A novel injectable bioactive bone cement for spinal surgery: A developmental and preclinical study
Corresponding Author
Y. W. Li
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Shanghai Biomaterial Research & Test Centre, Shanghai Second Medical University, 716 Xie Tu Road, Shanghai 200023, P. R. China
Y. W. Li, New York University Medical Center, USA
J. C. Y. Leong, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, or Y. W. Li, New York University Medical Center, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
J. C. Y. Leong
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Y. W. Li, New York University Medical Center, USA
J. C. Y. Leong, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, or Y. W. Li, New York University Medical Center, USA
Search for more papers by this authorW. W. Lu
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Search for more papers by this authorK. D. K. Luk
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Search for more papers by this authorK. M. C. Cheung
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Search for more papers by this authorK. Y. Chiu
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Search for more papers by this authorS. P. Chow
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Y. W. Li
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Shanghai Biomaterial Research & Test Centre, Shanghai Second Medical University, 716 Xie Tu Road, Shanghai 200023, P. R. China
Y. W. Li, New York University Medical Center, USA
J. C. Y. Leong, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, or Y. W. Li, New York University Medical Center, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
J. C. Y. Leong
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Y. W. Li, New York University Medical Center, USA
J. C. Y. Leong, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, or Y. W. Li, New York University Medical Center, USA
Search for more papers by this authorW. W. Lu
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Search for more papers by this authorK. D. K. Luk
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Search for more papers by this authorK. M. C. Cheung
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Search for more papers by this authorK. Y. Chiu
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Search for more papers by this authorS. P. Chow
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The injection of bone cement by minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of vertebral body fractures or for stabilization of an osteoporotic vertebral body is regarded as promising in spinal surgery. The purpose of this study was to develop a novel injectable bioactive bone cement to address such concerns. The cement was composed mainly of strontium-containing hydroxyapatite (Sr-HA) filler and Bisphenol A Diglycidylether Dimethacrylate (D-GMA) resin. The Sr-HA filler was prepared by precipitation and calcination, then analyzed with Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra and X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns. Samples of strontium-containing hydroxyapatite cement (SrHAC) were formed by a combination of powder filler and resin matrix, with the setting time and peak temperature recorded. Cell relative growth rate (RGR), Tetrazolium bromide (MTT), and haemolysis tests were used to detect initial in vitro biocompatibility of the new cement. In vitro spinal biomechanical testing and morphological observation after bone cement injection were performed on pig spines. Results indicate that the setting time and peak temperature of the cement was 15 min and 55°C, respectively. Cytotoxicity of the cement was class 1 (no cytotoxicity) and haemolysis was 1% (no haemolysis). Stiffness after cement injection and fatigue loading were 112% and 95% of the intact bone, respectively, which is similar to that of natural bone. Radiopacity of SrHAC allowed easy radiographic imaging. The use of SrHAC cement is, thus, promising in spinal surgery. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 52, 164–170, 2000.
References
- 1Bostrom MPG, Lane JM. Future directions: augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral bodies. Spine 1997; 22: 38s–42s.
- 2Mermelstein LE, McLain RF, Yerby SA. Reinforcement of thoracolumbar burst fractures with calcium phosphate cement. Spine 1998; 23: 664–671.
- 3Schildhauer TA, Bennett AP, Wright TM, Lane JM, O'Leary PF. Intravertebral body reconstruction with an injectable in situ-setting carbonated apatite: biomechanical evaluation of a minimally invasive technique. J Orthop Res 1999; 1: 67–72.
- 4Charnley J. Anchorage of femoral head prosthesis to the shaft of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg 1960; 42B: 28–30.
10.1302/0301-620X.42B1.28 Google Scholar
- 5Freeman MAR, Bradley GW, Ravell PA. Observation upon the interface between bone and polymethylmethacrylate cement. J Bone Joint Surg 1982; 64B: 489–493.
10.1302/0301-620X.64B4.7096429 Google Scholar
- 6Goldring SR, Schiller AL, Roelke M, Rourke CM, O'Neill DA, Harris WH. Formation of a synovial-like membrane at the bone-cement interface. J Bone Joint Surg 1983; 65A: 575–584.
10.2106/00004623-198365050-00001 Google Scholar
- 7Saha S, Pal S. Mechanical properties of bone cement: a review. J Biomed Mater Res 1984; 18: 435–462.
- 8Sogal A, Hulbert SF. Mechanical properties of a composite bone cement: polymethylmethacrylate and hydroxyapatite. Proc 5th Int Symp Ceram Med. Bioceram 1992; 5: 213–224.
- 9Dove JH, Hulbert SF. Fatigue properties of a polymethylmethacrylate-hydroxyapatite composite bone cement. Tokyo: Proc 2nd Int Symp Apatite; 1995.
- 10Dai KR, Liu YK, Park JB, Clark CR, Nishiyama K, Zheng ZK. Bone particle impregnated bone cement: an in vivo weight-bearing study. J Biomed Mater Res 1991; 25: 141–156.
- 11Goodwin CJ, Braden M, Downes S, Marshall NJ. Investigation into the release of bioactive recombinant human growth hormone from normal and low-viscosity poly(methylmethacrylate) bone cements. J Biomed Mater Res 1997; 34: 47–55.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199701)34:1<47::AID-JBM7>3.0.CO;2-N CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 12Brown WE, Chow LC. A new calcium phosphate setting cement. J Dent Res 1983; 62: 672.
- 13Kawanabe K, Tamura J, Yamamuro T, Nakamura T, Kokubo T, Yoshihara S. A new bioactive bone cement consisting of Bis-GMA resin and bioactive glass powder. J Appl Biomater 1993; 4: 135–141.
- 14Kokubo T, Morita Y, Miyaji F, Nakanishi K, Soga N, Nakamura T. Bioactivity of bioactive filler-resin cement. Proc 8th Int Symp Ceram Med. Bioceram 1995; 8: 213–217.
- 15Yamamuro T, Nakamura T, Iida H, Kawanabe K, Matsuda Y, Ido K, Tamura J, Senaha Y. Development of bioactive bone cement and its clinical applications. Biomater 1998; 19: 1479–1482.
- 16Kobayashi M, Nakamura T, Tamura J, Kokubo T, Kikutani T. Bioactive bone cement: Comparison of AW-GC filler with hydroxyapatite and beta-TCP fillers on mechanical and biological properties. J Biomed Mater Res 1997; 37: 301–303.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19971205)37:3<301::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-P CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 17Miyaji F, Morita Y, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. Surface structural change of bioactive inorganic filler-resin composite cement in simulated body fluid: effect of resin. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 15: 604–610.
- 18Labella R, Braden M, Deb S. Novel hydroxyapatite-based dental composites. Biomater 1994; 15: 1197–1200.
- 19Saito M, Maruoka A, Mori T, Sugano N, Hino K. Experimental studies on a new bioactive bone cement: hydroxyapatite composite resin. Biomater 1994; 15: 156–160.
- 20Behiri J, Braden M, Khorasani SN, Wiwattandate D, Bonfield W. Advanced bone cement for long term orthopaedic implantations. Proc 4th Int Symp Ceram Med. Bioceram 1991; 4: 301–304.
- 21Haper EJ, Behiri JC, Bonfield W. Flexural and fatigue properties of a bone cement based upon polyethylmethacrylate and hydroxyapatite. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1995; 6: 799–803.
- 22Khorasani SN, Deb S, Behiri JC, Braden M, Bonfield W. Modified hydroxyapatite reinforced bone cement. Proc 5th Int Symp Ceram Med. Bioceram 1992; 5: 225–232.
- 23Revell PA, Braden M, Freeman MAR. Review of the biological response to a novel bone cement containing poly(ethyl methacrylate) and n-butyl methacrylate. Biomater 1998; 19: 1579–1586.
- 24Aoki H. Medical applications of hydroxyapatite. Tokyo: Ishiyaku EuroAmerica; 1994. p 205–305.
- 25Christoffersen J, Christoffersen MR, Kolthoff N, Barenholdt O. Effect of strontium ions on growth and dissolution of hydroxyapatite and on bone mineral detection. Bone 1997; 20: 47–54.
- 26Reginster JY. Miscellaneous and experimental agents. Am J Med Sci 1997; 3: 33–40.
- 27Boivin G, Deloffre P, Perrat B, Panczer G, Boudeulle M, Mauras Y, Allain P, Tsouderos Y, Meunier PJ. Strontium distribution and interactions with bone mineral in monkey iliac bone after strontium salt (S12911) administration. J Bone Miner Res 1996; 11: 1302–1311.
- 28Gedalia I, Brayer L, Kalter N, Richter M, Stabholz A. The effect of fluoride and strontium application on dentin: in vivo and in vitro studies. J Periondontol 1978; 49: 269–272.
- 29Zhang CX, Sun J, Meng AY. A new method of measuring the cytotoxicity by spectrophotometer for amalgam of different cupric quantity. Chung Hua Kou Chiang Hsueh Tsa Chih 1990; 25: 216–218.
- 30Li YW, Chen J, Xue M, Ning L, Meng AY, Liu J. A comparative study on cytocompatibility of medical PVA and Intelligent PVA-g-NIPAAm hydrogel. J Biomed Eng 1999; 16: 5–9.
- 31ISO10993: Biological evaluation of medical devices. Part 5: Tests for cytotoxicity: in vitro methods. Geneva: ISO; 1992.
- 32ISO 10993: Biological evaluation of medical devices. Part 4: Selection of tests for interaction with blood. Geneva: ISO; 1992.
- 33Anderson JM. Interaction with blood. In: JH Braybrook, editor. Biocompatibility assessment of medical devices and materials. Chichester: Wiley; 1997. p 140–142.
- 34Demian HW, McDermott K. Regulatory perspective on characterization and testing of orthopaedic bone cements. Biomater 1998; 19: 1607–1618.
- 35Lu WW, Luk KDK, Ruan DK, Fei ZQ, Leong JCY. Stability of the whole lumbar spine after multilevel fenestration and discectomy. Spine 1999; 24.
- 36Gibson IR, Best SM, Bonfield W. Chemical characterization of silicon-substituted hydroxyapatite. J Biomed Mater Res 1999; 44: 422–428.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19990315)44:4<422::AID-JBM8>3.0.CO;2-# CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 37Aoki H. Science and medical application of hydroxyapatite. Tokyo: Jaas; 1991. p vii, xv, 214.
- 38Paris I, Jones JB Jr. The handbook of trace elements. Boca Raton, FL: St.Lucie; 1997.
- 39Kirkpatrick CJ, Bittinger F, Kohler H, van Kooten TG, Klein CL, Otto M. Current trends in biocompatibility testing. Proc Inst Mech Eng 1998; 212H: 75–84.
- 40Spangberg LSW. Endodontic filling materials. In: DC Smith, DF Williams, editors. Biocompatibility of dental materials. Vol. III. Biocompatibility of dental restorative materials. Boca Raton, FL: CRC; 1982. p 161–222.
- 41Simon JA, Ricci JL, Di Cesare PE. Bioresorbable fracture fixation in orthopedics: a comprehensive review. Part I. Basic science and preclinical studies. Am J Ortho 1997; 26: 665–671.