Volume 2010, Issue 1 926370
Research Article
Open Access

Transition of Firing Patterns in a Complex Neural Network

Peng Wang

Peng Wang

College of Physics and Electronic Information, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241000, China ahnu.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author
Ji-Qian Zhang

Corresponding Author

Ji-Qian Zhang

College of Physics and Electronic Information, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241000, China ahnu.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author
Hai-Lin Ren

Hai-Lin Ren

College of Physics and Electronic Information, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241000, China ahnu.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 March 2010

Abstract

We study the effects of random long-range connections (shortcuts) on the firing patterns in a network composed of Hindmarsh-Rose neurons. It is found that the system can achieve the transition of neural firing patterns from the lower period state to the higher one, when the number of shortcuts in the neural network is greater than a threshold, indicating that the nervous system may make the optimal response to the change of stimulation by a corresponding adjustment of the shortcuts. Then we discuss the transition degree of firing patterns of neural network and its critical characteristics for different external stimulation current. Furthermore, the influences of coupling strength on such transition behavior of neural firing patterns are also considered. Our results may be useful in comprehending the real mechanism in neural coding and information transmission in neurobiological systems.

1. Introduction

In nature, many real systems can be described by complex networks, where nodes represent dynamical individuals and links represent interactions between individuals. Some works have been dedicated to the studies of complex networks in the last decade [14]. In particular, the small-world network, a prominent type of complex networks introduced by Watts and Strogatz [5, 6], has been realized extensively for describing the structure of many real-world networks [710].

The brain consists of a large number of neurons connected to each other by synapses, which can be depicted by a complex network. In the cortex and other brain regions, the connectivity of neurons is mainly local, where the long-distance projections are comparatively sparse, forming together a small-world brain network [11]. The neurons communicate with each other through electrical impulse. For a neuron stimulated by an external stimulus from its connected neurons, it fires an electrical discharge through its axon which through synapses transmits charges to the dendrites of other neurons. Neuronal firing activities are crucial to the information processing. Based on the time intervals inside neural firings, neural information is coded and transmitted [12], and different firing patterns are displayed in the firing neurons including spiking, bursting, chaos, and so on [13]. Therefore, various neuronal firing patterns and their generation and transition, which is basic for the understanding the origins of different neural coding and information processing strategies, have always been a significant research subject [1418].

Previous studies of small-world network mostly focused on the network topological properties and various mechanisms to determine the topological structure, however, more recent works have shifted to the investigation of the influences of the network topology on dynamical behaviors [1923]. For instance, Kwon and Moon. have shown that small-world connections could lead to an enhancement of temporal coherence and of spatial synchronization in coupled excitable neurons [19]. Lin and Chen. have found that there were different avalanche dynamical behaviors for different density of short paths in small-world neural network [20]. In reference [21], the effects of the topology on the synchronization properties of the Hindmarsh–Rose neural network have been investigated. Additionally, in nervous system, there exists optimal network topology randomness at which the spiking oscillations show the best regularity [22, 23]. All these studies have indicated that small-world network topology plays an essential role in dynamics of nervous systems. However, studies on the dependence of generation and transition of various neural firing patterns in neural networks on the random long-range connections are still few in the previous literatures. Specifically, for the purpose of the present work, we are wondering how the network topologies influence the generation and transition of various neural firing patterns.

In this paper, we mainly study the effects of topological randomness on the firing patterns in a network composed of Hindmarsh–Rose (HR) neurons. We show that random long-range connections can induce the transitions of neural firing patterns when the number of random connections is greater than a threshold value. Furthermore, we introduce the average transition ratio λ to quantitatively study the transition degree of firing patterns of the neural network. The influences of coupling strength on such transition behavior of neural firing patterns are also considered. For any transition of firing patterns, the threshold value decreases with coupling strength increasing.

2. Model

The model used in this paper consists of N = 500 HR neurons that form a small-world network, which is constructed as follows. First, constructing a regular ring, where each neuron connects to its K = 2 nearest neighbors. then, links are randomly added between nonnearest neurons. To measure the effects of shortcuts on the neural firing patterns, we introduce a controlling parameter p defined as the ratio of the number of shortcuts M to the total number of all possible additional connections: p = 2M/[N(N − 3)]. The parameter p controls the topology of neural network that can take different values between 0 and 1: for p = 0, the network becomes the original regular network, and conversely for p = 1, it turns to globally coupled network. Additionally, lots of network realizations present for a given p. The dynamics of each HR neuron are given by [24]:

()
Here xi is the membrane action potential, yi is a recovery variable, and zi is a slow adaptation current. g is the coupling strength and aij is the coupling parameter between the two neurons i and j, which is determined by the coupling pattern of the system. If the two neurons are coupled to each other, aij = aji = 1; others, aij = aji = 0. Also, aii = 0 are for all i, and Iext is the external current whose variation takes great effects on the firing pattern of HR neuron [25, 26]. Other parameters are set as: a = 1.0, b = 3.0, c = 1.0, d = 5.0, s = 4.0, r = 0.006, and X0 = −1.56. Figure 1 depicts the bifurcation diagram of the interspike intervals (ISIs) of a single HR neuron versus the parameter Iext. One can see that in Figure 1, as Iext is increased, a single HR neuron will show quiescent, periodic, and/or chaotic spiking behaviors. In the following sections, we take Iext as a control parameter to generate various dynamics behaviors of firing patterns.
Details are in the caption following the image
The bifurcation diagram of interspike intervals (ISIs) of a single HR neuron versus the parameter Iext.

In this paper, by using the fourth-order Runge-Kutta method with a fixed time step of 0.001, equations (1) are numerically integrated. One notes that each neuron in the network is identical except for different initial conditions. To qualitatively measure dynamical behavior of neural network, the interspike intervals (ISIs) of neural firing for each HR neural are calculated: , where is the time of the kth pulse in the ith neuron, and the threshold value of xi(t) is set at xi  = 1.0.

3. Results and Discussion

To begin, we fix the coupling strength g = 0.0002, and take separately the external current Iext = 1.400, 1.950, and 2.456, where the firing pattern of each neuron in the network is corresponding to period-1, period-2, and period-3, respectively. The patterns of ISIs of an arbitrary individual neuron in the HR neural network as the variation of p at different levels of the external current Iext are plotted in Figure 2. We can see that, no matter which Iext we apply to the system, ISIs turn into high-period firing pattern from low-period firing pattern when the parameter p is greater than a threshold, indicating the occurrence of the transition of neural firing patterns. Figure 2(a) depicts the transition of firing patterns from period-1 to period-2 for arbitrary single neuron in the network. Also, Figures 2(b) and 2(c) show the transition from period-2 to period-3 at Iext = 1.950, and the transition from period-3 to period-4 at Iext = 2.456, respectively. The corresponding phase diagrams are displayed from left pannel to right pannel in Figure 3, respectively. This indicates that the transitions of neural firing patterns can be induced by adjusting the network topological structure.

Details are in the caption following the image
Bifurcation diagrams of ISIs of arbitrary single neuron in the HR network versus the parameter p at different external current Iext. (a) Iext = 1.400; (b) Iext = 1.950; (c) Iext = 2.456. g = 0.0002.
Details are in the caption following the image
Bifurcation diagrams of ISIs of arbitrary single neuron in the HR network versus the parameter p at different external current Iext. (a) Iext = 1.400; (b) Iext = 1.950; (c) Iext = 2.456. g = 0.0002.
Details are in the caption following the image
Bifurcation diagrams of ISIs of arbitrary single neuron in the HR network versus the parameter p at different external current Iext. (a) Iext = 1.400; (b) Iext = 1.950; (c) Iext = 2.456. g = 0.0002.
Details are in the caption following the image
Phase diagrams of periodic firing of any neuron in the HR neural network for different transition of firing patterns. (a) Iext = 1.400, p = 0.2; (b) Iext = 1.400,  p = 0.4; (c) Iext = 1.950, p = 0.2; (d) Iext = 1.950, p = 0.4; (e) Iext = 2.456, p = 0.2; (f) Iext = 2.456, p = 0.4.  g = 0.0002.
Details are in the caption following the image
Phase diagrams of periodic firing of any neuron in the HR neural network for different transition of firing patterns. (a) Iext = 1.400, p = 0.2; (b) Iext = 1.400,  p = 0.4; (c) Iext = 1.950, p = 0.2; (d) Iext = 1.950, p = 0.4; (e) Iext = 2.456, p = 0.2; (f) Iext = 2.456, p = 0.4.  g = 0.0002.
Details are in the caption following the image
Phase diagrams of periodic firing of any neuron in the HR neural network for different transition of firing patterns. (a) Iext = 1.400, p = 0.2; (b) Iext = 1.400,  p = 0.4; (c) Iext = 1.950, p = 0.2; (d) Iext = 1.950, p = 0.4; (e) Iext = 2.456, p = 0.2; (f) Iext = 2.456, p = 0.4.  g = 0.0002.
Details are in the caption following the image
Phase diagrams of periodic firing of any neuron in the HR neural network for different transition of firing patterns. (a) Iext = 1.400, p = 0.2; (b) Iext = 1.400,  p = 0.4; (c) Iext = 1.950, p = 0.2; (d) Iext = 1.950, p = 0.4; (e) Iext = 2.456, p = 0.2; (f) Iext = 2.456, p = 0.4.  g = 0.0002.
Details are in the caption following the image
Phase diagrams of periodic firing of any neuron in the HR neural network for different transition of firing patterns. (a) Iext = 1.400, p = 0.2; (b) Iext = 1.400,  p = 0.4; (c) Iext = 1.950, p = 0.2; (d) Iext = 1.950, p = 0.4; (e) Iext = 2.456, p = 0.2; (f) Iext = 2.456, p = 0.4.  g = 0.0002.
Details are in the caption following the image
Phase diagrams of periodic firing of any neuron in the HR neural network for different transition of firing patterns. (a) Iext = 1.400, p = 0.2; (b) Iext = 1.400,  p = 0.4; (c) Iext = 1.950, p = 0.2; (d) Iext = 1.950, p = 0.4; (e) Iext = 2.456, p = 0.2; (f) Iext = 2.456, p = 0.4.  g = 0.0002.

To quantitatively study the transition degree of firing patterns of the neural network, we introduce the average transition ratio λ which is defined as follows:

()
where ntra(i) is defined as follows: if the transition of firing pattern of ith neuron in the neural network occurs, ntra(i) = 1; others, ntra(i) = 0. For λ = 0, all the neurons locate in the original firing patterns (the lower periodic) state, and in higher periodic state when λ = 1, indicating the occurrence of transition of the firing pattern from lower periodic state to higher state in the neural network.

In Figure 4, the average transition ratio λ versus the parameter p at different external current Iext is plotted. When Iext is set as 1.40 (the period-1 state), one can find that there exist two critical points corresponding to the parameter p, that is, the system maintains in the period-1 state when p < pc1 ≈ 0.20. However, when p increases a bit from 0.20, few neurons still locate in the period-1 firing state, but a larger portion of neurons begin to behave period-2 firing state, thus λ increases steeply from 0 to 1. If p increases further, and reaches another critical value pc2 ≈ 0.23, all the neurons in the network turn into period-2 state from period-1state. This indicates the occurrence of the transition of firing pattern of neural network. Such trend is shown in Figure 4(a). Also, if the level of the external stimulation is changed, that is, Iext is set at 1.95 (transition from period-2 to period-3) and 2.456 (transition from period-3 to period-4), respectively, similar results can be obtained and are shown in Figures 4(b) and 4(c). These phenomena imply that the nervous system may have the ability to make the optimal response to the change of stimulation by a corresponding adjustment of the shortcuts.

Details are in the caption following the image
The average transition ratio λ versus the parameter p at different external current Iext.
Details are in the caption following the image
The average transition ratio λ versus the parameter p at different external current Iext.
Details are in the caption following the image
The average transition ratio λ versus the parameter p at different external current Iext.

We now consider the effects of coupling strength g on the transition of neural firing patterns. Here, the average threshold value 〈Pc〉 is introduced as a measure which is defined as follow:

()
where pc(i) is the ratio of the critical value of added shortcuts to the total number of all possible additional connections, and beyond it the firing pattern of ith neuron will change into high-period state from low-period state. Figure 5 depicts the dependence of the average threshold value 〈Pc〉 on the coupling strength g at different values of Iext. One can notice that 〈Pc〉 decreases as the increment of g. Under the condition of the equal g, the bigger is Iext, the smaller is 〈Pc〉. Obviously, it is beneficial to achieve the transitions of neural firing patterns by increasing the coupling strength g and external current Iext. Consequently, these parameters, such as the parameter p, the coupling strength g, and the levels of the external current Iext compose an integrated system, and the transitions of neural firing patterns can be efficiently modulated through the interplay of these parameters.
Details are in the caption following the image
The average threshold value 〈Pc〉 versus the coupling strength g at different external current Iext.

To check the effect of system size, we have also calculated the patterns of ISIs of neural network as the variation of p at different external current Iext for the other three system size levels N = 100, 400, 800 with g   =   0.0002 (figures not shown). We find that for different values of N, the nervous system undergoes the transitions of neural firing patterns as well, and the variation of λ versus p is almost unchanged, as well as the evolution of 〈Pc〉 with changing g. These indicate that the variation of appropriate system size takes slight effect on neural firing patterns.

How does explain the occurrence of the transition of firing patterns induced by random long-range connections in the complex neural network? Maybe, it has inherent relevance to the bifurcation feature of a single neuron and interneuronal interaction through gap junctions. In Figure 1, one can see that, for a single HR neuron subject to an external stimulus current Iext closed to the bifurcation point, some external fluctuations can make the neurons stay at different activity intensity state and lead to the occurrence of transitions. When the parameter p is relatively small, the system shows rather bad synchronization such that neurons behave incoherent firing [27]. For any neuron in the network, it may receive many incoherent inputs from its neighbor neurons, which leads to counteract coupling interactions between different neurons, and thus low-period firing pattern is still maintained. On the other hand, with the increment of p, the interaction between neurons will be strengthened. A small portion of HR neurons begin to make coherent firing activities such that each neuron can obtain some coherent synaptic inputs [28, 29]. As a result, coupling term in the right hand of (1) plays a similar role in enhancing the external current Iext. When p is larger than a critical value pc, coupling interaction is strong enough to ensure the emergence of the transition of firing patterns. At last, coupling strength can lower the critical value pc, which can be easily understood from the above analysis.

From the biological point of view, our result exhibits its importance and reasonability since (i) in neurobiological system, the neurons are connected to each other by synapses. Despite that most synapses just connect close by neurons, a few of them also can be long range and connect to a neuron. So, a number of long-range shortcuts among neurons are reasonable and realistic; (ii) for a single HR neuron subject to an external stimulus current, the neuron sustains obvious persistent firing as the amplitude of the stimulus varies [26]. Thus the studies of the connection between the topological structure of neural network and neural firing patterns may play a significant role in unveiling the mechanism of neural coding and information processing in neurobiological systems. Synaptic plasticity is one of the most functions in real neural network, where new synaptic connections can be generated, and old synaptic connections among neurons can be also pruned. Our findings exhibit the network topology can induce the transitions of neural firing patterns. Therefore, we may speculate that there should be a link between synaptic plasticity and the problems of neural coding and signal transmission.

4. Conclusion

In summary, we investigate the effects of the network topology on the firing patterns in a network composed of HR neurons. It is found that shortcuts can induce the transitions of neural firing patterns when the number of random shortcuts is greater than a threshold. Our findings imply that, on the one hand, shortcuts may play a constructive role in the transition process among different firing patterns of nervous system, thus, the neural network system may have the ability to make the optimal response to the change of stimulation by a corresponding self-adjustment of topological randomness [21]; on the other hand, our results may be useful in comprehending the real mechanism in neural coding and information transmission in neurobiological systems and have interesting implications for understanding the dynamical behaviors in some living neuronal systems.

Acknowledgments

The work is supported by the Key Research Foundation of Higher Education of Anhui Province of China under Grant no. KJ2007A079, the Natural Science Founds of Anhui Province of China (090413099), and Program for Innovative Research Team in Anhui Normal University.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.