Volume 94, Issue 6 pp. 1138-1145
COLORECTAL SURGERY

Management & surveillance of rectal neuroendocrine tumours: a single-centre retrospective analysis

Paige Barnard MBBS

Corresponding Author

Paige Barnard MBBS

Department of Surgery and Critical Care, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia

Correspondence

Dr Paige Barnard, Cairns Hospital, 165 The Esplanade, Cairns City, QLD 4870, Australia.

Email: [email protected]

Contribution: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, ​Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Bree Stephensen BSc, MBBS(Hons), FRACS

Bree Stephensen BSc, MBBS(Hons), FRACS

Department of Surgery and Critical Care, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia

Contribution: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, ​Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Georgia Taylor MD

Georgia Taylor MD

Cairns Hospital, Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Contribution: Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Johnson Huang BSc, MBBS, MPhil

Johnson Huang BSc, MBBS, MPhil

Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia

Contribution: Data curation, Formal analysis, ​Investigation, Writing - original draft

Search for more papers by this author
Elzerie de Jager MBBS(Hons), PhD

Elzerie de Jager MBBS(Hons), PhD

Division of Public Health, Department of Medicine, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA

Contribution: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Matthew McMahon MD

Matthew McMahon MD

Cairns Hospital, Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Contribution: Data curation, Writing - original draft

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 12 February 2024
P. Barnard MBBS; B. Stephensen BSc, MBBS(Hons), FRACS; G. Taylor MD; J. Huang BSc, MBBS, MPhil; E. de Jager MBBS(Hons), PhD; M. McMahon MD.

Abstract

Background

Rectal neuroendocrine tumours (rNETs) are rare but are increasing in incidence. Current management and surveillance recommendations are based on low-grade evidence. Follow-up practices are often inconsistent and costly. This retrospective study analyses a single-centre's experience with rNETs to assess incidence, management practices, outcomes, and guideline adherence.

Methods

This is a single-centre retrospective study from Queensland Australia, spanning from 2012 to 2023. Twenty-eight rNET cases met inclusion criteria. Examined parameters included incidence, management, outcomes and adherence to European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society (ENETS) guidelines. R1 resection rate was analysed for associations with resection technique and lesion recognition and recurrence rate was assessed in all patients.

Results

This study shows an increasing incidence of rNETs during the study period, reflecting a global trend. R1 resection rate at initial endoscopy was 75%. There was a general lack of advanced endoscopic techniques utilized and poor lesion recognition, however a statistically significant correlation was not established between these factors and an R1 result (P < 0.05). Most patients with an R1 result had subsequent re-resection to render the result R0, however five patients (33%) underwent surveillance with no reports of recurrence on follow-up. Overall, follow-up practices in our cohort were inconsistent and did not adhere to guidelines.

Conclusion

rNETs are increasing in incidence, emphasizing the need for standardized management and surveillance. Further training is required for rNET recognition and advanced endoscopic resection techniques. Further research is required to assess long-term outcomes in surveilled R1 cases, understand optimal endoscopic resection techniques and further develop local surveillance guidelines.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare, there is no financial interest to report.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.