Volume 64, Issue 21 e202500522
Research Article

Mechanism Switch Between Radical-Polar Crossover and Radical Buffering

Minghao Xu

Minghao Xu

College of Chemistry and Molecular Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Power Grid Environmental Protection, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072 P.R. China

These authors contributed equally to this work.

Search for more papers by this author
Yan-Bo Li

Yan-Bo Li

Organisch-Chemisches Institut, Universität Münster, Corrensstraße 40, 48149 Münster, Germany

These authors contributed equally to this work.

Search for more papers by this author
Huamin Wang

Huamin Wang

Organisch-Chemisches Institut, Universität Münster, Corrensstraße 40, 48149 Münster, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Frank Glorius

Corresponding Author

Frank Glorius

Organisch-Chemisches Institut, Universität Münster, Corrensstraße 40, 48149 Münster, Germany

E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Xiaotian Qi

Corresponding Author

Xiaotian Qi

College of Chemistry and Molecular Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Power Grid Environmental Protection, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072 P.R. China

E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 13 March 2025

Graphical Abstract

The radical buffering scenario, which features the reversible radical dissociation from alkyl chromium(III) followed by the metal-carbonyl-coupled (MCC) radical addition to form the C─C bond, is established for Cr-catalyzed carbonyl alkylation. This new radical bonding model provides an orthogonal avenue to radical-polar crossover for the design of radical coupling reactions.

Abstract

Radical-polar crossover (RPC) is a classic concept that bridges one- and two-electron chemistry. It has been widely used in Cr-catalyzed carbonyl addition reactions to clarify the formation of alkyl chromium(III) intermediate and subsequent carbonyl insertion. Herein, we proposed an orthogonal bonding model, the radical buffering scenario, for Cr-catalyzed carbonyl alkylation. This radical bonding model features the radical dissociation from the alkyl chromium(III) complex followed by the Cr(II)-carbonyl-coupled radical addition to form the C─C bond. The mechanism switch between the radical and polar bonding models is affected by the radical stability, radical nucleophilicity, radical size, and the presence of an α-heteroatom or α–π bond. The collaborative computational and experimental studies have verified the reliability of the radical mechanism. More importantly, we demonstrated that this radical buffering scenario possesses a different stereoselectivity control model from that in the RPC scenario. A general enantioselectivity and diastereoselectivity control model derived from the multiple ligand-radical interactions is thus established for CrCl2/bisoxazoline-catalyzed asymmetric radical addition.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available in the Supporting Information of this article.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.