Adverse drug reactions with oral anticoagulants: data from sicilian spontaneous reporting system database
Maria Antonietta Barbieri PharmD
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorPaola Maria Cutroneo PharmD, PhD
Sicilian Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre, University Hospital of Messina, Messina, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorChiara Baratelli MD
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorGiuseppe Cicala PharmD
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorAlessandro Battaglia MD
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorVincenza Santoro BSc, PhD
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorGiuseppe Andò MD, PhD
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Edoardo Spina MD, PhD
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
Correspondence
Edoardo Spina MD, PhD, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorMaria Antonietta Barbieri PharmD
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorPaola Maria Cutroneo PharmD, PhD
Sicilian Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre, University Hospital of Messina, Messina, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorChiara Baratelli MD
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorGiuseppe Cicala PharmD
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorAlessandro Battaglia MD
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorVincenza Santoro BSc, PhD
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorGiuseppe Andò MD, PhD
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Edoardo Spina MD, PhD
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
Correspondence
Edoardo Spina MD, PhD, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Objective
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were developed to avoid the limitations of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). DOACs are associated with a greater incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding and a smaller number of intracranial haemorrhages than VKAs. Therefore, it is important to deepen our knowledge of their safety profiles. The aim of this study was thus to analyse adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports on DOACs and VKAs using the Sicilian Spontaneous Reporting System (SRS) database.
Methods
All ADR reports with DOACs and VKAs as suspected drugs that were entered into the Sicilian SRS database during the period 2001–2019 were selected. In detail, all reports with the following single active substances were included: dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban; acenocoumarol and warfarin were included as a comparator group. Descriptive statistical methodology was used to evaluate characteristics of the reported cases with a case-by-case assessment.
Results and Discussion
Out of 521 reports related to anticoagulants, 444 (85.2%) and 77 (14.8%) involved DOACs and VKAs, respectively. DOAC-related reports were mainly of gastrointestinal disorders. In contrast, VKAs were mostly associated with blood and lymphatic system disorders, injury, investigations and vascular disorders. Many more cases of ADRs in the form of gastrointestinal disorders concerned dabigatran etexilate (n = 179, 73.7%) than the other DOACs, while ADRs in the form of blood disorders were mainly associated with acenocoumarol (n = 27, 57.4%). The most commonly reported Preferred Terms for DOACs were dyspepsia (n = 89, 17.1%), upper abdominal pain (n = 41, 9.2%) and pruritus (n = 26, 5.8%), whereas for VKAs, they were anaemia (n = 21, 27.3%) and hypocoagulable state (n = 18, 3.5%). Potentially interacting concomitant medications particularly included antithrombotic agents (n = 19, 4.3%) for DOACs and proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) (n = 37, 48.1%) and antithrombotic agents (n = 13, 16.9%) for VKAs.
Conclusion
The ADRs most commonly associated with DOACs, especially dabigatran, were gastrointestinal disorders, particularly gastrointestinal bleeding. Our study also highlights the potential role of drug-drug interactions in the ADRs. The cases of gastrointestinal bleeding highlight the need for careful prescribing of DOACs and use of potentially interacting concomitant drugs.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1Monaco L, Biagi C, Conti V, et al. Safety profile of the direct oral anticoagulants: an analysis of the WHO database of adverse drug reactions. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017; 83(7): 1532-1543. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13234
- 2Raj G, Kumar R, Paul MW. Long-term oral anticoagulant therapy: update on indications, therapeutic ranges, and monitoring. Am J Med Sci. 1994; 307(2): 128-132. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000441-199402000-00011
- 3Mekaj YH, Mekaj AY, Duci SB, Miftari EI. New oral anticoagulants: their advantages and disadvantages compared with vitamin K antagonists in the prevention and treatment of patients with thromboembolic events. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015; 11: 967-977. https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S84210
- 4Spina E, Barbieri MA, Cicala G, Bruno A, de Leon J. Clinically relevant drug interactions between newer antidepressants and oral anticoagulants. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2020; 16(1): 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425255.2020.1700952
- 5Trailokya A, Hiremath JS, Sawhney JPS, et al. Acenocoumarol: a review of anticoagulant efficacy and safety. J Assoc Physicians India. 2016; 64(FEBRUARY): 88-93.
- 6Gallagher AM, Rietbrock S, Plumb J, Van Staa TP. Initiation and persistence of warfarin or aspirin in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation in general practice: do the appropriate patients receive stroke prophylaxis? J Thromb Haemost. 2008; 6(9): 1500-1506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.03059.x
- 7Morgan CL, McEwan P, Tukiendorf A, Robinson PA, Clemens A, Plumb JM. Warfarin treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation: observing outcomes associated with varying levels of INR control. Thromb Res. 2009; 124(1): 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2008.09.016
- 8Buller H, Prins M, Lensin A. Oral rivaroxaban for the treatment of symptomatic pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366(14): 1287-1297. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1113572
- 9Pirlog AM, Pirlog CD, Maghiar MA. DOACS vs vitamin K antagonists: a comparison of phase III clinical trials and a prescriber support tool. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019; 7(7): 1226-1232. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.289
- 10Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E, et al. Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369(22): 2093-2104. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1310907
- 11Haas S, ten Cate H, Accetta G, et al. Quality of vitamin K antagonist control and 1-year outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: a global perspective from the GARFIELD-AF Registry. PLoS One. 2016; 11(10):e0164076. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164076
- 12Xian Y, Xu H, O’Brien EC, et al. Clinical effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants vs warfarin in older patients with atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke. JAMA Neurol. 2019; 76(10): 1192. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.2099
- 13Andò G, Capranzano P. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2017; 231: 162-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.303
- 14 SPREAD – Stroke Prevention and Educational Awareness Diffusion. Ictus cerebrale: Linee guida italiane di prevenzione e trattamento. 2016. https://www.iso-stroke.it/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/LIBRO-SPREAD-VIII-ED-13-09-16.pdf
- 15Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J. 2019; 00: 1-61. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz405
- 16Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016; 37(38): 2893-2962. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw210
- 17Rong F, Jia B, Huang P, Lynn HS, Zhang W. Safety of the direct-acting anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. Thromb Res. 2015; 135(6): 1117-1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2015.04.004.
- 18Saraf K, Morris P, Garg P, Sheridan P, Storey R. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs): clinical evidence and therapeutic considerations. Postgrad Med J. 2014; 90(1067): 520-528. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-132605.
- 19Southworth MR, Reichman ME, Unger EF. Dabigatran and postmarketing reports of bleeding. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368(14): 1272-1274. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1302834
- 20Chatterjee S, Sardar P, Biondi-Zoccai G, Kumbhani DJ. New oral anticoagulants and the risk of intracranial hemorrhage: Traditional and Bayesian meta-analysis and mixed treatment comparison of randomized trials of new oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation. JAMA Neurol. 2013; 70(12): 1486-1490. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.4021
- 21Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2014; 383(9921): 955-962. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62343-0
- 22Yao X, Abraham NS, Caleb Alexander G, et al. Effect of adherence to oral anticoagulants on risk of stroke and major bleeding among patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016; 5(2):e003074. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.003074
- 23Desai J, Granger CB, Weitz JI, Aisenberg J. Novel oral anticoagulants in gastroenterology practice. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013; 78(2): 227-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2013.04.179
- 24Ho MH, Ho CW, Cheung E, et al. Continuation of Dabigatran therapy in “Real-World” practice in Hong Kong. PLoS One. 2014; 9(8):e101245. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101245
- 25Staerk L, Gislason GH, Lip GYH, et al. Risk of gastrointestinal adverse effects of dabigatran compared with warfarin among patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study. Europace. 2015; 17(8): 1215-1222. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv119
- 26Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(12): 1139-1151. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0905561
- 27Raschi E, Poluzzi E, Koci A, et al. Liver injury with novel oral anticoagulants: assessing post-marketing reports in the US Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015; 80(2): 285-293. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.12611
- 28Liakoni E, Rätz Bravo AE, Krähenbühl S. Hepatotoxicity of New Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs). Drug Saf. 2015; 38(8): 711-720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-015-0317-5
- 29Strom BL, Kimmel SE, Hennessy S. Pharmacoepidemiology. Postmarketing Spontaneous Pharmacovigilance Reporting Systems, Fifth Edition. 2012: 135-157. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119959946
10.1002/9781119959946 Google Scholar
- 30Noguchi Y, Tachi T, Teramachi H. Review of statistical methodologies for detecting drug–drug interactions using spontaneous reporting systems. Front Pharmacol. 2019; 10(1319): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.01319
- 31 Osservatorio Nazionale sull’impiego dei Medicinali. L’uso dei farmaci in Italia. Rapporto Nazionale Anno 2018. Roma: Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco. 2019.
- 32Sessa M, Mascolo A, Callréus T, Capuano A, Rossi F, Andersen M. Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in pregnancy: new insight from VigiBase®. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1): 7236. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43715-4
- 33Mascolo A, Ruggiero R, Sessa M, et al. Preventable cases of oral anticoagulant-induced bleeding: data from the spontaneous reporting system. Front Pharmacol. 2019; 10: 425. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00425
- 34Mcdonald CJ, Kalisch Ellett LM, Barratt JD, Caughey GE. An international comparison of spontaneous adverse event reports and potentially inappropriate medicine use associated with dabigatran. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015; 24(4): 399-405. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.3648
- 35Caughey GE, Kalisch Ellett LM, Barratt JD, Shakib S. Apixaban, concomitant medicines and spontaneous reports of haemorrhagic events. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2017; 8(5): 157-164. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042098616689771
- 36 World Health Organization. VigiBase. https://www.who-umc.org/vigibase/vigibase/
- 37 Eudravigilance. European database of suspected adverse drug reaction reports. http://www.adrreports.eu/it/eudravigilance.html
- 38 European Medicines Agency. EudraVigilance System Overview. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/researchdevelopment/pharmacovigilance/eudravigilance/eudravigilance-system-overview. Published. 2020.
- 39 European Medicines Agency. Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP) Annex I-Definitions (Rev 4). Heads of Medicine Agencies. EMA/876333/2011 Rev 4*. 2017. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-good-pharmacovigilance-practices-annex-i-definitions-rev-4_en.pdf
- 40Brown EG, Wood L, Wood S. The Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). Drug Saf. 1999; 20(2): 109-117. https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-199920020-00002
- 41 WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment 2021. Oslo, Norway, 20. https://www.whocc.no/filearchive/publications/2021_guidelines_web.pdf
- 42Oteri A, Minore C, La Cavera C, Cananzi P. Trend d’uso dei Nuovi Anti Coagulanti Orali in Sicilia negli anni 2013 – 2018. Analisi di farmacoutilizzazione e farmacovigilanza.
- 43 Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco. Banca Dati Farmaci dell'AIFA. https://farmaci.agenziafarmaco.gov.it/bancadatifarmaci/home
- 44 European Medicines Agency. Human medicines. http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/medicines/landing/epar_search.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac058001d124
- 45 IBM Micromedex Web Applications Access. https://www.micromedexsolutions.com/home/dispatch
- 46Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, et al. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981; 30(2): 239-245. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.1981.154
- 47Horn JR, Hansten PD, Chan LN. Proposal for a new tool to evaluate drug interaction cases. Ann Pharmacother. 2007; 41(4): 674-680. https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1H423
- 48 Osservatorio Nazionale sull’impiego dei Medicinali. L’uso dei farmaci in Italia. Report regionali sul consumo dei farmaci in Italia - anno 2017. Regione Sicilia. Roma: Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco. 2018.
- 49Giardina C, Cutroneo PM, Mocciaro E, et al. Adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: Results of the FORWARD (facilitation of reporting in hospital ward) study. Front Pharmacol. 2018; 9(350): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00350
- 50Routledge PA, O’Mahony MS, Woodhouse KW. Adverse drug reactions in elderly patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003; 57(2): 121-126. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01875.x
- 51Charlton B, Adeboyeje G, Barron JJ, Grady D, Shin J, Redberg RF. Length of hospitalization and mortality for bleeding during treatment with warfarin, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban. PLoS One. 2018; 13(3):e0193912. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193912
- 52 The Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF). Realworld evidence from GARFIELD-AF shows superior reduction in mortality with Non-vitamin K Antagonists Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. Vitamin K Antagonists (VKAs) in newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation. ESC Congress 2018, Munich, Germany, 28 August 2018.
- 53Larsen TB, Skjøth F, Nielsen PB, Kjældgaard JN, Lip GYH. Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: propensity weighted nationwide cohort study. BMJ. 2016:i3189. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i3189
- 54Vinogradova Y, Coupland C, Hill T, Hippisley-Cox J. Risks and benefits of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in a real world setting: cohort study in primary care. BMJ. 2018:k2505. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k2505
- 55Hernandez I, Zhang Y, Saba S. Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Warfarin in newly diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2017; 120(10): 1813-1819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.092
- 56Lavalle C, Lullo LD, Bellasi A, et al. Adverse drug reactions during real-life use of direct oral anticoagulants in italy: an update based on data from the italian national pharmacovigilance network. Cardiorenal Med. 2020; 10(4): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1159/000507046
- 57Ferri N, Corsini A. Nuovi anticoagulanti orali: considerazioni di farmacologia clinica. G Ital Cardiol. 2015; 16(11 Suppl. 1): 3S-16S.
- 58Kim I-S, Kim H-J, Kim T-H, et al. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants have better efficacy and equivalent safety compared to warfarin in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiol. 2018; 72(2): 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.01.015
- 59Uguccioni M, Terranova A, Di Lullo L. Valutazione delle reazioni avverse agli anticoagulanti orali dirette registrate nella Rete Nazionale di Farmacovigilanza mediante uno specifico indice di rischio. G Ital Cardiol. 2018; 19(10 suppl 1): 3s-11s. https://doi.org/10.1714/2984.29850
- 60Ntaios G, Papavasileiou V, Makaritsis K, Vemmos K, Michel P, Lip GYH. Real-World setting comparison of nonvitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus Vitamin-K antagonists for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2017; 48(9): 2494-2503. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017549
- 61Hosohata K, Oyama S, Niinomi I, Wakabayashi T, Inada A, Iwanaga K. Comparison of safety profiles of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin using the japanese spontaneous reporting database. Clin Drug Investig. 2019; 39(7): 665-670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-019-00788-3
- 62Caldeira D, Barra M, Ferreira A, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015; 42(11–12): 1239-1249. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.13412
- 63Caldeira D, Rodrigues R, Abreu D, Anes AM, Rosa MM, Ferreira JJ. Suspected adverse drug reaction reports with oral anticoagulants in Portugal: a pharmacovigilance study. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2018; 17(4): 339-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2018.1439474
- 64Kolb JM, Flack KF, Chatterjee-Murphy P, et al. Locations and mucosal lesions responsible for major gastrointestinal bleeding in patients on warfarin or dabigatran. Dig Dis Sci. 2018; 63(7): 1878-1889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5007-6
- 65Schulman S, Shortt B, Robinson M, Eikelboom JW. Adherence to anticoagulant treatment with dabigatran in a real-world setting. J Thromb Haemost. 2013; 11(7): 1295-1299. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.12241
- 66Arepally GM, Ortel TL. Changing Practice of Anticoagulation: Will Target-Specific Anticoagulants Replace Warfarin? Annu Rev Med. 2015; 66(1): 241-253. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-051113-024633
- 67Lip GYH. Stroke prevention in AF. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2012; 9(2): 71-73. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2011.203
- 68Bernát SI, Rókusz L. The efficacy and safety of acenocoumarol and warfarin therapy in patients with lower limb deep vein thrombosis. Orv Hetil. 2012; 153(20): 786-790. https://doi.org/10.1556/OH.2012.29350
- 69Anthony CJ, Karim S, Ackroyd-Stolarz S, et al. Intensity of anticoagulation with warfarin and risk of adverse events in patients presenting to the emergency department. Ann Pharmacother. 2011; 45(7–8): 881-887. https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1P670
- 70Budnitz DS, Shehab N, Kegler SR, Richards CL. Medication use leading to emergency department visits for adverse drug events in older adults. Ann Intern Med. 2007; 147(11): 755. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-147-11-200712040-00006
- 71To K, Reynolds C, Spinler SA. Rash associated with dabigatran etexilate. Pharmacother J Hum Pharmacol Drug Ther. 2013; 33(3): e23-e27. https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.1203
- 72Whitehead H, Boyd JM, Blais DM, Hummel J. Drug-induced exanthem following dabigatran. Ann Pharmacother. 2011; 45(10): 1306. https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1Q317
10.1345/aph.1Q317 Google Scholar
- 73Eid TJ, Shah SA. Dabigatran-induced rash. Am J Heal Pharm. 2011; 68(16): 1489-1490. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp110088
- 74Vranckx P, Valgimigli M, Heidbuchel H. The significance of drug-drug and drug-food interactions of oral anticoagulation. Arrhythmia Electrophysiol Rev. 2018; 7(1): 55-61. https://doi.org/10.15420/aer.2017.50.1
- 75Harskamp RE, Teichert M, Lucassen WAM, van Weert HCPM, Lopes RD. Impact of Polypharmacy and P-Glycoprotein- and CYP3A4-modulating drugs on safety and efficacy of oral anticoagulation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2019; 33: 615-623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-019-06907-8
- 76Lee JY, Oh I-Y, Lee J-H, et al. The increased risk of bleeding due to drug-drug interactions in patients administered direct oral anticoagulants. Thromb Res. 2020; 195(April): 243-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2020.07.054
- 77Kumar S, Danik SB, Altman RK, et al. Non-Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet therapy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cardiol Rev. 2016; 24(5): 218-223. https://doi.org/10.1097/CRD.0000000000000088
- 78Zhang Y, Souverein PC, Gardarsdottir H, van den Ham HA, Maitland-van der Zee AH, de Boer A. Risk of major bleeding among users of direct oral anticoagulants combined with interacting drugs: A population-based nested case–control study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020; 86(6): 1150-1164. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.14227
- 79Fernandez S, Lenoir C, Samer C, Rollason V. Drug interactions with apixaban: A systematic review of the literature and an analysis of VigiBase, the World Health Organization database of spontaneous safety reports. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2020; 8(5): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.647
- 80Valeriani E, Porreca E, Weitz JI, Schulman S, Candeloro M, Di Nisio M. Impact of concomitant antiplatelet therapy on the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants for acute venous thromboembolism: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2020; 18(7): 1661-1671. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.14807
- 81Bertram V, Yeo K, Anoopkumar-Dukie S, Bernaitis N. Proton pump inhibitors co-prescribed with warfarin reduce warfarin control as measured by time in therapeutic range. Int J Clin Pract. 2019; 73(11):e13382. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.13382
- 82Teichert M, van Noord C, Uitterlinden AG, et al. Proton pump inhibitors and the risk of overanticoagulation during acenocoumarol maintenance treatment. Br J Haematol. 2011; 153(3): 379-385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08633.x
- 83 AIFA. Pradaxa®, Riassunto delle Caratteristiche del Prodotto. 2020. https://farmaci.agenziafarmaco.gov.it/aifa/servlet/PdfDownloadServlet?pdfFileName=footer_000092_038451_RCP.pdf&retry=0&sys=m0b1l3. Published 2020.
- 84Stangier J, Stähle H, Rathgen K, Fuhr R. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the direct oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran in healthy elderly subjects. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2008; 47: 47-59. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200847010-00005
- 85Ollier E, Hodin S, Basset T, et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of drug-drug interaction between dabigatran and proton pump inhibitors. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2015; 29: 604-614. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcp.12154
- 86Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2020; 00: 1-125. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612
- 87Dalton SO, Sørensen HT, Johansen C. SSRIs and upper gastrointestinal bleeding: What is known and how should it influence prescribing? CNS Drugs. 2006; 20: 143-151. https://doi.org/10.2165/00023210-200620020-00005
- 88De Abajo FJ, Montero D, García Rodríguez LA, Madurga M. Antidepressants and risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006; 98: 304-310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-7843.2006.pto_303.x
- 89 Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco. Riassunto delle caratteristiche del prodotto Eliquis. https://farmaci.agenziafarmaco.gov.it/aifa/servlet/PdfDownloadServlet?pdfFileName=footer_003646_041225_RCP.pdf&retry=0&sys=m0b1l3
- 90Sheikh Rezaei S, Mittlböck M, Reichardt B, Wolzt M. SSRI co-medication with NOAC or VKA does not increase hospitalisation for bleeding: a retrospective nationwide cohort study in Austria 2010–2015. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019; 34(8): 1194-1199. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5117
- 91Tielleman T, Bujanda D, Cryer B. Epidemiology and risk factors for upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2015; 25(3): 415-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giec.2015.02.010
- 92Schjerning Olsen A-M, McGettigan P, Gerds TA, et al. Risk of gastrointestinal bleeding associated with oral anticoagulation and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide study. Eur Hear J - Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2020; 6(5): 292–300. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvz069
10.1093/ehjcvp/pvz069 Google Scholar
- 93 Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco. ESKIM®, Riassunto delle Caratteristiche del Prodotto. Published 2020. https://farmaci.agenziafarmaco.gov.it/aifa/servlet/PdfDownloadServlet?pdfFileName=footer_004375_027618_RCP.pdf&retry=0&sys=m0b1l3
- 94Forbes HL, Polasek TM. Potential drug–drug interactions with direct oral anticoagulants in elderly hospitalized patients. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2017; 8(10): 319-328. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042098617719815
- 95Gumbrevičius G, Damulevičienė G, Gumbrevičiūtė M, Galaunė V. Possible interaction between dabigatran and ranolazine in patients with renal failure. Med. 2020; 56(1): 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56010013
- 96Antoniou T, Macdonald EM, Yao Z, et al. Association between statin use and ischemic stroke or major hemorrhage in patients taking dabigatran for atrial fibrillation. CMAJ. 2017; 189(1): E4-E10. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.160303
- 97Lupercio F, Romero J, Peltzer B, et al. Efficacy and safety outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants and amiodarone in patients with atrial fibrillation. Am J Med. 2018; 131(5): 573.e1-573.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.11.047
- 98Steffel J, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E, et al. Edoxaban vs. warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation on amiodarone: A subgroup analysis of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial. Eur Heart J. 2015; 36: 2239-2245. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv201
- 99 Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco. Xarelto®, Riassunto delle Caratteristiche del Prodotto. Published 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/health/documents/community-register/2018/20180702141274/anx_141274_it.pdf
- 100Bellesini M, Bianchin M, Corradi C, Donadini MP, Raschi E, Squizzato A. Drug-drug interactions between direct oral anticoagulants and hepatitis c direct-acting antiviral agents: looking for evidence through a systematic review. Clin Drug Investig. 2020; 40(11): 1001–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-020-00962-y
- 101Barbieri MA, Cicala G, Cutroneo PM, et al. Ototoxic Adverse Drug Reactions: A Disproportionality Analysis Using the Italian Spontaneous Reporting Database. Front Pharmacol. 2019; 10: 1161. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.01161
- 102Motola D, Vargiu A, Leone R, et al. Influence of regulatory measures on the rate of spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting in Italy. Drug Saf. 2008; 31(7): 609-616. https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200831070-00006
- 103Russo E, Palleria C, Leporini C, et al. Limitations and obstacles of the spontaneous adverse drugs reactions reporting: two “challenging” case reports. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2013; 4(5): 66-72. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-500X.120955
10.4103/0976-500X.120955 Google Scholar
- 104Pillans PI. Clinical perspectives in drug safety and adverse drug reactions. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2008; 1(5): 695-705. https://doi.org/10.1586/17512433.1.5.695
- 105Bäckström M, Mjörndal T, Dahlqvist R, Nordkvist-Olsson T. Attitudes to reporting adverse drug reactions in northern Sweden. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2000; 56(9–10): 729-732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002280000202
- 106Mascolo A, Scavone C, Sessa M, et al. Can causality assessment fulfill the new European definition of adverse drug reaction? A review of methods used in spontaneous reporting. Pharmacol Res. 2017; 123: 122-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2017.07.005
- 107Thaker SJ, Sinha RS, Gogtay NJ, Thatte UM. Evaluation of inter-rater agreement between three causality assessment methods used in pharmacovigilance. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2016; 7(1): 31-33. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-500X.179361
- 108Marante KB. The Challenges of Adverse Drug Reaction Evaluation. J Pharmacovigil. 2018; 06(03): https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-6887.1000260
10.4172/2329-6887.1000260 Google Scholar
- 109Khan LM, Al-Harthi SE, Osman AMM, Sattar MAAA, Ali AS. Dilemmas of the causality assessment tools in the diagnosis of adverse drug reactions. Saudi Pharm J. 2016; 24(4): 485-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2015.01.010