Volume 6, Issue 4 e575
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Open Access

Environmental DNA for monitoring the impact of offshore wind farms on fish and invertebrate community structures

Isolde Cornelis

Corresponding Author

Isolde Cornelis

Animal Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Oostende, Belgium

Correspondence

Isolde Cornelis, Animal Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Jacobsenstraat 1, Oostende B-8400, Belgium.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Annelies De Backer

Annelies De Backer

Animal Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Oostende, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Sara Maes

Sara Maes

Animal Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Oostende, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Joran Vanhollebeke

Joran Vanhollebeke

Animal Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Oostende, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Rein Brys

Rein Brys

Research Institute for Nature and Forest, Geraardsbergen, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Tom Ruttink

Tom Ruttink

Plant Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Melle, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Kris Hostens

Kris Hostens

Animal Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Oostende, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Sofie Derycke

Sofie Derycke

Animal Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Oostende, Belgium

Biology Department, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 June 2024
Citations: 2

Abstract

To reach the renewable energy targets set by the European Commission, a tenfold expansion of the installed offshore wind farms is needed. Since the construction of offshore wind farms may affect local soft-sediment fauna, an efficient monitoring technique is needed to monitor the potential effects on the marine ecosystem. Here, we assess whether eDNA metabarcoding is a suitable alternative to monitor fish and epibenthos biodiversity in these difficult to access marine habitats. Water sampling and trawl surveys were conducted in parallel in 12 coastal and 18 offshore sites, the latter located inside and outside two offshore wind farms in the Belgian part of the North Sea. 12S eDNA metabarcoding retrieved 85.7% of the fish species caught in the beam trawls, whereas the COI eDNA metabarcoding only identified 31.4% of the epibenthic invertebrate species. Furthermore, the 12S marker resulted in an additional detection of 26 unique fish species, whereas the COI marker detected an additional 90 invertebrate species. Spatial patterns in alpha diversity recovered with eDNA metabarcoding were not significantly different from those observed with morphological determination. Significant differences were found in fish and invertebrate community structures between the coastal, transition and offshore zones as well as on the smaller wind farm scales, which agreed with the morphological beam trawl data. Indicator species found with morphological beam trawl monitoring for each of the three zones (coastal, transition, offshore) were also detected with 12S eDNA metabarcoding, and the latter method detected an additional 31 indicator species. Our findings show the need for adequate quality control of the obtained species lists and reveal that 12S eDNA metabarcoding analyses offers a useful survey tool for the monitoring of fish communities in offshore wind farms, but the used COI assay did not adequately capture the epibenthic communities as observed with beam trawl data.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

All sequencing data and sample metadata have been archived on NCBI under the BioProject number PRJNA1032405 (SUB14012338 for the 12S eDNA metabarcoding data and SUB14013523 for the COI eDNA metabarcoding data). A version of the inferred biodiversity data is available at GBIF.org: DOI 10.15468/nvabg3 (12S eDNA metabarcoding data) and DOI 10.15468/tvng39 (COI eDNA metabarcoding data). This version includes all the species detected in the unrarefied and concatenated data after decontamination with Decontam instead of microDecon. All scripts used for bioinformatics, taxonomic assignments, and statistical analyses are available on GitHub (https://github.com/icornelis90/eDNA_metabarcoding_NJ2021.git) and Zenodo (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.11280892).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.