Volume 2022, Issue 1 1171545

Research Article

Open Access

Mechanism of Extruding Flowing Floor Heave in Mining Gateways Using an Elastic Foundation Beam Model

Corresponding Author

Pan Chen

[email protected]

orcid.org/0000-0002-7607-4861

College of Architecture & Civil Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China xust.edu.cn

Institute of Hydrogeology, Xi’an Research Institute Co., Ltd. of China Coal Technology & Engineering Group Corp, Xi’an 710077, China

Search for more papers by this author

Yuan-Xiang Yu,

Yuan-Xiang Yu

orcid.org/0000-0002-8345-3536

College of Architecture & Civil Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China xust.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author

Shuan-Cheng Gu,

Shuan-Cheng Gu

College of Architecture & Civil Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China xust.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author

Pan Chen,

Corresponding Author

Pan Chen

[email protected]

orcid.org/0000-0002-7607-4861

College of Architecture & Civil Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China xust.edu.cn

Institute of Hydrogeology, Xi’an Research Institute Co., Ltd. of China Coal Technology & Engineering Group Corp, Xi’an 710077, China

Search for more papers by this author

Yuan-Xiang Yu,

Yuan-Xiang Yu

orcid.org/0000-0002-8345-3536

College of Architecture & Civil Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China xust.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author

Shuan-Cheng Gu,

Shuan-Cheng Gu

College of Architecture & Civil Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China xust.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author

First published: 16 May 2022

https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1171545

Citations: 1

Academic Editor: Yu Qian

Share a link

Email
Wechat
Bluesky

Abstract

Considering the action of high bearing pressures, a mechanical model of a coal wall mining gateway is established based on the elastic theory. The stress-strain distribution of the coal body is also discussed. According to the compression column model, under the action of the peak-bearing pressure, the maximum horizontal tensile strain in the coal wall is located at 0.65 times the height of the roadway. Furthermore, a theoretical formula for the limit equilibrium zone width and the ultimate tensile strain of the coal body was proposed. The results show that the width of the limit equilibrium zone of the coal wall is related to the ultimate tensile strain of the coal body, the maximum bearing pressure, Poisson’s ratio, the elastic modulus, the original rock stress, and the width of the elastic zone. The maximum shearing breakage depth and position of the floor rock under the plastic flow extruded through coal walls are discussed. Finally, taking the 350–450 m section of the transportation lane in the 14501 working face of Bailiang coal mine as an example, the limit equilibrium of the wall width and the floor breakage depth are calculated on the basis of the relevant parameters. Based on the results, bolt support parameters are designed, which enhance the stability of surrounding rock significantly, providing a theoretical reference for the prevention of liquid gateway floor heave.

1. Introduction

Floor heave is becoming increasingly common with the sustained increases in the scale and depth of underground excavation, which is a technical issue that needs urgent addressing. A significant number of on-site analyses on floor heave have been carried out over the past few years. The floor heave in railways induced by soil swelling has been investigated in several countries. Currently, many methods have been developed to measure the soil swelling pressure and swelling potential through experimentation (Al-Basma et al. [1]; Al-Mhaidib [2]; Al-Shamrani and Dhowian [3]). In addition, with increases in the mining depth and intensity of coal mines, along with more complex geological conditions, a large number of floor heave have appeared in the underground tunnels of coal mines, tectonic stress, mining induced stress, water, elastic deformation, and broken soft surrounding rock may lead to roadway floor heave, which have become an important factor restricting the safe and efficient operation of coal mines (Kang and Hu [4]; Ma and Chong-Jiaong [5]; Jiang and Lu [6]; He [7]; Wang and Chong-Jiong [8]).

In recent years, engineering experts have attempted to study the mechanism and control measures for underground engineering heave. Anh-Minh et al. [9] studied the mechanism of floor heave in a railway tunnel in southern France and found that they were caused by soil expansion. To discuss the effect of grooving methods to suppress the floor heave, Jin and Lian-Guo [10] used finite-difference software to numerically simulate floor grooving, finding that selecting appropriate grooving parameters can improve the control effect of soft rock tunnel floor heave. Tang et al. [11] believed that floor heave was largely caused by degradation in the strength of the floor in contact with water and proposed a model to simulate the process of the floor heave in which the tunnel floor swells with water. Wang et al. [12] observed three types of floor heave: intumescent floor heave, extrusion and mobility floor heave, and compound floor heave in double-track transportation roadways in the west wing of Tingnan Coal Mine. Chang et al. [13] compared the anchoring mechanism of resin bolts and hydraulic expansion bolts, analyzing the application of hydraulic expansion bolts in controlling floor heave in soft rock roadways. Yongshui et al. [14] proposed a new type of combined reinforcement and support system for the floor of underground tunnels in coal mines. Sun et al. [15] used a finite-difference method to analyze the failure mechanism and coupling control countermeasures of asymmetric floor heave in deep rock roadway. Fu-Rong et al. [16] built an integral mechanical model that combined semicircular arches and straight walls to solve the problems of floor heave in deep collieries. Xi-Gui et al. [17] studied the evolution law of the stress slip line field, ultimate load, and velocity, discussing the mechanism of and countermeasures against the kick-dumping of the fold entry of the smooth layer in the Datun mining area. Qiang and Xiang et al. [18] established a mechanical analysis model of roadway floors, obtaining analytical solutions for the stress and displacement of roadway floors. Zhao et al. [19] proposed a closed support method using inverted U-shaped steel arches on the floors of roadways to improve the support effect of the floor and prevent floor heave. Xu et al. [20] proposed the bolt method and steel pile method to control floor heave by actually using a floor heave law for gob-side entry retention.

The aforementioned studies have played active roles in effectively controlling floor heave. Owing to the high complexity of the lithology and stress state, there is still a lack of a unified understanding of the mechanism of roadway floor heave, resulting in ineffective control measures. In general, the treatment effect of the floor heave is not ideal. In fact, for gateway floors, the coal mass of the two sides plays a role in the transfer stress; therefore, the occurrence and development floor heave is closely related to the distribution of the support pressure on the two sides.

Consequently, this study firstly studies the load distribution law and the associated limit equilibrium zone width of the coal wall in the extraction opening under the support pressure using elastic foundation beam theory. Based on this, the deformation and destruction law of the floor under the extrusion of the coal wall is discussed.

2. Analysis of the Stress and Deformation of the Coal Body at the Side of the Roadway

2.1. Establishment of the Mechanical Analysis Model of the Coal Gang

Usually, support pressure is formed on the sides of roadways. In this study, the coal sidewall on both sides of the roadway is called coal gang. If there is no support, under the action of the vertical support pressure, the coal gang will manifest a crushing zone, plastic zone, and elastic zone, as shown in Figure 1 [21], in which k is the stress concentration factor.

Details are in the caption following the image — Open in figure viewer PowerPoint

To facilitate a discussion, the support pressure above the coal gang in the roadway is simplified as a linear distribution, as shown in Figure 2, k is the stress concentration factor.

2.2. Deformation Calculation Principle of Coal Gang Rock Masses

Although rock masses at the sides of roadways are discontinuous, heterogeneous, and anisotropic in terms of their physical and mechanical properties, their deformation range caused by excavation and unloading is usually small, and a linear distribution can basically reflect the coal-side characteristics. For the objective distribution law of the bearing pressure, it is advisable to set the rock mass at the side of the roadway to be continuous, homogeneous, and isotropic, and the bearing pressure is then superimposed according to the two working conditions of uniform load and linear load. In a certain range of the coal gang, a single unit is selected as the research object. According to the analysis principle of each stress component of a semi-infinite body under normal load, the stress components σ_x, σ_y, and τ_xy, generated by the unit body under the action of each partial load, can be calculated; then, the stress components can be superimposed on these to obtain the coal stress components at any point in the band [22, 23]. The force model at any point in the coal bank of the roadway under the action of uniform distributed load and linear distributed load is established, as shown in Figures 3 and 4, respectively.

Based on elastic theory, it is known that the stress components at any point in the coal gang rock mass under uniformly distributed loads are

(1)

(2)

(3)

Similarly, the stress components at any point in the coal gang rock mass under linearly distributed loads are

(4)

(5)

(6)

2.3. Determination of the Stress Components of Coal Gang Rock Masses

All variables in (1) to (6) are represented by the rectangular coordinate values x and y. Let the peak stress P₁ = kγH and P₀ = γH, according to the load distribution form, and divide the simplified model of the roadway coal gang bearing pressure shown in Figure 2 into three parts; the stress components of each part can be calculated as follows.

2.3.1. Linear Loads in the Limit Equilibrium Area

The linear load calculation model of the limit equilibrium zone of the coal gang is shown in Figure 5.

From (4) to (6), the stress component at any point in the region can be obtained as

(7)

(8)

(9)

2.3.2. Uniform Load Distribution in the Elastic Zone

The calculation model of the uniform load in the elastic zone of the coal gang is shown in Figure 6.

From equations (1) to (3), the stress component at any point in the region can be obtained as

(10)

(11)

(12)

2.3.3. Linear Load in the Elastic Zone

The calculation model for the linear load in the elastic zone of the coal gang is shown in Figure 7.

From (4) to (6), it is clear that the stress component at any point in the region can be obtained as

(13)

(14)

(15)

2.4. Stress-Strain Analysis of the Coal-Bearing Rock Mass

By determining the stress component at any point in the coal gang rock body under the action of the supporting pressure of each part, the stress component at the given point can be obtained using elastic mechanics theory as

(16)

Simplifying the coal-bearing rock mass of the roadway as a homogeneous and continuous elastic body, according to Hooke’s law, the strain component at any point in the coal-bearing rock body can be obtained as

(17)

where E and μ are the comprehensive elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio of the coal gang rock mass, respectively.

3. Width Analysis of the Limit Equilibrium Zone of Roadway Coal Gang

3.1. Establishment of a Pillar Model for the Coal Gang Rock Mass under Bearing Pressure

In engineering practice, after a roadway is excavated, the coal-bearing rock mass will expand and deform into the roadway under the action of a large vertical support pressure, which will lead to radial tensile strain in the coal-bearing rock mass towards the roadway. The bearing pressure increases continuously. For the coal gang rock mass on a specific interface, its deformation failure under the bearing pressure has obvious “compression column” deflection characteristics, as shown in Figure 8.

When the radial tensile strain of the rock mass at the elastic-plastic interface of the coal gang reaches its ultimate tensile strain under the action of the support pressure above it, the “compressed column” rock mass on the interface will be in a critical state of flexural fracture. Owing to the continuous distribution of the bearing pressure above the coal gang, on the different interfaces from the elastic-plastic interface to the coal gang surface, the flexural deformation of the “compression column” rock mass gradually increases, and multiple “compression columns” are juxtaposed. The radial deflection and deformation of the rock mass are continuously superimposed and produce a “bump” on the surface of the coal gang, finally forming a continuous limit equilibrium zone within a certain depth of the coal gang [24, 25].

3.2. Flexural Fracture Mechanics Analysis of the Coal Gang Rock Mass

Taking the elastoplastic interface rock mass of the coal gang as the research object and ignoring the weight of the interface rock mass itself and its compressive deformation in the vertical direction, the “compression column” model of the elastoplastic interface rock mass under bearing pressure is established, as shown in Figure 9.

As shown in Figure 9(c), taking the portion below the x section as the separation body and taking the centroid of the x section as the center to establish the moment balance equation, the following can be obtained:

(18)

where M is the bending moment at the centroid of the x section, in kN·m, F_p is the vertical pressure on the coal wall, w is the deflection of the coal wall, M₀ is the moment at the fixed end of the coal wall, and h is the design height of the roadway.

According to the material mechanics theory [26], it is known that

(19)

where EI is the moment stiffness of the coal wall.

From (18) and (19), we can obtain

(20)

Make

(21)

Then, from (20) and (21), we can obtain the following:

(22)

The general solution of differential (22) is

(23)

where c₁ and c₂ are the general solution coefficients of the differential equation.

It can be seen from Figure 9 that the boundary conditions for the deformation of the compression column are

(24)

From (23) and (24), we can obtain

(25)

By substituting (23) into (21), we can obtain the following:

(26)

When sin(4.49(h − x)/h) = 1, the deflection w obtains the maximum value:

(27)

where k ∈ Z.

Solution is

(28)

The position range of ultimate tensile strain shall be 0 ≤ x ≤ h. When k = 0, the maximum position of horizontal flexural displacement can be calculated:

(29)

Equation (29) shows that the horizontal deflection deformation curve of the “compression column” rock mass on the elastic-plastic interface of the coal gang under the action of the bearing pressure is a half-sine wave, and the maximum horizontal deflection displacement is located at 0.65h from the bottom plate. When the horizontal tensile strain of the rock mass at this point reaches its ultimate tensile strain, the “compressed column” rock mass will enter the critical state of flexural fracture, which is consistent with the results found in previous studies [27–29].

3.3. Calculation of the Width of the Limit Equilibrium Zone of Coal Gang

It can be seen from the above analysis that the unit body with the maximum horizontal deflection displacement at the elastoplastic interface of the coal gang is located at (x₀, 0.35 h); by substituting these coordinates into (7), (8), (10), (11), (13), and (14), the stress components of the unit under the action of the supporting pressure of each part can be determined:

(30)

where P₁ is the peak bearing pressure of coal wall, in MPa, P₀ is the vertical original rock stress value of coal wall, in MPa, and Le is the width of elastic zone, in m.

(31)

(32)

Substituting (30)–(32) into (16), the stress component of the unit rock mass with the largest horizontal displacement on the elastoplastic interface of the coal gang is found to be

(33)

(34)

For the elastoplastic interface of the coal gang under the peak bearing pressure, the horizontal tensile strain of the coal body with the maximum horizontal strain will reach its ultimate tensile strain:

(35)

It can be seen from (35) that the width of the limit equilibrium zone of the coal gang in the roadway is an implicit function of the ultimate tensile strain of the coal gang rock mass. Furthermore, it is closely related to the original rock stress, the peak stress level of redistribution after roadway excavation, and the width of the elastic zone of the coal gang.

4. Analysis of the Deformation and Failure of Floor Rock Masses in Gateways

4.1. Basic Deformation and Failure Process of the Floor Rock Mass

Figure 10 shows the plastic failure zoning of the floor. The limit equilibrium zone with a certain width of the coal wall exists after gateway excavation. The floor rock within the limit equilibrium zone will be cut off and is out of touch with the rock mass at the bottom corner of the wall when the support pressure reaches or exceeds the limit strength of the active zone rock mass (first zone) of the gateway floor. The rock mass in the active zone is compressed in the vertical direction, whose deformation and failure will occur and enter a broken zone; simultaneously, the rock mass of the active zone will expand in the horizontal direction and squeeze the rock mass in the transition zone (second zone). In addition, the rock mass of the transition zone continues to squeeze the rock mass of the passive zone (third zone). A continuous shear slip surface is gradually formed at the floor in the transition zone and the passive zone. Finally, the floor rock of the passive zone lifts up, leading to floor heave at a different scale [30, 31].

4.2. Maximum Damage Depth of the Floor Rock Mass

The rock mass of the floor is simplified as a medium with elastoplastic characteristics, whose slide line field on support pressure is illustrated in Figure 11.

To facilitate simpler analysis and calculation, the mechanical calculation model of the floor failure depth is shown in Figure 12.

The slip line of the active limit zone (aa^′b) and passive limit zone (ac d) are two sets of straight lines, while that of the transition region (aa^′c) is a logarithmic spiral and the other is a radioactive ray that begins with dot (a). If the internal friction angle of the floor rock mass is assumed to be φ₁, the logarithmic spiral equation can be formulated as

(36)

For the convenience of analysis, Δaa^′b is assumed to be an isosceles triangle whose base line is equal to the width of the limit equilibrium zone. In this case,

(37)

(38)

Similarly, the following is obtained provided that Δ dac is also an isosceles triangle:

(39)

and

(40)

It is clear that

(41)

Furthermore,

(42)

Therefore,

(43)

According to (42) and (43), the maximum shearing breakage depth of the floor can be formulated as

(44)

Then,

(45)

(46)

That is,

(47)

Therefore, the maximum shearing breakage depth can be derived using formulas (37), (44), and (46):

(48)

The results show that the maximum shearing breakage depth of the floor is in line with the limit equilibrium zone width of the coal wall. Additionally, in accordance with Δoae, the following horizontal distance from the maximum damage depth to the surface of the coal wall can be inferred:

(49)

It becomes clear that once the corners of α and θ in (43) and (47) are certain, it is possible to obtain the horizontal distance, which is expressed as follows:

(50)

An analysis of (43) and (47) shows that the maximum shearing breakage depth of the floor and its distance to the surface of the corresponding coal wall depends on the limit equilibrium zone width of the coal wall and the internal friction angle of the floor rock mass.

5. Engineering Case Analysis

5.1. Engineering Description

The Shaanxi Chenghe Bailiang Coal Mine (the geographical location is shown in Figure 13) No. 4 main coal seam 14501 working face transportation trough was designed as a rectangular section with dimensions of 4000 × 4600 mm, with an average burial depth of 600 m, the roof and floor slate properties of the roadway are shown in Figure 14. Although the surrounding rock of the roadway was supported by high-strength bolts (cables) in the early stages of excavation, severe deformation of the sidewall and floor still occurred, and the convergence rate of the two groups was as high as 40–45 mm/d, which seriously affected the later stages of operation. The recovery work is carried out normally.

5.2. Theoretical Analysis

5.2.1. Width Analysis of the Limit Equilibrium Zone of Coal Gang

After on-site testing and engineering analysis, the parameters of the rock mass in the 14501 working face of Bailiang Mine are listed in Table 1.

1. The value of calculating parameters of the coal wall.

Parameters	H (m)	γ (kN·m⁻³)	K_s (GPa/m)	c₀ (MPa)	φ₀ (^°)	λ	k	E (GPa)	μ	ε_tmax (×10⁻³)
Value	600	25	0.14	3.0	27	0.75	1.5	3.4	0.15	0.35

Before and after the excavation of the 350–450 m section of the 14501 working face along the transportation channel, the peak values of the original rock stress and bearing pressure above the coal gang are

(51)

(52)

Let the width of the elastic zone of the coal gang be the design height of the roadway, and substitute (51) and (52) into (33) and (34) to obtain

(53)

(54)

Substitute the relevant parameters for (53) and (54) in Table 1 into (35) and simplify to obtain

(55)

From (55), it can be seen that the width of the limit equilibrium zone of the 350–450 m section of the 14501 transport trough is x₀ = 3.2 m.

5.2.2. Maximum Damage Depth of the Floor

It is known that the internal friction angle of the floor is 18° through field tests. Combined with the aforementioned limit equilibrium zone width of the coal wall, by using (48), the maximum damage depth of the floor can be easily computed as follows:

(56)

Therefore, the horizontal distance from the maximum damage depth to the surface of the coal wall can be computed using (49):

(57)

5.3. Field Measurement

To compare the theoretical calculation result and engineering practice, the borehole peep instrument is used to peep the borehole within 8m of the roadway floor on floor. Figure 15 illustrates the deformation and failure of the floor rock mass at different depths. It can be clearly seen that the crack developed most from 3.5 m to 4.0 m, indicating that the theoretical calculation results of (56) and (57) verify the damage depth.

On the basis of determining the limit equilibrium zone of the coal wall and the maximum damage depth of the floor, the support parameters of the prestressed bolt and anchor wire were designed rationally, and a supporting scheme was implemented, as shown in Figure 16. The results show that the stability of the coal wall and floor has been improved greatly.

6. Conclusions

This study investigates the mechanism of extruding flowing floor heave in mining gateways. Treating the coal body on the elastic-plastic interface as a cylinder model under bearing pressure, the equations of the limit equilibrium zone width of the coal wall and the maximum damage depth of the floor are formulated. The main conclusions of this study are as follows. (1) The width of the limit equilibrium zone of the coal wall depends on the ultimate tensile strain of the coal body, the maximum bearing pressure, Poisson’s ratio, the elastic modulus, the original rock stress, and the elastic zone width. (2) The deformation and failure law of the floor rock under the extrusion of the coal wall confirms to the slip line field theory. The maximum shearing breakage depth of the floor has a linear relation with the limit equilibrium zone width. (3) The maximum shearing breakage depth of the floor and its distance to the surface of the corresponding coal wall depends on the limit equilibrium zone width of the coal wall and the internal friction angle of the floor rock mass. (4) Experimentally measured data have been used to validate the theoretical value of the breakage depth of the floor. As a result, the elastic foundation beam analysis model is feasible and effective for calculating the deformation and failure of the coal wall as well as the floors in gateways. (5) It is more reliable to design the supporting parameters and improve the stability of the coal wall and floor according to the findings in this study. Although the transport trough of the 14501 working face in the Bailiang coal mine is one specific engineering example, this study’s findings can be applied to other gateways with different engineering geological conditions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51474173).

Open Research

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

1 Al Basma A. A., Al-Homoud A. S., and Husein A., Laboratory assessment of swelling pressure of expansive soils, Applied Clay Science. (1995) 9, no. 5, 355–368, https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-1317(94)00032-l, 2-s2.0-0029477566.
10.1016/0169-1317(94)00032-L
Google Scholar
2 Al-Mhaidib A. I., Swelling behavior of expansive shale: a case study from Saudi Arabia, Geotechnical & Geological Engineering. (1999) 16, no. 4, 291–307.
10.1023/A:1008819025348
Google Scholar
3 Al-Shamrani M. A. and D Howian A. W., Experimental study of lateral restraint effects on the potential heave of expansive soils, Engineering Geology. (2003) 69, no. 1-2, 63–81, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0013-7952(02)00248-x, 2-s2.0-0037400105.
10.1016/S0013-7952(02)00248-X
Web of Science® Google Scholar
4 Kang H. and Lu S., Research on mechanism of floor heave of roadway, Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering. (1991) 10, no. 4, 362–373.
Google Scholar
5 Ma N. J. and Chao-jiong H. O. U., Analysis of gateway surrounding rock mass subsidence and Mechanical, Journal of China Coal Society. (1993) 18, no. 2, 46–51.
Google Scholar
6 Jiang Y. and Lu S., Investigation of mechanism of floor heave of roadway, Journal of China Coal Society. (1994) 19, no. 4, 343–351.
Google Scholar
7 He Y.-N. and He Y.-A., Analysis of the measured results on the floor heave in maoming mine, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. (1994) 16, no. 4, 40–46.
Google Scholar
8 Wang W. J. and Chao-jiong H. O. U., New Development of Mechanism and Control Technique Study of Extraction Opening Floor Heave, Journal of Xiangtan Mining Institute. (2003) 18, no. 1, 1–6.
Google Scholar
9 Anh-Minh T., Cui Y. J., Trinha V.-N., Szerman Y., and Marchadier G., Analysis of the railway heave induced by soil swelling at a site in southern France, Engineering Geology. (2009) 106, no. 1-2, 68–77, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.03.002, 2-s2.0-67349162557.
10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.03.002
Web of Science® Google Scholar
10 Jin S. and Lian-guo W., Numerical simulation of grooving method for ﬂoor heave control in soft rock roadway, Mining Science and Technology. (2011) 21, no. 1, 49–56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mstc.2010.12.007, 2-s2.0-79951958876.
10.1016/j.mstc.2010.12.007
Google Scholar
11 Tang S. B. and Tang C. A., Numerical studies on tunnel ﬂoor heave in swelling ground under humid conditions, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. (2012) 55, no. 10, 139–150, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.07.007, 2-s2.0-84867135200.
10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.07.007
Web of Science® Google Scholar
12 Wang J., Zhi-biao G., Yu-biao Y., Jiewen P., and Shujiang Z., Floor heave in the west wing track haulage roadway of the Tingnan Coal Mine:Mechanism and control, International Journal of Mining Science and Technology. (2012) 22, no. 3, 295–299, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2012.04.002, 2-s2.0-84861861812.
10.1016/j.ijmst.2012.04.002
Google Scholar
13 Chang Q.-L., Zhou H., Xie Z., and Shen S., Anchoring mechanism and application of hydraulic expansion bolts usedin soft rock roadway ﬂoor heave control, International Journal of Mining Science and Technology. (2013) 23, no. 3, 323–328, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2013.05.017, 2-s2.0-84880570904.
10.1016/j.ijmst.2013.05.017
Google Scholar
14 Yongshui K., Quansheng L., Guangqing G., and Huaichao W., Application of a combined support system to the weak ﬂoor reinforcement in deep underground coal mine, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. (2014) 71, 143–150, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJRMMS.2014.03.017, 2-s2.0-84907303595.
10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.03.017
Web of Science® Google Scholar
15 Sun X., Wang D., Feng J., Zhang C., and Chen Y., Deformation control of asymmetric floor heave in a deep rock roadway: a case study, International Journal of Mining Science and Technology. (2014) 24, no. 6, 799–804, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2014.10.011, 2-s2.0-84919413730.
10.1016/j.ijmst.2014.10.011
Google Scholar
16 Fu-rong T., Liu N., and Xi-gui Z., Anti-floor heaven mechanical model and application of closed U-shaped support formed by straight wall and semicircular arch, Journal of China Coal Society. (2014) 39, no. 11, 2165–2171.
Google Scholar
17 Xi-gui Z., Liu N., Zhang N., and Jin-Bo H., Floor heave mechanism and control technology of flexural and folded deep mine roadway, Journal of China Coal Society. (2014) 39, no. 3, 417–423, https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2013.0242, 2-s2.0-84899097572.
10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2013.0242
Google Scholar
18 Qiang F. and Jiang B. S., Analytical solution for stress and deformation of the mining ﬂoor based on integral transform, International Journal of Mining Science and Technology. (2015) 25, 581–586.
10.1016/j.ijmst.2015.05.010
Google Scholar
19 Zhao Y. M., Liu N., Xi-gui Z., and Zhang N., Mechanical model for controlling ﬂoor heave in deep roadways with U-shaped steel closed support, International Journal of Mining Science and Technology. (2015) 25, no. 5, 713–720, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2015.07.003, 2-s2.0-84942552998.
10.1016/j.ijmst.2015.07.003
Web of Science® Google Scholar
20 Xu Y., Zhou H., Jian-biao B., and Chen J., Characteristics and control method of floor heave in gob-side entry retaining, Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering. (2015) 34, no. 2, 4235–4243, https://doi.org/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2015.1023, 2-s2.0-84946235592.
10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2015.1023
Google Scholar
21 Xu G., Jing H., and Ding S., Evolution rules of stress and displacement for narrow coal pillars between double gob-side entries, Journal of Mining ＆ Safety Engineering. (2010) 27, no. 2.
Google Scholar
22 Wang W., Huang C., Hou C., and Peng G., Mechanical deformation analysis of floor strata of roadway driving along next goaf in fully mechanized sub-level caving face, Journal of China Coal Society. (2002) 27, no. 1, 26–30.
Google Scholar
23 Xue Q., Elastic Mechanics, 2006, Peking University Press, Beijing, China.
Google Scholar
24 Gu J. and Gu L., Model test study on mechanism of layered fracture within surrounding rock of tunnels in deep stratum, Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering. (2008) 27, no. 3, 433–438.
Google Scholar
25 Xu S., Mao X., and Zhang D., Study on Pillar’s Plastic Zone Based on Elasto-Visco-Plastic Theory, Journal of Liaoning Technical University. (2006) 25, no. 2, 194–196.
Google Scholar
26 Sun X. and Fang X., Mechanics of Materials, 2009, Higher Education Press, Beijing, China.
Google Scholar
27 Huang Q. and Gaoquan H., Research on the floor failure range and its effects of entry, Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology. (2018) 38, no. 1, 51–58.
CAS Google Scholar
28 Ning Y., Mechanism and control technique of the rib spalling in fully mechanized mining face with great mining height, Journal of China Coal Society. (2009) 34, no. 1, 51–52.
Google Scholar
29 Yin X., Yan S., and An Y., Characters of the rib spalling in fully mechanized caving face with great mining height, Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering. (2008) 25, no. 2, 50–52.
Google Scholar
30 Liu S., Zhang W., and Feng Y., Study on migration mechanism of slipping floor heave rock mass in deep oadway and its control countermeasure, Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering. (2013) 30, no. 5, 706–711.
Google Scholar
31 Wen Z., Lu J., Xiao Q., Chen G., Yang T., Jiang Y., Li L., Yang S., Zhao R., and Cheng W., Failure mechanism of floor heave and supporting technology of soft rock roadway, Journal of China Coal Society. (2019) 44, no. 7, 1991–1999.
Google Scholar

Citing Literature

All articles

Mechanism of Extruding Flowing Floor Heave in Mining Gateways Using an Elastic Foundation Beam Model

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Analysis of the Stress and Deformation of the Coal Body at the Side of the Roadway

2.1. Establishment of the Mechanical Analysis Model of the Coal Gang

2.2. Deformation Calculation Principle of Coal Gang Rock Masses