Volume 32, Issue 5 pp. 643-650
Original Article
Full Access

Serial cranial and spinal cord magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis

S. Wiebe MD

S. Wiebe MD

Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
D. H. Lee MD

D. H. Lee MD

Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada

Department of Radiology, University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
S. J. Karlik PhD

S. J. Karlik PhD

Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada

Department of Radiology, University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
M. Hopkins RN

M. Hopkins RN

Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
M. K. Vandervoort MSc

M. K. Vandervoort MSc

Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
C. J. Wong MSc

C. J. Wong MSc

Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
L. Hewitt RT

L. Hewitt RT

Department of Radiology, University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
G. P. A. Rice MD

G. P. A. Rice MD

Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
G. C. Ebers MD

G. C. Ebers MD

Department of Radiology, University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Dr. J. H. Noseworthy MD

Corresponding Author

Dr. J. H. Noseworthy MD

Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada

Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, 411 Guggenheim Building, 200 First St, SW, Rochester, MN 55905Search for more papers by this author
First published: November 1992
Citations: 57

Abstract

Twenty-nine mildly disabled patients with multiple sclerosis underwent serial clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluations (pre- and postgadolinium cranial and spinal cord MRI) on at least 3 occasions at 13-week intervals and during periods of suspected relapse. Using clinical judgment of the presence of recent active disease as the gold standard, combined MRI studies confirmed the clinical impression of active disease in 93% of follow-up visits (sensitivity) and the absence of active MS in 63% of follow-up visits (specificity). None of the cranial and spinal MRI-detected abnormalities disappeared. Gadolinium administration particularly increased the yield of spinal MRI. Cranial MRI alone detected 80% of the MRI-active visits. Clinical and MRI concordance was significantly better for the presence of recent disease activity than for the anatomical localization of the presumed site of activity. MRI evidence of apparent ongoing disease activity was seen more frequently in patients believed to have active multiple sclerosis in the preceding year (13 of 21) than in patients who had been in clinical remission for at least the 2 preceding years (2 of 8). Although clinical evidence of new disease activity was much less common in patients with active, chronic-progressive disease (1 of 8) than in patients with active, relapsing disease (9 of 13), the proportion of patients with either infrequent relapses, frequent relapses, or slow chronic-progressive disease in the preceding year in whom MRI activity developed and the pattern of this new MRI activity was similar between these types of active patients. This finding suggests that although there are differences in the clinical expression of disease, there may not be a fundamental difference between mild, active relapsing and mild, active progressive multiple sclerosis as defined by MRI.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me