Volume 39, Issue 12 pp. 2040-2046
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Full Access

Diagnosis of Li-Fraumeni Syndrome: Differentiating TP53 germline mutations from clonal hematopoiesis

Results of the observational AGO-TR1 trial

Konstantin Weber-Lassalle

Konstantin Weber-Lassalle

Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany

Konstantin Weber-Lassalle and Philipp Harter contributed equally to this work.

Search for more papers by this author
Philipp Harter

Philipp Harter

Department of Gynecology & Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany

Konstantin Weber-Lassalle and Philipp Harter contributed equally to this work.

Search for more papers by this author
Jan Hauke

Jan Hauke

Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Corinna Ernst

Corinna Ernst

Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Stefan Kommoss

Stefan Kommoss

Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Frederik Marmé

Frederik Marmé

Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Nana Weber-Lassalle

Nana Weber-Lassalle

Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Katharina Prieske

Katharina Prieske

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Dimo Dietrich

Dimo Dietrich

Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Julika Borde

Julika Borde

Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Esther Pohl-Rescigno

Esther Pohl-Rescigno

Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Alexander Reuss

Alexander Reuss

Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Beyhan Ataseven

Beyhan Ataseven

Department of Gynecology & Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Christoph Engel

Christoph Engel

Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

LIFE-Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Julia C. Stingl

Julia C. Stingl

Research Division, Federal Institute for Drugs & Medical Devices, Bonn, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Rita K. Schmutzler

Rita K. Schmutzler

Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Eric Hahnen

Corresponding Author

Eric Hahnen

Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany

Correspondence

Eric Hahnen, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 34, 50931 Cologne, Germany.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 14 September 2018
Citations: 20

Funding information:

Astra Zeneca, Germany; Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, Grant/Award Number: V-16698/68502/2016-2020; Ministry for Innovation, Science and Research of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia, Grant/Award Number: #323-8.0302.16.02-132142; Federal Institute of Drugs and Medical Devices, Grant/Award Number: V-16698/68502/2016-2020; LIFE Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases, University Leipzig.

Communicated by Thierry Soussi

Abstract

The Li-Fraumeni cancer predisposition syndrome (LFS1) presents with a variety of tumor types and the TP53 gene is covered by most diagnostic cancer gene panels. We demonstrate that deleterious TP53 variants identified in blood-derived DNA of 523 patients with ovarian cancer (AGO-TR1 trial) were not causal for the patients’ ovarian cancer in three out of six TP53-positive cases. In three out of six patients, deleterious TP53 mutations were identified with low variant fractions in blood-derived DNA but not in the tumor of the patient seeking advice. The analysis of the TP53 and PPM1D genes, both intimately involved in chemotherapy-induced and/or age-related clonal hematopoiesis (CH), in 523 patients and 1,053 age-matched female control individuals revealed that CH represents a frequent event following chemotherapy, affecting 26 of the 523 patients enrolled (5.0%). Considering that TP53 mutations may arise from chemotherapy-induced CH, our findings help to avoid false-positive genetic diagnoses of LFS1.

1 INTRODUCTION

Deleterious germline mutations in the TP53 gene (MIM# 191170) cause the Li-Fraumeni cancer predisposition syndrome (LFS1, MIM# 151623). LFS1 presents with a variety of tumor types and the TP53 gene is therefore covered by most diagnostic cancer gene panels. Due to the central role of the TP53 protein in tumor initiation, the classification of deleterious TP53 mutations identified in blood-derived DNA as disease-causing appears to be self-evident. The interpretation of TP53 variants identified in a germline diagnostic setting, however, remains challenging. Firstly, most pathogenic TP53 mutations are missense mutations (Bouaoun et al., 2016) and cannot be easily classified based on mutation type. Secondly, TP53 mutations may arise de novo, leading to somatic mosaicism (Forsberg, Gisselsson, & Dumanski, 2017). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) allows detecting genetic variants with a high read depth. While inherited, heterozygous germline variants usually show a variant fraction (VF) of approximately 50%, TP53 variants with a VF below 50% were described, suggesting de novo somatic mosaic variants (Weitzel et al., 2017). Using blood-derived DNA, Swisher et al. (2016) identified deleterious somatic mosaic TP53 variants in 10 out of 686 patients with ovarian cancer (OC). Paired neoplastic tissue was available for four women with TP53 mutations—in no case, the TP53 mutation was identified in the tumor-derived DNA. The evidence for deleterious TP53 mutations identified purely in blood-derived DNA but not in the tumor of the patient seeking advice requires further validation since it may have severe implications for genetic counseling.

2 MATERIALS AND METHODS

Genomic DNA was isolated from venous EDTA blood samples using standard methods. Using blood-derived DNA, we screened 523 unselected patients with primary diagnosis of OC (n = 281) or platinum-sensitive recurrent OC (n = 242) and 1,053 cancer-free female control individuals for deleterious variants in the TP53 (MIM# 191170) and PPM1D (MIM# 605100) genes by hybridization capture-based NGS (Agilent SureSelect XT protocol). The patient cohort was previously screened for pathogenic germline mutations in established cancer predisposition genes (observational AGO-TR1 study). Healthy controls were recruited by a study on civilization diseases (LIFE study, https://life.uni-leipzig.de/). The studies were approved by the local ethic committees. All participants gave their written informed consent. The study sample and the methodologies were previously described in detail (Harter et al., 2017). The AGO-TR1 study protocol was approved by the ethical committee of the Landesaerztekammer Nordrhein (Nr. 2014340) and registered (NCT02222883); all patients gave written informed consent prior to any study related procedure. The hybridization capture-based NGS method was suitable for the analysis of DNA derived from either blood- or formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples (Agilent SureSelect XT protocol). For DNA isolation from FFPE tumor samples, hematoxylin and eosin-stained 3 μm tissue sections were analyzed by an experienced pathologist at the Institute of Pathology at the University Hospital Bonn, Germany. Tumor areas containing >80% tumor nuclei were chosen for DNA isolation using standard techniques. DNA quantification was performed using a Nanodrop® ND-1000 spectral photometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE).

For the verification of TP53 variants identified in blood/ tumor-derived DNA by hybridization capture-based NGS, TP53-positive DNA samples were re-analyzed using an amplicon-based Fluidigm Access Array 48.48 system (Fluidigm, San Francisco, CA) for target enrichment, covering all coding TP53 exons and exon-flanking intronic sequences (TP53 reference transcript NM_000546.5). DNA libraries were sequenced in 150 base paired end mode with the Mid Output Kit v2. on a Nextseq 500 device (Illumina, San Diego, CA). For evaluation of the variants, BCL files were demultiplexed, converted into FASTQ format using bcl2fastq2 Conversion Software v2.19.1.403. Sequence reads were mapped to the human reference genome assembly GRCh37 including decoy sequences (hs37d5) using Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA) v0.7.15 (Li & Durbin, 2009), and target-specific primer sequences were removed using BAMClipper v1.1.1 (Au, Ho, Kwong, Chan, & Ma, 2017). The Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) v3.8 (DePristo et al., 2011; McKenna et al., 2010) was used for realignment of insertions and deletions and quality recalibration. Variant calling was performed using Freebayes v1.1.0 (https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3907; https://github.com/ekg/freebayes), claiming a minimum alternate allele fraction of 0.05 (via argument –min-alternate-fraction), and base and mapping qualities of at least 20 (via arguments –min-base-quality and –min-mapping-quality). All positions found by FreeBayes (Garrison E, Marth G. Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.3907 [q-bio.GN] 2012) with a minimum alternative allele fraction of 0.05 and a minimum read depth of 60 were considered as putative variants, irrespective of the predicted genotype. Read depths and base counts of positions with alternative allele fractions below 0.05 were obtained via the mpileup utility of samtools v1.9, with minimum mapping and base qualities set to 20 (via arguments -min-MQ and –min-BQ).

3 RESULTS

In our patient sample, potentially deleterious missense variants in the TP53 gene were identified in blood-derived DNA of six out of 523 patients with OC using hybridization capture-based NGS (Table 1). The VFs of three TP53 variants detected in three patients (#1–#3) were 55%, 50% and 49%, respectively, compatible with VFs usually observed for germline variants. In the remaining three patients (#4–#6), four TP53 variants with lower VFs of 34%, 26%, 17%, and 7%, respectively, were observed (Table 1). DNA samples derived from paired neoplastic tissue from all six patients were analyzed by NGS. TP53 variants with a VF of approximately 50% in blood-derived DNA (patients #1–#3) were also present in the corresponding tumor samples (Table 1). The VFs were elevated in the tumor samples of two patients (#1, #2), suggesting loss of the wild-type TP53 alleles. In contrast, the TP53 variants with lower VFs (patients #4–#6) were not or only barely detectable in the corresponding tumor. Of note, different somatic de novo TP53 variants were observed only in the tumors of the latter three patients (Table 1), which were classified nonfunctional in the IARC TP53 database (Bouaoun et al., 2016) and pathogenic according to the UMD TP53 database and Seshat TP53 variant classification tool (Soussi, Leroy, & Taschner, 2014). Two variants listed in the ClinVar database were classified likely pathogenic/pathogenic. In summary, these data suggest that deleterious TP53 variants identified in blood-derived DNA were not causal for the patients’ cancer in three out of six cases.

Table 1. Potentially deleterious TP53 variants identified by NGS in 523 unselected patients with OC
Classification
Patient (age at first diagnosis, y) Histologic subtype 1st line chemotherapy Blood draw (after completing 1st line chemotherapy, m) TP53 variant cDNA TP53 variant protein (exon number) Variant fraction blood (total reads) Variant fraction tumor (total reads) IARC TP53 database Seshat ClinVar / UMD TP53 database
#1 (49) High grade serous Carboplatin, Paclitaxel 63 c.643A>G p.(Ser215Gly) (6) 55% (205/373) 77% (477/620) Non-functional Deleterious LP/LP
#2 (51) Mucinous None n.a. c.374C>T p.(Thr125Met) (4) 50% (338/676) 62% (57/92) Non-functional Deleterious LP/LP
#3 (45) High grade serous Bevacizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel 2 c.523C>T p.(Arg175Cys) (5) 49% (184/377) 46% (139/302) Partially functional Uncertain Uncertain/PP
#4 (27) Serous/papillary Carboplatin, Paclitaxel 15

c.482C>A

p.(Ala161Asp) (5)

34% (216/636)

<1% (2/203)

Non-functional

Deleterious

Uncertain/LP

c.823T>A

p.(Cys275Ser) (8)

26% (121/462)

0% (0/166)

Non-functional

Uncertain

Not listed/VUS

c.818G>A

p.(Arg273His) (8)

0% (0/462) 63% (103/163) Non-functional Pathogenic P/P
#5 (58) High grade serous Carboplatin, Paclitaxel 9

c.1177G>C

p.(Asp393His) (11)

17% (61/361)

0% (0/144)

Functional

Not listed

Not listed/VUS

c.646G>A p.(Val216Met) (6) 0% (0/381) 39% (114/292) Non-functional Pathogenic LP/P
#6 (66) High grade serous Bevacizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel 27 c.711G>A p.(Met237Ile) (7) 7% (24/338) 0% (0/196) Non-functional Pathogenic LP/P
c.775G>T p.(Asp259Tyr) (7) 0% (0/362) 51% (93/182) Non-functional Pathogenic Not listed/P
  • Alternative allele fractions ≥5% were considered true positive variant calls. For each patient, age at first diagnosis in years (y), histologic subtype, type of chemotherapy, time of blood draw after completing 1st line chemotherapy in months (m) and the TP53 variants are given (including their VFs in blood- and tumor-derived DNA). Patient #6 carried a heterozygous pathogenic germline variant in the BRCA2 gene (c.5496dupT, p.(Asn1833*fs)). The variant was present in blood (VF 48%, 208/433 reads) and in the corresponding tumor (VF 72%, 305/423 reads). The remaining five patients tested negative for deleterious germline variants in cancer predisposition genes (Harter et al., 2017). PLD, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin; n.a., not applicable; LP, likely pathogenic; PP, possibly pathogenic; P, pathogenic; VUS, variant of uncertain significance.
  • aTP53 transcript NM_000546.5.
  • bhttp://p53.iarc.fr/ R18 (April 2016) (assessed January 2018).
  • chttp://vps338341.ovh.net/ (assessed July 2018).
  • dhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/ (last updated July 2016) (assessed July 2018).
  • ehttps://p53.fr/tp53-database (assessed July 30, 2018).

All TP53 variants identified in blood-derived DNA using hybridization capture-based NGS were independently verified using an amplicon-based assay for target enrichment prior to NGS, with similar VFs observed (Table 2). Thus, TP53 variants listed in Table 1 represent true positive NGS variant calls. No additional TP53 variants were observed in the verification analysis.

Table 2. Technical verification of potentially deleterious TP53 variants (NM_000546.5) identified by NGS in blood-derived DNA of 523 unselected patients with OC
Patient TP53 variant cDNA TP53 variant protein Variant fraction blood hybrid capture (total reads) Variant fraction blood amplicon-based (total reads)
#1 c.643A>G p.(Ser215Gly) 55% (205/373) 47% (1,686/3,588)
#2 c.374C>T p.(Thr125Met) 50% (338/676) 38% (1,479/3,870)
#3 c.523C>T p.(Arg175Cys) 49% (184/377) 41% (1,709/4,169)
#4

c.482C>A

c.823T>A

p.(Ala161Asp)

p.(Cys275Ser)

34% (216/636)

26% (121/462)

30% (2,084/6,945)

20% (1,253/6,266)

#5 c.1177G>C p.(Asp393His) 17% (61/361) 18% (372/2,068)
#6 c.711G>A p.(Met237Ile) 7% (24/338) 6% (295/4,910)
  • Using a hybrid capture technique for target enrichment (Agilent SureSelect), seven potentially deleterious TP53 variants were identified in six patients. Alternative allele fractions ≥5% were considered true positive variant calls. All seven potentially deleterious TP53 variants were independently verified by NGS using an amplicon-based technique (Fluidigm) for target enrichment, with a considerably higher read depth. For each patient, the TP53 variants including their VFs in both independent assays are shown.

The occurrence of deleterious mutations with a low VF may be caused by chemotherapy-induced and/or age-related clonal hematopoiesis (CH), in which the deleterious mutations only affect the hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in the bone marrow and no other compartments of the body (Genovese et al., 2014; Jaiswal et al., 2014; Swisher et al., 2016). To differentiate whether the occurrence of TP53 variants with low VFs may be chemotherapy-induced and/or age-related, we analyzed 1,053 cancer-free female control individuals for deleterious variants in the TP53 gene by hybridization capture-based NGS. In this large control sample with a mean age at blood draw of 59.3 years (range 19–80) similar to the mean age at blood draw in all 523 patients enrolled in the AGO-TR1 trial (59.9 years, range 18–93), no pathogenic TP53 variant and no other TP53 variant with a low VF was observed, suggesting that age-related CH affecting the TP53 gene represents a rare event.

At the time of the blood draw, patients with deleterious TP53 variants with a low VF in blood had completed first line taxane/platinum-based chemotherapy (Table 1). Consequently, we suggested that the low VF-variants observed in the TP53 gene were chemotherapy-induced rather than age-related. Mutations affecting the PPM1D gene were originally thought to represent mosaic events leading to predisposition to OC (Ruark et al., 2013). Subsequent studies have elucidated that such events are enriched in the peripheral blood of patients with prior chemotherapy (Coombs et al., 2017). In our study sample, 24 out of 523 patients (4.6%) carried truncating variants affecting the PPM1D gene (Table 3), with generally low VFs (≤40%) in blood-derived DNA which were not compatible with heterozygous germline alterations. In corresponding tumor-derived DNA samples, PPM1D variants were not or only barely detectable (Table 3). Traces of mutant alleles in the tumor may be explained by infiltration of the tumor tissue with blood cells. Of note, 18 out of 24 PPM1D-positive patients had completed first line platinum-based chemotherapy prior to blood draw. In five cases, blood was drawn during 1st line chemotherapy (Table 3). In the age-matched control sample (n = 1,053), PPM1D variants were extremely rare with only one 77-year-old woman carrying a nonsense variant with a low VF affecting the PPM1D gene (c.1654C>T, p.(Arg552*), VF 15%, 30 out of 198 reads).

Table 3. Loss-of-function (LoF) variants in the PPM1D gene were identified by NGS in 24 out of 523 unselected patients with OC
Patients (age at first diagnosis, y) Histologic subtype 1st line chemotherapy Blood draw (after completing 1st line chemotherapy, m) PPM1D variant cDNA (NM_003620.3), protein Variant fraction blood (total reads) Variant fraction tumor (total reads) Germline mutation status gene, cDNA, protein, VF, total reads in blood (B) versus tumor (T)
Patients with pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants in established predisposition cancer genes
#7 (72) High grade serous

BIBF 1120 or placebo,

Carboplatin, Paclitaxel

47 c.1538del, p.(Leu513*) 43% (248/576) 0% (0/301) RAD51C, c.224dup, p.(Tyr75*), B:49%(292/596), T:80%(214/268)
#8 (58) High grade serous Bevacizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel 29 c.1731dup, p.(Leu578Thrfs*8) 40% (215/635) 1% (8/827) BRCA2, c.3264dup, p.(Gln1089Serfs*10), B:51%(240/471), T:49%(196/401)
#9 (50) High grade serous Carboplatin, Paclitaxel 80 c.1714C>T, p.(Arg572*) 40% (97/242) <1% (3/1,063) BRCA1, c.3108dup, p.(Lys1037Phefs*13), B:47%(117/248), T:57%(402/706)
#10 (61) High grade serous Carboplatin, Paclitaxel 39 c.1654C>T, p.(Arg552*) 23% (117/507) 2% (16/1,038) BRCA1, c.3481_3491del, p.(Glu1161Phefs*3), B:39% (196/503), T:38% (350/921)
#6 (66) High grade serous Bevacizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel 27

c.1535dup, p.(Asn512Lysfs*16)

c.1440del, p.(Ala481Profs*2)

12% (50/417)

7% (35/509)

0% (0/213)

0% (0/717)

BRCA2, c.5496dup, p.(Asn1833*), B:48%(208/433), T:72%(305/423)
#11 (62) High grade serous Bevacizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel 21 c.1521_1522insT, p.(Met508Tyrfs*20) 11% (31/275) <1% (3/664)

BRCA1, c.2475del, p.(Asp825Glufs*21),

B:51%(148/291), T:74%(474/640)

#12 (62) Missing Missing Missing c.1534_1535del, p.(Asn512Phefs*15) 10% (34/344) Tumor n.a.

BRCA1, c.4689C>G, p.(Tyr1563*),

B:45%(167/371), T:n.a.

#13 (50) High grade serous Carboplatin, Paclitaxel 45

c.1535dup, p.(Asn512Lysfs*16)

c.1451del, p.(Leu484*)

10% (46/461)

6% (33/542)

0% (0/741)

0% (0/714)

BRCA2, c.4965C>G, p.(Tyr1655*), B:51%(275/528), T:65%(291/448)
#14 (46) High grade serous Carboplatin, Paclitaxel 135 c.1535del, p.(Asn512fs) 6% (27/446) <1% (1/994) BRCA2, c.7976G>A, p.(Arg2659Lys), B:48%(175/364), T:80%(483/604)
#15 (64) High grade serous Carboplatin, Paclitaxel 69 c.1280G>A, p.(Trp427*) 5% (17/349) 0% (0/401) RAD51C, c.502A>T, p.(Arg168*), B:48%(200/416), T:57%(212/372)
Patients without pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants in established predisposition cancer genes
#16 (76) High grade serous Bevacizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel During 1st line c.1280G>A, p.(Trp427*) 36% (313/869) <1% (2/264) Negative
#17 (63) High grade serous Carboplatin, Paclitaxel 39 c.1432del, p.(Cys478Alafs*5) 33% (193/586) <1% (8/999) Negative
#18 (70) Serous/papillary (grade unknown) Bevacizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel During 1st line c.1456_1460del, p.(Ile486*) 33% (237/718) <1% (2/791) Negative
#19 (61) High grade serous Carboplatin, Paclitaxel 37 c. 1430del, p.(Asn477Ilefs*6) 31% (131/423) <1% (7/1,027) Negative
#20 (76) High grade serous Carboplatin, Paclitaxel 30 c.1618G>T, p.(Glu540*) 29% (194/669) 0% (0/1,094) Negative
#21 (68) High grade serous Bevacizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel 20 c.1535dup, p.(Asn512Lysfs*16) 27% (134/496) <1% (4/561) Negative
#22 (73) Serous/papillary (grade unknown) Carboplatin, Paclitaxel 67 c.1407del, p.(Asp470Ilefs*13) 26% (100/386) 0% (0/793) Negative
#23 (63) High grade serous Carboplatin, Paclitaxel 112 c.1422del, p.(Glu475Lysfs*8) 17% (85/498) tumor n.a. Negative
#24 (62) High grade serous Carboplatin, Paclitaxel 48 c.1636delC, p.(Leu546*) 11% (55/503) 0% (0/964) Negative
#25 (65) High grade serous Bevacizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel During 1st line c.1432del, p.(Cys478Alafs*5*) 10% (76/755) 0% (0/987) Negative
#26 (71) Missing Carboplatin, Paclitaxel 18

c.1403C>G, p.(Ser468*)

c.1654C>T, p.(Arg552*)

8% (57/709)

6% (44/741)

1% (9/755)

<1% (8/962)

Negative
#27 (76) Clear cell Carboplatin During 1st line c.1281G>A, p.(Trp427*) 6% (28/462) 0% (0/969) Negative
#28 (72) High grade serous Bevacizumab, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel During 1st line c.1417_1430del, p.(Pro473Leufs*3) 6% (43/719) 0% (0/811) Negative
#29 (63) High grade serous Carboplatin, Paclitaxel 22 c.1602delT, p.(Phe534Leufs*5) 5% (25/500) <1% (2/461) Negative
  • All LoF variants affect the last exon (exon 6) of the PPM1D gene. Of the 24 PPM1D-positive individuals, 10 (42%) were shown to carry likely pathogenic or pathogenic germline variants in established OC predisposition genes. The remaining 14 patients were tested negative for likely pathogenic or pathogenic germline variants in established OC predisposition genes. For each patient, age at first of diagnosis (years), histologic subtype, type of chemotherapy, time of blood draw after completing 1st line chemotherapy (months) and the PPM1D variants are given (including their VFs in blood- and tumor-derived DNA). Germline mutation status is shown in the right column, including the variants and their VFs in blood- and tumor-derived DNA. PLD, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin; n.a., not applicable.

In summary, 26 out of 523 (5.0%) patients enrolled in the AGO-TR1 trial carried TP53 and/or PPM1D variants with low VFs in blood-derived DNA (23× PPM1D only, 2× TP53 only, 1× PPM1D and TP53 [patient #6 in Tables 1 and 3]) versus one out of 1,053 (0.1%) in age-matched control individuals (1× PPM1D). Thus, the event of a CH is substantially enriched following standard chemo therapy and most likely account for the TP53 variants with low VFs observed in this study. Notably, the overall prevalence of pathogenic germline mutations in validated OC predisposition genes ATM (MIM# 607585), BRCA1 (MIM# 113705), BRCA2 (MIM# 600185), BRIP1 (MIM# 605882), MSH2 (MIM# 609309), MSH6 (MIM# 600678), RAD51C (MIM# 602774), RAD51D (MIM# 602954) according to Lilyquist et al. (2017) in the AGO-TR1 study was 25.2% (132 out of 523) (Harter et al., 2017). In the subgroup of patients showing variants with low VFs in the CH-associated genes TP53 and PPM1D, the proportion of germline mutation carriers was elevated (41.7%, 10/24; Table 3) compared with the overall patient sample, though not reaching levels of significance.

4 DISCUSSION

We demonstrate that deleterious TP53 variants identified in blood-derived DNA of patients with OC (AGO-TR1 trial, NCT02222883) were not causal for the patients’ cancer in three out of six TP53-positive cases. The paired analysis of blood/tumor-derived DNA of OC patients along with the analysis of 1,053 age-matched healthy female control individuals revealed that, in three out of six patients, TP53 mutations with low VFs arise from chemotherapy-induced CH. To avoid false-positive molecular genetic diagnoses of LFS1, we suggest that conspicuous TP53 test results in patients who received chemotherapy prior to blood draw should be complemented with additional tissue testing, excluding the hematopoietic compartment (e.g., tumor tissue). Following these analyses, we now consider the TP53 germline variants observed in the patients #1–#3 (Table 1) likely pathogenic.

Genovese et al. (2014) proposed that CH is associated with increased risks of hematologic cancer. In line with this suggestion patient #6, the only patient who was shown to carry both, TP53 and PPM1D variants, developed an acute myeloid leukemia. Whether chemotherapy-induced CH may be a risk factor for therapy-associated secondary hematologic malignancies needs to be clarified in larger prospective studies. In the subgroup of patients showing CH-associated alterations in the TP53 and PPM1D genes, however, the proportion of patients carrying germline mutations in validated OC predisposition genes was 1.7-fold higher than in the overall patient sample. Thus, we suggest that patients with a heterozygous inactivation of OC predispositions genes are prone to chemotherapy-induced CH. Whether germline cancer predisposition may be a risk factor for therapy-associated secondary hematologic events needs to be clarified.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Astra Zeneca Germany for the support of the trial, the team of Peter Schantl (Schantl Pharmacy Service, Wiesbaden, Germany) for the monitoring, and the team of Gabriele Elser (AGO Study Group, Wiesbaden/Essen, Germany) for study coordination.

    CONFLICT OF INTEREST

    Philipp Harter: Consulting or Advisory Role-AstraZeneca, Roche/Genentech, Tesaro, Clovis, Pharmamar Lilly, Sotio; Research Funding-AstraZeneca (Inst); Travel, Accommodations, Expenses-Medac; Stefan Kommoss: Honoraria-Astra Zeneca, Roche; Consulting or Advisory role-Roche, Tesaro, Astra-Zeneca; Travel, Accommodations, Expenses-Tesaro, PhermaMar, AstraZeneca; Katharina Prieske: Travel, Research funding-Medac Oncology; Honoraria-Astra Zeneca, Roche. Beyhan Ataseven: Advisory Role-Tesaro and Roche/Genetech; Honoraria-Roche/Genentech, AstraZeneca, Amgen; Travel Support-Roche/Genentech; Rita K. Schmutzler: Honoraria-AstraZeneca; Consulting or Advisory Role-AstraZeneca; Research Funding-AstraZeneca (Inst); Eric Hahnen: Honoraria-AstraZeneca, Consulting or Advisory Role-AstraZeneca, Research Funding-AstraZeneca (Inst); Konstantin Weber-Lassalle, Jan Hauke, Corinna Ernst, Frederik Marmé, Nana Weber-Lassalle, Dimo Dietrich, Julika Borde, Esther Pohl-Rescigno, Alexander Reuss, Christoph Engel, Julia Stingl, no relationships to disclose. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.