A Novel Implementation of Krasnoselskii’s Fixed-Point Theorem to a Class of Nonlinear Neutral Differential Equations
Abstract
In this work, we examine a class of nonlinear neutral differential equations. Krasnoselskii’s fixed-point theorem is used to provide sufficient conditions for the existence of positive periodic solutions to this type of problem.
1. Introduction
In recent years, differential equations have garnered considerable interest (cf. [1, 2] and references therein). Important types of these problems include differential equations with delay. For instance, in [1, 3–10], the authors employed a variety of techniques to determine the existence of positive periodic solutions. The uniqueness and positivity of a first-order nonlinear periodic differential equation are investigated in [11]. The authors of [12] discussed nearly periodic solutions to nonlinear Duffing equations. Among them, the fixed-point principle has established itself as a critical tool for studying the existence and periodicity of positive solutions. Numerous studies, including [4, 6, 11], examined this method.
- (i)
a, τ ∈ C(ℝ, (0, ∞))
- (ii)
g ∈ C(ℝ × [0, ∞), ℝ) and f ∈ C(ℝ × [0, ∞), [0, ∞))
- (iii)
a, τ, g(t, x), f(t, x) are ω-periodic in t, ω is a positive constant
Krasnoselskii’s fixed-point theorem offers sufficient conditions for the existence of positive periodic solutions to the aforesaid problem.
Neutral differential equations are employed in various technological and natural science applications. For example, they are widely employed to investigate distributed networks with lossless transmission lines (see [7]). Therefore, their qualitative qualities are significant.
Krasnoselskii’s fixed-point theorem is used to derive some sufficient conditions for the existence of positive periodic solutions to the aforementioned problem.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: in the next Section, we deliver the definitions and lemmas required to prove our main results. In particular, we state some Green’s function properties related to the problem (1). Section 3 establishes some necessary conditions for the existence of positive solutions to our problem (1).
2. Preliminaries
Lemma 1. The equation
has a unique ω-periodic solution
Proof. First, it is evident that the homogeneous equation associated with (8) has a solution
Using the parameter variation method, we obtain
Keeping in mind that x(t), x′(t), x′′(t), and x′′′(t) are periodic functions, we obtain
Hence,
Lemma 2. Assume that
Then,
Proof. The definition of G(t, s) gives
On the other hand, it is simple to demonstrate that (d/ds)G(t, s) = 0 only if s = t + ω/2.
Hence,
Since
So,
Consequently,
Proof. Let x ∈ Pω be a solution of (1). Equation (1) reads as
According to Lemma 1, we obtain
This completes the proof. Let us define the two operators as follows:
We formulate equation (26) in Lemma 3 as follows:
Remark 4. Any solution to equation (31) is a solution to problem (1).
Let us introduce the following hypotheses, which are assumed hereafter:
The function g(t, x) is Lipschitz continuous in x. That is to say, there exists a positive constant k such that
Proof. It is evident that is continuous for all . Moreover,
So, for all , we have
Thus,
Consequently, it follows from (33) that is a contraction.
Lemma 6. Assume that M < 4(π/ω)4 and 0 < F(t, x) ≤ C. Then, is completely continuous.
Proof. Firstly, we show that is continuous. To this end, let {yn} be a sequence such that yn⟶y in Pω. We have
It follows from the continuity of f and g that
Thus, is continuous.
Secondly, we prove that maps bounded sets into bounded sets in (Pω, ‖.‖). To this end, let Br = {(x ∈ Pω, ‖x‖ < r)} be a bounded ball in (Pω, ‖.‖), we have
From Lemma 2 and since F(t, x) ≤ C, we get
The estimation of implies
This shows that is uniformly bounded.
As t2⟶t1, the right-hand side of the above inequality tends to zero. By the Arzela-Ascoli theorem, we conclude that is a completely continuous operator. This completes the proof. This section will be concluded by referring to Krasnoselskii’s fixed-point theorem (see [9]).
Theorem 7. (Krasnoselskii). Let be a closed convex nonempty subset of a Banach space (B, ‖.‖). Suppose that and map into B such that
- (i)
, implies
- (ii)
is a contraction mapping
- (iii)
is completely continuous
Then, there exists with
3. Existence of Positive Periodic Solutions
We will examine the existence of positive periodic solutions to problem (1) using Krasnoselskii’s fixed-point theorem. For this purpose, we consider (B, ‖.‖) = (Pω, ‖.‖) and for some positive constant K and L. Moreover, define the set which is a closed convex and bounded subset of the Banach space Pω.
By looking at the three cases g(t, x) < 0, g(t, x) = 0, and g(t, x) > 0 for all t ∈ ℝ, , we can prove the existence of a positive periodic solution of (1).
3.1. The Case g(t, x) < 0
Theorem 8. Assume that M < 4(π/ω)4 and the function f satisfies
Then, problem (1) has a positive ω-periodic solution x in the subset .
Proof. Let us start by proving that
In fact,
On the other hand,
We conclude from Lemma 5 that is a contraction. Also, Lemma 6 implies that the operator is completely continuous.
We deduce from Krasnoselskii’s fixed-point theorem (see [15], p.~31) that has a fixed point which is a solution to (31). As a result of Remark 4, φ is a solution to problem (1). This completes the proof.
3.2. The Case g(t, x) = 0
Theorem 9. Assume that M < 4(π/ω)4, and
Then, equation (1) has a positive ω-periodic solution x in the subset .
3.3. The Case g(t, x) > 0
Theorem 10. Assume that M < 4(π/ω)4 and the function f satisfies
Then, problem (1) has a positive ω-periodic solution x in the subset .
Proof. According to Lemma 5, it follows that the operator is a contraction, and from Lemma 6, the operator is completely continuous.
Now, we prove that
We have
Also,
Thus,
By Krasnoselskii’s theorem (see [15], p. 31), we deduce that has a fixed point which is a solution to (31), so problem (1) has a positive ω-periodic solution x in the subset .
4. Conclusion
In this work, we established sufficient conditions for the existence of positive periodic solutions to the fourth-order nonlinear neutral differential equations with variable delay. Our proof relies on Krasnoselskii’s fixed-point theorem, which is an excellent tool when the conditions of the Banach or Schauder fixed-point theorems are not fulfilled.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Authors’ Contributions
All authors contributed to the design and implementation of the research, to the analysis of the results, and to the writing of the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
This research has been funded by the Scientific Research Deanship at University of Hail, Saudi Arabia, through project number RG-21 008.
Open Research
Data Availability
No data were used to support this study.