Free Access

Sugarcane

Part 7. Transgenic Sugar, Tuber and Fiber Crops
Stevens M. Brumbley

Stevens M. Brumbley

University of Queensland, The Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Sandy J. Snyman

Sandy J. Snyman

South African Sugarcane Research Institute (SASRI), KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Search for more papers by this author
Annathurai Gnanasambandam

Annathurai Gnanasambandam

BSES Limited, Indooroopilly, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Priya Joyce

Priya Joyce

BSES Limited, Indooroopilly, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Scott R. Hermann

Scott R. Hermann

BSES Limited, Indooroopilly, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Jorge A.G. da Silva

Jorge A.G. da Silva

Texas A&M University, Department of Soil & Crop Sciences, Weslaco, TX, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Richard B. McQualter

Richard B. McQualter

University of Queensland, The Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia

James Cook University, Comparative Genomics Centre, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Ming-Li Wang

Ming-Li Wang

Hawaii Agriculture Research Center, Aiea, HI, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Brian T. Egan

Brian T. Egan

BTE Consulting, Everton Park, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Andrew H. Paterson

Andrew H. Paterson

University of Georgia, Plant Genome Mapping Laboratory, Athens, GA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Henrick H. Albert

Henrick H. Albert

Disease and Production Unit, USDA Tropical Plant Physiology, Aiea, HI, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Paul H. Moore

Paul H. Moore

Disease and Production Unit, USDA Tropical Plant Physiology, Aiea, HI, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 April 2009
Citations: 19

Abstract

As more than 70% of the sugar harvested for human consumption is derived from sugarcane, improving sucrose content, biomass yield, and resistance to pests and diseases remains an important focus of traditional breeding programmes. In addition, genetic engineering research has supported the introduction of specific traits and facilitated further understanding of complex physiological pathways in the plant. Transgenesis has allowed diversification of output traits so that a range of sugars, biopolymers, neutraceuticals, industrial enzymes, and pharmaceuticals can be produced by the plant. Sugarcane is considered as a critical component of our bioenergy future and is currently a major feedstock for ethanol production. Significant advances in associating putative biological functions to sugarcane genes have been achieved by the Brazilian SUCEST project. Future genetic improvement of sugarcane will rely on a better understanding of metabolic control and flux, cellular compartmentation and availability of metabolites, and the ability to identify potential and crucial targets for genetic engineering.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.