Volume 30, Issue 3 e1777
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Assessing students with dyslexia and other reading difficulties through multiple diagnostic assessments

Nai-Cheng Kuo

Corresponding Author

Nai-Cheng Kuo

Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA

Correspondence

Nai-Cheng Kuo, Augusta University, 2500 Walton Way, Augusta, GA 30904, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Heather Wahl

Heather Wahl

Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Wendy McKinney

Wendy McKinney

Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA

Search for more papers by this author
McKenzie Thompson

McKenzie Thompson

Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Nicole Roberson

Nicole Roberson

Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Thomas Mattison

Thomas Mattison

Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Megan Ray

Megan Ray

Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 July 2024
Citations: 1

Abstract

This article aims to assist practitioners in understanding dyslexia and other reading difficulties and assessing students' learning needs. We describe the essential components of language and literacy, universal screening, diagnostic assessments, curriculum-based measurement and eligibility determination. We then introduce four diagnostic assessments as examples, including norm-referenced assessments (i.e. the Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing second edition and the Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Achievement) and criterion-referenced assessments (i.e. the Gallistel-Ellis Test of Coding Skills and the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills). Finally, We use a makeup case as a concrete example to illustrate how multiple diagnostic assessments are recorded and how the results can be used to inform intervention and eligibility for special education services.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

No data are available. It is a mock case study for the purpose of demonstration.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.