Volume 13, Issue 5 pp. e481-e488
Original article

Treatment interruption during radiation therapy: Experience at a single institution in the Republic of Korea

Jung Ae Lee

Jung Ae Lee

Departments of Radiation Oncology, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Department of Radiation Oncology, Guro Hospital, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Nam Kwon Lee

Nam Kwon Lee

Departments of Radiation Oncology, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Won Sup Yoon

Corresponding Author

Won Sup Yoon

Departments of Radiation Oncology, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Correspondence: Won Sup Yoon MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ansan Hospital, Korea University Medical Center, 123 Jeokgeum Street, Ansan, Gyeonggi-do 425–707, Republic of Korea. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Dae Sik Yang

Dae Sik Yang

Department of Radiation Oncology, Guro Hospital, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Chul Yong Kim

Chul Yong Kim

Departments of Radiation Oncology, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Se Ryun Lee

Se Ryun Lee

Internal Medicine, Ansan Hospital, College of Medicine, Korea University, Ansan, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Hwa Jeong Seong

Hwa Jeong Seong

Internal Medicine, Ansan Hospital, College of Medicine, Korea University, Ansan, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 August 2016
Citations: 8

Abstract

Aim

Our study analyzed the frequency and causes of treatment interruption among patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT).

Methods

A total of 1637 RT courses in 1500 patients were reviewed from September 2009 to October 2013. A continuous break over 7 days or a discontinuous break over 14 days was regarded as a temporary break and RT under 80% of planned treatment was regarded as incomplete.

Results

Two-hundred and twenty courses (13.4%) with treatment interruption were identified. Half of the patients received RT with a definitive aim, and the other half for palliative care. Completion after temporary break, near completion and incompletion were noticed in 12.3%, 21.3%, and 66.4% of cases, respectively. Among patients with a definite aim, thorax (19.2%) and abdomen (16.3%) had a higher interruption rate. For brain and bone with a palliative aim, the frequency of interruption was about 16%. Old age and worse performance negatively affected interruption. The most common cause of treatment interruption was cancer progression including death (30%) and the next was treatment-related side effects (23.1%).

Conclusion

About 13% of RT cases were interrupted. Two third of patients received less than 80% of the planned RT. To improve RT completion rate, multidirectional efforts are needed.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.