Volume 3, Issue 1 pp. 17-22
Full Access

Fine Needle Aspiration of Palpable Breast Lumps: A 1-Year Audit Using the Cytospin Method

A. J. HOWAT

Corresponding Author

A. J. HOWAT

Department of Histopathology/Cytopathology, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK. PR2 4HG

Dr A. J. Howat, Department of Histopathology/Cytopathology, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston PR24HG, UK.Search for more papers by this author
G. R. ARMSTRONG

G. R. ARMSTRONG

Department of Histopathology/Cytopathology, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK. PR2 4HG

Search for more papers by this author
W. A. BRIGGS

W. A. BRIGGS

Department of Histopathology/Cytopathology, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK. PR2 4HG

Search for more papers by this author
C. M. NICHOLSON

C. M. NICHOLSON

Department of Histopathology/Cytopathology, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK. PR2 4HG

Search for more papers by this author
D. J. STEWART

D. J. STEWART

Department of Surgery, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK. PR2 4HG

Search for more papers by this author
First published: February 1992
Citations: 17

Abstract

A Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) service for the diagnosis of palpable breast lumps was started at the Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK, in November 1989. Over the subsequent year, 407 FNAs were taken from 393 women. A simple technique was used which involved the surgeon flushing the aspirate into 10ml of Cytospin collection fluid; cytocentrifuge preparations were then safely and conveniently prepared in the laboratory. Slides were stained with Papanicolaou and H&E. the method detected 112 out of a total of 121 cancers (92.6%); of the nine that were undetected, five aspirates were inadequate and four were falsely reported as negative. There were no false positives. the overall inadequate rate was 11.0%. Excluding inadequate samples, the absolute sensitivity was 89.7% and complete sensitivity 96.6% with 94.4% specificity. This 1-year audit has shown the Cytospin method of FNA in palpable breast disease to have a favourable sensitivity and specificity, and therefore to be an alternative to conventional FNA using direct smears.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.