Imaging diagnosis and research progress of carotid plaque vulnerability
Lianlian Zhang
Yancheng Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, The First peolie's Hospital of Yancheng, Yancheng, Jiangsu, China
Search for more papers by this authorXia li
Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu medical vocational college, The Third People's Hospital of Yancheng, Yancheng, Jiangsu, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Qi Lyu
Taizhou People's Hospital, Taizhou, China
Correspondence
Qi Lyu, Taizhou People's Hospital, Taizhou, china.
Email: [email protected];
Guofu Shi, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu medical vocational college, The Third People's Hospital of Yancheng.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Guofu Shi
Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu medical vocational college, The Third People's Hospital of Yancheng, Yancheng, Jiangsu, China
Correspondence
Qi Lyu, Taizhou People's Hospital, Taizhou, china.
Email: [email protected];
Guofu Shi, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu medical vocational college, The Third People's Hospital of Yancheng.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorLianlian Zhang
Yancheng Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, The First peolie's Hospital of Yancheng, Yancheng, Jiangsu, China
Search for more papers by this authorXia li
Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu medical vocational college, The Third People's Hospital of Yancheng, Yancheng, Jiangsu, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Qi Lyu
Taizhou People's Hospital, Taizhou, China
Correspondence
Qi Lyu, Taizhou People's Hospital, Taizhou, china.
Email: [email protected];
Guofu Shi, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu medical vocational college, The Third People's Hospital of Yancheng.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Guofu Shi
Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu medical vocational college, The Third People's Hospital of Yancheng, Yancheng, Jiangsu, China
Correspondence
Qi Lyu, Taizhou People's Hospital, Taizhou, china.
Email: [email protected];
Guofu Shi, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu medical vocational college, The Third People's Hospital of Yancheng.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorLianlian Zhang and Xia li contributed equally to this study.
Funding information: Scientific Research Start-up Fund of Taizhou People's Hospital, Grant/Award Number: QDJJ202115; General project of Jiangsu medical vocational college, Grant/Award Number: 20219119; Instructive project of the health commission of Jiangsu Province, Grant/Award Number: 2021262
Abstract
Ischemic stroke (IS) exhibits a high disability rate, mortality, and recurrence rate, imposing a serious threat to human survival and health. Its occurrence is affected by various factors. Although the previous research has demonstrated that the occurrence of IS is mainly associated with lumen stenosis caused by carotid atherosclerotic plaque (AP), recent studies have revealed that many patients will still suffer from IS even with mild carotid artery lumen stenosis. Blood supply disturbance causes 10% of IS to the corresponding cerebral blood supply area caused by carotid vulnerable plaque. Thrombus blockage of distal branch vessels caused by rupture of vulnerable carotid plaque is the main cause of ischemic stroke. Therefore, how to accurately evaluate vulnerable plaque and intervene as soon as possible is a problem that needs to be solved in clinic. The vulnerability of plaque is determined by its internal components, including thin and incomplete fibrous cap, necrotic lipid core, intra-plaque hemorrhage, intra-plaque neovascularization, and ulcerative plaque formation. The development of imaging technology enables the routine detection of AP vulnerability. By analyzing the pathological changes, characteristics, and formation mechanism of carotid plaque vulnerability, this article aims to explore the modern imaging methods which can be used to identify plaque composition and plaque vulnerability to provide a reference basis for disease diagnosis and differential diagnosis.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have no conflict of interest.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
REFERENCES
- 1Benjamin EJ, Muntner P, Alonso A. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2019 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019; 139: e56-e528.
- 2Yamada K, Kawasaki M, Yoshimura S, et al. High-intensity signal in carotid plaque on routine 3D-TOF-MRA is a risk factor of ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016; 41: 13-18.
- 3Magge R, Lau BC, Soares BP, et al. Clinical risk factors and CT imaging features of carotid atherosclerotic plaques as predictors of new incident carotid ischemic stroke: a retrospective cohort study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013; 34: 402-409.
- 4Pikija S, Trkulja V, Mutzenbach JS, McCoy MR, Ganger P, Sellner J. Fibrinogen consumption is related to intracranial clot burden in acute ischemic stroke: a retrospective hyperdense artery study. J Transl Med. 2016; 14: 250.
- 5Brinjikji W, Huston J 3rd, Rabinstein AA, et al. Contemporary carotid imaging: from degree of stenosis to plaque vulnerability. J Neurosurg. 2016; 124: 27-42.
- 6Prabhakaran S, Rundek T, Ramas R, et al. Carotid plaque surface irregularity predicts ischemic stroke: the northern Manhattan study. Stroke. 2006; 37: 2696-2701.
- 7Libby P, Ridker PM, Maseri A. Inflammation and atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2002; 105(9): 1135-1143.
- 8Millon A, Mathevet JL, Boussel L, et al. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of carotid atherosclerosis identifies vulnerable carotid plaques. J Vasc Surg. 2013; 57: 1046-1051.
- 9Grimm JM, Schindler A, Freilinger T, et al. Comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerotic carotid plaques using parallel imaging and 3 T black-blood in vivo CMR. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013; 15: 44-63.
- 10Ten Kate GL, van den Oord SC, Sijbrands EJ, et al. Current status and future developments of contrast-enhanced ultrasound of carotid atherosclerosis. J Vasc Surg. 2013; 57: 539-546.
- 11Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, et al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies—part II. Circulation. 2003; 108: 1772-1778.
- 12Beg F, Rehman H, Al-Mallah MH. The vulnerable plaque: recent advances in computed tomography imaging to identify the vulnerable patient. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2020; 22: 1-7.
- 13De Havenon A, Mossa-Basha M, Shah L. High-resolution vessel wall MRI for the evaluation of intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Neuroradiology. 2017; 59: 1193-1202.
- 14Kern R, Szabo K, Hennerici M, Mir S. Characterization of carotid artery plaques using real-time compound B-mode ultrasound. Course. 2004; 35: 870-875.
- 15Roy Cardinal MH, Heusinkveld MHG, Qin Z, et al. CarotidArtery plaque vulnerability assessment. Using noninvasive ultrasound Elastography: validation with MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017; 209: 142-151.
- 16Bengtsson E, Hultman K, Edsfeldt A, et al. CD163+ macrophages are associated with a vulnerable plaque phenotype in human carotid plaques. Sci Rep. 2020; 10: 14362.
- 17Saba L, Anzidei M, Marincola BC, et al. Imaging of the carotid artery vulnerable plaque. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014; 37: 572-585.
- 18Grønholdt ML, Wiebe BM, Laursen H, et al. Lipid-rich carotid artery plaques appear echolucent on ultrasound B-mode images and may be associated with intraplaque haemorrhage. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1997; 14: 439-445.
- 19Johnsen SH, Mathiesen EB. Carotid plaque compared with intimamedia thickness as a predictor of coronary and cerebrovascular disease. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2009; 11: 21-27.
- 20Nakahara T, Narula J, Strauss HW. Molecular imaging of vulnerable plaque. Semin Nucl Med. 2018; 48: 291-298.
- 21Qiao H, Cai Y, Huang M, et al. Quantitative assessment of carotid artery atherosclerosis by three-dimensional magnetic resonance and two-dimensional ultrasound imaging: a comparison study[J]. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2020; 10: 1021-1032.
- 22Kalashyan H, Shuaib A, Gibson PH, et al. Single sweep three-dimensional carotid ultrasound: reproducibility in plaque and artery volume measurements. Atherosclerosis. 2014; 232: 397-402.
- 23AlMuhanna K, Hossain MM, Zhao L, et al. Carotid plaque morphometric assessment with three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. J Vasc Surg. 2015; 61: 690-697.
- 24Yuan J, Makris G, Patterson A, et al. Relationship between carotid plaque surface morphology and perfusion: a 3D DCE-MRI study. Magma. 2018; 31: 191-199.
- 25Egger M, Krasinski A, Rutt BK, Fenster A, Parraga G. Comparison of B-mode ultrasound, 3-dimensional ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging measurements of carotid atherosclerosis. J Ultrasound Med. 2008; 27: 1321-1334.
- 26Zhou R, Guo F, Azarpazhooh MR, et al. A voxel-based fully convolution network and continuous max-flow for carotid Vessel-Wall-volume segmentation from 3D ultrasound images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2020; 39: 2844-2855.
- 27Ophir J, Moriya T, Yazdi Y. A single transducer transaxial compression technique for the estimation of sound speed in biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging. 1991; 13: 269-279.
- 28Sidhu S, Cantisani V, Dietrich CF, et al. The EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations for the clinical practice of contrast enhanced- ultrasound(CEUS) in non-hepatic applications: update 2017(10ng version). Uhraschall Med. 2018; 39: e2-e44.
- 29Shah F, Balan P, Weinberg M, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of atherosclerotic carotid plaque neovascularization: a new surrogate marker of atherosclerosis. Vasc Med. 2007; 12: 291-297.
- 30Varetto G, Gibello L, Bergamasco L, et al. Contrast enhanced ultrasound in atherosclerotic carotid artery disease. Int Angiol. 2012; 31: 565-571.
- 31Vavuranakis M, Sigala F, Vrachatis DA, et al. Quantitative analysis of carotid plaque vasa vasorum by CEUS and correlation with histology after endarterectomy. Vasa. 2013; 42: 184-195.
- 32Sung J-H, Chang J-H. Mechanically rotating intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) transducer: a review. Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21: 3907.
- 33Saba L, Sanfilippo R, Montisci R, Atzeni M, Ribuffo D, Mallarini G. Vulnerable plaque: detection of agreement between multi-detector-row CT angiography and US-ECD. Eur J Radiol. 2011; 77: 509-515.
- 34Ogunleye AA, Deptula PL, Inchauste SM, et al. The utility of three-dimensional models in complex microsurgical reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg. 2020; Sep; 47: 428-434.
- 35Xu L, Wang R, Liu H, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic performances of ultrasound, high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in a rabbit carotid vulnerable plaque atherosclerosis model. J Ultrasound Med. 2020; 39: 2201-2209.
- 36Cai JM, Hatsukami TS, Ferguson MS, Small R, Polissar NL, Yuan C. Classification of human carotid atherosclerotic lesions with in vivo multicontrast magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2002; 106: 1368-1373.
- 37Oikawa M, Ota H, Takaya N, Miller Z, Hatsukami TS, Yuan C. Carotid magnetic resonance imaging. A window to study atherosclerosis and identify high-risk plaques. Circ J. 2009; 73: 1765-1773.
- 38Paolo R, Pontone G, Andreini D, et al. Role of new imaging modalities in pursuit of the vulnerable plaque and the vulnerable patient. Int J Cardiol. 2018; 250: 278-283.
- 39Pahk K. A novel Cd147 inhibitor Sp-8356 attenuates plaque progression and stabilizes vulnerable plaque in Apoe-deficient mice. Atherosclerosis. 2019; 287:e271.
- 40Fu W, Chen M, Ou L, et al. Xiaoyaosan prevents atherosclerotic vulnerable plaque formation through heat shock protein/glucocorticoid receptor axis-mediated mechanism. Am J Transl Res. 2019; 11: 5531-5545.
- 41Saber H, Rajah GB, Seraji-Bozorgzad N, Nasiriavanaki M. Intravascular imaging in neuroendovascular surgery: a brief review. Neurol Res. 2018; 40: 892-899.
- 42Chen CJ, Kumar JS, Chen SH, et al. Optical coherence tomography: future applications in cerebrovascular imaging. Stroke. 2018; 49: 1044-1050.
- 43Brezinski ME. Optical coherence tomography for identifying unstable coronary plaque. Int J Cardiol. 2006; 107: 154-165.
- 44Kubo T, Imanishi T, Takarada S, et al. Assessment of culprit lesion morphology in acute myocardial infarction: ability of optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and coronary angioscopy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 50: 933-939.
- 45Huang X, Zhang Y, Qian M, et al. Classification of carotid plaque echogenicity by combining texture features and morphologic characteristics. J Ultrasound Med. 2016; 35: 2253-2261.
- 46Wang Y, Han S, Qin H, et al. Chinese Stroke Association guidelines for clinical management of cerebrovascular disorders: executive summary and 2019 update of the management of high-risk population. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2020; 5: 270-278.
- 47Wang Y, Liu M, Pu C. 2014 Chinese guidelines for secondary prevention of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. Int J Stroke. 2017; 12: 302-320.
- 48Kernan WN, Ovbiagele B, Black HR, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014; 45: 2160-2236.