Volume 57, Issue 4 pp. 506-512

Effect of counterface roughness on the wear of conventional and crosslinked ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene studied with a multi-directional motion pin-on-disk device

Vesa Saikko

Corresponding Author

Vesa Saikko

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Helsinki University of Technology, P.O. Box 4300 FIN-02015 HUT, Finland

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Helsinki University of Technology, P.O. Box 4300 FIN-02015 HUT, FinlandSearch for more papers by this author
Olof Calonius

Olof Calonius

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Helsinki University of Technology, P.O. Box 4300 FIN-02015 HUT, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Jaakko Keränen

Jaakko Keränen

Department of Materials Engineering, Tampere University of Technology, P.O. Box 589 FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland

Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

The effect of counterface roughness on the wear of conventional γ-sterilized, and electron-beam-crosslinked ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene was studied with a circularly translating pin-on-disk device. The counterfaces, CoCr disks, were either polished, or roughened so that they represented the type of roughening and the range of surface roughness values (Ra = 0.014–0.24 μm) observed in explanted femoral heads of total hip prostheses. The lubricant was diluted calf serum, and the test length 3 million cycles. A total of 24 tests were done. With both types of polyethylene, there was a strong correlation between Ra and wear factor k. The power equations were k = 5.87 × 10−5(Ra)0.91 for conventional polyethylene (R2 = 0.94), and k = 7.87 × 10−5(Ra)2.49 for crosslinked polyethylene (R2 = 0.82). Crosslinking improved wear resistance significantly. The wear of crosslinked polyethylene against the roughest counterfaces was lower than the wear of conventional polyethylene against the polished counterfaces. Against rough counterfaces, the wear of crosslinked polyethylene was an order of magnitude lower than that of conventional polyethylene. On the crosslinked polyethylene pins that were tested against polished counterfaces, remains of original machining marks were still visible after the test. The average size of wear particles produced by both types of polyethylene against rough counterfaces was similar, 0.4 μm, whereas that produced by conventional and crosslinked polyethylene against polished counterfaces was significantly smaller, 0.2 and 0.1 μm, respectively. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 57: 506–512, 2001

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.