Early View
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Managing context in Six Sigma projects: New themes from a methods-only replication

Tim Baker

Corresponding Author

Tim Baker

Department of Finance and Management Science, Carson College of Business, Washington State University, Richland, Washington State, USA

Correspondence

Tim Baker, Department of Finance and Management Science Carson College of Business Washington State University 2710 Crimson Way, Floyd 207P Richland, WA 99354, USA. Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Thamer N. Almutairi

Thamer N. Almutairi

College of Business, Al Yamamah University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Search for more papers by this author
Xun Xu

Xun Xu

School of Global Innovation and Leadership, Lucas College and Graduate School of Business, San José State University, San José, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Lizao Zhang

Lizao Zhang

Maine Business School, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Phillip W. Witt

Phillip W. Witt

Department of Strategic Management and Operations, Woodbury School of Business, Utah Valley University, Orem, Utah, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 February 2025

Abstract

We conduct a methods-only replication of Nair, Malhotra, and Ahire's study by analyzing 13 Six Sigma (SS) projects from nine small- to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Nair et al. analyzed 10 SS projects from seven large firms and found support for three propositions associating themes (i.e., expanded scope of analysis, clarity of metrics, and cross-functional integration) contributing to SS project success, as well as 10 propositions associating project contextual factors, project management elements, and themes. Our replication provides support for two of the original propositions, partial support for five original propositions, and no support for five original propositions. Note that one of the 13 original propositions from Nair et al. could not be replicated given data restrictions. These replication results suggest that SS project success and their associations with project management elements and project context are contingent on firm size. Importantly, for SMEs, unlike larger firms, expanded scope of analysis, clarity of metrics, and cross-functional integration are not important contributing factors to SS project success in SMEs. Instead, we derived two new themes (i.e., time-to-completion and prioritization) and seven corresponding propositions that appear to better explain how SMEs can manage SS project context to improve SS project performance. These two new themes illustrate the need for SS project teams within SMEs to be amenable to (a) emphasizing quick wins and (b) being more selective in pursuing process drivers for improvement.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.