Volume 2, Issue 1 pp. 25-35
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Open Access

Investigating the relationships between emotional experiences and behavioral responses amid the Covid-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey

Tingting Wang

Tingting Wang

School of Business, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Contribution: Conceptualization (lead), Data curation (lead), Formal analysis (lead), Funding acquisition (lead), ​Investigation (lead), Methodology (lead), Project administration (lead), Supervision (lead), Validation (lead), Visualization (lead), Writing - original draft (lead), Writing - review & editing (lead)

Search for more papers by this author
Xin Zheng

Xin Zheng

School of Business, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Data curation (equal), Formal analysis (equal), ​Investigation (equal), Methodology (equal), Project administration (equal), Supervision (equal), Validation (equal), Visualization (equal), Writing - original draft (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal)

Search for more papers by this author
Zhaomeng Niu

Zhaomeng Niu

Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA

Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Data curation (equal), Formal analysis (equal), ​Investigation (equal), Methodology (equal), Project administration (equal), Supervision (equal), Validation (equal), Visualization (equal), Writing - original draft (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal)

Search for more papers by this author
Pengwei Hu

Pengwei Hu

Merck China Innovation Hub, Shanghai, China

Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Data curation (equal), Formal analysis (equal), ​Investigation (equal), Methodology (equal), Project administration (equal), Supervision (equal), Validation (equal), Visualization (equal), Writing - original draft (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal)

Search for more papers by this author
Ruiqi Dong

Corresponding Author

Ruiqi Dong

Fordham University, New York, New York, USA

Correspondence: Ruiqi Dong, Fordham University, New York, NY, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Data curation (equal), Formal analysis (equal), ​Investigation (equal), Methodology (equal), Project administration (equal), Supervision (equal), Validation (equal), Visualization (equal), Writing - original draft (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal)

Search for more papers by this author
Zhihan Tang

Zhihan Tang

Medical College, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China

Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Data curation (equal), Formal analysis (equal), Funding acquisition (equal), ​Investigation (equal), Methodology (equal), Project administration (equal), Supervision (equal), Validation (equal), Visualization (equal), Writing - original draft (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal)

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 06 September 2022

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic produced a complex combination of intense negative emotions among the general public, influencing people's coping reactions toward the pandemic. Yet each discrete emotion may affect people's behaviors in different ways. Unveiling the specific emotion–behavior relationships can provide valuable implications for designing effective intervention programs. Through the lens of the appraisal theory of emotion, we assessed the relationships between negative emotions and pandemic-related behaviors among the Chinese population midst the early outbreak of the pandemic. An anonymous online survey was distributed to mainland Chinese participants (n = 2976), which assessed individuals' emotional states and behavioral reactions to the pandemic. Consistent with the differential appraisal theme underlying each negative emotion as delineated by the appraisal theory, mixed relationships between emotions and pandemic-related behaviors were revealed. Specifically, anxiety was positively associated with behaviors of seeking pandemic-related information, sharing such information, and stockpiling preventive goods, yet, contrary to prediction, anxious people were reluctant to adopt preventive measures, which is maladaptive. Sad people sought information less frequently and exhibited lower intention to stockpile preventive goods; but, opposing prediction, they shared information less frequently. Angry people were more active in sharing information and in stockpiling preventive goods. These findings suggest that public health practitioners can utilize the emotion–behavior relationships to identify the vulnerable individuals who tend to adopt maladaptive coping behaviors, help them address emotional distress, and encourage their adoption of effective coping behaviors.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data and material are available upon request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.