Volume 49, Issue 1 pp. 114-116
Brief Communication

No evidence for genetic association or linkage of the cathepsin D (CTSD) exon 2 polymorphism and Alzheimer disease

Lars Bertram MD

Lars Bertram MD

Genetics and Aging Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA

Search for more papers by this author
Suzanne Guénette PhD

Suzanne Guénette PhD

Genetics and Aging Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA

Search for more papers by this author
Jennifer Jones BS

Jennifer Jones BS

Genetics and Aging Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA

Search for more papers by this author
Devon Keeney MS

Devon Keeney MS

Genetics and Aging Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA

Search for more papers by this author
Kristina Mullin BS

Kristina Mullin BS

Genetics and Aging Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA

Search for more papers by this author
Adam Crystal BA

Adam Crystal BA

Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA

Search for more papers by this author
Sanjay Basu

Sanjay Basu

Genetics and Aging Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA

Search for more papers by this author
Stephen Yhu BS

Stephen Yhu BS

Genetics and Aging Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA

Search for more papers by this author
Amy Deng PhD

Amy Deng PhD

Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA

Search for more papers by this author
G. William Rebeck PhD

G. William Rebeck PhD

Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA

Search for more papers by this author
Bradley T. Hyman MD, PhD

Bradley T. Hyman MD, PhD

Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA

Search for more papers by this author
Rodney Go PhD

Rodney Go PhD

Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL

Search for more papers by this author
Melvin McInnis MD

Melvin McInnis MD

Department of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins University Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD

Search for more papers by this author
Deborah Blacker MD, ScD

Deborah Blacker MD, ScD

Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA

Search for more papers by this author
Rudolph Tanzi PhD

Corresponding Author

Rudolph Tanzi PhD

Genetics and Aging Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA

Genetics and Aging Unit, MGH-East, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, MA 02129Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Two recent case-control studies have suggested a strong association of a missense polymorphism in exon 2 of the cathepsin D gene (CTSD) and Alzheimer disease (AD). However, these findings were not confirmed in another independent study. We analyzed this polymorphism in two large and independent AD study populations and did not detect an association between CTSD and AD. The first sample was family-based and included 436 subjects from 134 sibships discordant for AD that were analyzed using the sibship disequilibrium test (SDT, p = 0.68) and the sib transmission/disequilibrium test (Sib-TDT, p = 0.81). The second sample of 200 AD cases and 182 cognitively normal controls also failed to show significant differences in the allele or genotype distribution in cases versus controls (X2, p = 0.91 and p = 0.88, respectively). In addition, two-point linkage analyses in an enlarged family sample (n = 670) did not show evidence for linkage of the chromosomal region around CTSD. Thus, our analyses on more than 800 subjects suggest that if an association between the CTSD exon 2 polymorphism and AD exists, it is likely to be smaller than previously reported. Ann Neurol 2001;49:114–116

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me