adhesives in restorative dentistry. A literature review. Am J Dent 2017; 30(3): 156–164.
- 121Bernades Kde O, Hilgert LA, Ribeiro AP, Garcia FC, Pereira PN. The influence of hemostatic agents on dentin and enamel surfaces and dental bonding: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc 2014; 145(11): 1120–1128.
- 122Tachibana A, Castanho GM, Vieira SN, Matos AB. Influence of blood contamination on bond strength of a self-etching adhesive to dental tissues. J Adhes Dent 2011; 13(4): 349–358.
- 123Kucukyilmaz E, Celik EU, Akcay M, Yasa B. Influence of blood contamination during multimode adhesive application on the microtensile bond strength to dentin. Niger J Clin Pract 2017; 20(12): 1644–1650.
- 124Kulkarni AS, Kokate S, Hegde V, Fanibunda U. The effect of saliva contamination on shear bond strength of two universal bonding agents – An in vitro study. J Clin Diag Res 2018; 12(4): 6–10.
- 125Santschi K, Peutzfeldt A, Lussi A, Flury S. Effect of salivary contamination and decontamination on bond strength of two one-step self-etching adhesives to dentin of primary and permanent teeth. J Adhes Dent 2015; 17(1): 51–57.
- 126Kim J, Hong S, Choi Y, Park S. The effect of saliva decontamination procedures on dentin bond strength after universal adhesive curing. Restor Dent Endod. 2015; 40(4): 299–305.
- 127Brum R, Mazur R, Almeida J, Borges G, Caldas D. The influence of surface standardization of lithium disilicate glass ceramic on bond strength to a dual resin cement. Oper Dent 2011; 36(5): 478–485.
- 128Tian T, Tsoi JK, Matinlinna JP, Burrow MF. Aspects of bonding between resin luting cements and glass ceramic materials. Dent Mater 2014; 30(7): e147–e162.
- 129Dimitriadi M, Panagiotopoulou A, Pelecanou M, Yannakopoulou K, Eliades G. Stability and reactivity of γ-MPTMS silane in some commercial primer and adhesive formulations. Dent Mater 2018; 34(8): 1089–1101.
- 130Phoenix RD, Shen C. Characterization of treated porcelain surfaces via dynamic contact angle analysis. Int J Prosthodont 1995; 8(2): 187–194.
- 131Söderholm KJ, Shang SW. Molecular orientation of silane at the surface of colloidal silica. J Dent Res 1993; 72(6): 1050–1054.
- 132Matinlinna JP, Vallittu PK. Bonding of resin composites to etchable ceramic surfaces – An insight review of the chemical aspects on surface conditioning. J Oral Rehabil 2007; 34(8): 622–630.
- 133Chen L, Shen H, Suh BI. Effect of incorporating BisGMA resin on the bonding properties of silane and zirconia primers. J Prosthet Dent 2013; 110(5): 402–407.
- 134Yao C, Yu J, Wang Y, Tang C, Huang C. Acidic pH weakens the bonding effectiveness of silane contained in universal adhesives. Dent Mater 2018; 34(5): 809–818.
- 135Kalavacharla VK, Lawson NC, Ramp LC, Burgess JO. Influence of etching protocol and silane treatment with a universal adhesive on lithium disilicate bond strength. Oper Dent 2015; 40(4): 372–378.
- 136Makishi P, André CB, Silva JL, Bacelar-Sá R, Correr-Sobrinho L, Giannini M. Effect of storage time on bond strength performance of multimode adhesives to indirect resin composite and lithium disilicate glass ceramic. Oper Dent 2016; 41(5): 541–551.
- 137Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Sonoda A, Maruo Y, Makita Y, Okihara T, Irie M, Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B. Effectiveness and stability of silane coupling agent incorporated in 'universal' adhesives. Dent Mater 2016; 32(10): 1218–1225.
- 138Moro AFV, Ramos AB, Rocha GM, Perez CDR. Effect of prior silane application on the bond strength of a universal adhesive to a lithium disilicate ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2017; 118(5): 666–671.
- 139Inokoshi M, De Munck J, Minakuchi S, Van Meerbeek B. Meta-analysis of bonding effectiveness to zirconia ceramics. J Dent Res 2014; 93(4): 329–334.
- 140Thammajaruk P, Inokoshi M, Chong S, Guazzato M. Bonding of composite cements to zirconia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2018; 80: 258–268.
- 141Özcan M, Bernasconi M. Adhesion to zirconia used for dental restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent 2015; 17(1): 7–26.
- 142Kern M. Bonding to oxide ceramics-laboratory testing versus clinical outcome. Dent Mater 2015; 31(1): 8–14.
- 143Yoshida K, Yamashita M, Atsuta M. Zirconate coupling agent for bonding resin luting cement to pure zirconium. Am J Dent 2004; 17(4): 249–252.
- 144Papia E, Larsson C, du Toit M, Vult von Steyern P. Bonding between oxide ceramics and adhesive cement systems: A systematic review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2014; 102(2): 395–413.
- 145Amaral M, Belli R, Cesar PF, Valandro LF, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. The potential of novel primers and universal adhesives to bond to zirconia. J Dent 2014; 42(1): 90–98.
- 146Alves M, Campos F, Bergoli CD, Bottino MA, Özcan M, Souza R. Effect of adhesive cementation strategies on the bonding of y-tzp to human dentin. Oper Dent 2016; 41(3): 276–283.
- 147Dal Piva AMO, Carvalho RLA, Lima AL, Bottino MA, Melo RM, Valandro LF. Silica coating followed by heat-treatment of MDP-primer for resin bond stability to yttria-stabilized zirconia polycrystals. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2019; 107(1): 104–111.
- 148Cura M, González-González I, Fuentes V, Ceballos L. Effect of surface treatment and aging on bond strength of composite resin onlays. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 116(3): 389–396.
- 149Stawarczyk B, Krawczuk A, Ilie N. Tensile bond strength of resin composite repair in vitro using different surface preparation conditionings to an aged CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic. Clin Oral Investig 2015; 19(2): 299–308.
- 150Arpa C, Ceballos L, Fuentes MV, Perdigão J. Repair bond strength and nanoleakage of artificially aged CAD-CAM composite resin. J Prosthet Dent 2018 Nov 5. pii: S0022-3913(18)30423-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.05.013.
- 151Fornazari IA, Wille I, Meda EM, Brum RT, Souza EM. Effect of surface treatment, silane, and universal adhesive on microshear bond strength of nanofilled composite repairs. Oper Dent 2017; 42(4): 367–374.
- 152Kiomarsi N, Espahbodi M, Chiniforush N, Karazifard MJ, Kamangar SSH. In vitro evaluation of repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface treatments with bur and laser and application of universal adhesive. Laser Ther 2017; 26(3): 173–180.
- 153Hattan MA, Pani SC, Alomari M. Composite bonding to stainless steel crowns using a new universal bonding and single-bottle systems. Int J Dent 2013; 2013: 607405.
- 154Ghadimi S, Heidari A, Sarlak H. Comparison of shear bond strength of composite to stainless steel crowns using two mechanical surface treatments and two bonding systems. J Dent (Tehran) 2016; 13(1): 60–67.
- 155Arbildo H, Lamas-Lara C, Cruzado-Oliva F, Rosas-Prado C, Gómez-Fuertes A, Vásquez-Rodrigo H. Comparison of the clinical effect of the adhesive strategies of universal adhesives in the treatment of non-carious cervical lesions. Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Res 2018; 7(5): 210–222.
10.17126/joralres.2017.049 Google Scholar
- 156Mahn E, Rousson V, Heintze S. Meta-analysis of the influence of bonding parameters on the clinical outcome of tooth-colored cervical restorations. J Adhes Dent 2015; 17(5): 391–403.
- 157Pashley DH. Dentin bonding: Overview of the substrate with respect to adhesive material. J Esthet Dent 1991; 3(2): 46–50.
- 158Söderholm KJ. Correlation of in vivo and in vitro performance of adhesive restorative materials: A report of the ASC MD156 task group on test methods for the adhesion of restorative materials. Dent Mater 1991; 7(2): 74–83.
