Research Article
The Link between Cocurricular Activities and Academic Engagement in Engineering Education
Abstract
Background
Cocurricular and extracurricular activities benefit precollege students. Yet connections between these activities and academic outcomes in college are mixed or inconclusive. Little is known about how involvement in cocurricular activities is associated specifically with academic engagement in college.
Purpose (Hypothesis)
The purpose of this study was to understand the connection between cocurricular activities and academic engagement for engineering and computer science undergraduates. We hypothesized that cocurricular activities and engagement are not directly related but are associated with one another through interactions with academic self-efficacy.
Design/Method
This study surveyed engineering and computer science students at four different institutions. Data were analyzed using multiple linear regression models to understand the relationships between cocurricular activities and academic engagement.
Results
While relationships between cocurricular activities and academic engagement were not significant, interaction effects with academic self-efficacy were significant. Academic cocurricular activities interacted positively with, whereas nonacademic cocurricular activities interacted negatively with, relationships between self-efficacy and academic engagement.
Conclusions
Results show that connections between cocurricular involvement and academic engagement not only occur in interactions with self-efficacy, but also depend on the nature of the cocurricular activity. Most students who are active in cocurricular activities report higher levels of engagement than do their nonactive peers for the same levels of self-efficacy.
References
- Allendoerfer, C., Wilson, D., Bates, R., Crawford, J., Jones, D., Floyd-Smith, T., … & Veilleux, N. (2012). Strategic pathways for success: The influence of outside community on academic engagement. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(3), 512–538.
- Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.
- Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In R. J. Corsini (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology ( 2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 368–369). New York, NY: Wiley.
- Brint, S., & Cantwell, A. M. (2010). Undergraduate time use and academic outcomes: Results from the University of California Undergraduate Experiences Survey. Teachers College Record, 112(9), 2441–2470.
- Brint, S., Cantwell, A. M., & Hanneman, R. A. (2008). The two cultures of undergraduate academic engagement. Research in Higher Education, 49(5), 383–402.
- Carnegie Foundation. (2010). The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://classifications.carnegiefoundation.org/
- Concannon, J., & Barrow, L. (2008). A cross-sectional study of engineering self-efficacy. In Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA.
- Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Minnesota Symposium of Child Psychology, 22, 43–77. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
- Cooper, H., Valentine, J. C., Nye, B., & Lindsay, J. J. (1999). Relationships between five after-school activities and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 369–378.
- Darling, N., Caldwell, L. L., & Smith, R. (2005). Participation in school-based cocurricular activities and adolescent adjustment. Journal of Leisure Research, 37(1), 51–76.
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134.
- Feldman, A. F., & Matjasko, J. L. (2005). The role of school-based cocurricular activities in adolescent development: A comprehensive review and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 159–210.
- Fischer, M. J. (2007). Settling into campus life: Differences by race/ethnicity in college involvement and outcomes. Journal of Higher Education, 78(2), 125–161.
- Gellin, A. (2003). The effect of undergraduate student involvement on critical thinking: A meta-analysis of the literature 1991–2000. Journal of College Student Development, 44(6), 746–762.
- Grubb, F. (2006). Does going Greek impair undergraduate academic performance? A case study. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 65(5), 1085–1110.
- Halbesleben, J. R. B. (2010). A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources, and consequences. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 102–117). London: Psychology Press.
- Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 184–192.
- Inman, P., & Pascarella, E. (1998). The impact of college residence on the development of critical thinking skills in college freshmen. Journal of College Student Development, 39(6), 557–568.
- Institute of International Education. (2010). Study abroad by U.S. students slowed in 2008/09 with more students going to less traditional destinations. Retrieved from http://www.iie.org/Who-We-Are/News-and-Events/Press-Center/Press-Releases/2010/2010-11-15-Open-Doors-US-Study-Abroad
- Knifsend, C. A., & Graham, S. (2012). Too much of a good thing? How breadth of cocurricular participation relates to school-related affect and academic outcomes during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(3), 379–389.
-
Laird, T. F. N.,
Chen, D., &
Kuh, G. D. (2008). Classroom practices at institutions with higher-than-expected persistence rates: What student engagement data tell us. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2008(115), 85–99.
10.1002/tl.327 Google Scholar
-
Linnenbrink, E. A., &
Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading &Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 119–137.
10.1080/10573560308223 Google Scholar
- Llorens, S., Schaufeli, W., Bakker, A., & Salanova, M. (2007). Does a positive gain spiral of resources, efficacy beliefs and engagement exist? Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 825–841.
- Ludden, A. (2011). Engagement in school and community civic activities among rural adolescents. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 40(9), 1254–1270.
- Marsh, H. W., & Kleitman, S. (2002). Cocurricular school activities: The good, the bad, and the nonlinear. Harvard Educational Review, 72(4), 464–511.
- Mih, V., & Mih, C. (2013). Perceived autonomy-supportive teaching, academic self-perceptions and engagement in learning: Toward a process model of academic achievement. Cognitie, Creier, Comportament/Cognition, Brain, Behavior, 27(4), 289–313.
- Miserandino, M. (1996). Children who do well in school: Individual differences in perceived competence and autonomy in above-average children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2), 203–14.
- Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(1), 30–38.
- National Science Foundation. (2009). Undergraduate enrollment in engineering programs by sex, enrollment status, race/ethnicity, and citizenship. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/2013/pdf/tab2–10.pdf
- National Survey on Student Engagement (NSSE). (2011). Fostering student engagement campuswide: Annual results 2011. Retrieved from http://nsse.iub.edu/NSSE_2011_Results/pdf/NSSE_2011_AnnualResults.pdf
- National Survey on Student Engagement (NSSE). (2012). Promoting student learning and institutional improvement. Retrieved from http://nsse.iub.edu/NSSE_2012_Results/pdf/NSSE_2012_Annual_Results.pdf
- O'Brien, E., & Rollefson, M. (1995). Extracurricular participation and student engagement. National Center for Educational Statistics Report 95-741. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs95/web/95741.asp
- Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578.
- Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Pew Forum. (2012). Pew-Internet: Social networking. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Commentary/2012/March/Pew-Internet-Social-Networking-full-detail.aspx
- Pike, G. (1999). The effects of residential learning communities and traditional residential living arrangements on educational gains during the first year of college. Journal of College Student Development, 40(3), 269–284.
- Pike, G. (2000). The influence of fraternity or sorority membership on students' college experiences and cognitive development. Research in Higher Education, 41(1), 117–139.
- Pike, G., & Killian, T. (2001). Reported gains in student learning: Do academic disciplines make a difference? Research in Higher Education, 42(4), 429–454.
- Pintrich, P. R., & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.
- Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801–813.
- Plett, M., Jones, D. C., Crawford, J. K., Floyd-Smith, T., Peter, D., Scott, E. P., & Veilleux, N. M. (2011). STEM seniors: Strong connections to community are associated with identity and positive affect in the classroom. In Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, B.C.
- Richardson, M., & Abraham, C. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387.
- Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Schaufeli, W. (2011). “Yes, I can, I feel good, and I just do it!” On gain cycles and spirals of efficacy beliefs, affect, and engagement. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 60(2), 255–285.
- Simbula, S., Guglielmi, D., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2011). A three-wave study of job resources, self-efficacy, and work engagement among Italian schoolteachers. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(3), 285–304.
- Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
- Valentine, J. C., Cooper, H., Bettencourt, B. A., & DuBois, D. L. (2002). Out-of-school activities and academic achievement: The mediating role of self-beliefs. Educational Psychologist, 37(4), 245–256.
- Vera, M., Le Blanc, P. M., Taris, T. W., & Salanova, M. (2014). Patterns of engagement: The relationship between efficacy beliefs and task engagement at the individual versus collective level. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44(2), 133–144.
- von Strumm, S., Hell, B., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2011). The hungry mind: Intellectual curiosity is the third pillar of academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(6), 574–588.
- Whitney, S. D., Renner, L. M., & Herrenkohl, T. I. (2010). Gender differences in risk/protection profiles for low academic performance. Journal of Community Psychology, 38(4), 435–455.
- Wilson, D., Jones, D., Crawford, J., Peter, D., Plett, M., Bates, R., … & Bates, R. (2012). Communities that make a difference: The CSET student perspective. In Proceedings of the 2012 Frontiers in Education Conference, Seattle, WA.
-
Xanthopoulou, D.,
Bakker, A. B.,
Demerouti, E., &
Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 14(2), 121.
10.1037/1072-5245.14.2.121 Google Scholar
- Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(3), 235–244.
