Critical Areas and Entry Points for Sustainability-Related Strategies in the Sugarcane-Based Ethanol Industry of Brazil
Corresponding Author
Wellington Spetic
School of Business Administration, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
School of Business Administration, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
Wellington Spetic, School of Business Administration, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorPatricia Marquez
School of Business Administration, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
Search for more papers by this authorRobert Kozak
Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Wellington Spetic
School of Business Administration, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
School of Business Administration, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
Wellington Spetic, School of Business Administration, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorPatricia Marquez
School of Business Administration, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
Search for more papers by this authorRobert Kozak
Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorABSTRACT
This study reveals five critical areas that Brazil's sugarcane-based ethanol industry could capitalize on to incorporate sustainability into their firms' strategies. The emergent theoretical framework represents a starting point for further investigations aimed at integrating the sustainability construct and strategies for the industry. A growing body of literature calls for strategic management to adapt to complex and ever-changing environments and sustainability trends. For many firms in developing economies, sustainability remains isolated from mainstream strategy, resulting in reactive approaches on the part of management. A qualitative research method – grounded theory – was used to induct from data. Five themes emerged from the analysis providing guidance on where sustainability-related strategies ought to begin. This research posits that existing sectoral innovation systems could be used to channel sustainability-driven innovations. In addition, a combination of public and private efforts to foster innovations based on the emergent themes could increase the value of industry under study, while lessening its social and environmental footprint. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
References
-
Abbey LA,
Baer W,
Filizzola M. 2006. Growth, efficiency, and equity: the impact of agribusiness and land reform in Brazil. Latin American Business Review 7(2): 93–115.
10.1300/J140v07n02_05 Google Scholar
- de Abreu MCS. 2009. How to define an environmental policy to improve corporate sustainability in developing countries. Business Strategy and the Environment 18(8): 542–556.
- Anfavea (Brazil's automobile industry association). 2009. www.anfavea.com.br/tabelas2009.html [24 April 2010].
- Ansoff HI. 1965. Corporate Strategy. McGraw-Hill: New York.
- Bansal P, Roth K. 2000. Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal 43(4): 717.
- Barros GSC, de Moraes MAFD. 2002. A desregulamentação do setor sucroalcooleiro. Revista de Economia Política 22: 156–173.
- Bazeley P. 2007. Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo, ( 2nd edn). Sage: Los Angeles, CA.
- Bell S, Morse S. 2008. Sustainability Indicators. Sterling, VA: London.
- Bowen HR. 1953. Social Responsibility of the Businessman. Harper and Row: New York.
- Brasilagro. 2009. http://www.brasilagro.com.br [19 January 2009].
- Brown S, Blackmon K. 2005. Aligning manufacturing strategy and business-level competitive strategy in new competitive environments: the case for strategic resonance. Journal of Management Studies 42(4): 793–815.
-
Carroll A. 1999. Corporate social responsibility: evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society 38(3): 268.
10.1177/000765039903800303 Google Scholar
-
Carter CR,
Dresner M. 2001. Purchasing's role in environmental management: cross-functional development of grounded theory. Journal of Supply Chain Management 37(3): 12.
10.1111/j.1745-493X.2001.tb00102.x Google Scholar
- Corbett C, Van Wassenhove L. 1993. Trade-offs? What trade-offs? Competence and competitiveness in manufacturing strategy. California Management Review 35(4): 107–122.
- Drejer A. 2002. Strategic Management and Core Competencies: Theory and Application. Quorum Books: Westport, CT.
- Eisenhardt KM, Martin LA. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal 21: 1105–1121.
- Elkington J. 1994. Towards the sustainable corporation: win–win–win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review 36(2): 90–100.
- Fischer G, Teixeira E, Tothne-Hizsnyik E, van Velthuizen H. 2009. Land use dynamics and sugarcane production. In Sugarcane Ethanol, Contributions to Climate Change Mitigation and the Environment, P Zuurbier, J Vooren (eds), IIASA RP-09-001. Wageningen: Laxenburg, Austria.
- Flick U. 1992. Triangulation revisited: strategy of validation or alternative? Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 22(2): 175–197.
- Flick U. 2006. An Introduction to Qualitative Research, ( 3rd edn). Sage: London.
-
Fowler SJ,
Hope C. 2007. Incorporating sustainable business practices into company strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment 16(1): 26–38.
10.1002/bse.462 Google Scholar
- Furtado AT, Scandiffio MIG, Cortez LAC. 2011. The Brazilian sugarcane innovation system. Energy Policy 39: 156–166.
-
von Geibler J,
Liedtke C,
Wallbaum H,
Schaller S. 2006. Accounting for the social dimension of sustainability: experiences from the biotechnology industry. Business Strategy and the Environment 15(5): 334–346.
10.1002/bse.540 Google Scholar
- Gilchrist VJ, Williams RL. 1999. Key informant interviews. In Doing Qualitative Research, ( 2nd edn), BF Crabtree, WL Miller (eds). Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA; 71–88.
- Grant RM. 1991. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review 33(3): 114.
- Hall J, Matos S. 2010. Incorporating impoverished communities in sustainable supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 40(1/20): 124–147.
- Hall J, Matos S, Severino L, Beltrão N. 2009. Brazilian biofuels and social exclusion: established and concentrated ethanol versus emerging and dispersed biodiesel. Journal of Cleaner Production 17: S77–S85.
- Hamel G, Prahalad CK. 1994. Competing for the Future. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
- Hart SL. 1995. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review 20(4): 986.
-
Hartshorn J,
Wheeler D. 2002. Facilitating strategic business responses to sustainability. Greener Management International 40: 107–119.
10.9774/GLEAF.3062.2002.wi.00009 Google Scholar
-
Katsoulakos T,
Katsoulacos Y. 2007. Integrating corporate responsibility principles and stakeholder approaches into mainstream strategy: a stakeholder-oriented and integrative strategic management framework. Corporate Governance 7(4): 355–369.
10.1108/14720700710820443 Google Scholar
- Kidd CV. 1992. The evolution of sustainability. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 5(1): 1–26.
-
Kolk A,
Mauser A. 2002. The evolution of environmental management: from stage models to performance evaluation. Business Strategy and the Environment 11(1): 14–31.
10.1002/bse.316 Google Scholar
- Korhonen J. 2004. Industrial ecology in the strategic sustainable development model: strategic applications of industrial ecology. Journal of Cleaner Production 12: 809–823.
- Kuzel AJ. 1999. Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In Doing Qualitative Research, ( 2nd edn), BF Crabtree, WL Miller (eds). Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA; 31.
- Leite RC de C, Leal MRLV, Cortez LAB, Griffin MW, Scandiffio MIG. 2009. Can Brazil replace 5% of the 2025 world gasoline demand with ethanol? Energy 34: 655–661.
-
Leontiades M. 1982. The confusing words of business policy. Academy of Management Review 7(1): 45–48.
10.2307/257247 Google Scholar
- Lubin DA, Esty DC. 2010. The sustainability imperative. Harvard Business Review 88(2): 42–50.
- van Marrewijk M, Werre M. 2003. Multiple levels of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics 44(2/3): 107–119.
- Martinelli LA, Filoso S. 2008. Expansion of sugarcane ethanol production in Brazil: environmental and social challenges. Ecological Applications 18(4): 885–898.
- Mathews JA. 2007. Biofuels: what a biopact between North and South could achieve. Energy Policy 35(7): 3550–3570.
-
McCracken G. 1988. The Long Interview. Sage: Newbury Park, CA.
10.4135/9781412986229 Google Scholar
- Merkens H. 2004. Selection procedures, sampling, case construction. In A Companion to Qualitative Research, U Flick, E Kardorff, I Steinke, B Jenner (eds). Sage: London; 165.
- Miles MB, Huberman AM. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
- Miller D. 1992. The generic strategy trap. Journal of Business Strategy 13(1): 37.
- Nidumolu R, Prahalad CK, Rangaswami MR. 2009. Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review 87(9): 56–64.
- Orlitzky M, Schmidt F, Rynes S. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organization Studies 24: 403–411.
- Pearce DW. 1998. Economics and Environment: Essays on Ecological Economics and Sustainable Development. Elgar: Northampton, MA.
- Porter M. 1980. Competitive Strategy. Free Press: New York.
- Porter M. 1985. Competitive Advantage. Free Press: New York.
- Porter M, Kramer, M. 2006. Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review 84: 78–92.
- Prahalad C, Hamel G. 1990. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review May–June: 79–91.
- Presley A, Meade L, Sarkis J. 2007. A strategic sustainability justification methodology for organizational decisions: a reverse logistics illustration. International Journal of Production Research 45(18/19): 4595–4620.
- Robinson J. 2004. Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological Economics 48(4): 369–384.
- Robinson J, Tinker J. 1997. Reconciling ecological, economic, and social imperatives: a new conceptual framework. In Surviving Globalism: Social and Environmental Dimensions, T Schrecker (ed.). Macmillan–St. Martin's: London–New York; 71–94.
- Russo MV. 2009. Explaining the impact of ISO 14001 on emission performance: a dynamic capabilities perspective on process and learning. Business Strategy and the Environment 18(5): 307–319.
- Savitz A, Weber K. 2006. The Triple Bottom Line: How Today's Best-Run Companies are Achieving Economic, Social and Environmental Success. Wiley: San Francisco, CA.
- Schaller N. 1993. The concept of agricultural sustainability. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 46: 89–97.
- Shapiro C. 1989. The theory of business strategy. RAND Journal of Economics 20(1): 125–137.
- Shikida PFA, de Moraes MAD, Alves LRA. 2004. Agroindústria canavieira do Brasil: intervencionismo, desregulamentação e neocorporatismo. Revista de Economia e Agronegócio 2(3): 361–382.
- Smeets E, Junginger M, Faaij A, Walter A, Dolzan P, Turkenburg W. 2008. The sustainability of Brazilian ethanol – an assessment of the possibilities of certified production. Biomass and Bioenergy 32(8): 781–813.
-
Strauss AL. 1987. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
10.1017/CBO9780511557842 Google Scholar
- Strauss A, Corbin J. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage: London.
- Teece D. 1984. Economic analysis and strategic management. California Management Review 26(3): 87–110.
- Teece D. 1998. Capturing value from knowledge assets: the new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California Management Review 40(3): 55–79.
- Teece D, Pisano G, Shuen A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18(7): 509–533.
- UNHCR. 2008. Building Resilience: a Human Rights Framework for World Food and Nutrition Security. http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/48cf71dd2.html [16 September 2008].
- Unica (Brazilian sugarcane industry association). 2009. http://english.unica.com.br/ [23 April 2009].
- Wagner B. 2009. Innovation and competitive advantages from the integration of strategic aspects with social and environmental management in European firms. Business Strategy and the Environment 18: 291–306.
-
Wagner M,
Schaltegger S. 2003. How does sustainability performance relate to business competitiveness? Greener Management International 44: 5–16.
10.9774/GLEAF.3062.2003.wi.00003 Google Scholar
- Ward PT, Duray R. 2000. Manufacturing strategy in context: environment, competitive strategy and manufacturing strategy. Journal of Operations Management 18(2): 123–138.
- Ward PT, McCreery JK, Anand G. 2007. Business strategies and manufacturing decisions. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 27(9): 951–973.
- Weiss R. 1994. Learning from Strangers. The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. Free Press: New York.
-
Weller SC,
Romney AK. 1988. Systematic Data Collection. Sage: Newbury Park, CA.
10.4135/9781412986069 Google Scholar
- Wheelen TL, Hunger JD. 1983. Strategic Management and Business Policy. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.
- Wikström P. 2010. Sustainability and organizational activities – three approaches. Sustainable Development 18(2): 99–107.
- World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
- Yavitz B, Newman W. 1982. Strategy in Action. Free Press: New York.
- Yin RK. 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, ( 3rd edn). Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
- Zapata C, Nieuwenhuis P. 2009. Driving on liquid sunshine – the Brazilian biofuel experience: a policy driven analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment 18(8): 528–541.