Development of a new solver for homogenous mixture based on regularized gas dynamic equation system
Andrey Epikhin
Ivannikov Institute for System Programming of the RAS, Moscow, Russia
Moscow Center of Fundamental and Applied Mathematics, Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics of the RAS, Moscow, Russia
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Ivan But
Ivannikov Institute for System Programming of the RAS, Moscow, Russia
Moscow Center of Fundamental and Applied Mathematics, Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics of the RAS, Moscow, Russia
Correspondence
Ivan But, Ivannikov Institute for System Programming of the RAS, Moscow, Russia.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAndrey Epikhin
Ivannikov Institute for System Programming of the RAS, Moscow, Russia
Moscow Center of Fundamental and Applied Mathematics, Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics of the RAS, Moscow, Russia
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Ivan But
Ivannikov Institute for System Programming of the RAS, Moscow, Russia
Moscow Center of Fundamental and Applied Mathematics, Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics of the RAS, Moscow, Russia
Correspondence
Ivan But, Ivannikov Institute for System Programming of the RAS, Moscow, Russia.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The paper presents an improved approach for modeling multicomponent gas mixtures based on quasi-gasdynamic equations. The proposed numerical algorithm is implemented as a reactingQGDFoam solver based on the open-source OpenFOAM platform. The following problems have been considered for validation: the Riemann problems, the backward facing step problem, the interaction of a shock wave with a heavy and a light gas bubble, the unsteady underexpanded hydrogen jet flow in an air. The stability and convergence parameters of the proposed numerical algorithm are determined. The simulation results are found to be in agreement with analytical solutions and experimental data.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors declare no potential conflict of interests.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
REFERENCES
- 1Landau LD, Lifshitz EM. Fluid mechanics: Landau and Lifshitz: Course of Theoretical Physics. Vol 6. Elsevier; 2013:6.
- 2Nigmatulin RI. Dynamics of Multiphase Media. Vol 2. CRC Press; 1990.
- 3Zlotnik A, Lomonosov T. On a doubly reduced model for dynamics of heterogeneous mixtures of stiffened gases, its regularizations and their implementations. Chaos: an interdisciplinary. J Nonlinear Sci. 2023a; 33(11):113-128.
- 4Kurganov A, Tadmor E. New high-resolution central schemes for nonlinear conservation laws and convection–diffusion equations. J Comput Phys. 2000; 160(1): 241-282.
- 5Rusanov VV. The calculation of the interaction of non-stationary shock waves with barriers. Zhurnal Vychislitel'noi Matematiki i Matematicheskoi Fiziki. 1961; 1(2): 267-279.
- 6Liu X-D, Tadmor E. Third order nonoscillatory central scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws. Numer Math. 1998; 79: 397-425.
- 7Liou M-S. A sequel to ausm: Ausm+. J Comput Phys. 1996; 129(2): 364-382.
- 8Kraposhin MV, Banholzer M, Pfitzner M, Marchevsky IK. A hybrid pressure-based solver for nonideal single-phase fluid flows at all speeds. Int J Numer Methods Fluids. 2018a; 88(2): 79-99.
- 9Elizarova TG. Quasi-Gas-Dynamic Equations. Springer; 2009.
10.1007/978-3-642-00292-2 Google Scholar
- 10Elizarova TG, Shil'nikov EV. Quasi-gasdynamic model and numerical algorithm for describing mixtures of different fluids. Comput Math Math Phys. 2023; 63(7): 1319-1331.
- 11Kraposhin MV, Smirnova EV, Elizarova TG, Istomina MA. Development of a new openfoam solver using regularized gas dynamic equations. Comput Fluids. 2018b; 166: 163-175.
- 12 OpenFOAMFoundation. Openfoam – the open source cfd toolbox. http://www.openfoam.com
- 13Epikhin A, Kraposhin M. Prediction of the free jet noise using quasi-gas dynamic equations and acoustic analogy. Lecture Notes Comput Sci. 2020;12143: 217-227.
10.1007/978-3-030-50436-6_16 Google Scholar
- 14Epikhin A, But I. Numerical simulation of supersonic jet noise using open source software. Lecture Notes Comput Sci. 2023;14077: 292-302.
10.1007/978-3-031-36030-5_24 Google Scholar
- 15Epikhin A, Elizarova TG. Numerical simulation of underexpanded supersonic jets impingement on an inclined flat plate. Thermophys Aeromech. 2021; 28(4): 479-486.
- 16 QGDSolvers. Github. https://github.com/unicfdlab/QGDsolver/tree/v2312
- 17Elizarova TG, Shil'nikov EV. Numerical simulation of gas mixtures based on the quasi-gasdynamic approach as applied to the interaction of shock wave with a gas bubble. Comput Math Math Phys. 2021; 61(1): 118-128.
10.1134/S0965542521010048 Google Scholar
- 18Elizarova TG, Shirokov I. Regularized Equations and Examples of their Use in the Modeling of Gas-Dynamic Flows. MAKS Press; 2017.
- 19Zlotnik A, Lomonosov T. On regularized systems of equations for gas mixture dynamics with new regularizing velocities and diffusion fluxes. Entropy. 2023b; 25(1): 158.
- 20Sod GA. A survey of several finite difference methods for systems of nonlinear hyperbolic conservation laws. J Comput Phys. 1978; 27(1): 1-31.
- 21Lora-Clavijo FD, Cruz-Pérez JP, Siddhartha Guzmán F, González JA. Exact solution of the 1d riemann problem in newtonian and relativistic hydrodynamics. Revista Mexicana de física E. 2013; 59(1): 28-50.
- 22Sementilli ML, McGurn MT, Chen J. A scalable compressible volume of fluid solver using a stratified flow model. Int J Numer Meth Fluids. 2023;95(5):777–795.
- 23Ferrer PJM, Buttay R, Lehnasch G, Mura A. A detailed verification procedure for compressible reactive multicomponent navier–stokes solvers. Comput Fluids. 2014; 89: 88-110.
- 24Huang Z, Zhao M, Xu Y, Li G, Zhang H. Eulerian-lagrangian modelling of detonative combustion in two-phase gas-droplet mixtures with openfoam: validations and verifications. Fuel. 2021; 286:119402.
- 25Liska R, Wendroff B. Comparison of several difference schemes on 1d and 2d test problems for the euler equations. SIAM J Sci Comput. 2003; 25(3): 995-1017.
- 26Noh WF. Errors for calculations of strong shocks using an artificial viscosity and an artificial heat flux. J Comput Phys. 1987; 72(1): 78-120.
- 27Sheretov YV. Continuum Dynamics under Spatiotemporal Averaging. Regulyarnaya i Khaoticheskaya Dinamika; 2009.
- 28Kraposhin MV, Ryazanov DA, Elizarova TG. Numerical algorithm based on regularized equations for incompressible flow modeling and its implementation in openfoam. Comput Phys Commun. 2022; 271:108216.
- 29Lax PD. Weak solutions of nonlinear hyperbolic equations and their numerical computation. Commun Pure Appl Math. 1954; 7(1): 159-193.
- 30Li Y, Chen C, Ren Y-X. A class of high-order finite difference schemes with minimized dispersion and adaptive dissipation for solving compressible flows. J Comput Phys. 2022; 448:110770.
- 31Pandya A, Most ER, Pretorius F. Conservative finite volume scheme for first-order viscous relativistic hydrodynamics. Phys Rev D. 2022; 105(12):123001.
- 32Sciacovelli L, Passiatore D, Cinnella P, Pascazio G. Assessment of a high-order shock-capturing central-difference scheme for hypersonic turbulent flow simulations. Comput Fluids. 2021; 230:105134.
- 33Abgrall R. How to prevent pressure oscillations in multicomponent flow calculations: a quasi conservative approach. J Comput Phys. 1996; 125(1): 150-160.
- 34Borisov VE, Rykov YG. Numerical simulation of multicomponent gas flows using double-flux method. Math Model. 2020; 32(10): 3-20.
- 35Chen G, Tang H, Zhang P. Second-order accurate godunov scheme for multicomponent flows on moving triangular meshes. J Sci Comput. 2008; 34: 64-86.
- 36Fu L, Hu XY, Adams NA. Targeted eno schemes with tailored resolution property for hyperbolic conservation laws. J Comput Phys. 2017; 349: 97-121.
- 37Vafakos GP, Kafkas A, Papadopoulos PK. Improved implicit potential method for incompressible flows on a fully collocated mesh. Int J Numer Meth Fluids. 2022;94(10):1706–1723.
- 38Yamamoto T, Takatani K. Pressure-based unified solver for gas-liquid two-phase flows where compressible and incompressible flows coexist. Int J Numer Meth Fluids. 2018;88(6):277–295.
- 39Armaly BF, Durst F, Pereira J, Schönung B. Experimental and theoretical investigation of backward-facing step flow. J Fluid Mech. 1983; 127: 473-496.
- 40Haas JF, Sturtevant B. Interaction of weak shock waves with cylindrical and spherical gas inhomogeneities. J Fluid Mech. 1987; 181: 41-76.
- 41Lian YS, Xu K. A gas-kinetic scheme for multimaterial flows and its application in chemical reactions. J Comput Phys. 2000; 163(2): 349-375.
- 42Gorlé C, Gamba M, Ham F. Investigation of an Underexpanded Hydrogen Jet in Quiescent Air Using Numerical Simulations and Experiments. Center for Turbulence Research Annual Research Briefs; 2010.
- 43Addy A. Effects of axisymmetric sonic nozzle geometry on mach disk characteristics. AIAA J. 1981; 19(1): 121-122.
- 44Ashkenas H, Sherman FS. Structure and utilization of supersonic free jets in low density wind tunnels. In Rarefied Gasdynamics 4. Academic Press; 1966.
- 45Hamzehloo A, Aleiferis PG. Large eddy simulation of highly turbulent under-expanded hydrogen and methane jets for gaseous-fuelled internal combustion engines. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2014; 39(36): 21275-21296.
