Volume 34, Issue 11 pp. 1537-1546
Research Article
Full Access

Screening of a Large Cohort of Leber Congenital Amaurosis and Retinitis Pigmentosa Patients Identifies Novel LCA5 Mutations and New Genotype–Phenotype Correlations

Donna S. Mackay

Donna S. Mackay

Department of Human Genetics, Institute of Ophthalmology, UCL, London, UK

These authors contributed equally to this study.

Search for more papers by this author
Arundhati Dev Borman

Arundhati Dev Borman

Department of Human Genetics, Institute of Ophthalmology, UCL, London, UK

Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK

These authors contributed equally to this study.

Search for more papers by this author
Ruifang Sui

Ruifang Sui

Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China

Search for more papers by this author
L. Ingeborgh van den Born

L. Ingeborgh van den Born

The Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Eliot L. Berson

Eliot L. Berson

Berman-Gund Laboratory for the Study of Retinal Degenerations, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts

Search for more papers by this author
Louise A. Ocaka

Louise A. Ocaka

Department of Human Genetics, Institute of Ophthalmology, UCL, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Alice E. Davidson

Alice E. Davidson

Department of Human Genetics, Institute of Ophthalmology, UCL, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
John R. Heckenlively

John R. Heckenlively

Kellogg Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Search for more papers by this author
Kari Branham

Kari Branham

Kellogg Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Search for more papers by this author
Huanan Ren

Huanan Ren

McGill Ocular Genetics Laboratory, Departments of Pediatric Surgery, Human Genetics and Ophthalmology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Irma Lopez

Irma Lopez

McGill Ocular Genetics Laboratory, Departments of Pediatric Surgery, Human Genetics and Ophthalmology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Maleeha Maria

Maleeha Maria

Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Centre, and Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Department of Biosciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan

Search for more papers by this author
Maleeha Azam

Maleeha Azam

Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Centre, and Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Department of Biosciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan

Search for more papers by this author
Arjen Henkes

Arjen Henkes

Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Centre, and Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Ellen Blokland

Ellen Blokland

Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Centre, and Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
[LCA5 Study Group (see Acknowledgments for Universities)

[LCA5 Study Group (see Acknowledgments for Universities)

Search for more papers by this author
Sten AndreassonElfride de BaereJean BennettGerald J. ChaderWolfgang BergerIrina GolovlevaJacquie GreenbergAnneke I. den HollanderCaroline C.W. KlaverB. Jeroen KleveringBirgit LorenzMarkus N. PreisingRaj RamesarLisa RobertsRonald RoepmanKlaus RohrschneiderBernd Wissinger]Raheel Qamar

Raheel Qamar

Department of Biosciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan

Al-Nafees Medical College & Hospital, Isra University, Islamabad, Pakistan

Search for more papers by this author
Andrew R. Webster

Andrew R. Webster

Department of Human Genetics, Institute of Ophthalmology, UCL, London, UK

Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Frans P.M. Cremers

Frans P.M. Cremers

Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Centre, and Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

These senior authors contributed equally to this study.

Search for more papers by this author
Anthony T. Moore

Anthony T. Moore

Department of Human Genetics, Institute of Ophthalmology, UCL, London, UK

Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK

These senior authors contributed equally to this study.

Search for more papers by this author
Robert K. Koenekoop

Corresponding Author

Robert K. Koenekoop

McGill Ocular Genetics Laboratory, Departments of Pediatric Surgery, Human Genetics and Ophthalmology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

These senior authors contributed equally to this study.

Correspondence to: Robert K. Koenekoop, McGill University Health Centre, McGill Ocular Genetics Centre, 2300 Tupper, Montreal, Quebec H3H 1P3, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 14 August 2013
Citations: 29

Contract grant sponsor: Fight for Sight (A.R.W., A.T.M.), National Institute for Health Research UK- Moorfields Eye Hospital Biomedical Research Centre (A.R.W., A.T.M.), Foundation Fighting Blindness-USA (A.R.W., A.T.M.), Ulvercroft Foundation (A.R.W., A.T.M.), Foundation for Retinal Research (F.P.M.C., R.K.K., A.I.d.H., J.B., R.R.), Foundation Fighting Blindness-Canada (R.K.K.), CIHR (R.K.K.), NIH (R.K.K.), Reseau Vision (R.K.K.), FRSQ (R.K.K.), Retina South Africa (J.G., R.R.).

Communicated by Daniel F. Schorderet

[This article was originally published online on 17 September 2013 and appeared in the issue (vol. 34, iss. 11) on 9 October 2013. Subsequently, an error in an author's name was identified and corrected on 15 October 2013.]

ABSTRACT

This study was undertaken to investigate the prevalence of sequence variants in LCA5 in patients with Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA), early-onset retinal dystrophy (EORD), and autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa (arRP); to delineate the ocular phenotypes; and to provide an overview of all published LCA5 variants in an online database. Patients underwent standard ophthalmic evaluations after providing informed consent. In selected patients, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus autofluorescence imaging were possible. DNA samples from 797 unrelated patients with LCA and 211 with the various types of retinitis pigmentosa (RP) were screened by Sanger sequence analysis of all LCA5 exons and intron/exon junctions. Some LCA patients were prescreened by APEX technology or selected based on homozygosity mapping. In silico analyses were performed to assess the pathogenicity of the variants. Segregation analysis was performed where possible. Published and novel LCA5 variants were collected, amended for their correct nomenclature, and listed in a Leiden Open Variation Database (LOVD). Sequence analysis identified 18 new probands with 19 different LCA5 variants. Seventeen of the 19 LCA5 variants were novel. Except for two missense variants and one splice site variant, all variants were protein-truncating mutations. Most patients expressed a severe phenotype, typical of LCA. However, some LCA subjects had better vision and intact inner segment/outer segment (IS/OS) junctions on OCT imaging. In two families with LCA5 variants, the phenotype was more compatible with EORD with affected individuals displaying preserved islands of retinal pigment epithelium. One of the families with a milder phenotype harbored a homozygous splice site mutation; a second family was found to have a combination of a stop mutation and a missense mutation. This is the largest LCA5 study to date. We sequenced 1,008 patients (797 with LCA, 211 with arRP) and identified 18 probands with LCA5 mutations. Mutations in LCA5 are a rare cause of childhood retinal dystrophy accounting for ∼2% of disease in this cohort, and the majority of LCA5 mutations are likely null. The LCA5 protein truncating mutations are predominantly associated with LCA. However, in two families with the milder EORD, the LCA5 gene analysis revealed a homozygous splice site mutation in one and a stop mutation in combination with a missense mutation in a second family, suggesting that this milder phenotype is due to residual function of lebercilin and expanding the currently known phenotypic spectrum to include the milder early onset RP. Some patients have remaining foveal cone structures (intact IS/OS junctions on OCT imaging) and remaining visual acuities, which may bode well for upcoming treatment trials.

Introduction

Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) is an infantile onset, severe retinal dystrophy that presents with profound visual impairment, inability to fixate and nystagmus from birth or within the first few weeks of life [von Leber, 1869]. It is the most severe form of a spectrum of disorders arising within the first few years of life, which affect both rod and cone photoreceptors, termed childhood or early-onset retinal dystrophy (EORD) [Gu et al., 1997]. The term juvenile retinitis pigmentosa (RP) has also been used to describe EORD. Autosomal recessive RP (arRP) falls into this spectrum of disorders with onset typically later in childhood or beyond. LCA accounts for 3%–5% of childhood blindness in the developed world and has an incidence of two to three per 100,000 live births [Heckenlively et al., 1988]. Depending on the age at diagnosis, the retinal appearance may be normal or there may be a variety of abnormalities including vascular narrowing, macular atrophy, peripheral white dots at the level of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), and retinal pigmentation. The full-field electroretinogram (ERG) is usually nondetectable (<10 μV) with conventional ERG testing or severely decreased before the age of 1 year [Foxman et al., 1985; Franceschetti and Dieterle, 1954].

LCA is predominantly inherited as an autosomal recessive trait, although rare dominant forms have been reported [Swaroop et al., 1999]. Nineteen causative genes have thus far been reported: AIPL1 [MIM #604392] [Sohocki et al., 2000], CABP4 [MIM #608965] [Aldahmesh et al., 2010], CEP290 [MIM #610142] [den Hollander et al., 2006], CRB1 [MIM #604210] [den Hollander et al., 2001], CRX [MIM #602225] [Freund et al., 1998], GUCY2D [MIM #600179] [Perrault et al., 1996], IMPDH1 [MIM #146690] [Bowne et al., 2006], IQCB1 [MIM #609237] [Estrada-Cuzcano et al., 2011], KCNJ13 [MIM #603208] [Sergouniotis et al., 2011], LCA5 [MIM #611408] [den Hollander et al., 2007], LRAT [MIM #604863] [Thompson et al., 2001], MERTK [MIM #604705] [Gal et al., 2000], NMNAT1 [MIM #608700] [Chiang et al., 2012; Falk et al., 2012; Koenekoop et al., 2012; Perrault et al., 2012], RD3 [MIM #180040] [Friedman et al., 2006], RDH12 [MIM #608830] [Janecke et al., 2004], RPGRIP1 [MIM #605446] [Dryja et al., 2001], RPE65 [MIM #180069] [Gu et al., 1997; Marlhens et al., 1997], SPATA7 [MIM #609868] [Wang et al., 2009], and TULP1 [MIM #602280] [Hanein et al., 2004]. Interestingly, mutations in some of these genes, such as CEP290 [Littink et al., 2010], CRB1 [den Hollander et al., 1999], LRAT [Thompson et al., 2001], MERTK [Gal et al., 2000], RPE65 [Morimura et al., 1998], and SPATA7 [Wang et al., 2009], may also be associated with milder forms of retinal dystrophy.

The LCA5 locus (MIM #604537) was mapped to chromosome 6q11-q16 by traditional linkage studies in a multigenerational kindred of the Old Order River Brethren [Dharmaraj et al., 2000]. Further homozygosity mapping in consanguineous and nonconsanguineous families led to a refinement of the critical region [den Hollander et al., 2007; Mohamed et al., 2003] and the causative gene, LCA5, was identified [den Hollander et al., 2007]. LCA5 comprises nine exons, seven of which encode Lebercilin, a 697 amino acid protein that contains four coiled-coil domains [den Hollander et al., 2007]. Lebercilin is widely expressed in human tissues including cilia. In situ hybridization of mouse embryos at day 12.5 postcoitum detected almost ubiquitous, low-level staining. At embryonic day 14.5, staining of the eye, inner ear, kidney, and regions of the central and peripheral neural system, gut and the ciliated epithelium of the nasopharynx, trachea, and lungs was more pronounced. In the adult eye, expression was limited to the photoreceptor cell layer. In ciliated cell lines, lebercilin localizes to the ciliary axoneme. In mouse and rat retina, it is found between the outer and inner segments of the photoreceptor layer. In a human embryonic kidney cell line, HEK293, recombinant lebercilin was found to interact with 24 proteins, many of which are associated with centrosomal or ciliary functions, and the intraflagellar transport machinery [Boldt et al., 2011]. Lca5 inactivation in mice led to very severe and rapid retinal degeneration. At 1 month postnatally, there was a significant reduction in photoreceptor cells, and after 4 months, the photoreceptor layer was completely absent [Boldt et al., 2011].

To date, 12 different mutations in LCA5 have been reported. In patients of all families except one, the phenotype has been typical of LCA [Abu-Safieh et al., 2013; Ahmad et al., 2011; den Hollander et al., 2007; Gerber et al., 2007; Jacobson et al., 2009; Li et al., 2011; Ramprasad et al., 2008; Vallespin et al., 2010a; Vallespin et al., 2010b]. Despite its ubiquitous expression and its crucial functions in the cilia [Boldt et al., 2011], the phenotype associated with LCA5 mutations has thus far been confined to the retina. In this paper, we present the results of screening for mutations in LCA5 in a large number of subjects with LCA and EORD (n = 797), and arRP (n = 211), and describe the associated phenotypes.

Materials and Methods

Patients

In total, we sequenced 1,008 patients. We ascertained 797 probands with LCA and EORD, living in Belgium (n = 47), Canada and the USA (n = 300), Germany (n = 65), The Netherlands (n = 54), South Africa (n = 18), Sweden (n = 20), Switzerland (n = 42), China (n = 100), Pakistan (n = 1), and the United Kingdom (n = 150). In addition, we included 211 persons with isolated or arRP from The Netherlands. Many LCA and arRP patients were not originally from their current place of residence and were actually from India, Pakistan, Russia, and other countries. Approximately 50% of the persons with LCA were previously analyzed using various Asper Ophthalmics LCA allele-specific primer extension (APEX) mutation chips. None of the DNAs of persons with arRP were previously analyzed for LCA5 mutations using APEX. LCA, EORD, and RP may be considered a continuum of retinal dystrophies, in which LCA represents the extreme end of severity, as far as the age of onset and functional outcome are concerned. In our current study, LCA was diagnosed in children who were born with severe visual loss, inability to fixate at around 6 weeks of age, nystagmus, and absent or nondetectable ERGs. EORD was diagnosed in children born with reduced, but clinically identifiable, visual function and fixation, with or without nystagmus, and with progressive night blindness and subsequent vision loss. arRP was diagnosed in patients without nystagmus, a variable onset of progressive night blindness and visual loss after the age of 2 years.

Clinical Investigations

All patients and family members provided informed consent as part of research projects approved by the local research ethics committees, and the study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Clinical evaluation, including monocular best-corrected visual acuity by projected Snellen charts, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and fundus examination was performed on all patients who could cooperate with testing. Where possible, patients underwent retinal imaging using a Topcon TRC 501A retinal camera (Topcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), optical coherence tomography using a SPECTRALIS® Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) scanner (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany), and retinal autofluorescence imaging using a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (Zeiss Prototype; Carl Zeiss Inc., Oberkochen, Germany). Pattern and full-field electroretinogram (PERG and ERG) were performed, where possible, using the recommendations of the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) or a modified Paediatric ERG protocol with skin electrodes as previously described [Flitcroft et al., 2005; Kriss, 1994; Marmor et al., 2009]. Patient #14 (Berman-Gund Laboratory ID: 048–038) was evaluated by full-field ERG testing using Burian Allen contact lens electrodes, narrow band-passed filtering, and computer averaging that can extend the range of detectability of 30 Hz cone ERGs to 0.05 μV [Berson et al., 1993]. Goldmann perimetry was performed in patient #16.

Blood samples were collected in EDTA tubes and DNA was extracted using the Puregene blood extraction kit (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK) following manufacturer's instructions, or by a standard salting out procedure [Miller et al., 1988].

Mutation Screening

Nucleotide numbering reflects cDNA with +1 corresponding to the A of the ATG translation initiation codon (RefSeq NM_181714.3), according to journal guidelines (www.hgvs.org/mutnomen). The initiation codon is codon 1. Primers used to amplify the coding exons and the intron–exon boundaries of LCA5 were designed using those published previously [den Hollander et al., 2007]. In addition, 194 persons with LCA and 94 persons with arRP were analyzed for the presence of an exon 1 deletion identified in the original LCA5 family [den Hollander et al., 2007]. To this end, primers 5′-TTCCGTGCAATTTAGGGATT-3′ and 5′-CGGGGTTTTTGTTTTGTTTG-3′ were designed to amplify a deletion breakpoint fragment of 117 bp. All standard polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were performed in a total volume of 30 μl containing 200 μM dNTPs (Bioline, London, UK), 20 μM of each primer, 1× reaction buffer with 1.5 mM MgCl2 (Bioline) with 1 unit of Biotaq (Bioline) and 100 ng of DNA. PCR was carried out on a PTC200 DNA engine thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, Hemel Hempstead, UK). Cycling conditions were as follows: 5 min denaturation at 94°C followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, annealing temperature for 30 sec, and extension at 72°C for 30 sec. A final extension of 72°C for 5 min completed the cycling conditions.

PCR products were visualized on a 2% agarose gel containing 0.05% ethidium bromide. The products were cleaned using multiscreen PCR filter plates (Millipore, Watford, UK) prior to sequencing. PCR products were sequenced directly using the ABI Prism Big Dye terminator Kit (V3.1, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) in a 10-μl reaction. Samples were purified using the Montage cleanup kit (Millipore) prior to being run on an ABI applied biosystems 3730 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems). Electropherograms were analyzed for sequence changes using DNAStar computational software (DNAStar, Inc., Madison, WI). Any sequence changes identified were checked visually.

Mutations were tested in normal controls when possible, and cosegregation was performed in the families, when possible. Mutation frequencies were analyzed in the exome variant server database, 1000 genomes database, and dbSNP database. In silico analyses were then performed to assess pathogenicity, including Blosum62, Polyphen2, and PhyloP.

Patient #1 was originally identified to harbor a heterozygous mutation in LCA5 by microarray analysis using the Asper LCA Apex chip. His second mutation was identified following LCA5 sequence analysis. Patient #18 was selected for LCA5 sequence analysis because homozygosity mapping of two affected persons (IV:2 and IV:3) of family W12-2240 (Fig. 1) showed a large, significant homozygous region surrounding LCA5. To identify this region, we had employed the CytoScan® High-Density array containing probes to detect 750,000 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA).

Details are in the caption following the image
Pedigrees of patients #7 and #18. A: An EORD family with proband #7 is indicated with an arrow. A half-brother and cousin also show the clinical characteristics of arRP and carry the splice variant (M: c.1231+2insT) in the homozygous state. One unaffected brother and the father of the proband carry this variant in the heterozygous state. B: An LCA family with proband #18. A frequent Pakistani LCA5 variant (c.1151del) is found in the homozygous state in three persons with LCA and in the heterozygous state in five unaffected persons.

Results

Mutational Analysis

A total of 797 patients with LCA and EORD and 211 with arRP were screened for sequence variants in protein-coding exons (i.e., exons 3 through 9) of LCA5. Sixteen probands were identified with two disease-causing variants. In all, 19 different LCA5 variants were identified (Table 1); 17 of these variants are novel. Homozygous variants were found in 10 probands, compound heterozygous variants in six probands, and heterozygous protein truncating variants in two probands (Table 1).

Table 1. Mutations Identified in LCA5
Allele 1 Allele 2
Patient DNA variant Protein variant DNA variant Protein variant Segregation Reference (allele 1/allele 2)
1 c.835C>T p.(Gln279*) c.1756A>T p.(Lys586*) Yes den Hollander et al., 2007/novel
2 c.1151delC p.(Pro384Glnfs*18) c.1151delC p.(Pro384Glnfs*18) Yes den Hollander et al., 2007
3 c.633_639del p.(Glu211Aspfs*13) c.633_639del p.(Glu211Aspfs*13) M-yes; F-NT Novel
4 c.3G>A p.(Met1Ile) c.835C>T p.(Gln279*) NT Novel/den Hollander et al., 2007
5 c.1676C>A p.(Ser559*) c.1676C>A p.(Ser559*) Yes Novel
6 c.367C>T p.(Gln123*) c.1756T>A p.(Lys586*) NT Novel/novel
7 c.1231+2insT p.? c.1231+2insT p.? Yes Novel
8 c.142A>T p.(Arg48*) c.142A>T p.(Arg48*) NT Novel
9 c.142A>T p.(Arg48*) c.142A>T p.(Arg48*) NT Novel
10 c.1543_1544delinsA p.(Ser515Lysfs*78) c.1543_1544delinsA p.(Ser515Lysfs*78) NT Novel
11 c.795T>G p.(Tyr265*) c.1759_1760insAG p.(Leu587Glnfs*7) NT Novel/novel
12 c.835C>T p.(Gln279*) c.835C>T p.(Gln279*) NT den Hollander et al., 2007
13 c.42_45del p.(Lys15Glnfs*95) c.1207C>T p.(Gln403*) NT Novel/novel
14 c.1730dup p.(Leu577Phefs*12) + + NT Novel
15 c.2011C>T p.(Arg671*) + + NT Novel
16 c.69C>G p.(Tyr23*) c.491A>G p.(His164Arg) NT Novel/novel
17 c.439_449dup p.(Glu151*) c.439_449dup p.(Glu151*) Yes Novel
18 c.1151delC p.(Pro384Glnfs*18) c.1151delC p.(Pro384Glnfs*18) Yes den Hollander et al., 2007
  • Mutation nomenclature is based on NM_181714.3.
  • F, father; M, mother; NT, not tested; +, not identified.

All but two mutations were predicted to lead to premature termination of the lebercilin protein. One of the missense mutations that we identified was in patient #4 involving the first amino acid of the lebercilin protein (p.Met1Ile). The other missense change is a novel change in patient #16 involving a histidine to arginine change at position 164 (p.His164Arg). The underlying c.491A>G variant was not found in 8,600 alleles of “control” individuals in the Exome Variant Server database and once in the 1000 genomes database (rs183669161). Unfortunately, we do not have parental DNA to test for segregation. The PhyloP score of c.491A is 3.92, Polyphen2 predicts damage, and the histidine at position 164 is fully conserved between human, rhesus, mouse, dog, opossum, chicken, Western clawed frog, and zebrafish. In an affected half-brother (IV:1) and an affected cousin (V:1) of patient #7 (Fig. 1A), the same homozygous splice site variant (c.1231+2insT) was found, and two unaffected persons carried this variant in the heterozygous state. This variant is predicted to completely inactivate this splice site based on SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntSplice, and NNSplice analysis. Homozygosity mapping using DNA from two persons with LCA from family W12-2240 (Fig. 1B: patients IV:2 and IV:3) yielded 10 shared homozygous regions larger than 5 Mb. The third largest homozygous region on chromosome 6 (18.9 Mb) encompassed LCA5. In all three affected individuals (Fig. 1B), the c.1151delC (p.Pro384Glnfs*18) variant was identified in the homozygous state in LCA5. This variant was present in the heterozygous state in five unaffected members (Fig. 1B).

The ethnic origins of the 18 probands with LCA5 mutations were as follows: European Caucasian: 7 (British, Slovakian-Romani, and Spanish); Asian: 7 (Pakistan, Afghanistan, Indian-Mauritian, Iraqi, Taiwanese, and Chinese); North American: 3; Mexican: 1.

Clinical Phenotype

Of the 18 probands with LCA5 variants identified in this study, all but two patients had a clinical diagnosis of LCA, with onset of severe visual loss at birth or within the first few months of life, and nystagmus (Table 2). However, patients #7 and #16 received a diagnosis of EORD. Patient #7 was born with congenital nystagmus, and developed night blindness at the age of 3, visual field loss at the age of 6, and visual loss at the age of 8. In patient #16, the visual loss started after the age of 40 years. In addition, patient #16 did not have nystagmus. All of our LCA and EORD patients had nyctalopia and severe visual field constriction. General health was good in the majority of patients, except in patient #2 who had global developmental delay and patient #3 who had behavioral problems. Fourteen of the 16 LCA patients were legally blind with visual acuity ranging from 1.0 logMAR to light perception. One patient, #11, with LCA and nystagmus, had visual acuities of 0.48 right (20/60) and 0.54 left (20/70) at the age of 6 years (Table 2). Patient #16, with EORD, had a visual acuity of 0.30 (20/40) at the age of 55 years. Most patients had a hypermetropic refraction (Table 2). The high myopic correction in patient #6 may be attributed to keratoconus. A full-field ERG was performed in eight patients and was nondetectable (<10 μV) with conventional ERG testing in five patients. A small cone ERG response could be quantified in patient #14 and trace cone ERG responses (unquantified) could be detected in patient #16 (Table 2). Anterior segments were normal in all but one of the oldest patients (patient #6), who had bilateral keratoconus at the age of 37 years. This patient also developed bilateral nuclear sclerotic and posterior subcapsular lenticular opacities in adulthood.

Table 2. Clinical Characteristics of Persons with LCA5 Variants
Age at Latest Latest RE spherical LE Spherical
Age of exam General VAR VAL equivalent Equivalent Anterior
Patient Ethnicity Diagnosis onset (years) health (LogMAR) LogMAR) (dioptres) (Dioptres) segment Fundus ERG
1 British Caucasian LCA 3 months 17 Good 1 1 +4.00 +4.38 Normal Widespread RPE atrophy, white dots, vascular attenuation, minimal BS pigmentation inferiorly Undetectable
2 Afghani LCA Birth 4 Global developmental delay LP LP +2.50 +2.00 Normal White dots in retinal periphery, normal macula, normal discs Rudimentary full-field rod function; undetectable cone function
3 Slovakian Romani LCA 3 months 8 Behavioral issues LP LP +6.50 +6.50 Normal Widespread RPE atrophy, white dots, macular atrophy Undetectable
4 British Caucasian LCA Infancy 8.5 Good 1.1 1.1 N/A N/A Normal Widespread RPE atrophy, white dots, normal discs, and macula N/A
5 Indian Mauritian LCA 6 weeks 1 N/A LP LP +6.00 +6.00 Normal N/A N/A
6 British Caucasian LCA Birth 37 Good CF LP −13.26 −1.94 Bilateral KC; bilateral NS; PSCLO Asteroid hyalosis LE, widespread RPE atrophy, white dots, minimal BS pigmentation, vascular thinning, normal macula N/A
7 Iraqi EORD Birth 21 Good 1 1.2 N/A N/A Normal Salt and pepper fundus, peripheral preserved RPE islands pattern, minimal BS pigmentation, pumpkin-colored macula N/A
8 Spanish LCA Birth 3 Good CF CF N/A N/A Normal White dots in retinal periphery N/A
9 Spanish LCA Birth 3 Good CF CF N/A N/A Normal White dots in retinal periphery N/A
10 Mexican LCA Birth 3 Good HM HM N/A N/A Normal N/A N/A
11 Chinese LCA Birth 6 Good 0.48 0.54 +3.25 +3.88 Normal White dots in posterior pole Undetectable
12 US LCA Birth 20 Good HM HM +5.00 +5.00 Normal Granularity throughout fundus Undetectable
13 Chinese LCA Birth 16 Good HM HM N/A N/A Normal White dots in retinal periphery Not able to perform
14 US LCA Birth 19 Good 1 1 +2.25 +2.25 Normal White dots in retinal periphery and posterior pole; minimal BS pigmentation; right optic disc drusen Cone b-wave: 0.26 μV OD, 0.56 μV OS
15 US LCA Birth 1 Good N/A N/A N/A N/A Normal N/A N/A
16 Taiwan EORD 43 years 55 Good 0.3 1.66 −0.75 −0.13 Normal Relatively pink optic disks, attenuated vessels with vascular sheathing, macular RPE atrophy with preserved foveae, widespread RPE atrophy, with superficial and deep intraretinal pigmentation Trace of cone function in OS
17 British Caucasian LCA Birth 18.5 Good LP LP +9.00 +9.00 Normal Bilateral well-circumscribed atrophic macular lesions. Relatively normal hypopigmented mid-peripheral and peripheral retinae. No white dots, normal optic nerves N/A
18 Pakistani LCA Birth 20 Good LP LP N/A N/A Normal N/A Undetectable
  • a Represents patient ID Berman–Gund Laboratory ID: 048–038. This patient was evaluated by full-field ERG testing using narrow band-passed filtering and computer averaging that can extend the range of detectability of 30 Hz cone ERGs to 0.05 μV [Berson et al., 1993].
  • ArRP, autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa; BS, bone spicule; CF, counting fingers; ERG, electroretinogram; HM, hand movements; KC, keratoconus; LCA, Leber congenital amaurosis; LP, light perception; N/A, not available; NS, nuclear sclerosis; OD, right eye; OS, left eye; PPRPE, preserved para-arteriolar retinal pigment epithelium; PSCLO, posterior capsular lens opacity; RPE, retinal pigment epithelium; VAL, visual acuity left eye; VAR, visual acuity right eye.

Fundus examination most commonly revealed widespread retinal pigment epithelial atrophy and granularity, with peculiar, small, white dots at the level of the RPE in the retinal periphery, which were seen in 10 of 14 patients (71%) in whom funduscopic data were available (Fig. 2). Figure 2B and C shows the white dots clearly, and document the round, evenly spaced, similar-sized lesions. Intraretinal pigment migration, when present, was minimal, situated in the far retinal periphery, and seen in the oldest patients, patients #1, #6, #7, #14, and #16 (Fig. 2A, D, and E). Macular atrophy was noted in only three patients, #3, #16, and #17 (Fig. 2B, E, and F); the macula was otherwise normal on funduscopy in the remaining patients. In one patient, the macular lesion was particularly severe, with features of a “macular coloboma” (Fig. 2F). Optic discs were normal in appearance (pink disc color) in all but one patient (patient #14), who had optic disc drusen (Fig. 2D). In one family with arRP (patient #7), we identified a pumpkin-colored maculopathy and intraretinal pigmentation in the periphery with faintly preserved islands of RPE (Fig. 3).

Details are in the caption following the image
Retinal phenotype of patients with LCA5 mutations. Right eye shown for each patient. A: Patient #1, age 17 years, with widespread RPE atrophy, mid-peripheral retinal white dots (white arrow), and peripheral intraretinal pigmentation B: Patient #3, age 5 years, with mid-peripheral retinal white dots (white arrow) and macular atrophy. C: Patient #4, age 8.5 years, with widespread RPE atrophy and mid-peripheral retinal white dots (white arrow). D: Patient #14, age 19 years, with retinal white dots (white arrow), peripheral intraretinal pigmentation, and optic disk drusen. E: Patient #16, age 55 years, with widespread RPE atrophy, foveal preservation, and peripheral intraretinal pigmentation. F: Patient #17, age 18.5 years, with marked macular atrophy and hypopigmented but relatively normal peripheral retina. Intraretinal pigment was seen in the oldest patients (panels A, D, and E).
Details are in the caption following the image
Retinal phenotype of arRP patient #7, right eye, age 21 years. There is widespread RPE atrophy, peripheral preserved islands of RPE (white arrow), peripheral intraretinal pigmentation, and a “pumpkin”-colored macula.

OCT data, available for patients #1, #11, and #16, showed preservation of the central foveal inner segment/outer segment (IS/OS) junctions and of the outer segments in the two younger patients (#1 and #11) (Fig. 4A and B). In the older patient (#16), OCT imaging demonstrated macular atrophy, disruption of retinal lamination, and the presence of a hyporeflective well-circumscribed area in the outer nuclear layer, with a hyperreflective border. This may represent an area of outer retinal tubulation (also known as rosettes) (Fig. 4C). OCT image acquisition was otherwise not possible due to nystagmus. Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging data were available in two patients (Fig. 5). FAF in patient #1 revealed an overall hypofluorescence in the macula, with a central hyperfluorescent signal in the fovea (Fig. 5A). FAF images of patient #16 showed severe hypofluorescence in the macula corresponding to significant RPE atrophy (Fig. 5B). Goldmann perimetry in patient #16 revealed a small central island, with a relatively large preserved nasal field and a small temporal field.

Details are in the caption following the image
Optical coherence tomography imaging of patients with LCA5 variants. A: Patient #1 (age 17 years). B: Patient #11 (age 6 years)—white arrows demarcate the extent of preservation of the central foveal IS/OS junctions and of the outer segments. C: Patient #16 (age 55 years) demonstrating macular atrophy, disruption of retinal lamination, and a presumed area of outer retinal tubulation (white arrow).
Details are in the caption following the image
Fundus autofluorescence imaging of patients with LCA5 variants. A: Patient #1 (age 17 years), demonstrating overall macular hypofluorescence, with a hyperfluorescent foveal signal, suggesting metabolic activity of the foveal cones and RPE complex. B: Patient #16 (age 55 years), showing a large area of macular hypofluorescence corresponding to RPE atrophy.

Discussion

LCA5 mutations are a rare cause of LCA. Previously, only 12 different mutations had been identified and published in 16 families with LCA. In the current study, which is the largest study to date, we have screened the coding region of LCA5 in 1,008 patients, 797 with LCA and EORD, and 211 with arRP, ascertained from eight different countries. We identified mutations in 18 new LCA families. We discovered 19 different LCA5 mutations, 17 of which are novel. Mutations in LCA5 thus account for ~2% of patients with LCA, EORD, and arRP in our cohort. All 29 different LCA5 variants have now been included in the new Leiden Open Variation Database (LOVD; http://www.LOVD.nl/LCA5). In two patients (#14 and #15), we identified heterozygous variants. The second allele may have been missed because the variant may be located outside the protein-coding exons, or because these variants are causative in a more complex inheritance model (such as digenic), or that these are coincidental findings of heterozygous variants that play no role in the LCA phenotype.

The majority of LCA5 mutations found both in this study and in those published previously are likely null mutations due to premature termination of the protein. Only one missense mutation in this gene (p.Ser202Pro) has been previously reported in LCA, but without accompanying clinical information [Vallespin et al., 2010b]. We also identified a missense variant, p.Met1Ile (the start codon), in patient #4, who carried a diagnosis of LCA, in combination with the most common LCA5 stop mutation p.Gln279*. If the next methionine in the open reading frame were to be used instead (at position 336), as the alternative start codon, then two coiled–coiled domains in the lebercilin protein would be lacking, very likely rendering the truncated lebercilin inactive. Therefore, this missense mutation may also be a null allele. We also identified another missense mutation, p.His164Arg. This mutation was found in combination with a novel nonsense mutation, p.Tyr23*, in LCA patient #16, but segregation data are lacking. Thus, we cannot exclude that these variants are in cis configuration and that they are not causative for the phenotype in patient #16.

Previously, and in the majority of patients in this study, the phenotype reported in association with LCA5 mutations is consistent with LCA with severely reduced vision at, or near birth, nystagmus, and a nondetectable (<10 μV) ERG [Ahmad et al., 2011; den Hollander et al., 2007; Dharmaraj et al., 2000; Gerber et al., 2007; Jacobson et al., 2009; Mohamed et al., 2003; Ramprasad et al., 2008]. High hypermetropia is common. The visual acuity is reported to range between 0.20 to light perception and there is extensive peripheral field loss. In our study, the majority of patients had a clinical diagnosis of LCA, with fundus examination revealing widespread atrophy of the retina and RPE but with little intraretinal pigment migration. On the clinical examination, we commonly identified scattered white dots at the level of the RPE (Fig. 2A–D—white arrows). White dots can be found in other genetic types of LCA, such as RPE65, LRAT, and CEP290. In RPE65-type LCA, Weleber et al. (2011) suggested that the white dots might represent accumulations of trans-retinyl esters. The biochemical make-up of the white dots associated with LCA5 mutations is as yet unknown. Our LCA5-associated retinal phenotypes are consistent with the retinal changes observed in other patients with LCA5 mutations (Figs. 2 and 3) [Ahmad et al., 2011; Dharmaraj et al., 2000; Gerber et al., 2007; Mohamed et al., 2003; Ramprasad et al., 2008].

However, in this study, for the first time, we identified an Iraqi family with two affected sibs who carried a diagnosis of EORD, because they maintained some useful vision until the age of 10 years. In addition, these siblings had preservation of the peripheral islands of RPE (Fig. 3), a phenotype similar to preserved para-arteriolar retinal pigment epithelium documented by Heckenlively (1982) and later found to be associated with LCA and arRP patients with CRB1 mutations [den Hollander et al., 1999; Heckenlively, 1982]. We have thus expanded the phenotypic spectrum associated with LCA5 mutations, which now includes both EORD and a new retinal phenotype consisting of preserved islands of peripheral RPE (Fig. 3).

There is little published data on retinal imaging such as OCT and FAF imaging in patients with LCA5 mutations. In this regard, we here contribute three new patients with LCA5 mutations and new OCT and FAF data. However, it is a limitation of the present study that we were unable to obtain good quality autofluorescence imaging and OCT on the entire cohort. This was, in part, due to the inherent difficulties of such imaging in patients with nystagmus, their ages and their remote living conditions. Jacobson et al. (2009) reported a low autofluorescent signal corresponding to macular atrophy in two siblings with a homozygous LCA5 mutation, in whom mutations in CRB1 had previously been excluded. We demonstrated similar macular hypoautofluorescence in one subject who in addition had a small area of hyperautofluorescence at the fovea, suggesting continued metabolic activity of the foveal cones and RPE. In our study, OCT imaging was possible in three subjects, and the findings revealed surprising preservation of the central foveal IS/OS junctions and of the outer segment structures (in the younger patients, of the age of 17 years and 6 years, respectively). In the older patient, of the age of 55 years, OCT imaging demonstrated macular atrophy, loss of the retinal lamination, and probable outer retinal tubulation (also known as rosettes), a late-stage process in the degeneration of photoreceptors that has been described recently in a number of retinal conditions (Fig. 4C) [Sergouniotis et al., 2012; Zweifel et al., 2009]. Previously published OCT findings have demonstrated loss of the photoreceptor and outer nuclear layers, and abnormal retinal lamination eccentric to the fovea, but with evidence of a retained photoreceptor layer at the fovea [Jacobson et al., 2009]. This suggests that in the early stages of the disease, there may be viable photoreceptors (cones) in the foveal region, which may be amenable to therapeutic intervention. It is of interest that patient #14 at the of age of 19, with an advanced stage of disease, still had a detectable 30 Hz cone ERG in each eye (Table 2) with narrow band-passed filtering and computer averaging. In future clinical trials, this technique of ERG recording, which is not performed in the present ISCEV protocol, could be considered as a method of objectively monitoring efficacy or lack of efficacy as undoubtedly most patients with remaining vision will have a detectable cone ERG with this technique.

Lebercilin is expressed in a number of tissues; however, there have been no reports of extraocular abnormalities in LCA5 mutations. One patient with LCA5 retinopathy died from asphyxia and the authors propose a possible link between the cause of death and the presence of lebercilin in the bronchial ciliated epithelial cells [Ramprasad et al., 2008]. In the present study, one patient had global developmental delay, whereas another experienced behavioral problems. Whether this is related to abnormal extraocular expression of lebercilin remains to be determined.

LCA5-associated LCA is a rare form of severe childhood onset retinal dystrophy. Most LCA5 mutations are null and are associated with a severe phenotype. Missense mutations are rare and may be associated with a milder EORD, suggesting that such mutations may result in some residual protein function. LCA5-type LCA may be amenable to treatment, but this is more likely to be successful in young patients.

URLs Used in This Study

Exome Variant Server database: http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/

1000 genomes database: http://www.1000genomes.org/

PhyloP: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2808870/

Polyphen2: http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/

SpliceSiteFinder: www.genet.sickkids.on.ca/~ali/splicesitefinder.html

MaxEntSplice: http://genes.mit.edu/burgelab/maxent/Xmaxentscan_scoreseq.html

NNSplice: http://www.fruitfly.org/seq_tools/splice.html

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank the patients’ families for taking part in this study. We are grateful for those who contributed to the assembly of large panels of probands, particularly in London, Bev Scott, Genevieve Wright, and Sophie Devery. The LCA5 Study Group consists of Sten Andreasson (Skane University Hospital Lund), Elfride de Baere (Ghent University), Jean Bennett (Scheie Eye Institute Philadelphia), Gerry Chader (Ophthalmology, Doheny Eye Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California), Wolfgang Berger (University of Zurich), Irina Golovleva (Umeå University), Jacquie Greenberg (Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town), Anneke I. den Hollander (Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre), Caroline C.W. Klaver (Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam), B. Jeroen Klevering (Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre), Birgit Lorenz (Justus Liebig University Gieβen), Markus N. Preising (Justus Liebig University Gieβen), Raj Ramesar (Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town), Lisa Roberts (Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town), Ronald Roepman (Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre), Klaus Rohrschneider (Universitäts-Augenklinik Heidelberg), and Bernd Wissinger (University of Tübingen).

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.