Thermoeconomic assessment and multiobjective optimization of a CCHP and MED hybrid system based on IR-SOFC/MGT
Huailiang You
School of Energy and Power, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, China
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jitian Han
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, China
Correspondence
Jitian Han, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorYang Liu
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, China
School of Thermal Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan, China
Search for more papers by this authorDaifen Chen
School of Energy and Power, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, China
Search for more papers by this authorHuailiang You
School of Energy and Power, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, China
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jitian Han
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, China
Correspondence
Jitian Han, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorYang Liu
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, China
School of Thermal Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan, China
Search for more papers by this authorDaifen Chen
School of Energy and Power, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, China
Search for more papers by this authorFunding information: International (regional) Cooperation and Exchange of the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant/Award Number: 41761144067; National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant/Award Number: 51376110
Summary
A thermoeconomic assessment and multi-objective optimization of a novel CCHP and multi-effect desalination (MED) hybrid system driven by an internal-reforming solid oxide fuel cell (IR-SOFC) and a micro gas turbine (MGT) are presented to comprehensively evaluate the hybrid system performance in this research. Firstly, the sensitivity analysis of system key design parameters such as steam to carbon ratio, compressor pressure ratio, pinch point temperature difference, motive steam pressure of MED and inlet pressure of ORC turbine on energy, exergy, economic, and thermoeconomic performance is investigated. It is indicated from the analysis results that the proposed hybrid system could produce power, cooling, heating and potable water which are 300.0 kW, 7.358 kW, 8.757 kW and 0.1715 kg/s, respectively. The system total cost and total cost per unit exergy are $9.838/h and $14.75/GJ under the design condition. A multi-objective optimization by using NSGA-II method is further implemented to obtain the ideal system design parameters and optimal system exergy efficiency, freshwater production, and total cost per unit exergy by setting four groups of different weights to these three objectives. The three-dimensional and two-dimensional Pareto frontier curves of the optimization results are depicted to reveal the relations between the objectives. It is validated that the system exergy efficiency and the system total cost per unit exergy are conflicted with the freshwater production.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
REFERENCES
- 1Herrando M, Pantaleo AM, Wang K, Markides CN. Solar combined cooling, heating and power systems based on hybrid PVT, PV or solar-thermal collectors for building applications. Renew Energy. 2019; 143: 637-647.
- 2Ebrahimi M, Keshavarz A, Jamali A. Energy and exergy analyses of a micro-steam CCHP cycle for a residential building. Energ Buildings. 2012; 45: 202-210.
- 3Maghanki MM, Ghobadian B, Najafi G, et al. Micro combined heat and power (MCHP) technologies and application. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2013; 28: 510-524.
- 4Lin S, Song W, Feng Z, Zhao Y, Zhang Y. Energy management strategy and capacity optimization for CCHP system integrated with electric-thermal hybrid energy storage system. Int J Energy Res. 2020; 44: 1125-1139.
- 5Siddiqui O, Ishaq H, Dincer I. A novel solar and geothermal-based trigeneration system for electricity generation, hydrogen production and cooling. Energy Convers Manag. 2019; 198:111812.
- 6Murugan S, Horák B. Tri and polygeneration systems-a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2016; 60: 1032-1051.
- 7Shu L, Sunarso J, Hashim SS, et al. Advanced perovskite anodes for solid oxide fuel cells: a review. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2019; 44:31275–31304.
- 8Azizi MA, Brouwer J. Progress in solid oxide fuel cell-gas turbine hybrid power systems: system design and analysis, transient operation, controls and optimization. Appl Energy. 2018; 215: 237-289.
- 9Xu Q, Xia L, He Q, Guo Z. Meng Ni thermo-electrochemical modelling of high temperature methanol-fuelled solid oxide fuel cells. Appl Energy. 2021; 291:116832.
- 10Kong W, Han Z, Lu S, Ni M. A simple but effective design to enhance the performance and durability of direct carbon solid oxide fuel cells. Appl Energy. 2021; 287:116586.
- 11Chen Y, Hao W, Wang F. Chemo-mechanical coupling model of solid oxide fuel cell under high-temperature oxidation. Int J Energy Res. 2020; 44: 7068-7081.
- 12Chen D, Ding K, Chen Z, Wei T, Liu K. Physics field distributions within fuel cell stacks with manifolds penetrating through the plane zone and open outlet features. Energy Convers Manag. 2018; 178: 190-199.
- 13Mehr AS, Nezhad MM, Lanzini A, et al. Thermodynamic assessment of a novel SOFC based CCHP system in a wastewater treatment plant. Energy. 2018; 150: 299-309.
- 14Mehrpooya M, Sadeghzadeh M, Rahimi A, et al. Technical performance analysis of a combined cooling heating and power (CCHP) system based on solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) technology-a building application. Energy Convers Manag. 2019; 198:111767.
- 15Yu Z, Han J, Cao X. Investigation on performance of an integrated solid oxide fuel cell and absorption chiller tri-generation system. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2011; 36:12561-12573.
- 16Marefati M, Mehrpooya M, Mousavi SA. Introducing an integrated SOFC, linear Fresnel solar field, Stirling engine and steam turbine combined cooling, heating and power process. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2019; 44:30256-30279.
- 17Eisavi B, Chitsaz A, Hosseinpour J, Ranjbar F. Thermo-environmental and economic comparison of three different arrangements of solid oxide fuel cell-gas turbine (SOFC-GT) hybrid systems. Energy Convers Manag. 2018; 168: 343-356.
- 18Haseli Y, Dincer I, Naterer GF. Thermodynamic modeling of a gas turbine cycle combined with a solid oxide fuel cell. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2008; 33(20): 5811-5822.
- 19Meng Q, Han J, Kong L, Liu H, Zhang T, Yu Z. Thermodynamic analysis of combined power generation system based on SOFC/GT and transcritical carbon dioxide cycle. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2017; 42(7): 4673-4678.
- 20Wang J, Yan Z, Ma S, Dai Y. Thermodynamic analysis of an integrated power generation system driven by solid oxide fuel cell. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2012; 37(3): 2535-2545.
- 21Aminyavari M, Mamaghani AH, Shirazi A, et al. Exergetic, economic, and environmental evaluations and multi-objective optimization of an internal-reforming SOFC-gas turbine cycle coupled with a Rankine cycle. Appl Therm Eng. 2016; 108: 833-846.
- 22Khalid KA, Antar MA, Khalifa A, Hamed OA. Allocation of thermal vapor compressor in multi effect desalination systems with different feed configurations. Desalination. 2018; 426: 164-173.
- 23You H, Han J, Yang L. Performance assessment of a CCHP and multi-effect desalination system based on GT/ORC with inlet air precooling. Energy. 2019; 185: 286-298.
- 24Hosseini M, Dincer I, Ahmadi P, Avval HB, Ziaasharhagh M. Thermodynamic modelling of an integrated solid oxide fuel cell and micro gas turbine system for desalination purposes. Int J Energy Res. 2013; 37: 426-434.
- 25Salimi M, Reyhani HA, Amidpour M. Thermodynamic and economic optimization of multi-effect desalination unit integrated with utility steam network. Desalination. 2018; 427: 51-59.
- 26Moghimi M, Emadi M, Akbarpoor AM, et al. Energy and exergy investigation of a combined cooling, heating, power generation, and seawater desalination system. Appl Therm Eng. 2018; 140: 814-827.
- 27Yang L, Han J, You H. Performance analysis of a CCHP system based on SOFC/GT/CO2 cycle and ORC with LNG cold energy utilization. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2019; 44:29700–29710.
- 28You H, Han J, Yang L. Conventional and advanced exergoeconomic assessments of a CCHP and MED system based on solid oxide fuel cell and micro gas turbine. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2020; 45(21):12143-12160.
- 29You H, Han J, Yang L, et al. 4E analysis and multi-objective optimization of a micro poly-generation system based on SOFC/MGT/MED and organic steam ejector refrigerator. Energy. 2020; 206:118122.
- 30Bavarsad PG. Energy and exergy analysis of internal reforming solid oxide fuel cell-gas turbine hybrid system. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2007; 32(17): 4591-4599.
- 31Hotz N, Senn SM, Poulikakos D. Exergy analysis of a solid oxide fuel cell micro power plant. J Power Sources. 2006; 158(1): 333-347.
- 32Chan SH, Ho HK, Tian Y. Multi-level modeling of SOFC-gas turbine hybrid system. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2003; 28(8): 889-900.
- 33Behbahani-nia A, Bagheri M, Bahrampoury R. Optimization of fire tube heat recovery steam generators for cogeneration plants through genetic algorithm. Appl Therm Eng. 2010; 30: 2378-2385.
- 34Esmaieli A, Poorya KM, Shakib SE, et al. Applying different optimization approaches to achieve optimal configuration of a dual pressure heat recovery steam generator. Int J Energy Res. 2013; 37(12): 1440-1452.
- 35Ameri M, Mohammadi SS, Hosseini M, Seifi M. Effect of design parameters on multi-effect desalination system specifications. Desalination. 2009; 245(1): 266-283.
- 36Eldessouky HT, Ettouney HM. Multiple-effect evaporation desalination systems: thermal analysis. Desalination. 1999; 125: 259-276.
- 37Kamali RK, Abbassi A, Sadough Vanini SA. A simulation model and parametric study of MED-TVC process. Desalination. 2009; 235(1): 340-351.
- 38Al-Mutaz IS, Wazeer I. Development of a steady-state mathematical model for MEE-TVC desalination plants. Desalination. 2014; 351: 9-18.
- 39Shara MA, Nafey AS, García-Rodríguez L. Thermo-economic analysis of solar thermal power cycles assisted MED-VC (multi effect distillation-vapor compression) desalination processes. Energy. 2011; 36(5): 2753-2764.
- 40Calise F, Capuozzo C, Carotenuto A, Vanoli L. Thermoeconomic analysis and off-design performance of an organic Rankine cycle powered by medium-temperature heat sources. Sol Energy. 2014; 103: 595-609.
- 41Dai Y, Wang J, Lin G. Exergy analysis, parametric analysis and optimization for a novel combined power and ejector refrigeration cycle. Appl Therm Eng. 2009; 29(10): 1983-1990.
- 42Ameri M, Ahmadi P, Hamidi A. Energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of a steam power plant: a case study. Int J Energy Res. 2010; 33(5): 499-512.
- 43Kanoglu M, Dincer I, Rosen MA. Understanding energy and exergy efficiencies for improved energy management in power plants. Energy Policy. 2007; 35(7): 3967-3978.
- 44Moghimi M, Emadi M, Ahmadi P, Moghadasi H. 4E analysis and multi-objective optimization of a CCHP cycle based on gas turbine and ejector refrigeration. Appl Therm Eng. 2018; 141: 516-530.
- 45Meratizaman M, Monadizadeh S, Amidpour M. Introduction of an efficient small-scale freshwater-power generation cycle (SOFC-GT-MED), simulation, parametric study and economic assessment. Desalination. 2014; 351: 43-58.
- 46Shariatzadeh OJ, Refahi A, Rahmani M, et al. Economic optimisation and thermodynamic modelling of SOFC tri-generation system fed by biogas. Energy Convers Manag. 2015; 105: 772-781.
- 47Yin J, Yu Z, Zhang C, Tian M, Han J. Thermodynamic analysis and multi-objective optimization of a novel power/cooling cogeneration system for low-grade heat sources. Energy Convers Manag. 2018; 166: 64-73.
- 48Amirhossein Mosaffa L, Farshi G. Thermodynamic and economic assessments of a novel CCHP cycle utilizing low-temperature heat sources for domestic applications. Renew Energy. 2018; 120: 134-150.
- 49Ashour MM. Steady state analysis of the Tripoli west LT-HT-MED plant. Desalination. 2003; 152: 191-194.
- 50Cocco D, Tola V. Use of alternative hydrogen energy carriers in SOFC-MGT hybrid power plants. Energy Convers Manag. 2009; 50(4): 1040-1048.
- 51Sanaye S, Katebi A. 4E analysis and multi objective optimization of a micro gas turbine and solid oxide fuel cell hybrid combined heat and power system. J Power Sources. 2014; 247: 294-306.
- 52Yang L, Han J, You H. Exergoeconomic analysis and multi-objective optimization of a CCHP system based on LNG cold energy utilization and flue gas waste heat recovery with CO2 capture. Energy. 2019; 190:116201.
- 53Sadeghi M, Chitsaz A, Mahmoudi SMS, et al. Thermoeconomic optimization using an evolutionary algorithm of a trigeneration system driven by a solid oxide fuel cell. Energy. 2015; 89: 191-204.
- 54Ahmadi P, Rosen MA, Dincer I. Multi-objective exergy-based optimization of a polygeneration energy system using an evolutionary algorithm. Energy. 2012; 46(1): 21-31.
- 55Ebrahimi-Moghadam A, Farzaneh-Gord M, Moghadam AJ, et al. Design and multi-criteria optimisation of a trigeneration district energy system based on gas turbine, Kalina, and ejector cycles: exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental evaluation. Energy Convers Manag. 2021; 227:113581.
- 56Hadelu LM, Boyaghchi FA. Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses and optimization of different ejector based two stage expander-organic flash cycles fuelled by solar energy. Energy Convers Manag. 2020; 216:112943.