Volume 2025, Issue 1 8828400
Review Article
Open Access

Advancements in Agriculture 4.0 and the Needs for Introduction and Adoption in Ethiopia: A Review

Yabebal Chekole Mihret

Corresponding Author

Yabebal Chekole Mihret

Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering , Bahir Dar Institute of Technology , Bahir Dar University , P.O. Box 26, Bahir Dar , Ethiopia , bdu.edu.et

Search for more papers by this author
Mulu Marie Takele

Mulu Marie Takele

Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering , Bahir Dar Institute of Technology , Bahir Dar University , P.O. Box 26, Bahir Dar , Ethiopia , bdu.edu.et

Search for more papers by this author
Smegnew Moges Mintesinot

Smegnew Moges Mintesinot

Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering , Bahir Dar Institute of Technology , Bahir Dar University , P.O. Box 26, Bahir Dar , Ethiopia , bdu.edu.et

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 February 2025
Citations: 3
Academic Editor: Ijaz Ahmad

Abstract

To address the food security of Ethiopia’s fast-growing population, transforming agriculture to Agriculture 4.0 is paramount by integrating emerging technologies such as remote sensing, big data, and artificial intelligence. This review explores its components, benefits, challenges, and opportunities in Ethiopia by employing deductive reasoning through a literature review. The findings indicated that Agriculture 4.0 could optimize resources, reduce production costs, provide real-time information, and allow farmers to draw well-informed judgments. It could contribute to sustainability and food security by increasing yield, productivity, and food quality, reducing waste, and enhancing product traceability. It also develops agri-tech companies that create jobs, increasing the need for tech-driven professions in agriculture and allowing smallholder farmers to compete in larger markets. Despite the advantages, in Ethiopia, the availability of scattered and small landholdings, limited farmers’ budgets, poor infrastructure, dependence on importation of technologies, increased tenure insecurity, skill shortage, and lack of training can discourage the implementation of Agriculture 4.0. However, the 2025 digital Ethiopia and climate-smart agriculture initiative, the introduction of 5G networks and data centers, and tax exemption on agricultural machinery imports could open chances for adopting Agriculture 4.0 in the country. To successfully implement it in the country, the government and concerned bodies should work to establish microfinance and subsidies for farmers, increase market access and literacy rate, encourage collaboration, and invest in rural infrastructure. As a result, Ethiopia can improve food security, promote environmental sustainability, create more jobs, and build a resilient agriculture to support its fast-growing population.

1. Introduction

Ethiopia, an African nation with over 120 million people, relies heavily on agriculture, which supports 84% of its population [1]. Agriculture contributes 41.7% of the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) and 54.1% of family food consumption [1, 2]. Furthermore, it is the primary source of raw materials and capital for market and investment, accounting for 79% of foreign earnings [3]. Although Ethiopian agriculture has proven remarkably resilient over many years, it is becoming less and less successful [3]. As a result, ensuring food security for the Ethiopian population will face significant challenges in the upcoming decades [2]. This is due to the fast-growing population [2, 3], urbanization, changes in the environment, depletion of natural resources, rising costs of necessities, political and civil unrest, youth unemployment [2], limited land per household, soil degradation [4], and outdated farming methods [3].

Still now in most parts of the country, traditional agriculture also called Agriculture 1.0 is practiced for crop production. Agriculture 1.0 is a stage of technological stagnation where backward forms of labor, capital, and land are gradually used to increase production. In this stage, sticks, stone, and simple hand tools such as hand hoe, traditional Arda plow, sickle, pitchfork, and animal draught force are used on land preparing for planting or harvesting. This agricultural stage is characterized by inefficient, low productivity and income per unit of input, and labor-intensive systems [5]. To overcome these challenges and promote sustainable agriculture, concerned bodies, and policymakers started to contribute to commercializing agriculture by enhancing infrastructures [2] and transforming agricultural practices to Agriculture 2.0.

In the stage of Agriculture 2.0, different agrochemicals, machinery, and low-capital specialized agricultural technologies including tractors are used. In this agriculture category, machinery such as sprayers, broadcasters, manure applicators, harvesters, threshers, irrigation, and water-lifting equipment are utilized [5]. Agriculture 2.0 in Ethiopia was started in the late 1960s, during the emperor era (1957–1974) by promoting engine-driven mechanization and expanding during the Derge regime (1974–1991) by state-led mechanization; hindered from 1991–2013, and renewed after the obstruction in 2013 [3, 6, 7]. This drives the country to increase production efficiency, yields, and the number of production seasons, optimizing inputs, and promoting sustainability while reducing production costs and labor shortages [5]. As a result of these, agricultural productivity increased by 4.2-fold. For example, cereal production yield increased from 1379 to 2617 kg/ha nearly doubling at a rate of 1.7% per year [3].

Moreover, due to the availability of labor-assisting machinery, farm areas expanded, for instance, it increased annually by 2.13% for cereal crops and 1.56% for pulse crops during 1979/80–2017/18 [3]. After 2013, under the Ministry of Agriculture, agricultural research institutes were opened and established to foster agricultural mechanization research in various parts of the country [7]. Aside from that, public universities are participating in research and education programs to build capacity in different research fields from undergraduate to postgraduate level. These institutions create a skilled workforce to operate and maintain agricultural machinery, train farmers, and create awareness of using farming technologies and inputs. In addition, these institutions have developed plowing, planting, inter-raw cultivating, animal feed processing, crop drying, maize shelling, and crop thresher machines. These combined practices of the research centers and Universities promote Agriculture 2.0 in Ethiopia agriculture.

The result of world technological advancements and efforts of continuous research in the country opened a new window of opportunities for data-driven solutions in agriculture called Agriculture 3.0. Agriculture 3.0, sometimes called precision agriculture, balances high agricultural productivity and better environmental performance for sustainable development. This stage incorporates machinery with guidance, sensors, controllers, telematics, data management software, and breeding [5]. It helps to increase agricultural production efficiency, productivity, and profitability while saving time and labor, and optimizing inputs like fertilizers, pesticides, and fungicides. This is possible by supplying crops with the required input at a specific location and time while reducing environmental effects [4]. It is believed that the significant upfront costs associated with purchasing equipment, software, scattered land holdings, and lack of trained personnel may deter Ethiopia from adopting Agriculture 3.0 [4].

However, Agriculture 3.0 is practiced in research and practical scenarios in the Ethiopian agricultural ecosystem. It is used in yield monitoring using combined harvester sensors in crop production, variable rate fertilizer, nitrogen, pesticides, fungicides, and irrigation applications in small areas [4]. Crop modeling systems like Agricultural Production System SiMulator (APSIM) and Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) were tested in various parts of the country. These systems were tested in 31.5% of administrative zones to model crop growth, maturity, yield prediction, and climate change impact assessment by varying agricultural inputs and management strategies [8]. It is also highly practiced in seed and animal breeding and genome editing resulting in increased productivity by more than 2% [9] due to enhanced practice and technological advancements. In addition, studies conducted by Komarek et al. [1] illustrate that a 0.18% increase in GDP was found by implementing climate-smart agriculture on 25% of maize and wheat-producing land.

The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) projects that by 2050, the Ethiopian population will grow to 190 million [10] and food production will rise by at least 60% and food production needs to increase to 70% to offset the projected increase in a population [11]. In addition, in 2050 in Ethiopia, urbanization will increase by 300% from 19 million in 2015–76 million in 2050, the temperature will be much warmer, and technology (Big data and automation) will increase [10]. Moreover, in Ethiopia, due to climate change, economic losses will increase from 10%–14% in 2022 to 20%–30% in 2023–30. And poverty will increase between 0.5% and 1.7% by 2050 resulting in an additional 3.7 million people living below the poverty line [12]. Furthermore, in 2050, land degradation and soil erosion will increase and consequently, crop yield will be reduced by 1%–5% for varied crops, and livestock production will also affected [12].

Generally, ensuring food security will become challenging in the upcoming years due to the rapidly increasing population and urbanization, reduction of natural resources and agricultural land, increasingly changing markets, climate change, demographics, and food waste [13]. This could lead to chronic hunger, extreme poverty, and micronutrient deficiencies [14]. The World Bank Group in Ethiopia recommends agricultural mechanization, circular agriculture, and organic fertilizer as the main climate change mitigation actions in the farming sector [12]. In addition, practicing proper land and water management by raising access to innovation and modern inputs for the farmer, creating a competitive agricultural value chain, and promoting sustainable irrigation practices are additional solutions [12].

Analyzing these insights indicates the necessity of shifting the agricultural system into a new paradigm, technologically advanced and sustainable, integrating science and technology, which is Agriculture 4.0. Based on the agro-ecological, information, socioeconomic, institutional, behavioral, technological, and farmers’ perception issues [4], different countries have started to adopt, implement, and practice Agriculture 4.0. However, Ethiopia’s evidence indicates that Agriculture 4.0 is a lofty goal. Therefore, the objective of this paper is (1) to assess the implementation and application, components and systems, level of use, and outlook of Agriculture 4.0 in the rest of the world, (2) to provide a synthesis for the benefit and need of Agriculture 4.0 in Ethiopia, (3) to indicate the challenges and opportunities that will face in introducing Agriculture 4.0 into Ethiopia’s agro-ecology, and (4) to propose a legal policy framework and incentive directions that help to strengthen the adoption of Agriculture 4.0 in Ethiopia.

2. Methodology

The sole foundation of this study is an assessment of scientific publications and reports in national and international organizations [15] using a comprehensive literature review method. The literature investigation and search method followed in this review has no defined specific protocols [16]; however, the same methods as [15, 1719] were used. We aimed to gather pertinent data to answer the research question “(I) What is Agriculture 4.0? (II) What are the components and the progress and significance of Agriculture 4.0? (III) What are the advantages and challenges of integrating it into the Ethiopian agricultural system?” A literature search was conducted in frequently used databases such as Scopus, Google Scholar, PubMed, IEEE Xplore, SpringerLink, and Web of Science to answer the proposed research questions. In addition, rarely accessed databases include AGRIS (agris.fao.org), the Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, the Ethiopian Society of Soil Science, and libraries of the Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research and National Soils Research Center.

Important search terms like “Agriculture 4.0,” “Agriculture AND Transformation,” “Agriculture AND digitalization,” “Smart Agriculture,” and “Precision farming” were used to filter the search. During the search, date restriction is put and it is between 2000 and 2024 since Agriculture 4.0 has emerged lately. To include and exclude papers during the review process the following criteria were considered. (1) Does the publication seem to answer the research question? (2) Is the paper written in English? (3) Is the paper from a legitimate peer-reviewed journal or proceedings? Using these criteria, both experimental, qualitative, and quantitative, review articles and book chapters were considered during the search to obtain publications.

During the search, over 186 publications including journal articles, conference proceedings, book chapters, thesis, and reports were browsed. Then, using Inclusion Criteria (1) and (2), duplicates and unrelated publications to the research question were removed, and 128 relevant materials remained to be prioritized for this review. Further, screening was performed by using Inclusion Criteria (3). The legitimacy of the publisher was analyzed using ISSN, Scopus, Science Direct, and Cross Ref. Finally, 110 relevant materials from indexed publishers and legitimate international and national organizations were considered for final review excluding 18 papers. However, to get specific data on the up-to-date market outlook of Agriculture, in addition to the published papers, we used internet websites too. From these sources to extract relevant scientific information, understand the topic, and write the whole paper, we employed logical deductive reasoning. Publications were appropriately cited using a Mendeley reference manager following the journal citation style and a total of 115 papers were cited out of which, 5 papers were used to refer to review methodology.

3. Result and Discussion

3.1. History of Agricultural Transformation in the World

The term “agricultural transformation” refers to the evolution of agricultural practices to boost earnings, lower malnutrition, and enhance the economy by reducing labor, workload, and time, and optimizing inputs while increasing productivity and efficiency. In the 21st century, agricultural practices changing constantly because of scientific and technological breakthroughs. It progressed from Agriculture 1.0 to Agriculture 4.0 [20] as the industry progressed from Industry 1.0 to Industry 4.0. Agriculture 1.0 was the first and traditional method used up until the 1950s [5] when firewood was used by people to generate heat energy [21]. The majority of production processes were carried out manually using simple tools like a plow, sickle, hoe, pitchfork [22], stick, stone, and simple equipment. This type of agricultural practice was characterized as labor-intensive [22], land-expansive, low energy-intensive, and resulted in low productivity [5, 22].

Subsequently, the Industrial 2.0 revolution introduced advancements in steam engines and internal combustion engine-powered machines resulting in Agriculture 2.0 [21]. Agriculture 2.0 was primarily implemented between the end of the 1980s and the late 1950s [5, 22]. During this phase of growth, mechanized agriculture significantly enhanced food production and decreased manual labor by introducing agricultural machinery for seedbed preparation, planting, irrigation, weeding, and harvesting [22]. At this point, genetic engineering, fertilizers, biological nitrogen fixations, pesticide agrochemicals, and hybridizations are also used. However, the 20th century saw the emergence of harmful effects of chemical use and its contamination, environmental destruction, massive power consumption, and natural resource depletion [20]. These challenges led the world to research and innovation as a result, Agriculture 3.0 was introduced.

Moreover, Agriculture 3.0 is brought about by the Industry 3.0 revolution’s introduction of assembly-line-based mass production, the development of embedded systems, software engineering, and communication technologies, and green renewable energy sources computers, and electric motors [21, 22]. Agriculture 3.0 flourished between the early 1990s and the late 2000s [5]. At this stage, technologies such as Global Positioning System (GPS) and yield monitoring [5, 22], drones, aerial spraying [5], no-till farming systems, data management software [5], and variable rate applications [5, 22] were used. This helps to improve irrigation practices, decrease the use of pesticides, and optimize inputs [20]. This stage of agricultural transformation also includes nonlinear dynamics, new biology-based value chains, sustainable development, bio-economy, and knowledge development.

Due to the emergence of advanced technologies and high-capacity computers, along with the Industrial 4.0 revolution, agriculture also transformed into Agriculture 4.0 starting in the late 2010s [5]. Agriculture 4.0 is useful to reshape farming management paradigms, predict and alleviate environmental uncertainties, and analyze data from fields, sensors, and third-party sources. It helps farmers to make decisions based on the information at the right time, and the right place, and in the right way [4]. Agriculture 4.0 could reduce labor, and struggle, and save time, create a sustainable agricultural chain, preserve environmental sustainability, increase economic and social sustainability, improve profitability as well as it is very important in improving efficiency, land yields, resource use, and production [23].

This stage is characterized by smart systems and devices [20], autonomous farming, reliable food supply, pervasive agriculture sensing [22], and the age of smart and new energy agriculture. It is featured by the usage of GPS and Remote sensing, Drones and Sensors, the Internet of Things (IoT), digitalization, cloud computing, artificial intelligence (AI), Blockchain, Big data and Analytics, soilless agriculture, and vertical farming (VF). Additionally, it is characterized by the application of nuclear technology, agricultural decision support system (ADSS), augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR), Nanotechnology, three-dimension (3D) and four-dimension (4D) printing, and other advancements [11, 13, 14, 24] as shown in Figure 1. These advancements existed due to the innovation of cheap and improved sensors and actuators, low-cost microprocessors, high bandwidth cellular communication, cloud-based ICT systems, and big data analytics [5]. Those advancements and technologies in Agriculture 4.0 are discussed in detail in Section 3.2.

Details are in the caption following the image
Advancements in Agriculture 4.0.

3.2. Components and Technological Advancements of Agriculture 4.0

3.2.1. Global Positioning System and remote Sensing

The developments observed in Agriculture 3.0 were expanded and improved in Agriculture 4.0. This covers the increasingly complex applications of remote sensing and GPS technologies. These technologies improve the capabilities of autonomous vehicles in agriculture by combining information from multiple origins such as satellites, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV), and sensors. GPS and remote sensing-based technologies are used to send alerts when crops exhibit stress, to monitor fields remotely, and to improve agricultural management practices [25]. These developments have also been found to be used in handheld and stationary agricultural machinery for jobs like pesticide and insecticide treatment, irrigation, crop harvesting, and animal location tracking and scouting [5, 21].

The major applications of GPS and remote sensing are listed in Figure 2. In addition, these technologies also provide detailed information about soil health, assessing factors like moisture content, levels of organic matter, cation exchange capacity, conductivity, and texture. This information serves as an early warning system, identifying potential issues and offering immediate solutions [23, 27]. Moreover, by analyzing reflection values at different wavelengths, these technologies can provide insights into plant growth and health. Images captured by a UAV equipped with a spectral camera, flown at the optimal altitude and under ideal sunlight conditions, contribute to this analysis [28]. All this makes GPS and remote sensing a valuable advancement in agriculture and a valuable component in Agriculture 4.0.

Details are in the caption following the image
Application of GPS and remote sensing in agriculture, Source [26].

3.2.2. Drones and Sensors

These innovations were slightly used in Agriculture 3.0, but they are now common and more advanced in the Agriculture 4.0 era. Over the past few years, drone-based imaging in precision agriculture has advanced quickly. Smaller farms are more likely to use drone imagery than satellite imagery when costs are prohibitive. Precision spraying by drone is a major advantage as it increases payload capacity [29]. Plant managers can monitor crop growth in real-time even from a distance utilizing drones. Integrating drones with 5G technology is used to transport agricultural goods and raw materials to various production lines [27].

Figure 3 summarizes and illustrates the wider application of drones and sensors. It can be used for weeding and pest management, disease detection, pruning, milking, sorting, planting, water supply, environmental monitoring, crop scouting, plant monitoring, and phenotyping [31]. The utilization of multifunctional creative systems comprising remote sensor platforms including agricultural aircraft, satellites, drones, and UAVs with a variety of sensor types that might be employed in several areas of interest for applications is essential to the success of agriculture 4.0 [32].

Details are in the caption following the image
Application of drones and different types of sensors in Agriculture, drone image taken from [30].

3.2.3. Internet of Things

The IoT is a vital component of Agriculture 4.0 and a key indicator of technological progress in 21st-century society. It is currently implemented in agriculture globally through a variety of channels. Among them, embedded technology is the one and it is a system of linked devices that perceive, communicate, and interact with their internal and external environments. Any microprocessor-powered system or sensor can collect, process, and analyze data; this control process is carried out by any remote computer or device linked to the internet [33]. Crop, climatic, and soil parameters are measured by sensing technologies powered by IoT.

The water requirement for irrigation is managed by controlling those parameters [34]. It is also suitable in the recent category of agriculture 4.0, the internet of underground things to acquire data relevant to our planet to make decisions [32]. The implementation of IoT aims to reduce agricultural resource wastes such as water, crops, soil, and nutrients by automation of agriculture. IoT is also used in data analytics to identify whether an operation is effective or ineffective [34]. The diversification of agricultural production due to IoT in plant and cattle production, processing, transportation, storage, planning, and management leads to resource efficiency and savings for competitive production [35].

3.2.4. Cloud Computing

Cloud computing is currently popular globally with agriculture being the primary focus of its introduction and rise which is converting agriculture into agriculture 4.0. It provides better resource control and efficient cost management for the highest irrigation water use efficiency. Researchers developed a precision agriculture utilization system based on cloud firmware that consumes less water for irrigation [36]. Before being saved by various data generated in agriculture 4.0 domains, including sensors, cars, and robots can be handled using offline processing and streaming, or a mix of these methods [37]. The foundational architecture of cloud computing makes intelligent farming applications possible. It includes scalable computations, programs, data retrieval, and repository services for farm management systems. Another cloud computing application in agriculture is data flow from external sources and real-time monitoring and guidance systems in farm fields.

Data systems are included in cloud systems for food and agriculture-led industrial sectors to boost the food supply in the future. These systems gather and distribute data from different agricultural control systems, to save costs and reduce adverse environmental effects [32]. Sensor data are handled in the cloud despite big volumes in single dedicated storage without examining memory needs for real-time data access, processing, and storage. Data can be stored on numerous dispersed servers via cloud computing. In contrast to traditional databases, where data is stored in a single dedicated storage unit, the likelihood of data loss in cloud computing is reduced. The weather parameter monitoring system that uses cloud computing and includes sensors with measuring range, micro-controllers, communication interfaces, and information storage is examined and found cost-effective in agriculture [38].

3.2.5. Artificial Intelligence

The main behavior of Agriculture 4.0 is digital data in agriculture. AI is mainly and frequently used in agriculture, especially in computer vision, acoustic event processing, and data processing [39]. In the agricultural industry, AI in its various forms including machine learning (ML), neural networks, and deep learning brings change in thinking. Its application in conjunction with big data, extremely effective computers, and IoT has created a portal for opportunities to investigate, comprehend, and analyze agricultural operations using massive amounts of data to minimize labor costs and increase production [38].

Using AI and ML for improved crop monitoring, and water for agriculture food product traceability, can help agriculture supply chains (preproduction, production, processing, and distribution) to be effective [39]. It also facilitates products to reach the end-user or consumer easily and efficiently on time without losing their quality attributes. Moreover, AI is also used in genome editing to develop weed, pesticide, climate change, temperature stress, and water stress-resistant genomes in crop seeds and animals.

3.2.6. Blockchain

From the moment crops are planted in the field until they are harvested, blockchain performs a vital part in guaranteeing the origin of food by dealing with the supply line in Agriculture 4.0. Blockchain is an emerging technology [40] that can track crop growth, aggregate information about seed quality, and account for the crop’s journey after it leaves the farm. With the help of Agriculture 4.0, agricultural enterprises are beginning to employ blockchain innovation to develop knowledge in the supply chain and lessen transactional bottlenecks, such as those brought on by COVID-19-related worldwide concerns [40]. For instance, data about fresh fruit farming can be obtained from the source to the retail store, and rice exporters can discuss trading and the need for international supply chains to be flexible. These efforts can advance the supply chain by facilitating a quicker and more affordable supply of goods, enhancing product traceability, and enhancing partner coordination [40].

Additionally, blockchain is used in agricultural systems including traceability for waste reduction and food safety, food security, effective contract exchange, and dependable operational data analysis [40]. Supply chain management used blockchain innovation in its business activities and suggested using autonomous vehicles and some blockchain features to transport food from supplier to customer in the agriculture 4.0 era. After it was first made available with Bitcoin [41, 42], the scientific community has been interested in blockchain innovation to explore its potential utilization in the supply line domain. Special concern was given to the audibility of supply chains for dairy, meat, yogurt, butter, and cheese [41]. A lot of effort was made in this regard and positive results were observed. Finally, since blockchain data is cryptographically protected, it aids Agriculture 4.0 in protecting sensor data [40, 42].

3.2.7. Big Data and Analytics

Agriculture 4.0 allowed farmers to manage their farms at spatial and temporal levels by accessing explicit information from substantial amounts of heterogeneous data and providing decision-making using Big Data and Analytics technology [43]. In the agri-food sector, agriculture 4.0 encompasses digital innovations and other advanced innovations, such as big data and digital twins [40]. Big data is produced at a variable rate with inconsistencies in the supply chain from a range of locations and sources, in various forms. It helps to monitor and analyze customer behavior and reduces overall time, cost, and waste in the food industry. These improvements have made the sector smarter and more efficient. It can also be combined with other advanced technologies to alert food safety risks in the supply chain [44].

Sensors, intelligent machines, cameras, and actors operating along the food supply chain are constantly producing data, and handling the big data generated along the food supply chain is still challenging and time-consuming and requires a large computational infrastructure. Industry 4.0 technologies try to solve this problem by data integrity, processing, transformation, governance, and analysis online using big data analytics [45]. The most current application of big data is in vegetable and fruit planting, identifying soil types for farming, mitigating post-harvest losses, and managing fruit and vegetable quality through ML [46]. Not only this, but big data can also be used to identify the exact feeding timing with an underwater image processing system, nutrient strategy, feed quantity, and disease diagnosis needed. This helps to optimize production to prevent waste in the initial stages of aquaculture growth and improve the quality of seafood products [47]. The bigger the data used and analyzed, the more accurate prediction is found. The inputs and other process monitoring become easy, production costs will be reduced, and yield will increase.

3.2.8. Soilless Agriculture and Vertical Farming

In this era of Agriculture 4.0, the food needs of the rapidly increasing population and environmental degradation, growing demand for agricultural goods, and the lack of resources transform agriculture into soilless and indoor VF [48]. This is the method and practice of cultivating and producing crops and plants in challenging environments where suitable land is unavailable [11, 14]. Crops grow by this practice without soil using fertile solutions in rural and urban places to use every inch of land and territory [49]. It also means producing plants in layers to maximize yield per unit area [50]. Its goal is to increase yield per unit of land area so that agriculture can be intensified sustainably [51].

VF is a well-known and commonly used soilless agriculture in vertical sloping areas and vertically stacked layers [11]. It uses shipping containers, skyscrapers, or warehouses [49] using hydroponics, aeroponics, or aquaponics methods to produce food [11, 14, 49]. This process uses 95% less water, fertilizer, nutritional supplements, and no pesticide [11, 14]. VF makes it simpler to regulate plants’ temperature, relative humidity, CO2 concentration, and airflow velocity [48]. According to Roberts et al. [51], VF improves crop pest and disease management. The three most common types of VF systems are hydroponics, aeroponics, and Aquaponics.

As Figure 4 indicates, the first VF system, hydroponics is the method of growing plants in a liquid nutrient solution, without soil. In this system, the roots of the plants are immersed in the water or the nutrient solution [52]. There are two types of hydroponic systems: open systems, in which the nutrient solution is given directly to the plant roots and is not reused, and closed systems, in which the surplus solution is collected, refilled, and recycled.

Details are in the caption following the image
Schematic diagram of hydroponics VF system, Source [52].

As Figure 5 depicts, the second type of VF system, aeroponics does not require trays or other water-holding containers. Because it employs nutrient solutions or mist in place of water without soil, and the roots are suspended in the air [52]. Consequently, this method is useful in a dry environment. Another advantage of the aeroponics method is that it does not require fertilizer or pesticides. In this system, crop yield rose by 45%–75%, while fertilizer use was cut by 60% [52]. Furthermore, research has demonstrated that this high-density planting method makes harvesting easier and produces higher yields.

Details are in the caption following the image
Schematic diagram of aeroponics VF system, Source [52].

The third type, Aquaponics, is a system that combines hydroponics and aquaculture [52] as shown in Figure 6. Using effluent from fish tanks to fertilize hydroponic growth beds is known as aquaponics. Nutrient-rich waste produced by fish is used for plant growth [52]. Aquaponic systems are an excellent way to grow lettuce, herbs, and specialist greens including watercress, spinach, chives, and basil.

Details are in the caption following the image
Schematic diagram of Aquaponics VF system, Source [52].

Generally, the Agriculture 4.0 era integrates crop production with information technologies to make VF cost-effective [52].

3.2.9. Nuclear Technology

Apart from the most devastating fearing and deadly bombs and utilization for electric generating, atomic power, and atomic energy appeared in Agriculture 4.0 to create genetic mutations in crops. Atomic energies are used in agriculture as ionizing energy such as gamma rays, electrons, and X-rays for pest control, mutagenicity, increased agricultural yield, and improved postharvest quality. Nuclear power is nowadays used in agricultural production as waste heat [53]. Miernicki et al. [53] summarized applications of atomic energy as waste heat in greenhouse heating, aquaculture, animal shelter heating, soil heating (open-field agriculture), algal biofuel production, and post-production. Farmers can also modify the genetic composition of crops to create superior strains in many ways using radioisotopes. It is feasible to cause crop mutations and produce more disease-resistant, climatically tolerant, yield-maximizing, and quickly developing cultivars by administering low amounts of gamma or neutron irradiation.

The implementation of atomic power in agriculture and food production is multifaceted. It was used in Insect Sterile Methodology to manage crop insects, tracer method for fertilizer potency, radioactive beam for crop fostering, and irradiation for nourishment or crop protection. This technique has increased the yield, quality, and quantity of aromatic and medicinal plants used as ingredients. Furthermore, enhanced output in the agriculture and nourishment sector is expected from optimizing the utilization of nuclear power. Ebrahimi et al. [54] identify key areas of progress in atomic power that become apparent in agricultural technology. These are applied for pest-enhanced food processing, to enhance animal health and agricultural productivity. This literature survey indicates that atomic power and innovations have revolutionized farm work in this agriculture 4.0 era.

3.2.10. Agricultural Decision Support System

ADSS is a human–computer system that utilizes data from various sources, to provide farmers with a list of advice for supporting their decision-making under different circumstances [36, 55]. It is an automated system that incorporates databases, modeling tools, and multicriteria analysis techniques to help evaluate and prioritize a collection of options during any decision-making process [56]. ADSS is developed using a general construction framework as shown in Figure 7. Researchers and organizations have developed different farm decision support systems using these frameworks. Crop simulation and prediction, dairy farms, and Farm Management Information Systems [57] and land use, crop yield and quality, resource management, pollution management, and economic evaluation are the main applications of these ADSS [56]. According to Zhai et al. [36], the application areas of ADSS also include food waste prevention, mission planning, water resource management, and climate change adaptation.

Details are in the caption following the image
A general framework of the ADSS, adapted from [36].

ADSSs like AquaCrop, APSIM, and DSSAT make yield prediction and climate impact scenario analysis possible. These systems work by modifying the different management practices like water, sowing date and time, and pesticide and nutrient utilization using soil, weather, and crop as input [8, 56, 58]. Similarly, ADSS for dairy yield forecasting also become practicable due to the advancement of data technology. It can easily predict milk, fat, and protein yield per cow by analyzing the previously stored data.

ADSS increases an agricultural company’s value by reducing costs, minimizing risks, enhancing planning, and better use of available resources [57]. The primary advantages of ADSS include the ability to evaluate more options, enhanced comprehension of the business and its procedures, detection of unforeseen circumstances, enhanced communication, reduced costs, better choices, quicker decision-making, and more efficient use of data and resources [36, 56, 57]. In-depth information about the challenges and architectural design of agricultural decision support systems is available in reference [36, 55, 56].

3.2.11. Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality

This technology is well known in the entertainment industry and now its advancements are also applied and used in agriculture in this Agriculture 4.0 era. AR is a technology that overlays a real-time view of the physical world with valuable additional information to augment the photographic depiction of an object [59]. Virtual reality is also a simulated environment that can create and experience the virtual real world [60]. AR is an advanced version of VR and is designed for a particular role than VR [61]. These technological advancements in agriculture are called virtual agriculture [62]. A system for detecting various bugs was created by Nigam, Kabra, and Doke [59]; the system’s ability to detect pests is a sign of its application in agriculture. This method, which eliminates the need to create physical models, lowers product costs, improves product quality and production, and shortens the manufacturing time, was also utilized by Zang et al. [60] for tractor performance testing.

AR can improve efficiency and lower supervisory costs in precision cattle and crop production [56, 61]. In a virtual version, it will assist in methodically gathering the necessary data and interpreting the data from the analytical results on the field, such as soil stress conditions and insect species [62]. Providing farmers with entertainment in a virtual version of their farm fields can help them make decisions by reflecting on the growth status of the crops. Using previously gathered field data and cloud data; AR enables farmers to view a virtualized version of their fields with their unaided eyes [62]. This enables them to apply pesticides, conduct efficient and uniform plowing, and assess the supplements in the land [62]. In agriculture, AR and VR are mostly applicable to production, resource regulation, distribution of goods, and the design and manufacture of agricultural machinery [59, 63]. According to Xi, Adcock, and McCulloch [64], AR could improve food production and quality of life.

3.2.12. Nanotechnology

In the Agriculture 4.0 era, nanotechnology is utilized as nanoparticles in the form of nanopesticides, nanofertilizers [65], and advanced biosensors. These technologies reduced the loss of soil biodiversity and resistance to pathogens and pests by eliminating the blind application of pesticides and chemical fertilizers [14]. The application area of nanotechnology in agriculture is summarized in Figure 8. It can be used widely in agriculture for crop protection, food processing and packaging, food security and water purification, environmental remediation, and crop improvement [66]. Nanoparticles, nanosensors, and nanoencapsulation are mostly used in agriculture for crop production to control plant disease and to sense and monitor different pesticides, nutrients, and parasites [67]. Nanosensors are also crucial for monitoring chemical and physical events in crop and soil environments, assessing soil and plant nutrient status, and detecting pathogens in crops.

Details are in the caption following the image
Nanotechnology application in agriculture, Source [14, 6568].

Nanomaterials are also used for genetically modifying animals and plants [66]. In addition, nanoparticles, nano brushes, and nanomembranes are applied to treat water and soil; cleaning and maintaining of fishponds [66]. According to Balasubramanian et al. [68], nanotechnologies are used in the forms of nanoemulsion, magnetic nanoselection, nanodevice, nanorobot, and nanotechnology with BioPhotonics for the muscle food system, breeding, cultured cell anchorage, for sorting molecules, for genuine tracking and expiry date checking in packaged products, respectively. It is also utilized as a packaging material since it has mechanical tolerance, heat-resistant properties, enhanced biodegradability, and improved barrier properties. Furthermore, due to their sensitivity and detection accuracy, nanotechnology is used as nanosensors in the meat industry to identify the presence of microbial pathogens, contamination, and toxins [68]. Nanotechnology paves the way for environmentally friendly and more sustainable agriculture [65].

3.2.13. 3D and 4D Printing

Significant advances in Industry 4.0, such as 3D and 4D printing, previously used in the industrial sector, are now being employed in Agriculture 4.0 for meat and food production [14, 68]. In the manufacturing sector, 3D printing is becoming increasingly common, especially in the food production sector. For instance, carrot-based food packages with the natural supplies of protein, carbs, colors, and antioxidants found in microalgae, in short, 3D printing turns mush into meals. 3D and 4D printing could also enhance various facets of the agriculture and the food industry, by developing customized diet programs and food qualities for specific populations such as athletes and the elderly. For instance, this includes turning food waste and by-products into new goods and producing plant-based alternatives to meat and seafood [46].

4D printing integrates 3D-printed foods with smart materials that react to external or internal environmental/human stimuli to change the products’ physical or chemical properties over time. This was demonstrated recently by Ghazal and colleagues, who used red cabbage juice and vanillin powder to create a 4D product that changed color and flavor in response to an external or internal pH stimulus [69]. Materials used in 4D printing can change or self-assemble over time in response to environmental causes like moisture, light, or heat. The food sector uses binder jetting, extrusion, inkjet printing, and bioprinting techniques for 3D and 4D printing. Among them, extrusion and bioprinting are the most widely used techniques, particularly to create meat in vitro [68] as shown in Figure 9. These technologies not only create new avenues for agriculturally relevant and inventive product characteristics but also optimize material utilization, minimize waste, and promote sustainability [70]. In addition, it can stop food shortages, stop animal abuse, cut down on greenhouse gas emissions, and save water [68].

Details are in the caption following the image
Application of 3D printing in vitro meat production, Source [68].

3.2.14. Other Technologies and Advancements in Agriculture 4.0

Other advanced technologies identified and applied in Agriculture 4.0 are bioplastics, desert agriculture, genetic modification, cultured meats, food sharing, crowd farming, and chatbots [14].

3.2.14.1. Bioplastics

Bioplastics are biodegradable conventional petroleum-based plastic substitutes [71, 72] that are mostly produced, derived, extracted, and synthesized [73] from different agricultural and food wastes, bio-waste from effluent, paper waste, and feather quill [74, 75], microorganisms, and biogenic [73]. Bioplastics use dates back more than 25 years. However, they are unable to fulfill the claims that they will be helpful as plastics and will completely return to nature without causing any harm [14].

Bioplastics are made in many parts of the world today from different sources. These sources include starch, cellulose, and protein [76], and lipids, such as polylactic acid, polyamide 11, poly-3-hydroxybutyrate, polyhydroxyalkanoate, and polyhydroxyuretanes [76]. Bioplastics are also recyclable, biodegradable, and compostable [14]. There are diverse types of biodegradable bioplastics based on chemical properties, biodegradation, Ecotoxicity, disintegration, manufacturing process, chemical and structural origin, etc. These classifications are thoroughly documented in [73, 75].

Because of their unique properties and capabilities, starch- and cellulose-based bioplastics are replacing widely used petrochemical polymer plastics at a much lower cost. As a result, numerous academics are studying these materials extensively [73]. According to Gamage et al. [73], starch-based bioplastics, in agriculture, are used for mulching to cover the top surface soil to control the development of weeds and soil temperature and silage wrapping of green foliage crops or grass in the form of bales. Furthermore, it is used for packaging perishable products like fruit and vegetables for long-lasting products like pasta and chips to preserve their quality and as carrier bags since they can easily decomposable after use [77].

Compared with petroleum-based plastics, bioplastics have a positive impact on the environment by reducing acidification, eutrophication, the risk of global warming, ozone layer depletion, freshwater ecotoxicity, and human toxicity [71, 72]. In addition, bioplastics have great significance in biodegradability, energy efficiency, low carbon footprint, versatility [71, 76], societal acceptance, and unique thermal and mechanical characteristics [76]. Moreover, bioplastics are less toxic, eco-friendly, increase soil fertility, and help develop organic waste management by effectively utilizing many wastes from different industries as bioplastics [75].

Ali et al. [74] documented the life cycle assessment of many types of bioplastics as indicated in Figure 10, their applications, benefits, recycling methods, and impacts. However, large-scale production, optimum biodegradability, cost, durability, recycling methods, sustainability, and greenhouse gas emissions of bioplastics still require extensive research and development [75, 76]. Therefore, every concerned body government, NGO, researcher, industrialist, policy maker, stakeholder [72], and others must work together. This transforms petroleum-based plastics completely into bioplastics and creates social awareness about the multidimensional benefits of bioplastics [76].

Details are in the caption following the image
Life cycle assessment of bioplastics, Source [74].

3.2.14.2. Desert Agriculture

Desert agriculture is a method of farming crops suitable for arid conditions [78]. It is well known that 29% or one-third of the landmasses of Earth consist of deserts of all types [14]. It is now practiced in Israel and Egypt [78], Southern California [79], West Omdurman Sudan [80], and Saudi Arabia [14]. This approach is water and land saving [78], and the world must turn the sea and the desert into food-producing environments to tackle the food crisis [14]. Desert agriculture includes promoting conventional crops that resist extreme stress conditions for long periods, using greenhouse farming and hydroponics, and land and water management. It also includes growing crops near coastal areas by using seawater or ocean water by desalinating it, rainwater harvesting to refill aquifers [78, 81], and Pink LED Technology to grow food with less water and land and also using aquaponics [81].

In desert agriculture, mechanical ventilation, evaporative cooling, and air conditioning technologies are also important to create a good shelter for animal rearing [80] and crop production, especially for greenhouse fruit and vegetable growing. Desert farming is still in the early stages [81] and is not mature enough. But to reduce the loss and wastage of water, irrigation systems that can detect crop water requirements based on climate conditions, soil moisture, and soil type including sprinkler and drip irrigations are applied nowadays in desert agriculture [82]. In addition, variable rate irrigation technologies are useful in handling the spatial and temporal water requirement variabilities for desert agriculture [79]. Finally, to tackle the main challenges of desert agriculture which are the scarcity, loss, and wastage of water, smart decision-making, and predictive solutions [81] must be made by using smart technologies like Cloud computing, AI, IoT, Big data and Analytics, and ADSS.

3.2.14.3. Genetic Modification

Crops that are more resistant to drought are improved by genetic modification [14]. Abiotic and biotic stresses, like heat, salt, cold, drought, bacteria, fungi, viruses, insects, and nematodes, can affect crops, plants, and animals in agriculture [83]. According to Clercq, Vats, and Biel [14], Kumar and Kumar [84], and Mittler and Blumwald [85], genetic engineering improves how plants and animals react to various kinds of stress. Furthermore, it also opens new markets and allows the development of new crops and kinds [86]. Most people call it biotechnology [84] or breeding, and it is great anticipation for agricultural improvement [86]. As science and technology have advanced, breeding has undergone various modifications, and in this era of Agriculture 4.0, breeding has reached Breeding 4.0. As large data creation and computer computational power increased [87], breeding became increasingly straightforward. As a result, genotype selection and gene editing technologies expanded, improving breeding accuracy and efficiency.

In addition, data-informed plant breeding technologies [87], genome prediction and selection, high-throughput phenotype determination, and application of AI and ML have become easy to use in genome editing. The summarized steps of genetic modification are presented in Figure 11. The following genome editing techniques are an advanced innovative approach for agriculture 4.0 and make genome editing easy. These are transcription activator-like effectors [8688], zinc-finger nucleases [86, 88], and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats [14, 8688]. Furthermore, DNA technologies based on DNA molecular markers, transgenic technology, and gene expression have been widely used in this agricultural development era [89].

Details are in the caption following the image
General schematic diagram of genetic modification.

Fang et al. [89] emphasized that DNA-based technologies demonstrated significant promise for enhancing crop breeding program efficiency and agricultural productivity, safeguarding germplasm resources and the environment. Hamdan et al. [88] documented many advantages of genetic modification including increased farmer’s and customer benefits, reduced environmental effects in agriculture, boosted crop output, and effective terra firm utilization. Additionally, they discussed the rise in forbearance to crop infection, sustenance improvement of main crops, production of plant-based pharmaceuticals, reduction in toxicity, allergies, and intended genetic effect on human health. Due to such positive effects of genetic modification on human health, the environment, and social and economic aspects, genetic engineering is much needed to address the nutrient demands of the future [14], in the era of Agriculture 4.0.

3.2.14.4. Cultured Meats

Cultured meat is the process of generating meat through the isolation, culture, and multiplication of animal cells [90]. Cells are cultivated in a growth medium in a bioreactor instead of coming directly from animal slaughtering [9193]. Production of cultured meat was introduced to solve moral, ecological, and public health problems related to animal-based meat [94]. This advancement is introduced because the practice of industrial animal husbandry is contributing to the cruel treatment of animals and hastening the negative consequences of climate change.

Furthermore, raising animals in large densities raises the possibility of foodborne illness, epidemic viruses, and antibiotic resistance. This poses serious risks to the security of food supplies and the health of people and animals. Meat cultivation is an innovative technology with great promise, but it is currently in the initial stages of development [14]. It is an interdisciplinary field of study that holds the potential to eliminate the world’s reliance on animal agriculture. Cultured meat has great promise to affect animal welfare, animal-borne food-related diseases, the environment, and food security [14]. In addition, it is thought that cultured beef can lower greenhouse gas emissions, enhance water and land use, eradicate food-borne and zoonotic diseases, lessen antibiotic resistance, and decrease the slaughter of animals [94].

Siddiqui et al. [95] summarized the supply chain of cultured meat as presented in Figure 12. Like other agricultural products, the supply chain of cultured meat needs the integration of different actors. These include scientists for meat production from cultured cells, industrialists for mass production and packaging, traders for distribution and retail, and consumers for daily consumption. During supply chain management, many types of technology are used. Diverse advanced technologies used in the cultured meat industry are reviewed and documented well by Kamalapuram and Choudhury [90] including AI, ML, decision support systems, etc. For further information on cultured meat industries, it is recommended to refer to this literature. There are still a lot of unknowns even with the apparent benefits of cultured beef [93]. Therefore, proponents and manufacturers of cultured meat need to think about how their products relate to various institutions and social and cultural phenomena of their communities’ preferences [94].

Details are in the caption following the image
Supply chain of cultured meat, Source [95].

3.2.14.5. Food Sharing

Food waste has been seen as a severe problem for the security of the world economy, environment, and health [92] and must be reduced by food sharing [14]. Food sharing has long been accepted as a social and cultural norm in most communities and is gaining popularity nowadays [96]. Due to overproduction in one part of the globe, there is a surplus of food, but in the other, there is a shortage of food, so it might be shared using a food-sharing platform. Local efforts that gather, manage, and distribute excess food have become more prevalent because of growing worries about food waste. Moreover, food sharing is strengthened by the emergence of new ICT technologies such as mobile applications and web platforms [97] like special food-sharing websites, and social media.

These apps and platforms implemented online and offline [96], made food sharing easy between neighbors and local shops. This eliminated discarded foods [14] and avoided unnecessary resource waste. The common working process of food-sharing platforms’ is presented in Figure 13 above. Food sharing is a voluntary activity, and all the agents participating in the process are volunteers. Food is an easily spoiled, decayed, and rapidly changing material, and its waste is not only food lost but also the waste of energy and cost of its value chain. Therefore, ethically surplus food has to be shared instead of thrown away, since somebody else is suffering from hunger [96]. In addition to the reduction of food waste, it also improves social inclusion and community engagement [97, 98] and food security [97] as it connects people and fosters social networks [98].

Details are in the caption following the image
The food-sharing process. (Dashed lines indicate social interaction).

Food sharing brings many people from various backgrounds and motivations together [97]. This community engagement improves collaboration, cooperation, information sharing, entertainment, and important sources used for food production or other things [96]. Food-sharing platforms are efficient tools for obtaining social, economic, and environmental sustainability and equality [98] as no money transactions are done and open to all levels of the food supply chain [96]. To facilitate food sharing within a community, it is important to consider technological acceptance, cultural norms, values, religious perspectives, and other socioeconomic aspects and perspectives.

3.2.14.6. Crowd Farming

Crowd farming allows people to own the land and plants a remote farmer cultivates [14]. It is characterized as a new value creation model [99], an open collaborative learning paradigm, a source for product development, and an online problem-solving tool and production model [100]. Crowd farming is also a process of outsourcing tasks by the organization or individual in an online platform in an “open call” [100, 101]. This links the producer and customer, so the owner gets its crop at no waste and zero overproduction [14].

The most commonly adopted crowd farming system is shown above in Figure 14. Nowadays, it has gained academicians’ and industrialists’ attention worldwide [100]. Crowd farming focuses on large and complex tasks that require the tight collaboration of multiple workers with different expertise [99]. It can also implemented by companies with full-time employees, fixed workplaces, and well-organized working structures [101].

Details are in the caption following the image
The crowd farming system.

3.2.14.7. Chatbots

Chatbots are easy-to-use and very user-friendly applications [102] that are becoming increasingly beneficial in agriculture. It allows farmers and consumers to communicate easily through their smartphones or personal computers. As Figure 15 illustrates, the farmer or the consumer asks the Chatbots what they need in their phone, laptop, or desktop computer and the Chatbots process their request and respond to their request. After receiving the relevant response and information from the Chatbots they act and perform accordingly. Chatbots provide a means of gaining access to and comprehending enormous volumes of data, facilitating the process of making well-informed judgments by aiding recommendations for a specific problem [14, 102]. Chatbots are more intelligent AI systems that are not just data retrieval systems, and they are also used for agricultural marketing and agricultural product delivery systems [103]. It is applied as a mediator and connector between the farmer and the consumer; thus, the consumer gets the farmer’s recommendation based on his requirement specifications [103] and vice versa for farmers and other stakeholders [104].

Details are in the caption following the image
Architecture and working principle of Agricultural Chatbots: design adapted from [103106].

Chatbots reduce food waste and save customers cash by accessing fresh products at a convenient economic price [103, 104]. Additionally, it eliminates the intermediary problem [104] and increases the farmer’s income by selling their products on time. Furthermore, Chatbots make agriculture an attractive profession for youths [103]. It can send data from varying sensors such as temperature, soil moisture, humidity, soil PH, and light sensors to databases and then send them to farmers when asked for information [105]. This indicates that Chatbots are vital parts of Agriculture 4.0 advancement.

3.3. Level of Use and Outlook of Agriculture 4.0 in the World

Most developed and some developing countries use one or more of the components and advancements of Agriculture 4.0 in their agricultural production system. The adoption level of Agriculture 4.0 was determined by considering several factors, including government policies, infrastructure readiness, investment levels, and skill sets of agricultural labor. The digital agriculture industry has grown fast worldwide, and between 2017 and 2022, it is growing at a rate of 19.3% annually, contributing an expected 23 billion dollars in 2022 [82]. Among the many, the USA, Germany, the Netherlands, Israel, Spain, and UAE are the top countries in implementing Agriculture 4.0 [11] as also Canada, Brazil, India, Denmark, Italy, Ireland, Taiwan, Missouri, France, Greece, Bahrain, Serbia, United Kingdom, China, Iran, Czech Republic, Australia, Indonesia, Vietnam, Belgium, Switzerland, Malaysia, and Thailand apply Agriculture 4.0 [107]. However, Agriculture 4.0 application in Africa except for Guinea, Rwanda, Zambia, and Central Asia except for Turkey and Armenia is limited or extremely low [108].

Agriculture 4.0 was implemented in France through the DigitAg program, New Zealand through the NZBIDA project, Europe through the DESIRA, FAIRshare, Smart-AKIS projects, and the European Horizon 2020 project “Internet of Farm & Food” (IoF2020) [24]. Similarly, it was initiated in Australia through the Digiscape Future Science Platform, in Canada through the Digital Agri-Food program, and in the USA through the Cornell Open Ag initiative [24]. In Africa, Kenya, Ghana, Nigeria, Uganda, Mali, and Zimbabwe tried many of the Agriculture 4.0 components [82] mostly in the form of farm management apps such as Hello-tractors in Kenya. So far, accomplishment stories in Agriculture 4.0 indicate that in 2021 only, the agriculture industry employed over 75 million internet-based devices [82]. The market share of Agriculture 4.0 increased each year due to technological advancements. For instance, by 2028, it is expected that 700,000 GPS-guided automatic steering tractors, and by 2038, 40,000 completely self-driving tractors will be sold out [82].

As an illustration, the market share of IoT in 2021 was 385 billion dollars, and in 2029, it is expected to reach 400 billion dollars [46]. A one million dollar market share of agricultural drones in 2019 is also expected to reach 3.7 million dollars in 2027, and the combined agricultural drone and robot market share is projected to reach 23 billion dollars in 2028 [109]. However, this prediction seems underestimated. According to the Markets and Markets™ market analysis report, the agricultural drone and robots market reached 16.6 billion dollars in 2024 and is expected to reach 51 billion in 2029 at a growth rate of 25.2% annually. A 133 million dollar market share of Blockchain in agri-food in 2020 is also projected to reach 950 million in 2025 [109] and the cloud-computing market in agriculture is forecasted to reach 12 billion dollars in 2026 from 4 billion dollars in 2021 at a growth rate of 25% yearly.

The AI-driven agricultural technology market is also expanding and according to FUTURE FARMING team analysis, it is expected to reach 4 billion dollars in 2026 which was 1 billion dollars in 2020. AI development leads to the growth of big data in agriculture. The 1.4 billion dollars market share of big data in agriculture in 2023 will be predicted to increase to 2.3 billion dollars in 2025. The remote sensing technology for the agriculture market is also foretold to reach 2.76 billion dollars in 2028 from 1.82 billion dollars in 2023. Soilless agriculture and VF market share is also skyrocketing and is predicted to increase from 8.5 billion dollars in 2019–18.5 billion dollars by 2030. Among the many Agriculture 4.0 technologies, nanotechnology adoption is limited and only 9% is adopted globally. As a result of these market requirements, most countries in North America, South America, Asia, Europe, and Australia used digital agricultural tools and Agriculture 4.0 components.

According to the McKinsey & Company Global Institute 2022 global farmers insights report, 44% of the farmers used new yield increase products and 34% used new crop protection products from North America, South America, Asia, and Europe. The farmers’ know-how and digital literacy in these continents are high. They used digital channels to purchase precision agriculture machinery hardware, software, maintenance services, and spare parts, and accomplish digital payment. For example, 66% of South America, 53% of North America, 54% of Europe, and 20% of Asia farmers used digital platforms and channels for purchasing. In addition, at least one type of Agriculture 4.0 component was used by 62% of Europe, 61% of North America, 50% of South America, and 9% of Asia (China and India) farmers. The development and application of Agriculture 4.0 in these countries have increased due to the priority given to research and development (R&D), the availability of good rural infrastructure, high investment in digital agriculture, and legal frameworks and incentives.

For instance, Israel used 17% of its budget for Research and Development (R&D) activities, and in 2017, 60.5 billion dollars were found from agricultural product exports [11]. Furthermore, within 2 years 2018–2020, the European Union invested more than 100 million euros to promote digital agriculture [110]. The United Kingdom (UK) government invested 90 million pounds to put the UK at the forefront of digital agriculture [111]. Moreover, these countries increased farm tech funding each year, and as an example, global farm tech funding increased from 1.1 in 2012 to 4.7 billion dollars in 2019. Among this funding in 2019, agricultural biotechnology covers 23%, innovative farming systems 20%, farm management software, sensing, and IoT 19%, farmer-to-consumer systems 4%, and agricultural robotics 4%.

In these countries, attention was given to education and digital literacy, which make more than 56% of the population digitally competent [112]. In Europe, the basic software skills were also more than 55% in 2018 [108] ranging from 83% in the Netherlands to 28% in Romania. For instance, between 2010 and 2019, the employment of ICT specialties in Europe grew by 49%, over seven times compared to other specialties. The main infrastructure of Agriculture 4.0 is internet connectivity. In Agriculture 4.0 adopting countries, the connectivity index score was higher and greater than 75% [112]. Wireless connectivity is important for Agriculture 4.0 and in European rural areas, wireless connectivity coverage is more than 40% and this caused higher implementation of Agriculture 4.0 in the region.

3.4. Benefits and the Need for Agriculture 4.0 in Ethiopia

This section provides a brief benefit and the need for introducing Agriculture 4.0 in Ethiopia in education, economy, environment, workload, health, community, and society.

3.4.1. Agriculture 4.0 and Education

The introduction of digital technologies into agriculture requires new knowledge and skills. Agriculture 4.0 is a digital data agricultural system that can significantly catalyze mutual learning, generate, share, and use knowledge and information related to intelligent agricultural practices, trends, opportunities, and operations. Agriculture 4.0 fosters digital education and makes acquiring new multidisciplinary skills and knowledge easier, providing a modularized approach to education that new job opportunities will require. In addition, as Agriculture 4.0 saves production time, farmers can engage in education and other training to qualify in certain fields. Also, farmers could interact with the community and share their knowledge by hosting lectures, workshops, or farm tours through community education and workshops. This benefit is also related to the community and society, additional detail in this regard is presented later.

Nowadays, attracting a young workforce to Ethiopian agriculture is hard since many young students are fans of computers and enjoy working on computers. However, Agriculture 4.0 creates increased employment opportunities for these urban graduates in agriculture using AI, IoT, food sharing, crowd farming, etc. Furthermore, this attracts the farmers to educate themselves to operate intelligent agricultural machines and technologies further lowering the country’s illiteracy rate. That means as they are educated more, they increase their chances of working in other areas. And help them understand the power of education and send their children to school. Generally, Agriculture 4.0 helps to realize the importance of education, demonstrates how it facilitates technological advancement, fosters development, and makes information sharing and mutual learning extremely beneficial for the country.

3.4.2. Agriculture 4.0 and Economy

Agriculture 4.0 in Ethiopia can provide greater control over activities leading to the optimization of resources. And consequently to less wastage of agricultural inputs including water, fertilizer, pesticides, seeds, fungicides, and herbicides, and harvesting and postharvest loss. All this leads the farmer savings on production inputs of around 30% with a productivity increase of 20%. Also, it results in a reduction of overproduction by crowd farming and food waste by food sharing. It helps to reduce post-harvest losses and create self-sufficiency in food, reduces food imports, increases agricultural exports, and increases the economic return of both the farmers and the country [11].

Agriculture 4.0 also increases agricultural productivity, reduction in waste, and reliable food production [11] in the country. Food waste means not only the eaten food but also the energy, land, water, labor, manufacturing, and packaging materials and costs. So reducing food waste implies saving such costs [14], and Agriculture 4.0 helps to reduce and eliminate these wastes. The application of Agriculture 4.0 can reduce energy and input and increase the quality leading to an increased farm sale [13]. It is also used to eliminate the middlemen or the broker who intentionally increased the food price for the customers to sustain their profitability without giving attention to the farmer’s profitability. But Agriculture 4.0 creates direct contact between the farmer and customer and benefits both of them mutually and marketing takes place at a reasonably low price for the customer and profitable price for the farmer. Agriculture 4.0 saves time so the farmers can engage in other activities and increase their income.

3.4.3. Agriculture 4.0 and the Environment

There is one aspect of agriculture that should not be underestimated, and that is environmental sustainability, which will be a defining characteristic of the agriculture of the future. Agriculture 4.0 is specifically designed to improve the sustainability of agricultural activity and the environmental impact of the entire food chain. It makes every drop of water count and reduces the environmental footprint of farming [11]. It can also improve emission control and mitigation strategies [32]. These technologies allow us to examine the soil’s spatial and temporal variations and manage them accordingly. The main environmental challenges of chemical drift (pesticide, fertilizer, fungicide, herbicide, etc.) can be reduced by optimization of agricultural activities using Agriculture 4.0.

As Ethiopia is a land of varied demography, Agriculture 4.0 brings many benefits and opportunities for sustainable environmental creation. It reduces land degradation in many mountainous fields and helps us to improve our irrigation management practices to save water. Additionally, it enables us to reduce chemical applications and assists in the use of organic and natural products that reduce environmental pollution. For example, bioplastics reduce and eliminate synthetic plastics that are hard to recycle and reduce environmental pollution as many plastics are burned since they are not recycled effectively and efficiently in the country. Food sharing also reduces the waste of foods that completely pollute the environment by producing unpleasant smells and many poisonous gases like methane.

3.4.4. Agriculture 4.0 and Workload

It is well established that recent technologies also improve the working conditions of the operator. They are made less burdensome, and time-saving thanks to the support of digital and innovative tools. Technologies reduce the workload of the farmers and operators and reduce the time that the farmers spend on agricultural operations [13] since machinery in Agriculture 4.0 is autonomous and self-driving. Agriculture 4.0 machinery is primarily operated remotely, shielding operators from inclement weather, intense heat, direct sunlight, and dust particles. This lessens operator fatigue and enables operators to work in comfortable conditions. So, Agriculture 4.0 helps the operator to work in a comfortable and pleasant environment and conditions sitting from the office or someplace remotely on his farm field and reducing his/her workload.

3.4.5. Agriculture 4.0 and Health

Agriculture 4.0 allows constant and precise monitoring of each stage of the production chain that translates into a higher quality product, which is undoubtedly beneficial to health. It is estimated that products in a high-tech supply chain retain their properties and are therefore healthier. In addition, Agriculture 4.0 allows control of agrochemical and fertilizer utilization to produce high-quality food products that improve consumer’s health and quality of life [13]. The reduction of methane from the decomposition of food waste is another benefit of Agriculture 4.0. Methane is 23 times more deadly than carbon dioxide [14], and its production from waste food is reduced by eliminating food waste at any food supply chain level by using Agriculture 4.0.

Generally, Agriculture 4.0 improves the health of our community and farmers through three main directions. In the beginning, it helps the farmer and other communities to reduce work overloads that create back pain, tiredness, and other health problems. Next, it helps to reduce food wastes that produce highly poisonous and deadly gases, as a result, the environment’s sustained pollution is reduced, and community health is improved. Finally, it helps us by providing high-quality and nutritious crops, fruits, vegetables, and other plants that improve our health by direct consumption or use as a medicine.

3.4.6. Agriculture 4.0 and Community or Society

Agriculture 4.0 can increase social interaction and community engagement, especially through food sharing and crowd-farming technological advancements. As it improves the quality of life, the social sustainability of the community increases, and youth attraction and participation in agricultural activities increase [13]. Farmers who use Agriculture 4.0 technologies may discover that, because of automated and streamlined procedures, they have more free time. They can use this additional time for volunteer work, social events, and community involvement to improve their social and community engagements. In the beginning, farmers could interact with the community and share their knowledge by hosting lectures, workshops, or farm tours through community education and workshops.

Next, farmers who have more spare time can offer their produce to customers directly by taking part in local events or farmer’s markets. This strengthens ties within the community, encourages a healthy diet, and boosts the regional economy. Then, farmers can contribute their time and expertise to a range of community projects, including food banks, environmental efforts, and community gardens. It helps the farmer to contribute their agricultural knowledge to enhance local conservation, sustainability, or food security initiatives in their community and society. Furthermore, farmers can become members of or head agricultural, environmental, or rural development-related community organizations. This enables them to connect with like-minded people, share ideas, and collaborate to solve problems or encourage constructive change in their neighborhood.

In addition, farmers can serve as mentors to students with an interest in agriculture or to aspiring farmers. To impart their experience and expertise to the upcoming generation of farmers, they could provide training courses, internships, and apprenticeships on their farms. Moreover, farmers can participate in advocacy campaigns to have an impact on national, regional, or local agriculture policies. Members of the public can express their ideas, share their experiences, and help shape policies that support sustainable agriculture and rural development by joining advocacy groups or attending community meetings. Finally, farmers who have more spare time can concentrate on their personal growth and explore interests or hobbies outside of farming. Sports, the arts, or volunteer work in non-agricultural fields are a few examples of non-agricultural activities that might improve their lives and widen their social networks.

3.5. Challenges, Opportunities, and Directions for Adoption of Agriculture 4.0 in Ethiopia

3.5.1. Challenges

Despite its benefits and necessity, adopting Agriculture 4.0 in Ethiopia comes with significant challenges and disadvantages. Many of these challenges were observed in developed countries before they achieved advancements in this sector. Main barriers include a lack of infrastructure (26%), limited availability of R&D and innovative business model (26%), lack of quality education (22%), and limitation of digital literacy and skilled manpower (26%). Additional challenges include the availability of limited information flow between the agricultural value chain actors (26%), technological complexity (40%), worries about reliability (42%), and, most notably, incompetence between advanced technological components (54%) [113]. It is expected that Ethiopia will face similar and additional challenges during the adoption of Agriculture 4.0. These anticipated barriers can be categorized as technological, economic, political, social, and environmental [112].

A major challenge in adopting Agriculture 4.0 in Ethiopia is the lack of technical and operational capacity, as well as gaps in knowledge and skills needed to manage advanced technologies. This issue arises from the scarcity of technologically equipped teaching institutes, laboratories, and facilities, as well as a shortage of trained workforce. Trained manpower is important for managing farms and data, operating smart agricultural machinery, maintaining machinery, and replacing machinery parts. Since Agriculture 4.0 components are all digital, digital literacy is critical. However, Ethiopia faces significant challenges in this area. As of 2015, the overall literacy rate in the country was just 49%, with 69% accounting for the age of 15–24. Only 8.1% of the population participated in higher education, and the rest participated in primary and secondary education. Furthermore, the digital literacy rate in Ethiopia is very low, at only 3.75% [108], for example, only 3% use mobile money. The lack of digital devices like smartphones or personal computers due to their price contributes to these challenges. Additionally, the low basic literacy rate and the language barrier, as most digital devices are imported with their operating systems in foreign languages and limited numbers of apps in the national language, further hinder the adoption of digital technologies and digital literacy.

In addition, the lack of required infrastructures to manage the bulk data and information used in Agriculture 4.0 is also a technological challenge for its adoption [112] in Ethiopia. Agriculture 4.0 needs different infrastructures such as connectivity, data centers, training facilities, road infrastructures, sensor networks, and automation systems. Among these, connectivity is placed at the forefront. High-speed internet and 5G networks are required for data transmission as well as the operation of IoT devices. However, as of 2024, only 19.4% (24.8 million people) are internet users and the average internet speed is just 27.2 Mbps, which is considered very low in terms of both user numbers and speeds. To store and analyze big data for decision-making, suitable data centers are required, along with facilities for educational and training programs that equip farmers with digital literacy. As of 2024, these infrastructures are limited, to give an illustration, the 5G network is available in 145 locations within Addis Ababa, Adama, Harar, Haromaya, and Dire Dewa only.

Higher investment costs for machinery purchase, infrastructure development, and skilled labor development are economic challenges for implementing Agriculture 4.0 [112] in Ethiopia. The majority of farmers are smallholders, with less than 2 hectares of land and limited budgets, which makes purchasing advanced agricultural machinery (hardware) and farm management software financially unfeasible. In addition, prohibitive costs of production discourage the adoption of Agriculture 4.0 without considering the weight of its benefits. Farmers fear the loss of money by investing in Agriculture 4.0 in small and scattered lands. Furthermore, the lack of open investment and loans as well as funds and grants for small-scale farmers will reduce the adoption rate of Agriculture 4.0 in our country.

Weak policies for encouraging farmer-centered approaches, and political demographic differences between developing and developed countries [112], as well as between educated and uneducated people within the country are also political challenges to adopting Agriculture 4.0 in Ethiopia. People training and qualification, digital literacy [112], social acceptance, awareness, and perceptions of smart technologies especially for cultured meat [94], genetic modification, and food sharing are the main social challenges to fostering the practice of Agriculture 4.0 in Ethiopia. This is because people think that all technologies are against religion, and they break the rules written in the holy scripts. People’s perception and acceptance of genetically modified plants and animals is the main challenge to implementing Agriculture 4.0. To illustrate, in a study conducted in Japan only, 40%–50% out of 10,000 are not willing to eat genetically modified plants or animals [69].

In Ethiopia, most people like the increased yield, but they think that genetic modification reduced the nutrients and health benefits of the crops in addition to the pesticides and fertilizers applied during the crop production process. In addition, genetically modified crops are not considered organic, and this perception reduced the acceptance of genetically modified crop seeds and factory-processed food products especially in all rural and less civilized urban places. Cultured meat technologies and 3D and 4D printed food printing technologies also faced the same challenge as genetic modification technologies, and Balasubramanian, Pushparaj, and Park [68] also indicated that cultured meat is prohibited and halal in most religions. In addition, the lack of food-safe substrate/material, effectiveness, and scalability are the main challenges of implementing 3D and 4D printing in agriculture and food manufacturing industries [68] in Ethiopia and other countries. Apart from the challenges of adopting Agriculture 4.0 in Ethiopia, hopeful opportunities indicate the implementation capabilities of Agriculture 4.0 in the country.

3.5.2. Opportunities

As part of the Digital Ethiopia strategy, Ethiopia plans to achieve 70% digital literacy by 2025. Additionally, the 5 million youth coders’ initiative, which capacitates 5 million youths in digital skills by 2026, has been launched to enhance digital literacy. Furthermore, universities are increasingly engaging in digital innovations, training, and research within the agriculture sector. These combined efforts aim to produce technically equipped, digitally literate, and skillful manpower capable of operating, maintaining, and managing Agriculture 4.0 technologies. Moreover, Ethiopia has introduced a climate-smart farming initiative to promote resilient agricultural practices in the future. The deployment of 5G internet offers significant potential for the adoption of Agriculture 4.0, enabling faster data transmission (10 Gbps) and the seamless operation of IoT devices. The Digital Transformation Strategy for Africa (2020–2030), proposed by the African Union [114], further provides an opportunity to enhance digital infrastructures, including big data, AI, IoT, and blockchain, which is suitable for implementing Agriculture 4.0.

The development of data centers for cryptocurrency and AI applications by Ethiopian investment holdings and Raxio data center (Tier III certified facility) in Addis Ababa enables the storage and analysis of big data. This capability is helpful for agricultural and food systems, facilitating informed, timely, and better decision-making. Additionally, in Ethiopia, the availability of large uncultivated arable land [114] and land cluster initiatives present a significant opportunity for implementing Agriculture 4.0. These resources expand the potential for utilizing digital machinery in sustainable tillage, planting, harvesting, and animal feed processing, as well as operating equipment such as rakes, and hay balers.

The existence of public universities and agricultural research institutes, including the Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (IMWIC), and the Agricultural Transformation Agency (ATA) [115], contributes a significant role to fostering Agriculture 4.0 by conducting researches and supporting innovations. Furthermore, the Global Network of Digital Agriculture Innovation Hub Ethiopia [114] provides additional opportunities to cultivate digital agri-tech entrepreneurs and promote the adoption of Agriculture 4.0.

Moreover, OCP Africa and Morocco-based Mohammed VI Polytechnic University (UM6P) are supporting the scale-up of agri-techs in Ethiopia. Events such as the FinTech Addis Exhibition and Forum, Agri Tech Expo, and Agri Tech Movers Forum also create valuable exposure for entrepreneurs and agriculture technology enthusiasts [115]. Additionally, government incentives and support for Agri-tech entrepreneurs, as part of the 2025 Digital Ethiopia plan, along with initiatives of private company Agri-tech accelerator programs and competitions present significant opportunities to promote the adoption of Agriculture 4.0. These efforts are further reinforced by digital agriculture competitions supported by organizations such as FAO, Mastercard Foundation, World Bank, and Orbit Innovation Hub.

Another key opportunity to encourage the promotion of Agriculture 4.0 is the government’s tax-free agricultural machinery import initiative. Given Ethiopia’s relatively high import taxes compared to other countries, this policy is expected to increase farmer’s and investor’s investment in advanced agricultural technologies. Finally, the establishment of the Agricultural Mechanization Center of Excellence, an initiative project in collaboration with the Korean government, also nurtures the adoption of Agriculture 4.0 in the country.

3.5.3. Directions

Legal policy frameworks and incentives must be considered to adopt Agriculture 4.0 and reduce the challenges (discussed in Section 3.5 A) of doing so in Ethiopia. Financial support, infrastructure development, education and training programs, and collaborative platforms are pertinent to fostering its implementation.
  • 1.

    Financial support, such as microfinancing and subsidies, could increase the adoption rate for digital agriculture by reducing farmers’ burden of buying expensive advanced agricultural machinery, farm management software, and replacement parts. Thus, strengthening and investing in group-based (farmers union), individual-based, cooperative, and village banking microfinance models is important.

  • 2.

    Increasing market access for smallholders, inclusive innovation, and reducing the procurement costs and challenges through providing spare parts and subsidiary maintenance services to the farmers through agricultural extension and mechanization experts and engineers also strengthen the adoption of Agriculture 4.0.

  • 3.

    Another pinpoint direction to stimulate the adoption of Agriculture 4.0 is investing in rural infrastructure access such as transport, water supply for irrigation, reliable energy sources, connectivity, R&D centers, demonstration facilities, and storage housing.

  • 4.

    To transport advanced agricultural machinery through the farm fields and from the housing to fields or the maintenance facility, road, bridge, and off-road vehicle is necessary, and investing in it is good.

  • 5.

    Investments in digital facilities like data centers for AI, IoT, and Blockchain and broadening the scope of 5G internet to more locations and in rural areas, maintenance facilities, and farmers’ training facilities enrich the adoption of Agriculture 4.0.

  • 6.

    Revising the education system to compete with the skyrocketing digital development, providing digital laboratory equipment in research centers and universities, implementing training programs centered on advanced agricultural machinery and digital agriculture for farmers and youths, empowering farmers and youths with digital skills, and increasing the literacy rate, bringing up Agriculture 4.0 to reality in the country.

  • 7.

    Working in collaboration with and encouraging collaborative works between government agencies like public universities, the Ministry of Agriculture, the Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, the Agricultural Transformation Agency, the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, NGOs such as FAO, World Bank, OCP Africa, Master Card Foundation, and private sectors fosters innovation and escalate the supplies or required resources for the implementation of agriculture 4.0 in the country.

4. Conclusion

Agricultural productivity and the working environment are changing more dynamically than ever before due to climate change and advancements in agricultural technology. Agriculture is undergoing a transformation from traditional practices (Agriculture 1.0) to a technologically advanced, innovative, and data-driven system known as digital agriculture (Agriculture 4.0). In this article, we conducted a literature survey to explore the concepts, components, and global outlook of Agriculture 4.0, its benefits and necessity, as well as the challenges and opportunities of introducing it into Ethiopia’s agricultural system. Based on our findings, we propose a direction to promote the adoption of Agriculture 4.0 in the country. The literature search was conducted using frequently accessed search engines and databases, such as Scopus, Google Scholar, PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science, and SpringerLink, as well as less commonly used databases, including Research Gate, AGRIS, and other national databases.

The findings indicate that Agriculture 4.0 integrates science and technology with data, utilizing tools and innovations such as drones, robots, remote sensing, AI, IoT, blockchain, big data, nanotechnology, nuclear technology, 3D and 4D printing, cloud computing, soilless and VF, decision support systems, AR, and virtual reality, genetic modification, desert agriculture, food sharing, crowd farming, and chatbots for both plant and livestock production. The results highlight that Agriculture 4.0 is primarily adopted in developed countries, with the USA, Germany, the Netherlands, Israel, Spain, and the UAE leading the way alongside some developing countries. Agriculture 4.0 plays a significant role in reducing food loss, improving food quality, enhancing production and management practices, and conserving inputs, such as water, seeds, fertilizers, and pesticides. Additionally, it contributes to reducing environmental pollution and mitigating climate change. The benefits of Agriculture 4.0 extend to Ethiopia and other nations, including sustainable food production, environmental preservation, quality education, increased social interaction, reduced workloads, and improved health for both farmers and consumers.

Our findings indicate that implementing and adopting Agriculture 4.0 in Ethiopia faces several barriers, including a lack of suitable skills and knowledge, inadequate technological infrastructure, high capital investment requirements, and the absence of policies and standards. The community’s limited social and cultural acceptance, political mindset, and critical thinking stage are also key challenges. However, the benefits of Agriculture 4.0 outweigh these challenges, making its adoption imperative for achieving economic, environmental, technological, and social advancements in Ethiopia. Furthermore, several opportunities provide hope for fostering the adoption of Agriculture 4.0 in the country. These include the 2025 Digital Ethiopia strategy, research, and innovation by universities and research institutes, the introduction of 5G internet, the Climate Smart Agriculture initiative, the development of a data center in Addis Ababa, tax-free importation of agricultural machinery, and agri-tech competitions and accelerator programs.

Finally, based on the literature reviewed, we proposed several directions to enhance the adoption of Agriculture 4.0 in Ethiopia, focusing on financial support, increased market access, investment, and collaborative efforts. This paper serves as a foundation or guidance for future research in the Agriculture 4.0 domain by exploring its benefits, challenges, and opportunities. In addition, it provides valuable insights for practitioners, technology enthusiasts, and agri-tech entrepreneurs, highlighting the potential of practicing and investing in digital agriculture. For students and academics, it emphasizes the importance of digital skills in agriculture and food production, encouraging them to adopt and contribute to this transformative field. Lastly, for government and policymakers, it offers guidance on developing and implementing policies that address the challenges, leverage the benefits, and capitalize on the opportunities of Agriculture 4.0.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding

No funding was received for this research.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.