Volume 12, Issue 4 pp. 4195-4205
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Open Access

Real-world outcomes among patients with advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancers initiating second-line treatment

David P. Cosgrove

David P. Cosgrove

Compass Oncology, The US Oncology Network, Vancouver, Washington, USA

Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Methodology (equal), Supervision (equal), Validation (equal), Writing - original draft (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal)

Search for more papers by this author
Emily S. Reese

Emily S. Reese

EMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA

Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), ​Investigation (equal), Methodology (equal), Project administration (equal), Writing - original draft (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal)

Search for more papers by this author
Nicole M. Fulcher

Nicole M. Fulcher

Ontada, The Woodlands, Texas, USA

Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Data curation (equal), Formal analysis (equal), ​Investigation (equal), Methodology (equal), Project administration (equal), Resources (equal), Validation (equal), Writing - original draft (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal)

Search for more papers by this author
Sarah S. Bobiak

Sarah S. Bobiak

EMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA

Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), ​Investigation (equal), Methodology (equal), Project administration (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal)

Search for more papers by this author
Francois-Xavier Lamy

Francois-Xavier Lamy

Healthcare Business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), ​Investigation (equal), Methodology (equal), Project administration (equal), Resources (equal), Supervision (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal)

Search for more papers by this author
Arthur Allignol

Arthur Allignol

Healthcare Business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

Contribution: Formal analysis (equal), Funding acquisition (lead), ​Investigation (equal), Methodology (equal), Validation (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal)

Search for more papers by this author
Marley Boyd

Marley Boyd

Ontada, The Woodlands, Texas, USA

Contribution: Data curation (equal), Formal analysis (equal), ​Investigation (equal), Methodology (equal), Validation (equal), Visualization (lead), Writing - review & editing (equal)

Search for more papers by this author
Seyed H. Mahmoudpour

Corresponding Author

Seyed H. Mahmoudpour

Healthcare Business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

Correspondence

Seyed H. Mahmoudpour, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Frankfurter Str. 250, F 135 / OG4_N2_11, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany.

Email: [email protected]

Contribution: Methodology (equal), Project administration (equal), Resources (equal), Supervision (equal), Writing - original draft (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal)

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 October 2022
Citations: 2

Abstract

Background

Limited data are available regarding second-line (2 L) treatment for advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancers (BTC) in the US real-world setting. This study explores the rapidly evolving and growing treatment landscape in the 2 L setting for advanced or metastatic BTC with a large cohort of patients treated in a community oncology setting.

Methods

Adult patients with BTC initiating 2 L treatment after a platinum-containing first-line between 1/1/10- and 6/30/19 were identified from the US Oncology Network electronic healthcare record database and followed through 12/31/19. Baseline patient and treatment characteristics were analyzed descriptively, including overall response rate (ORR) in the real-world clinical setting. Kaplan–Meier methods were used to measure duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results

The overall population (N = 160) included 74 patients (46.3%) with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 41 (25.6%) with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and 45 (28.1%) with gallbladder cancer. Thirty unique 2 L regimens were recorded for the study population, with folinic acid, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX, 34.4%) and capecitabine monotherapy (20.0%) being the most common. ORR was 7.5% (95% CI, 3.9%–12.7%). From 2 L initiation, median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI, 2.4–3.3 months), and median OS was 5.2 months (95% CI, 4.2–6.7 months).

Conclusion

Results from this study provide real-world evidence that although patients treated in the community oncology setting receive a wide variety of 2 L treatments, the regimens are consistent with those recommended by guidelines. Although responses are observed with 2 L treatment, duration is brief and associated with poor OS in patients with advanced or metastatic disease.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

David P. Cosgrove reports employment at Compass Oncology, consulting fees from Daiichi Sankyo/Lilly and Merck KGaA, honoraria from Pfizer, and travel meeting support from US Oncology. Emily S. Reese reports employment with EMD Serono. Nicole M. Fulcher reports employment with Ontada. Sarah S. Bobiak reports employment with EMD Serono. Francois-Xavier Lamy reports employment with Merck KGaA at the time of the study. Arthur Allignol reports employment with Merck KGaA at the time of the study. Marley Boyd reports employment with Ontada at the time of the study. S. Hamidreza Mahmoudpour reports employment with Merck KGaA.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The health data used to support the findings of this study are restricted by the US Oncology Institutional Review Board in order to protect patient privacy. For this reason, data used to support the findings of this study have not been made available.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.