Establishing a threshold for rainfall-induced landslides by a kinetic energy–duration relationship
Corresponding Author
Vito Ferro
Department of Earth and Marine Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
Correspondence
Vito Ferro, Department of Earth and Marine Sciences, University of Palermo, Via Archirafi 20, Palermo 90137, Italy.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorFrancesco G. Carollo
Department of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorMaria A. Serio
Department of Earth and Marine Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Vito Ferro
Department of Earth and Marine Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
Correspondence
Vito Ferro, Department of Earth and Marine Sciences, University of Palermo, Via Archirafi 20, Palermo 90137, Italy.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorFrancesco G. Carollo
Department of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorMaria A. Serio
Department of Earth and Marine Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Many investigators have attempted to define the threshold of landslide failure, that is, the level of the selected climatic variable above which a rainfall-induced landslide occurs. Intensity–duration (I–d) relationships are the most common type of empirical thresholds proposed in the literature for predicting landslide occurrence induced by rainfall. Recent studies propose the use of the kinetic power per unit volume of rainfall (J m−2 mm−1) to quantify the threshold of landslides induced by rainfall. In this paper, the relationship between rainfall duration and kinetic power corresponding to landslides triggered by rain was used to propose a new approach to define the threshold for predicting landslide occurrence. In particular, for the first time, a kinetic power per unit volume of rainfall–duration relationship is proposed for defining the minimum threshold needed for landslide failure. This new method can be applied using commonly used relationship for estimating the kinetic power per unit volume of rainfall and a new equation based on the measured raindrop size distribution. The applicability of this last method was tested using the data of rainfall intensity, duration and median volume diameter for 51 landslides in Taiwan. For the 51 landslides, the comparison between the measured pairs' kinetic power–duration and all selected relationships demonstrated that the equation based on the measured raindrop size distribution is the best method to define the landslide occurrence threshold, as it is both a process-oriented approach and is characterized by the best statistical performance. This last method has also the advantage to allow the forecasting of landslide hazard before the end of the rainfall event, since the rainfall kinetic power threshold value can be exceeded for a time interval less than the event duration.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
REFERENCES
- Beard, K. V. (1976). Terminal velocity and shape of cloud and precipitation drops aloft. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 33, 851–864.
- Blanchard, D. C. (1967). From raindrops to volcanoes. New York, NY: Doubleday Garden City.
- Brand E.W., Premchitt J., & Phillipson H.B.. 1984. Relationship between rainfall and landslides. Paper presented at: Proceeding of 4th International Symposium on Landslides, Toronto. Vol. 1. BiTech Publishers. Vancouver, Canada. pp. 377–384.
- Brown, L. C., & Foster, G. R. (1987). Storm erosivity using idealized intensity distribution. Transactions of ASAE, 30, 379–386. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.31957
- Brunetti, M. T., Peruccacci, S., Rossi, M., Luciani, S., Valigi, D., & Guzzetti, F. (2010). Rainfall thresholds for the possible occurrence of landslides in Italy. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 10, 447–458.
- Caine, N. (1980). The rainfall intensity-duration control of shallow landslides and debris flows. Geografiska Annaler, 62A, 23–27.
- Cannon, S. H., & Gartner, J. E. (2005). Wildfire-related debris flow from a hazards perspective. In M. Jakob & O. Hungr (Eds.), Debris flow hazards and related phenomena (pp. 363–385). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
10.1007/3-540-27129-5_15 Google Scholar
- Carollo, F., & Ferro, V. (2015). Modeling rainfall Erosivity by measured drop-size distributions. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 20, C4014006-1-7. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001077
- Carollo, F., Ferro, V., & Serio, M. A. (2017). Reliability of rainfall kinetic power-intensity relationships. Hydrological Processes, 31, 1293–1300.
- Carollo, F., Ferro, V., Serio, M. A., & Cerdà, A. (2018). Characterizing rainfall erosivity by kinetic power-median volume diameter relationship. Catena, 165, 12–21.
- Chang, J. M., Chen, H., Jou, B. J. D., Tsou, N. C., & Lin, G. W. (2017). Characteristics of rainfall intensity, duration, and kinetic energy for landslide triggering in Taiwan. Engineering Geology, 231, 81–87.
- Chen, H., & Su, D. Y. (2001). Geological factors for hazardous debris flow in Hoser, Central Taiwan. Environmental Geology, 40, 1114–1124.
- Clarizia, M., Gullà, G., Sorbino, G., 1996. Sui meccanismi di innesco dei soil slip. Paper presented at: Proceedings of International Conference Prevention of hydrogeological Hazards: The Role of Scientific Research. 1, 585–597, (in Italian).
- Crosta, G.B., Frattini, P. 2001. Rainfall thresholds for triggering soil slips and debris flow. In: Mediterranean storms. Proceedings of the 2nd EGS Plinius Conference on Mediterranean Storms ( A. Mugnai, F. Guzzetti, G. Roth Eds). Siena, Italy, 463–487.
- De Luca, D. L., & Versace, P. (2017). A comprehensive framework for empirical modeling of landslides induced by rainfall: The generalized FLaIR model (GFM). Landslides, 14, 1009–1030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-016-0768-5
- Epema, G. F., & Riezebos, H. T. (1983). Fall velocity of waterdrops at different heights as a factor influencing erosivity of simulated rain. In J. Ploey (Ed.), Catena Supplement. Rainfall simulation, runoff and soil erosion (Vol. 4, pp. 1–18). W. Germany: CATENA VERLAG.
- Ferro, V. (2001). Tecniche di misura e monitoraggio dei processi erosivi. Quaderni di Idronomia Montana, 21(2), 63–128 (in Italian).
- Ferro, V., & Bagarello, V. (1996). Rainfall depth-duration relationship for South Italy. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 1, 178–180.
- Ferro, V., & Porto, P. (1999). Regional analysis of rainfall depth-duration-equation for South Italy. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 4, 326–336.
- Ferro, V., & Porto, P. (2006). Flood frequency analysis for Sicily (South Italy). Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE, 11, 110–122.
- Foster G.R. 2004. User's reference guide: Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE2). Report USDA.
- Gunn, R., & Kinzer, G. D. (1949). The terminal velocity of fall for water droplets in stagnant air. Journal of Meteorology, 6, 243–248.
- Guo, W., Xu, X., Wang, W., Liu, Y., Guo, M., & Cui, Z. (2019). Rainfall-triggered mass movements on steep loess slopes and their entrainment and distribution. Catena, 183, 104238.
- Guzzetti, F., Perucacci, S., Rossi, M., & Stark, C. P. (2008). The rainfall intensity-duration control of shallow landslides and debris flow: An update. Landslides, 5, 3–17.
- Guzzetti, F., Peruccacci, S., Rossi, M., & Stark, C. (2007). Rainfall thresholds for the initiation of landslides in central and southern Europe. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 98, 239–267.
- Huang, Y., & Zhao, L. (2018). Review on landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machines. Catena, 165, 520–529.
- Innes, J. L. (1983). Debris flows. Progress in Physical Geography, 7, 469–501.
- Iverson, R. M. (2005). Regulation of landslide motion by dilatancy and pore pressure feedback. Journal of Geophysical Research, 110, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JF000268
- Jayawardena, A. W., & Rezaur, R. B. (2000). Measuring drop size distribution and kinetic energy of rainfall using a force transducer. Hydrological Processes, 14, 37–49.
- Kinnell, P. I. A. (1981). Rainfall intensity-kinetic energy relationship for soil loss prediction. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, 45, 153–155. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1981.03615995004500010033x
- Kinnell, P. I. A. (1987). Rainfall energy in eastern Australia: Intensity-kinetic energy relationships for Canberra, ACT. Soil Research, 25, 547–553. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR9870547
- Kornejady, A., Ownegh, M., & Bahremand, A. (2017). Landslide susceptibility assessment using maximum entropy model with two different data sampling methods. Catena, 152, 144–162.
- Laws, J. O. (1941). Measurements of the fall velocity of water drops and raindrops. Transactions - American Geophysical Union, 22, 709–721.
- Laws, J. O., & Parsons, D. A. (1943). The relation of raindrop size to intensity. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 24, 452–460.
10.1029/TR024i002p00452 Google Scholar
- Lin, G. W., & Chen, H. (2012). The relationship of rainfall energy with landslides and sediment delivery. Engineering Geology, 125, 108–118.
- Lu, J. Y., Su, C. C., Lu, T. F., & Maa, M. M. (2008). Number and column raindrop size distributions in Taiwan. Hydrological Processes, 22, 2148–2158.
- Marshall, J. S., & Palmer, W. M. (1948). The distribution of raindrops with size. Journal of Meteorology, 5, 154–166.
10.1175/1520-0469(1948)005<0165:TDORWS>2.0.CO;2 Google Scholar
- McGregor, K. C., Bingner, R. L., Bowie, A. J., & Foster, G. R. (1995). Erosivity index values for northern Mississippi. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 38, 1039–1047.
- Morin, J. (1996). Rainfall analysis. In M. Agassi (Ed.), Soil erosion, conservation and rehabilitation. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
- Nyssen, J., Vandenreyken, H., Poesen, J., Moeyersons, J., Deckers, J., Haile, M., … Govers, G. (2005). Rainfall erosivity and variability in the northern Ethiopian highlands. Journal of Hydrology, 311, 172–187.
- Poulenard, J., Podwojewski, P., Janeau, J. L., & Collinet, J. (2001). Runoff and soil erosion under rainfall simulation of Andisols from the Ecuadorian Paramo: Effect of tillage and burning. Catena, 45, 185–207.
- Pourghasemi, H. R., & Rahmati, O. (2018). Prediction of the landslide susceptibility: Which algorithm, which precision? Catena, 162, 177–192.
- Renard, K. G., Foster, G. R., Weesies, G. A., McCool, D. K., & Yoder, D. C. (1997). Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE). Agriculture handbook No. 703 (p. 404). Washington DC: United States Department of Agriculture.
- Salles, C., Poesen, J., & Sempere-Torres, D. (2002). Kinetic energy of rain and its functional relationship with intensity. Journal of Hydrology, 257, 256–270.
- Segoni, S., Piciullo, L., & Gariano, S. L. (2018). A review of the recent literature on rainfall thresholds for landslide occurrence. Landslides, 15, 1483–1501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-0966-4
- Sloneker, L. L., Olson, T. C., & Moldenhauer, W. C. (1976). Effect of pore water pressure on sand splash. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 40, 948–951.
- Teng, L. S. (1990). Geotectonic evolution of late Cenozoic arc-continent collision in Taiwan. Tectonophysics, 183, 57–76.
- Thompson, A. L., Ghidey, F., & Regmi, T. P. (2001). Raindrop energy effects on chemical and sediment transport. Transactions of ASAE, 44, 835–841.
- Thompson, A. L., & James, L. G. (1985). Water droplet impact and its effect on infiltration. Transactions of ASAE, 28, 1506–1510.
- Torri, D., Sfalanga, M., & Del Sette, M. (1987). Splash detachment: Runoff depth and soil cohesion. Catena, 14, 149–155.
- Uijlenhoet, R., & Stricker, J. N. M. (1999). A consistent rainfall parameterization based on exponential raindrop size distribution. Journal of Hydrology, 218, 101–127.
- Ulbrich, C. W. (1983). Natural variations in the analytic form of the raindrop size distribution. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology, 228, 1764–1775.
10.1175/1520-0450(1983)022<1764:NVITAF>2.0.CO;2 Google Scholar
- Van Dijk, A. I. J. M., Bruijnzeel, L. A., & Rosewell, C. J. (2002). Rainfall intensity–kinetic energy relationships: A critical literature appraisal. Journal of Hydrology, 261, 1–23.
- Wieczorek, G. F. (1987). Effect of rainfall intensity and duration on debris flows in Central Santa Cruz Mountains. In J. E. Costa & G. F. Wieczorek (Eds.), Reviews in Engineering Geology Debris flow/avalanches: Process, recognition, and mitigation (Vol. 7, pp. 93–104). Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America.
10.1130/REG7-p93 Google Scholar
- Wieczorek, G. F., & Glade, T. (2005). Climatic factors influencing occurrence of debris flows. In M. Jakob & O. Hungr (Eds.), Debris flow hazards and related phenomena, ( 325–362). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
10.1007/3-540-27129-5_14 Google Scholar
- Wischmeier, W. H., & Smith, S. S. (1978). Predicting rainfall erosion losses, agricultural handbook 537 (p. 58). Washington, DC: Science and Education Administration, USDA.