Volume 134, Issue 9 pp. 4045-4051
Original Report

Robotic Neck Dissection in Head and Neck Cancer via Modified BABA Technique

Surendra K. Dabas MS, DNB

Surendra K. Dabas MS, DNB

Department of Surgical Oncology, BLK-MAX Super Specialty Hospital, Delhi, India

Search for more papers by this author
Nandini N. Menon MS

Corresponding Author

Nandini N. Menon MS

Department of Surgical Oncology, BLK-MAX Super Specialty Hospital, Delhi, India

Send correspondence to Nandini N. Menon, Department of Surgical Oncology, BLK-MAX Super Specialty Hospital, Pusa Road, Rajendra Place, Delhi 110005, India. Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Sukirti Tiwari MDS

Sukirti Tiwari MDS

Department of Surgical Oncology, BLK-MAX Super Specialty Hospital, Delhi, India

Search for more papers by this author
Himanshu Shukla MS, DNB

Himanshu Shukla MS, DNB

Department of Surgical Oncology, BLK-MAX Super Specialty Hospital, Delhi, India

Search for more papers by this author
Reetesh Ranjan MS

Reetesh Ranjan MS

Department of Surgical Oncology, BLK-MAX Super Specialty Hospital, Delhi, India

Search for more papers by this author
Bikas Gurung DNB

Bikas Gurung DNB

Department of Surgical Oncology, BLK-MAX Super Specialty Hospital, Delhi, India

Search for more papers by this author
Bharat B. Bassan MS

Bharat B. Bassan MS

Department of Surgical Oncology, BLK-MAX Super Specialty Hospital, Delhi, India

Search for more papers by this author
Rahul Kapoor MS, MCh

Rahul Kapoor MS, MCh

Department of Surgical Oncology, BLK-MAX Super Specialty Hospital, Delhi, India

Search for more papers by this author
Vinay Verma MS, MCh

Vinay Verma MS, MCh

Department of Surgical Oncology, BLK-MAX Super Specialty Hospital, Delhi, India

Search for more papers by this author
Pankaj Sharma MS, MCh

Pankaj Sharma MS, MCh

Department of Plastic Surgery, Max Superspeciality Hospital, Delhi, India

Search for more papers by this author
Devesh Verma MS, MCh

Devesh Verma MS, MCh

Department of Surgical Oncology, BLK-MAX Super Specialty Hospital, Delhi, India

Search for more papers by this author
Ashwani Sharma MS, DNB

Ashwani Sharma MS, DNB

Department of Surgical Oncology, BLK-MAX Super Specialty Hospital, Delhi, India

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 27 April 2024
Editor's Note: This Manuscript was accepted for publication on April 01, 2024.

The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Abstract

Introduction

Neck dissection forms an important component in the surgical management of head and neck cancers. By using the conventional techniques of neck dissection, a conspicuous scar is inevitable for the patients. The development of robotic assisted neck dissection provides for a scar-free neck along with good oncological and functional outcomes.

Methods

A prospective observational study was conducted in our institute from 2020 March to 2022 March, where robotic-assisted neck dissections performed via the modified bilateral axillo-breast insufflation technique.

Results

Eighty-two patients underwent robotic neck dissections in our institute. Notably, 79 patients were treatment-naïve. The average docking time was 12 min and console time was 160 ± 15 min. The mean lymph node yield was 28.2. The average post-operative stay was 5.6 days. The average follow-up was noted to be 6.4 months. The mean cosmetic satisfaction score in our patients was 4.45. Only one patient presented with nodal recurrence, who was identified as a defaulter for adjuvant treatment. Robotic neck dissection gives similar functional and oncological outcomes as compared with conventional neck dissection. Patients had excellent cosmetic satisfaction following the procedure. The limitations of these techniques include high cost of procedure and longer operating time. This is a level IV evidence study.

Conclusion

Although good oncological, functional, and cosmetic outcomes have been attained in robotic assisted neck dissection, further randomized controlled studies need to be conducted to justify the added costs, cosmetic advantage, and the time taken.

Level of Evidence

IV Laryngoscope, 134:4045–4051, 2024

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.