Methodology for identification of new target molecules in neuroimmunological disorders
Corresponding Author
Setsu Sawai
Department of Functional Anatomy, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
Department of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
Correspondence
Setsu Sawai, MD, PhD, Department of Functional Anatomy, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorMasahiro Mori
Department of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorSatoshi Kuwabara
Department of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Setsu Sawai
Department of Functional Anatomy, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
Department of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
Correspondence
Setsu Sawai, MD, PhD, Department of Functional Anatomy, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorMasahiro Mori
Department of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorSatoshi Kuwabara
Department of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Autoantibodies have been identified as key players in several neuroimmunological disorders such as autoimmune encephalitis, CNS demyelinating diseases, neuropathies, and neuromuscular junction disorders. Recent advances of proteomic technologies enable scientists to determine the target protein of autoantibodies. These methods are divided into three categories, namely, (1) mass spectrometry (MS)-based method, (2) gene expression library screening, and (3) protein microarray. MS-based methods can analyze posttranslationally modified proteins or conformational proteins, while gene expression library screening cannot. However, in MS-based methods, protein-abundant bias could prevent the identification of the target protein, and DNA sequencing could be more easily performed than MS-based methods. Therefore, a sound knowledge of the advantages and limitations of each technique is required for selection of the optimal methodology for antigen identification in neuroimmunological disorders.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None declared.
REFERENCES
- 1Dalmau J, Tüzün E, Wu HY, Masjuan J, Rossi JE, Voloschin A, et al. Paraneoplastic anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis associated with ovarian teratoma. Ann Neurol. 2007; 61: 25–36.
- 2Lai M, Hughes EG, Peng X, Zhou L, Gleichman AJ, Shu H, et al. AMPA receptor antibodies in limbic encephalitis alter synaptic receptor location. Ann Neurol. 2009; 65: 424–34.
- 3Lai M, Huijbers MGM, Lancaster E, Graus F, Bataller L, Balice-Gordon R, et al. Investigation of LGI1 as the antigen in limbic encephalitis previously attributed to potassium channels: a case series. Lancet Neurol. 2010; 9: 776–85.
- 4Lennon VA, Kryzer TJ, Pittock SJ, Verkman AS, Hinson SR, et al. IgG marker of optic-spinal multiple sclerosis binds to the aquaporin-4 water channel. J Exp Med. 2005; 202: 473–7.
- 5Shahrizaila N, Lehmann HC, Kuwabara S. Guillain-Barré syndrome. Lancet. 2021; 397: 1214–28.
- 6Ilyas AA, Quarles RH, MacIntosh TD, Dobersen MJ, Trapp BD, Dalakas MC, et al. IgM in a human neuropathy related to paraproteinemia binds to a carbohydrate determinant in the myelin-associated glycoprotein and to a ganglioside. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984; 81: 1225–9.
- 7Querol L, Nogales-Gadea G, Rojas-Garcia R, Martinez-Hernandez E Diaz-Manera J, Suárez-Calvet X, et al. Antibodies to contactin-1 in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy Ann. Neurol. 2013; 73: 370–80.
- 8Ng JKM, Malotka J, Kawakami N, Derfuss T, Khademi M, Olsson T, et al. Neurofascin as a target for autoantibodies in peripheral neuropathies. Neurology. 2012; 79: 2241–8.
- 9Bender AdamN, King Engel W, Ringel StevenP, Daniels MathewP, Vogel Z, et al. Myasthenia gravis: a serum factor blocking acetylcholine receptors of the human neuromuscular junction. Lancet. 1975; 1: 607–9.
- 10Hoch W, McConville J, Helms S, Newsom-Davis J, Melms A, Vincent A, et al. Auto-antibodies to the receptor tyrosine kinase MuSK in patients with myasthenia gravis without acetylcholine receptor antibodies. Nat Med. 2001; 7: 365–8.
- 11Higuchi O, Hamuro J, Motomura M, Yamanashi Y. Autoantibodies to low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 in myasthenia gravis. Ann Neurol. 2011; 69: 418–22.
- 12Kim YI, Neher E. IgG from patients with Lambert-Eaton syndrome blocks voltage-dependent calcium channels. Science. 1988; 239: 405–8.
- 13Kimbrough DJ, Fujihara K, Jacob A, Lana-Peixoto MA, Isabel Leite M, Levy M, et al. Treatment of neuromyelitis optica: review and recommendations. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2012; 1: 180–7.
- 14Shimizu Y, Yokoyama K, Misu T, Takahashi T, Fujihara K, Kikuchi S, et al. Development of extensive brain lesions following interferon beta therapy in relapsing neuromyelitis optica and longitudinally extensive myelitis. J Neurol. 2008; 255: 305–7.
- 15Kojima Y, Uzawa A, Ozawa Y, et al. Rate of change in acetylcholine receptor antibody levels predicts myasthenia gravis outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2021: jnnp-2020. Epub ahead of print.
- 16Kellner R, Lichtenfels R, Atkins D, Bukur J, Ackermann A, Beck J, et al. Targeting of tumor associated antigens in renal cell carcinoma using proteome-based analysis and their clinical significance. Proteomics. 2002; 2: 1743–51.
10.1002/1615-9861(200212)2:12<1743::AID-PROT1743>3.0.CO;2-U CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 17Klade CS, Voss T, Krystek E, Ahorn H, Zatloukal K, Pummer K, et al. Identification of tumor antigens in renal cell carcinoma by serological proteome analysis. Proteomics. 2001; 1: 890–8.
- 18Unwin RD, Harnden P, Pappin D, Rahman D, Whelan P, Craven RA, et al. Serological and proteomic evaluation of antibody responses in the identification of tumor antigens in renal cell carcinoma. Proteomics. 2003; 3: 45–55.
- 19Mathey EK, Derfuss T, Storch MK, Williams KR, Hales K, Woolley DR, et al. Neurofascin as a novel target for autoantibody-mediated axonal injury. J Exp Med. 2007; 204: 2363–72.
- 20Derfuss T, Parikh K, Velhin S, Braun M, Mathey E, Krumbholz M, et al. Contactin-2/TAG-1-directed autoimmunity is identified in multiple sclerosis patients and mediates gray matter pathology in animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106: 8302–7.
- 21Kuwabara S, Yuki N. Axonal Guillain-Barré syndrome: concepts and controversies. Lancet Neurol. 2013; 12: 1180–8.
- 22Hafer-Macko CE, Sheikh KA, Li CY, Ho TW, Cornblath DR, McKhann GM, et al. Immune attack on the Schwann cell surface in acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Ann Neurol. 1996; 39: 625–35.
- 23Sawai S, Satoh M, Mori M, Misawa S, Sogawa K, Kazami T, et al. Moesin is a possible target molecule for cytomegalovirus-related Guillain-Barré syndrome. Neurology. 2014; 83: 113–7.
- 24Gires O, Munz M, Schaffrik M, Kieu C, Rauch J, Ahlemann M, et al. Profile identification of disease-associated humoral antigens using AMIDA, a novel proteomics based technology. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2004; 61: 1198–207.
- 25Pitsch J, Kamalizade D, Braun A, Kuehn JC, Gulakova PE, Rüber T, et al. Drebrin Drebrin autoantibodies in patients with seizures and suspected encephalitis. Ann Neurol. 2020; 87: 869–84.
- 26Littleton E, Dreger M, Palace J, Vincent A. Immunocapture and identification of cell membrane protein antigenic targets of serum autoantibodies. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2009; 8: 1688–96.
- 27Sabater L, Gaig C, Gelpi E, Bataller L, Lewerenz J, Torres-Vega E, et al. A novel non-rapid-eye movement and rapid-eye-movement parasomnia with sleep breathing disorder associated with antibodies to IgLON5: a case series, characterisation of the antigen, and post-mortem study. Lancet Neurol. 2014; 13: 575–86.
- 28Gaig C, Graus F, Compta Y, Högl B, Bataller L, Brüggemann N, et al. Clinical manifestations of the anti-IgLON5 disease. Neurology. 2017; 88: 1736–43.
- 29Sahin U, Tureci O, Schmitt H, Cochlovius B, Johannes T, Schmits R, et al. Human neoplasms elicit multiple specific immune responses in the autologous host. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1995; 92: 11810–3.
- 30Muto M, Mori M, Hiwasa T, Takiguchi M, Iwadate Y, Uzawa A, et al. Novel serum autoantibodies against talin1 in multiple sclerosis: possible pathogenetic roles of the antibodies. J Neuroimmunol. 2015; 284: 30–6.
- 31Smith GP. Filamentous fusion phage: novel expression vectors that display cloned antigens on the virion surface. Science. 1985; 228: 1315–7.
- 32Larman HB, Zhao Z, Laserson U, Li MZ, Ciccia A, Gakidis MAM, et al. Autoantigen discovery with a synthetic human peptidome. Nat Biotechnol. 2011; 29: 535–41.
- 33Mandel-Brehm C, Dubey D, Kryzer TJ, O’Donovan BD, Tran B, Vazquez SE, et al. Kelch-like protein 11 antibodies in seminoma-associated paraneoplastic encephalitis. N Engl J Med. 2019; 381: 47–54.
- 34Schweitzer B, Meng L, Mattoon D, Rai AJ. Immune response biomarker profiling application on protoarray® protein microarrays. Methods Mol Biol. 2010; 641: 243–52.
- 35Gallardo E, Martínez-Hernández E, Titulaer MJ, Huijbers MG, Martínez MA, Ramos A, et al. Cortactin autoantibodies in myasthenia gravis. Autoimmun Rev. 2014; 13: 1003–7.
- 36Cortés-Vicente E, Gallardo E, Martínez MÁ, Díaz-Manera J, Querol L, Rojas-García R, et al. Clinical characteristics of patients with double-seronegative myasthenia gravis and antibodies to cortactin. JAMA Neurol. 2016; 73: 1099–104.