Volume 10, Issue 4 pp. 322-329
Original article

Retrospective analysis on the efficacy of bevacizumab with FOLFOX as a first-line treatment in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Mitsukuni Suenaga

Corresponding Author

Mitsukuni Suenaga

Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan

Correspondence: Dr Mitsukuni Suenaga MD PhD, Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Nobuyuki Mizunuma

Nobuyuki Mizunuma

Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Satoshi Matsusaka

Satoshi Matsusaka

Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Eiji Shinozaki

Eiji Shinozaki

Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Masashi Ueno

Masashi Ueno

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Toshiharu Yamaguchi

Toshiharu Yamaguchi

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 August 2013
Citations: 7
Conflict of interest: none

Abstract

Aims

Past reports have suggested that the addition of bevacizumab (BV) to oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (leucovorin) (FOLFOX4) provides a limited survival benefit in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Our study aimed to evaluate the survival benefits of a FOLFOX4 + BV regimen.

Methods

Patients with mCRC who started treatment between April 2005 and July 2008 were evaluated in this retrospective cohort study. Patients received FOLFOX4, or FOLFOX4 + BV after the approval of BV in 2007. The two cohorts treated before and after BV approval were compared. Primary end-points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and response rate (RR).

Results

A total of 213 patients received either FOLFOX4 (n = 128) or FOLFOX4 + BV (n = 85). For FOLFOX4 and FOLFOX4 + BV respectively, median PFS was 9.9 and 17.0 months (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.42–0.82; P = 0.002), median OS was 20.5 and 38.8 months (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.34–0.71; P < 0.001), respectively. Patients who received 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin (FL) as maintenance therapy during oxaliplatin suspension in both FOLFOX4 (n = 6) and FOLFOX4 + BV (n = 46) groups showed a trend to improved median PFS and median OS.

Conclusions

The additive effect and potential survival benefits of adding BV to the FOLFOX4 regimen in first-line treatment of mCRC were demonstrated. Maintenance FL during suspension of oxaliplatin appeared to be an important factor in better survival.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.