The lifetime of a wireless sensor network (WSN) can be impacted by the energy consumption of the routing protocol, because small sensor nodes are typically hard to recharge after deployment. Generally, data aggregation is employed to decrease the data redundancy and save energy at each node in a WSN. Traditional routing protocols frequently fall short of handling the complexities of data aggregation while getting energy efficient. In this paper, Optimized Multi-Stream General Adversarial Network espoused Data-Aggregation-Aware Energy-Efficient Routing Protocol for WSN (MSGAN-RPOA-DAA-EERP) is proposed. Here, Multi-Stream General Adversarial Network (MSGAN) is used for routing protocol. Then the Red Panda Optimization algorithm (RPOA) is proposed to optimize the MSGAN to increase the network lifetime of WSN. The proposed model is used to maximize the parameters such as data aggregation, communication energy and node residual energy. The proposed MSGAN-RPOA-DAA-EERP method attains 20.28%, 27.91% and 17.53% lower energy consumption when compared to the existing methods, like Energy-efficient cross-layer-basis opportunistic routing protocol and partially informed sparse autoencoder for data transfer in WSN (EECOP-PIAS-WSN), Improved buffalo optimized deep feed forward neural learning dependent multiple path routing for energy efficient data accumulation (IBO-DFFNL-EEDA), Effective communication in WSN utilizing optimized energy efficient engroove leach clustering protocol (EC-WSN-EEELCP) respectively.

Open Research

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

1S. A. Sibi and L. S. Annabel, “ Q Energy and SARSA Energy Learning for Energy Efficient Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks,” in 2022 International Conference on IoT and Blockchain Technology (ICIBT) (Ranchi, India: IEEE, 2022), 1–5.
10.1109/ICIBT52874.2022.9807754
Google Scholar
2M. Sathyamoorthy, S. Kuppusamy, R. K. Dhanaraj, and V. Ravi, “Improved K-Means Based q Learning Algorithm for Optimal Clustering and Node Balancing in WSN,” Wireless Personal Communications 122, no. 3 (2022): 2745–2766.
10.1007/s11277-021-09028-4
Web of Science® Google Scholar
3R. Abraham and M. Vadivel, “An Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Network With Flamingo Search Algorithm Based Cluster Head Selection,” Wireless Personal Communications 130, no. 3 (2023): 1503–1525.
10.1007/s11277-023-10342-2
Web of Science® Google Scholar
4D. Prabhu, R. Alageswaran, and S. Miruna Joe Amali, “Multiple Agent Based Reinforcement Learning for Energy Efficient Routing in WSN,” Wireless Networks 17 (2023): 1.
Google Scholar
5A. Keerthika and H. V. Berlin, “Reinforcement-Learning Based Energy Efficient Optimized Routing Protocol for WSN,” Peer-To-Peer Networking and Applications 15, no. 3 (2022): 1685–1704.
10.1007/s12083-022-01315-6
Web of Science® Google Scholar
6A. A. Okine, N. Adam, and G. Kaddoum, “ Reinforcement Learning Aided Routing in Tactical Wireless Sensor Networks,” in International Symposium on Ubiquitous Networking (Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022), 211–224.
Google Scholar
7R. Molose, B. Isong, N. Dladlu, and A. Abu-Mahfouz, “ Data Aggregation Schemes for Maximal Network Lifetime,” in 2022 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Energy Technologies (ICECET) (Prague, Czech Republic: IEEE, 2022), 1–8.
10.1109/ICECET55527.2022.9872947
Google Scholar
8H. Guo, R. Wu, B. Qi, and C. Xu, “Deep-Q-Networks-Based Adaptive Dual-Mode Energy-Efficient Routing in Rechargeable Wireless Sensor Networks,” IEEE Sensors Journal 22, no. 10 (2022): 9956–9966.
10.1109/JSEN.2022.3163368
Web of Science® Google Scholar
9D. Kumar, V. K. Arora, and R. Sawhney, “Different Categories of Forwarding Routing Protocols in Wsn (Wireless Sensor Network): A Review,” Mobile Computing and Sustainable Informatics: Proceedings of ICMCSI 2022 (2022): 509–521.
10.1007/978-981-19-2069-1_35
Google Scholar
10M. S. Hajar, H. Kalutarage, and M. O. Al-Kadri, “ RRP: A Reliable Reinforcement Learning Based Routing Protocol for Wireless Medical Sensor Networks,” in 2023 IEEE 20th Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC) (Las Vegas, NV: IEEE, 2023), 781–789.
10.1109/CCNC51644.2023.10060225
Google Scholar
11P. S. Prakash, D. Kavitha, and P. C. Reddy, “Delay-Aware Relay Node Selection for Cluster-Based Wireless Sensor Networks,” Measurement: Sensors 24 (2022): 100403.
10.1016/j.measen.2022.100403
Google Scholar
12N. Kaur, R. Kaur, and R. Sharma, “ A Systematic Review of Data Aggregation Using Machine Learning Techniques,” in 2022 3rd International Conference on Computing, Analytics and Networks (ICAN) (Rajpura, Punjab: IEEE, 2022), 1–6.
10.1109/ICAN56228.2022.10007131
Google Scholar
13H. K. Sivaraman, “ Minimizing the Energy Consumption and Enhancing the NetworkLifetime in WSN Using Advanced LEACH Protocol,” in 2022 Fourth International Conference on Emerging Research in Electronics, Computer Science and Technology (ICERECT) (Mandya, India: IEEE, 2022), 1–6.
10.1109/ICERECT56837.2022.10059740
Google Scholar
14I. Ullah, C. M. Kim, J. S. Heo, and Y. H. Han, “An Energy-Efficient Data Collection Scheme by Mobile Element Based on Markov Decision Process for Wireless Sensor Networks,” Wireless Personal Communications 123, no. 3 (2022): 2283–2299.
10.1007/s11277-021-09241-1
Web of Science® Google Scholar
15R. Sheeja, M. M. Iqbal, and C. Sivasankar, “Multi-Objective-Derived Energy Efficient Routing in Wireless Sensor Network Using Adaptive Black Hole-Tuna Swarm Optimization Strategy,” Ad Hoc Networks 144 (2023): 103140.
10.1016/j.adhoc.2023.103140
Web of Science® Google Scholar
16R. Kapoor and S. Sharma, “ BMREWSN: Design of a Hybrid Bio-Inspired Model for Improving the Routing Performance of Energy-Aware Wireless Sensor Networks,” in 2022 IEEE 6th Conference on Information and Communication Technology (CICT) (Gwalior, India: IEEE, 2022), 1–6.
10.1109/CICT56698.2022.9997975
Google Scholar
17C. Sivasankar and T. Kumanan, “Reinforcement Learning Based Active Attack Detection and Blockchain Technique to Protect the Data From the Passive Attack in the Autonomous Mobile Network,” Wireless Personal Communications 19 (2023): 1–8.
Google Scholar
18R. R. Mostafa, M. El Bannany, and A. M. Khedr, “ Gradient Enhanced Regressive Multivariate Artificial Fish Swarm Optimized Data Collection for IoT-Enabled WSN in Smart Environments,” in 2023 International Conference on Advances in Intelligent Computing and Applications (AICAPS) (Kochi, India: IEEE, 2023), 1–8.
Google Scholar
19Y. Yao, D. Xie, Y. Li, C. Wang, and Y. Li, “Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Based on Archimedes Optimization Algorithm,” IEEE Sensors Journal 22, no. 15 (2022): 15561–15573.
10.1109/JSEN.2022.3186063
Web of Science® Google Scholar
20G. Sahar, K. B. Bakar, F. T. Zuhra, S. Rahim, T. Bibi, and S. H. Madni, “Data Redundancy Reduction for Energy-Efficiency in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comprehensive Review,” IEEE Access 9 (2021): 157859–157888.
10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3128353
Web of Science® Google Scholar
21C. Su, J. Wei, D. Lin, L. Kong, and Y. L. Guan, “Task Offloading and Resource Allocation for Fog Computing in NG Wireless Networks: A Federated Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal 11 (2023): 6802–6816.
10.1109/JIOT.2023.3314496
Google Scholar
22D. Lin, M. Yan, L. Kong, R. Quan, and Y. L. Guan, “A Framework of Real-Time Intelligent Transportation System Based on Hybrid Fog-Cloud Computing,” IEEE Communications Magazine 62, no. 1 (2023): 126–132.
10.1109/MCOM.013.2200616
Google Scholar
23D. Lin, Z. Chen, X. Liu, L. Kong, and Y. L. Guan, “ESWCM: A Novel Energy-Sustainable Approach for SWIPT-Enabled WSN With Constraint MEAP Configurations,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 23 (2024): 9012–9028.
10.1109/TMC.2024.3357771
Google Scholar
24C. Zhao, Q. Wu, D. Lin, et al., “An Energy-Balanced Unequal Clustering Approach for Circular Wireless Sensor Networks,” Ad Hoc Networks 132 (2022): 102872.
10.1016/j.adhoc.2022.102872
Web of Science® Google Scholar
25V. P. Raj and M. Duraipandian, “An Energy-Efficient Cross-Layer-Based Opportunistic Routing Protocol and Partially Informed Sparse Autoencoder for Data Transfer in Wireless Sensor Network,” Journal of Engineering Research 12, no. 1 (2024): 122–132.
10.1016/j.jer.2023.10.023
Web of Science® Google Scholar
26S. S. Rani and K. S. Sankar, “Improved Buffalo Optimized Deep Feed Forward Neural Learning Based Multipath Routing for Energy Efficient Data Aggregation in WSN,” Measurement: Sensors 27 (2023): 100662.
10.1016/j.measen.2022.100662
Google Scholar
27N. Meenakshi, S. Ahmad, A. V. Prabu, et al., “Efficient Communication in Wireless Sensor Networks Using Optimized Energy Efficient Engroove Leach Clustering Protocol,” Tsinghua Science and Technology 29, no. 4 (2024): 985–1001.
10.26599/TST.2023.9010056
Web of Science® Google Scholar
28N. R. Sivakumar, S. M. Nagarajan, G. G. Devarajan, L. Pullagura, and R. P. Mahapatra, “Enhancing Network Lifespan in Wireless Sensor Networks Using Deep Learning Based Graph Neural Network,” Physical Communication 59 (2023): 102076.
10.1016/j.phycom.2023.102076
Web of Science® Google Scholar
29K. Debasis, L. D. Sharma, V. Bohat, and R. S. Bhadoria, “An Energy-Efficient Clustering Algorithm for Maximizing Lifetime of Wireless Sensor Networks Using Machine Learning,” Mobile Networks and Applications 28, no. 2 (2023): 853–867.
10.1007/s11036-023-02109-7
Web of Science® Google Scholar
30A. Hossan and P. K. Choudhury, “DE-SEP: Distance and Energy Aware Stable Election Routing Protocol for Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Network,” IEEE Access 10 (2022): 55726–55738.
10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3177190
Web of Science® Google Scholar
31J. D. Abdulai, K. S. Adu-Manu, F. A. Katsriku, and F. Engmann, “A Modified Distance-Based Energy-Aware (mDBEA) Routing Protocol in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs),” Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 14, no. 8 (2023): 10195–10217.
10.1007/s12652-021-03683-y
Web of Science® Google Scholar
32M. Yurt, S. U. Dar, A. Erdem, E. Erdem, K. K. Oguz, and T. Çukur, “mustGAN: Multi-Stream Generative Adversarial Networks for MR Image Synthesis,” Medical Image Analysis 70 (2021): 101944.
10.1016/j.media.2020.101944
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
33H. Givi, M. Dehghani, and Š. Hubálovský, “Red Panda Optimization Algorithm: An Effective Bio-Inspired Metaheuristic Algorithm for Solving Engineering Optimization Problems,” IEEE Access 11 (2023): 57203–57227.
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3283422
Web of Science® Google Scholar
34W. K. Yun and S. J. Yoo, “Q-Learning-Based Data-Aggregation-Aware Energy-Efficient Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks,” IEEE Access 9 (2021): 10737–10750.
10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3051360
Web of Science® Google Scholar

Citing Literature

Volume36, Issue2

February 2025

e70017

Data-Aggregation-Aware Energy-Efficient in Wireless Sensor Networks Using Multi-Stream General Adversarial Network

ABSTRACT

Open Research

Data Availability Statement

References

Citing Literature

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

Data-Aggregation-Aware Energy-Efficient in Wireless Sensor Networks Using Multi-Stream General Adversarial Network

ABSTRACT

Open Research

Data Availability Statement

References

Citing Literature

References

Related

Information