Volume 7, Issue 2 pp. 336-343
Original Research
Open Access

Mechanism underlying the negative effect of prostate volume on the outcome of extensive transperineal ultrasound-guided template prostate biopsy

Takayoshi Demura

Corresponding Author

Takayoshi Demura

Department of Urology, Sapporo Kosei General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan

Correspondence

Takayoshi Demura, Department of Urology, Sapporo Kosei General Hospital, North-3, East-8, Chuo-Ku, Sapporo 060-0033, Japan. Tel: +81-11-261-5331; Fax: +81-11-261-6040; E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Takenori Takada

Takenori Takada

Terrestrial Ecology, Graduate School of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Naohiko Shimoda

Naohiko Shimoda

Department of Urology, Sapporo Kosei General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Takaya Hioka

Takaya Hioka

Department of Urology, Sapporo Kosei General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Yoshihumi Iwaguchi

Yoshihumi Iwaguchi

Department of Clinical Pathology, Sapporo Kosei General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Shin Ichihara

Shin Ichihara

Department of Clinical Pathology, Sapporo Kosei General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Hiroko Gotoda

Hiroko Gotoda

Department of Clinical Pathology, Sapporo Kosei General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 January 2018
Citations: 3

Abstract

Previous studies have indicated a possible relationship between increased prostate volume (PV) and decreased biopsy yield, although the mechanism involved is unclear. We evaluated 1650 patients who underwent template biopsy. The distribution of 993 cancer lesions in 302 prostatectomy specimens was compared with the biopsy data to determine whether each lesion was detected. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) model was used to determine the diagnostic accuracy of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and related markers. A medical record number (MRN) was used as a negative control. The cancer positive rate did not change as PSA increased in patients with PV ≥50 mL (= 0.466), although it increased as PSA increased in patients with PV<50 mL (= 0.001). The detection rate of cancer lesions decreased as the diameter of the lesions decreased (= 0.018), but remained unchanged with respect to PV. The diameters of the maximum lesions in patients with PV ≥ 50 mL were significantly smaller than those in patients with PV<50 mL (= 0.003). In patients with PV ≥ 50 mL, the areas under the ROC curves for PSA-related markers did not differ significantly from that for MRN, although they were significantly greater than that for MRN in patients with PV<50 mL (< 0.001). These results suggest that an increase in PV is associated with a decrease in size and detectability of cancer lesions resulting in a decrease in biopsy yield. Loss of diagnostic accuracy of markers in patients with PV ≥ 50 mL indicates a decrease in serum levels of PSA produced by prostate cancer, which suggests growth inhibition of the cancer.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no disclosures.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.